constraint programming 2
play

Constraint Programming (2) Marco Chiarandini Department of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DM204 , 2010 SCHEDULING, TIMETABLING AND ROUTING Lecture 8 Constraint Programming (2) Marco Chiarandini Department of Mathematics & Computer Science University of Southern Denmark Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Course Overview


  1. DM204 , 2010 SCHEDULING, TIMETABLING AND ROUTING Lecture 8 Constraint Programming (2) Marco Chiarandini Department of Mathematics & Computer Science University of Southern Denmark

  2. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Course Overview ✔ Problem Introduction Scheduling ✔ Scheduling classification Single Machine ✔ Scheduling complexity Parallel Machine and Flow ✔ RCPSP Shop Models Job Shop General Methods Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Model ✔ Integer Programming Constraint Programming Timetabling Heuristics Dynamic Programming and Reservations and Education Branch and Bound University Timetabling Crew Scheduling Public Transports Vechicle Routing Capacited Models Time Windows models Rich Models Marco Chiarandini .::. 2

  3. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Outline 1. Constraint Languages 2. Refinements on CP Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Refinements: Constraints Symmetry Breaking Reification CP in Scheduling Marco Chiarandini .::. 3

  4. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Optimization Problems Objective function to minimize F ( X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ) Solve a modified Constraint Satisfaction Problem by setting an (upper) bound z ∗ in the objective function Dichotomic search: U upper bound, L lower bound M = U + L 2 Marco Chiarandini .::. 5

  5. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Outline 1. Constraint Languages 2. Refinements on CP Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Refinements: Constraints Symmetry Breaking Reification CP in Scheduling Marco Chiarandini .::. 6

  6. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Constraint Programming Systems Expressiveness language stream (modelling) + (efficient solvers) Algorithm stream CP systems typically include general purpose algorithms for constraint propagation (arc consistency on finite domains) built-in constraint propagation for various constraints (eg, linear, boolean, global constraints) built-in for constructing various forms of search Marco Chiarandini .::. 7

  7. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Logic Programming Logic programming is the use of mathematical logic for computer programming. First-order logic is used as a purely declarative representation language, and a theorem-prover or model-generator is used as the problem-solver. Logic programming supports the notion of logical variables Syntax – Language Alphabet Well-formed Expressions E.g., 4X + 3Y = 10; 2X - Y = 0 Semantics – Meaning Interpretation Logical Consequence Calculi – Derivation Inference Rule Transition System Marco Chiarandini .::. 8

  8. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Logic Programming Example: Prolog A logic program is a set of axioms, or rules, defining relationships between objects. A computation of a logic program is a deduction of consequences of the program. A program defines a set of consequences, which is its meaning. Sterling and Shapiro: The Art of Prolog, Page 1. To deal with the other constraints one has to add other constraint solvers to the language. This led to Constraint Logic Programming Marco Chiarandini .::. 9

  9. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Prolog Approach Prolog II till Prolog IV [Colmerauer, 1990] CHIP V5 [Dincbas, 1988] http://www.cosytec.com (commercial) CLP [Van Hentenryck, 1989] Ciao Prolog (Free, GPL) GNU Prolog (Free, GPL) SICStus Prolog ECLiPSe [Wallace, Novello, Schimpf, 1997] http://eclipse-clp.org/ (Open Source) Mozart programming system based on Oz language (incorporates concurrent constraint programming) http://www.mozart-oz.org/ [Smolka, 1995] Marco Chiarandini .::. 10

  10. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Example The puzzle SEND+MORE = MONEY in ECLiPSe Marco Chiarandini .::. 11

  11. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Other Approaches Libraries: Constraints are modelled as objects and are manipulated by means of special methods provided by the given class. CHOCO (free) http://choco.sourceforge.net/ Kaolog (commercial) http://www.koalog.com/php/index.php ILOG CP Optimizer www.cpoptimizer.ilog.com (ILOG, commercial) Gecode (free) www.gecode.org C++, Programming interfaces Java and MiniZinc G12 Project http://www.nicta.com.au/research/projects/constraint_ programming_platform Marco Chiarandini .::. 12

  12. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Other Approaches Modelling languages: OPL [Van Hentenryck, 1999] ILOG CP Optimizer www.cpoptimizer.ilog.com (ILOG, commercial) MiniZinc [] (open source, works for various systems, ECLiPSe, Geocode) Comet Marco Chiarandini .::. 13

  13. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP MiniZinc Marco Chiarandini .::. 14

  14. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP CP Languages Greater expressive power than mathematical programming constraints involving disjunction can be represented directly constraints can be encapsulated (as predicates) and used in the definition of further constrains However, CP models can often be translated into MIP model by eliminating disjunctions in favor of auxiliary Boolean variables unfolding predicates into their definitions Marco Chiarandini .::. 15

  15. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP CP Languages Fundamental difference to LP language has structure (global constraints) different solvers support different constraints In its infancy Key questions: what level of abstraction? solving approach independent: LP, CP, ...? how to map to different systems? modelling is very difficult for CP requires lots of knowledge and tinkering Marco Chiarandini .::. 16

  16. Constraint Languages Refinements on CP Summary Model your problem via Constraint Satisfaction Problem Declare Constraints + Program Search Constraint Propagation Languages Marco Chiarandini .::. 17

  17. Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Constraint Languages Refinements: Constraints Refinements on CP Symmetry Breaking Reification Outline CP in Scheduling 1. Constraint Languages 2. Refinements on CP Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Refinements: Constraints Symmetry Breaking Reification CP in Scheduling Marco Chiarandini .::. 18

  18. Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Constraint Languages Refinements: Constraints Refinements on CP Symmetry Breaking Reification Modelling CP in Scheduling Different views to the problem Adding implied constraints Auxiliary variables to make it easier to state constraints and improve constraint propagation Marco Chiarandini .::. 20

  19. Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Constraint Languages Refinements: Constraints Refinements on CP Symmetry Breaking Reification A Puzzle Example CP in Scheduling SEND + GERALD + MORE = DONALD = MONEY ROBERT Two representations The first yields initially a weaker constraint propagation. The tree has 23 nodes and the unique solution is found after visiting 19 nodes The second representation has a tree with 29 nodes and the unique solution is found after visiting 23 nodes However for the puzzle GERALD + DONALD = ROBERT the situation is reverse. The first has 16651 nodes and 13795 visits while the second has 869 nodes and 791 visits � Finding the best model is an empirical science Marco Chiarandini .::. 21

  20. Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Constraint Languages Refinements: Constraints Refinements on CP Symmetry Breaking Reification Guidelines CP in Scheduling Rules of thumbs for modelling (to take with a grain of salt): use representations that involve less variables and simpler constraints for which constraint propagators are readily available use constraint propagation techniques that require less preprocessing (ie, the introduction of auxiliary variables) since they reduce the search space better. Disjunctive constraints may lead to an inefficient representation since they can generate a large search space. use global constraints (see below) Marco Chiarandini .::. 22

  21. Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Constraint Languages Refinements: Constraints Refinements on CP Symmetry Breaking Reification CP in Scheduling Backtracking Branch and Bound Local Search Marco Chiarandini .::. 24

  22. Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Constraint Languages Refinements: Constraints Refinements on CP Symmetry Breaking Reification Randomization in Search Tree CP in Scheduling Dynamical selection of solution components in construction or choice points in backtracking. Randomization of construction method or selection of choice points in backtracking while still maintaining the method complete � randomized systematic search . Randomization can also be used in incomplete search Marco Chiarandini .::. 25

  23. Refinements: Modeling Refinements: Search Constraint Languages Refinements: Constraints Refinements on CP Symmetry Breaking Reification Incomplete Search CP in Scheduling http://4c.ucc.ie/~hsimonis/visualization/techniques/partial_search/main.htm Marco Chiarandini .::. 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend