constituent order in head driven phrase structure grammar
play

Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Stefan M - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Stefan M uller Theoretische Linguistik/Computerlinguistik Fachbereich 10 Universit at Bremen Institut f ur Linguistik


  1. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Example Tree with Valency Information (II) V[ subcat �� ] 1 NP V[ subcat � 1 � ] 2 NP V[ subcat � 1 , 2 � ] Peter Maria erwartet � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 6/69

  2. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Valency and Grammar Rules: HPSG • specific rules for head argument combination: B V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] V[SUBCAT A ] → � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 7/69

  3. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Valency and Grammar Rules: HPSG • specific rules for head argument combination: B V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] V[SUBCAT A ] → • ⊕ is a relation that concatenates two lists: � a, b � = � a � ⊕ � b � oder �� ⊕ � a, b � oder � a, b � ⊕ �� � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 7/69

  4. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Valency and Grammar Rules (II) V[ subcat �� ] V[SUBCAT A ] → B V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] A = � � , B = 1 1 NP V[ subcat � 1 � ] V[SUBCAT A ] → B V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] A = � 1 � , B = 2 2 NP V[ subcat � 1 , 2 � ] Peter Maria erwartet � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 8/69

  5. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Generalization over Rules • specific rules for head argument combinations: V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] V[SUBCAT A ] → B A[SUBCAT A ] → A[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B N[SUBCAT A ] N[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B P[SUBCAT A ] → P[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 9/69

  6. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Generalization over Rules • specific rules for head argument combinations: V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] V[SUBCAT A ] → B A[SUBCAT A ] → A[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B N[SUBCAT A ] N[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B P[SUBCAT A ] → P[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B • abstraction with respect to the order: V[SUBCAT A ] → V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B A[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] A[SUBCAT A ] → B N[SUBCAT A ] N[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B P[SUBCAT A ] P[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 9/69

  7. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Generalization over Rules • specific rules for head argument combinations: V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] V[SUBCAT A ] → B A[SUBCAT A ] → A[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B N[SUBCAT A ] N[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B P[SUBCAT A ] → P[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B • abstraction with respect to the order: V[SUBCAT A ] → V[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B A[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] A[SUBCAT A ] → B N[SUBCAT A ] N[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B P[SUBCAT A ] P[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B • generalized, abstract shema (H = head): H[SUBCAT A ] H[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] → B � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 9/69

  8. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Application of the Rules • generalized, abstract shema (H = head): H[SUBCAT A ] → H[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 10/69

  9. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Application of the Rules • generalized, abstract shema (H = head): H[SUBCAT A ] → H[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B • possible instanciations of the schema: V[SUBCAT A ] → V[SUBCAT A �� ⊕ � B NP � ] B NP Maria erwartet Peter schl¨ aft Peter � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 10/69

  10. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Application of the Rules • generalized, abstract shema (H = head): H[SUBCAT A ] → H[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B • possible instanciations of the schema: V[SUBCAT A ] → V[SUBCAT A �� ⊕ � B NP � ] B NP Maria erwartet Peter schl¨ aft Peter V[SUBCAT A � NP � ⊕ � B NP � ] B NP V[SUBCAT A ] → erwartet Maria � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 10/69

  11. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Application of the Rules • generalized, abstract shema (H = head): H[SUBCAT A ] → H[SUBCAT A ⊕ � B � ] B • possible instanciations of the schema: V[SUBCAT A ] → V[SUBCAT A �� ⊕ � B NP � ] B NP Maria erwartet Peter schl¨ aft Peter V[SUBCAT A � NP � ⊕ � B NP � ] B NP V[SUBCAT A ] → erwartet Maria N[SUBCAT A ] N[SUBCAT A �� ⊕ � B Det � ] B Det → Mann der � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 10/69

  12. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Representation of Valency in Feature Descriptions gibt (‘gives’, finite form):   phon � gibt � part-of-speech verb     � � subcat NP[ nom ], NP[ acc ], NP[ dat ] NP[ nom ], NP[ acc ] and NP[ dat ] are abbreviations of complex feature descriptions. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 11/69

  13. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Valency Demo: Grammar 3 (1) a. der Mann schl¨ aft the man sleeps ‘The man sleeps’ b. der Mann die Frau kennt the man the woman knows ‘The man knows the woman.’ � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 12/69

  14. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Outline • General Overview of the Framework • Valency • Head Argument Structures • Scrambling • Verb Placement • Nonlocal Dependencies • Other Prominent Constituent Order Analyses in HPSG

  15. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Representation of Grammar Rules (I) • Feature Descriptions as uniform means for describing linguistic objects • morphological rules • lexical entries • syntactic rules � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 13/69

  16. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Representation of Grammar Rules (I) • Feature Descriptions as uniform means for describing linguistic objects • morphological rules • lexical entries • syntactic rules • separation of immediate dominance (ID) and linearer precedence (LP) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 13/69

  17. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Representation of Grammar Rules (I) • Feature Descriptions as uniform means for describing linguistic objects • morphological rules • lexical entries • syntactic rules • separation of immediate dominance (ID) and linearer precedence (LP) • dominance in dtr features (head daughters and non-head daughters) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 13/69

  18. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Representation of Grammar Rules (I) • Feature Descriptions as uniform means for describing linguistic objects • morphological rules • lexical entries • syntactic rules • separation of immediate dominance (ID) and linearer precedence (LP) • dominance in dtr features (head daughters and non-head daughters) • precedence is implicit in phon � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 13/69

  19. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Part of the Structure in AVM Representation – phon values (I) NP  phon � dem Mann �  � � head-dtr phon � Mann �   Det N     �� ��   phon � dem � non-head-dtrs dem Mann • There is exactly one head daughter ( head-dtr ). The head daughter contains the head. a structure with the daughters the and picture of Mary → picture of Mary is the head daughter, since picture is the head. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 14/69

  20. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Part of the Structure in AVM Representation – phon values (I) NP  phon � dem Mann �  � � head-dtr phon � Mann �   Det N     �� ��   phon � dem � non-head-dtrs dem Mann • There is exactly one head daughter ( head-dtr ). The head daughter contains the head. a structure with the daughters the and picture of Mary → picture of Mary is the head daughter, since picture is the head. • There may be several non-head daughters (if we assume flat structures or in headless binary branching structures). � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 14/69

  21. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Representation of Grammar Rules • Dominance Rule: head-argument-structure →  subcat 1  head-dtr | subcat 1 ⊕ � 2 �   non-head-dtrs � 2 � The arrow stands for implication • alternative spelling, inspired by the X Schema: H[SUBCAT 1 ] → H[SUBCAT 1 ⊕ � 2 � ] 2 The arrow stands for replacement (rewriting) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 15/69

  22. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Representation of Grammar Rules • Dominance Rule: head-argument-structure →  subcat 1  head-dtr | subcat 1 ⊕ � 2 �   non-head-dtrs � 2 � The arrow stands for implication • alternative spelling, inspired by the X Schema: H[SUBCAT 1 ] → H[SUBCAT 1 ⊕ � 2 � ] 2 The arrow stands for replacement (rewriting) • possible instantiations: N[SUBCAT 1 ] → N[SUBCAT 1 �� ⊕ � Det � ] Det V[SUBCAT 1 ] → V[SUBCAT 1 �� ⊕ � NP � ] NP V[SUBCAT 1 ] → V[SUBCAT 1 � NP � ⊕ � NP � ] NP � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 15/69

  23. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures An Example V[ subcat �� ] C H 1 NP[ nom ] V[ subcat � 1 � ] C H 2 NP[ acc ] V[ subcat � 1 , 2 � ] C H 3 NP[ dat ] V[ subcat � 1 , 2 , 3 � ] er das Buch dem Mann gibt � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 16/69

  24. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Part of the Structure in AVM Representation – phon values (I) V NP V NP V D N NP V D N er das Buch dem Mann gibt  phon � dem Mann gibt �  � � head-dtr phon � gibt �        phon � dem Mann �      � �  � �  head-dtr phon � Mann �     non-head-dtrs        �� ��     non-head-dtrs phon � dem �  � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 17/69

  25. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Modelling Constituent Structure with Feature Structures Partial Structure in Feature Structure Representation   phon � dem Mann gibt � subcat 1 � � NP[ nom ], NP[ acc ]     � phon � gibt � �    head-dtr  subcat 1 ⊕ � 2 �         phon � dem Mann �     p-o-s noun         � �  subcat ��      non-head-dtrs 2     head-dtr . . .          non-head-dtrs . . .        head-argument-structure     head-argument-structure � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 19/69

  26. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Projection of Head Properties Projection of Head Properties V[ fin , subcat � � ] C H 1 NP[ nom ] V[ fin , subcat � 1 � ] C H 2 NP[ acc ] V[ fin , subcat � 1 , 2 � ] C H 3 NP[ dat ] V[ fin , subcat � 1 , 2 , 3 � ] er das Buch dem Mann gibt The finite verb is the head. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 21/69

  27. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Projection of Head Properties Feature Structure Representation: the head Value • possible feature geometry:   phon list of phoneme strings p-o-s p-o-s     vform vform     subcat list � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 22/69

  28. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Projection of Head Properties Feature Structure Representation: the head Value • possible feature geometry:   phon list of phoneme strings p-o-s p-o-s     vform vform     subcat list • more structure, bundling of information that has to be projected:   phon list of phoneme strings � �  p-o-s p-o-s   head    vform vform     subcat list � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 22/69

  29. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Projection of Head Properties Different Heads Project Different Features • feature vform makes sense for verbs only • Prenominal adjectives and nouns project case. • Possible structure: a structure that contains all features:   p-o-s p-o-s vform vform     case case case no value for verbs, vform no value for nouns � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 23/69

  30. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures Projection of Head Properties Different Heads Project Different Features • feature vform makes sense for verbs only • Prenominal adjectives and nouns project case. • Possible structure: a structure that contains all features:   p-o-s p-o-s vform vform     case case case no value for verbs, vform no value for nouns • Better solution: different types of feature structures • for verbs: � � vform vform verb • for nouns: � � case case noun � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 23/69

  31. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features A Lexical Entry with Head Features • A lexical entry contains the following: gibt : (‘gives’)             � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 24/69

  32. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features A Lexical Entry with Head Features • A lexical entry contains the following: gibt : (‘gives’)  phon � gibt �            • phonological information � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 24/69

  33. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features A Lexical Entry with Head Features • A lexical entry contains the following: gibt : (‘gives’)  phon � gibt �  � � vform fin   head   verb       • phonological information • head information (part of speech, verb form, . . . ) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 24/69

  34. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features A Lexical Entry with Head Features • A lexical entry contains the following: gibt : (‘gives’)  phon � gibt �  � � vform fin   head   verb       � � subcat NP[ nom ], NP[ acc ], NP[ dat ] • phonological information • head information (part of speech, verb form, . . . ) • valency information: a list of descriptions of arguments � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 24/69

  35. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features Head Feature Principle In a headed structure the head features of the mother are identical to the head features of the head daughter. � � head 1 headed-structure → head-dtr | head 1 � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 25/69

  36. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features All Constraints for a Local Tree (Head-Argument)   head 1 subcat 2       � �  head  1 head-dtr     subcat 2 ⊕ � 3 �      non-head-dtrs � 3 �    head-argument-structure � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 26/69

  37. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features Partial Structure in Feature Structure Representation   phon � dem Mann gibt � head 1     subcat 2 � NP[ nom ], NP[ acc ] �        phon � gibt �    � �   vform fin      head 1     verb  head-dtr           subcat 2 ⊕ � 3 �         word        phon � dem Mann �      � � cas dat      head       noun    � �       non-head-dtrs 3  subcat ��           head-dtr . . .          non-head-dtrs . . .       head-argument-structure     head-argument-structure � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 27/69

  38. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Head Argument Structures A Lexical Entry with Head Features Demo: Grammar 4 (2) a. der Mann schl¨ aft the man sleeps ‘The man sleeps’ b. der Mann die Frau kennt the man the woman knows ‘The man knows the woman.’ � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 28/69

  39. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Scrambling Outline • General Overview of the Framework • Valency • Head Argument Structures • Scrambling • Verb Placement • Nonlocal Dependencies • Other Prominent Constituent Order Analyses in HPSG

  40. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Scrambling Constituent Order • We will look at German, since it is interesting in regard to its reordering possibilities. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 29/69

  41. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Scrambling Constituent Order • We will look at German, since it is interesting in regard to its reordering possibilities. • German is a SOV language, however in declarative main clauses and questions, the verb is placed in second and first position, respectively. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 29/69

  42. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Scrambling Constituent Order • We will look at German, since it is interesting in regard to its reordering possibilities. • German is a SOV language, however in declarative main clauses and questions, the verb is placed in second and first position, respectively. • How do we account for the serialization of arguments? � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 29/69

  43. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Scrambling Constituent Order • We will look at German, since it is interesting in regard to its reordering possibilities. • German is a SOV language, however in declarative main clauses and questions, the verb is placed in second and first position, respectively. • How do we account for the serialization of arguments? • How do we account for the verb position? � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 29/69

  44. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Relatively Free Constituent Order • Arguments can be serialized in almost any order: (3) a. weil der Mann der Frau das Buch gibt because the man the woman the book gives ‘because the man gives the book to the woman’ b. weil der Mann das Buch der Frau gibt c. weil das Buch der Mann der Frau gibt d. weil das Buch der Frau der Mann gibt e. weil der Frau der Mann das Buch gibt f. weil der Frau das Buch der Mann gibt � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 30/69

  45. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Relatively Free Constituent Order • Arguments can be serialized in almost any order: (3) a. weil der Mann der Frau das Buch gibt because the man the woman the book gives ‘because the man gives the book to the woman’ b. weil der Mann das Buch der Frau gibt c. weil das Buch der Mann der Frau gibt d. weil das Buch der Frau der Mann gibt e. weil der Frau der Mann das Buch gibt f. weil der Frau das Buch der Mann gibt • For (3b–f) a different accenting is needed and the set of contexts in which the sentences may be uttered is restricted in comparison to (3a) (H¨ ohle, 1982). � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 30/69

  46. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Adjuncts Adjuncts in the Mittelfeld • Apart from the arguments, adjuncts may be serialized in the Mittelfeld. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 31/69

  47. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Adjuncts Adjuncts in the Mittelfeld • Apart from the arguments, adjuncts may be serialized in the Mittelfeld. • These can be placed at arbitrary positions between the arguments: (4) a. weil morgen der Mann das Buch der Frau gibt because tomorrow the man the woman the book gives ‘because the man gives the book to the woman tomorrow’ b. weil der Mann morgen das Buch der Frau gibt c. weil der Mann das Buch morgen der Frau gibt d. weil der Mann das Buch der Frau morgen gibt � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 31/69

  48. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Adjuncts Scopal Adjuncts • scopal adjuncts may not be reordered without changing the meaning: (5) a. weil er oft nicht lacht (sondern weint) because he often not laughs but crys ‘because he often does not laugh’ b. weil er nicht oft lacht (sondern selten lacht) because he not often laughs but seldomly laughs ‘because he does not laugh often’ � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 32/69

  49. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Adjuncts Binary Branching Structures • Sentences like (6) are unproblematic: (6) weil [der Mann [das Buch [der Frau gibt]]] because the man the book the woman gives � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 33/69

  50. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Adjuncts Binary Branching Structures • Sentences like (6) are unproblematic: (6) weil [der Mann [das Buch [der Frau gibt]]] because the man the book the woman gives • The integration of adjuncts is easy as well: (7) a. weil [morgen [der Mann [das Buch [der Frau gibt]]]] b. weil [der Mann [morgen [das Buch [der Frau gibt]]]] c. weil [der Mann [das Buch [morgen [der Frau gibt]]]] d. weil [der Mann [das Buch [der Frau [morgen gibt]]]] � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 33/69

  51. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Adjuncts Binary Branching Structures • Sentences like (6) are unproblematic: (6) weil [der Mann [das Buch [der Frau gibt]]] because the man the book the woman gives • The integration of adjuncts is easy as well: (7) a. weil [morgen [der Mann [das Buch [der Frau gibt]]]] b. weil [der Mann [morgen [das Buch [der Frau gibt]]]] c. weil [der Mann [das Buch [morgen [der Frau gibt]]]] d. weil [der Mann [das Buch [der Frau [morgen gibt]]]] • The difference in meaning in (8) follows from the difference in embedding: (8) a. weil er [oft [nicht lacht]] (sondern weint) b. weil er [nicht [oft lacht]] (sondern selten lacht) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 33/69

  52. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Permutation of Arguments in the Mittelfeld • Permutation of arguments is not explained yet. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 34/69

  53. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Permutation of Arguments in the Mittelfeld • Permutation of arguments is not explained yet. • Until now we combine the head with the last element in the subcat list. head-argument-structure →   subcat 1 head-dtr | subcat 1 ⊕ � 2 �     non-head-dtrs � 2 � � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 34/69

  54. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Permutation of Arguments in the Mittelfeld • Permutation of arguments is not explained yet. • Until now we combine the head with the last element in the subcat list. head-argument-structure →   subcat 1 head-dtr | subcat 1 ⊕ � 2 �     non-head-dtrs � 2 � • Generalization of the Head-Argument-Schema: Instead of append ( ⊕ ) we use delete . delete takes one element from the list and returns the rest: del(X,[1,2,3]) has the following results: del(1,[1,2,3]) = [2,3] del(2,[1,2,3]) = [1,3] del(3,[1,2,3]) = [1,2] � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 34/69

  55. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments The Head-Argument-Schema • old: head-argument-structure →   cat | subcat 1 head-dtr | cat | subcat 1 ⊕ � 2 �     non-head-dtrs � 2 � • new: head-argument-structure →   cat | subcat del( 1 , 2 ) head-dtr | cat | subcat 2     non-head-dtrs � 1 � � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 35/69

  56. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Example: Normal Order (9) a. weil jeder das Buch kennt because everybody the book knows b. weil das Buch jeder kennt V[ subcat � � ] 1 NP[ nom ] V[ subcat � 1 � ] 2 NP[ acc ] V[ subcat � 1 , 2 � ] jeder das Buch kennt � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 36/69

  57. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Example: Reordering V[ subcat � � ] 2 NP[ acc ] V[ subcat � 2 � ] 1 NP[ nom ] V[ subcat � 1 , 2 � ] das Buch jeder kennt The difference is the order in which the elements in subcat get saturated. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 37/69

  58. Scrambling Permutation of Constituents in the Mittelfeld Arguments Demo: Grammar 9 (10) a. daß der Mann der Frau das Buch gibt that the man- nom the woman- dat the book- acc gives b. daß der Mann das Buch der Frau gibt that the man- nom the book- acc the woman- dat gives c. daß der Mann der Frau das Buch morgen that the man- nom the woman- dat the book- acc tomorrow gibt gives d. daß der Mann der Frau morgen das Buch that the man- nom the woman- dat tomorrow the book- acc gibt gives e. daß er oft nicht lacht that he often not laughs � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 38/69

  59. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Verb Placement Outline • General Overview of the Framework • Valency • Head Argument Structures • Scrambling • Verb Placement • Nonlocal Dependencies • Other Prominent Constituent Order Analyses in HPSG

  60. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Verb Placement Verb Placement VP V � VP � VP V NP V’ NP V kennt k er ihn [ ] k • A trace takes the position of the finite verb in verb initial sentences. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 39/69

  61. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Verb Placement Verb Placement VP V � VP � VP V NP V’ NP V kennt k er ihn [ ] k • A trace takes the position of the finite verb in verb initial sentences. • A special form of the verb is in initial position. It selects the projection of the empty verb. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 39/69

  62. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Verb Placement Verb Placement VP V � VP � VP V NP V’ NP V kennt k er ihn [ ] k • A trace takes the position of the finite verb in verb initial sentences. • A special form of the verb is in initial position. It selects the projection of the empty verb. • The special lexical item is licenced by a lexical rule. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 39/69

  63. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Verb Placement Verb Placement VP V � VP/ /V � VP/ /V V NP V’/ /V NP V / /V kennt k er ihn [ ] k • A trace takes the position of the finite verb in verb initial sentences. • A special form of the verb is in initial position. It selects the projection of the empty verb. • The special lexical item is licenced by a lexical rule. • Connection between verb and trace is established by percolation. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 39/69

  64. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Verb Placement Demo: Grammar 9 (11) Gibt der Mann der Frau das Buch. gives the man- nom the woman- dat the book- acc � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 40/69

  65. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Outline • General Overview of the Framework • Valency • Head Argument Structures • Scrambling • Verb Placement • Nonlocal Dependencies • Other Prominent Constituent Order Analyses in HPSG

  66. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Overview: Fronting VP NP VP V VP V NP V’ NP V das Buch i kennt k jeder [ ] i [ ] k • As in the analysis of verb movment: trace in the “base position”. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 41/69

  67. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Overview: Fronting VP NP VP/NP V VP/NP V NP V’/NP NP/NP V das Buch i kennt k jeder [ ] i [ ] k • As in the analysis of verb movment: trace in the “base position”. • Percolation of information through the tree � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 41/69

  68. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Overview: Fronting VP NP VP/NP V VP/NP V NP V’/NP NP/NP V das Buch i kennt k jeder [ ] i [ ] k • As in the analysis of verb movment: trace in the “base position”. • Percolation of information through the tree • constituent movement is not local, but verb movement is We use two features to model the two kinds of movement ( slash vs. dsl ) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 41/69

  69. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Propoerties of the Analysis Propoerties of the Analysis • percolation of non-local information � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 42/69

  70. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Propoerties of the Analysis Propoerties of the Analysis • percolation of non-local information • structure sharing � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 42/69

  71. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Propoerties of the Analysis Propoerties of the Analysis • percolation of non-local information • structure sharing • Information is simultaneously present at every node in the extraction path. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 42/69

  72. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Propoerties of the Analysis Propoerties of the Analysis • percolation of non-local information • structure sharing • Information is simultaneously present at every node in the extraction path. • Nodes in the middle of an unbounded dependncy may access this information (Bouma, Malouf and Sag (2001): Irish, Chamorro, Palauan, Icelandic, Kikuyu, Ewe, Thompson Salish, Moore, French, Spanish, and Yiddish) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 42/69

  73. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Data Structure: Local and Non-Local Information Data Structure: Local and Non-Local Information HPSG devides the information into such that is locally relevant ( local ) and information that plays a role in long distance dependencies ( nonlocal )   phon list of phoneme strings     head head      cat subcat list of synsem objects                loc cat           cont cont         loc      nonloc nonloc    sign � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 43/69

  74. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Data Structure: Local and Non-Local Information Data Structure for Non-Local Information • The nonloc value has internal structure:   que list of npros         nonloc • que : list of indices of question words (interrogative clauses) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 44/69

  75. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Data Structure: Local and Non-Local Information Data Structure for Non-Local Information • The nonloc value has internal structure:   que list of npros rel list of indices         nonloc • que : list of indices of question words (interrogative clauses) • rel : list of indices of relative pronouns (relative clauses) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 44/69

  76. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Data Structure: Local and Non-Local Information Data Structure for Non-Local Information • The nonloc value has internal structure:   que list of npros rel list of indices     slash list of local structures     nonloc • que : list of indices of question words (interrogative clauses) • rel : list of indices of relative pronouns (relative clauses) • slash : list of local objects (fronting, relative and interrogative sentences) � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 44/69

  77. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies The Trace of the Accusative Object The Trace of the Accusative Object of kennen (‘know’)   phon ��  � �    cas acc   head    noun    cat  loc   1          subcat ��       � �   slash � 1 � nonloc       word � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 45/69

  78. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies The Trace of the Accusative Object The Trace of the Accusative Object of kennen (‘know’)   phon ��  � �    cas acc   head    noun    cat  loc   1          subcat ��       � �   slash � 1 � nonloc       word • The trace does not contribute phonologically. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 45/69

  79. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies The Trace of the Accusative Object The Trace of the Accusative Object of kennen (‘know’)   phon ��  � �    cas acc   head    noun    cat  loc   1          subcat ��       � �   slash � 1 � nonloc       word • The trace does not contribute phonologically. • The trace has the local properties that kennen (‘know’) requires. � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 45/69

  80. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies The Trace of the Accusative Object The Trace of the Accusative Object of kennen (‘know’)   phon ��  � �    cas acc   head    noun    cat  loc   1          subcat ��       � �   slash � 1 � nonloc       word • The trace does not contribute phonologically. • The trace has the local properties that kennen (‘know’) requires. • This information is also introduced into slash . � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 45/69

  81. Constituent Order in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Nonlocal Dependencies Percolation of Non-Local Information Percolation of Non-Local Information (simplified → wrong verb placement!) V[ subcat �� F H NP 1 [ acc ] V[ subcat �� H C V[ subcat � 2 � 2 NP[ nom ] H C V[ subcat � 2 , 3 � 3 NP[ acc ] das Buch kennt jeder � Stefan M¨ c uller 2005, CL, FB 10, Universit¨ at Bremen & CL, Uni Potsdam 46/69

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend