CONSERVATIVE PLAN AGGRESSIVE APPROACH Confidential Do not duplicate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

conservative plan aggressive approach
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CONSERVATIVE PLAN AGGRESSIVE APPROACH Confidential Do not duplicate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

(CSE: OIL)(OTCQB:OILCF) Q1 2020 ASSETS A portfolio of low-cost producing oil assets in Texas and New Mexico SCALE UPSIDE Horizontal leg conversion and lateral drilling programs in the San Andres formation SUSTAINABLE UPSIDE Low cost infill


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ASSETS A portfolio of low-cost producing oil assets in Texas and New Mexico SCALE UPSIDE Horizontal leg conversion and lateral drilling programs in the San Andres formation SUSTAINABLE UPSIDE Low cost infill drilling and secondary recovery

CONSERVATIVE PLAN – AGGRESSIVE APPROACH

Q1 2020

(CSE: OIL)(OTCQB:OILCF)

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation Actual production may not be as projected

slide-2
SLIDE 2

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

Presentation and Reader Advisory

Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as

  • exhaustive. Although Permex believes the expectations expressed in such forward -

looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements. Investors should not place undue reliance on these forward - looking statements, which speak only as of the date

  • f t his presentation. Other than as required under applicable securities laws, Permex

does not assume a duty to update these forward - looking statements. This presentation and, in particular the information in respect of the Corporation's prospective future net income and operating netback, may contain information deemed to be "future-oriented financial information" or a "financial outlook" (collectively, "FOFI") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The FOFI has been prepared by management to provide an outlook of the Corporation's activities and results and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The FOFI has been prepared based on a number of assumptions including the assumptions discussed

  • above. The actual results of operations of the Corporation and the resulting financial

results may vary from the amounts set forth herein, and such variations may be

  • material. The Corporation and management believe that the FOFI has been prepared
  • n a reasonable basis, reflecting management's best estimates and judgments. FOFI

contained in this presentation was made as of the date of this presentation and the Corporation disclaims any intention or obligations to update or revise any FOFI contained in this presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events

  • r otherwise, unless required pursuant to applicable law.

Information and facts included in this presentation have been obtained from publicly available and published sources and where appropriate those sources have been cited in this presentation. Permex does not assume a duty to independently verify publicly available an d published sources of information provided by arms length third parties. This presentation includes certain statements that may be deemed forward - looking statements under applicable securities laws. All statements in this presentation , other than statements of historical facts, that address future events or developments that Permex Petroleum Corporation (“Permex” or the “Corporation”) expects are forward - looking statements. Forward - looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. In particular, forward looking statements in this presentation include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the Corporation’s exploration and development program on its oil and gas leases, the anticipated stock exchange listing and initial public offering of the Corporation, reserves estimates and values, enterprise value, operating netback, pricing assumptions, future income, expected production, expected development costs, future acquisitions and future capital expenditures. Forward - looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward - looking statements. Some of the risks and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions in Canada, the United States and globally; industry conditions, including fluctuations in commodity prices; governmental regulation of the oil and gas industry, including environmental regulation; geological, technical and drilling problems; unanticipated operating events; competition for and/or inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; volatility in market prices for commodities; liabilities inherent in oil and gas exploration, development and production, marketing and transportation; changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the oil and gas exploration industry; loss of markets; currency fluctuations; imprecision of reserve estimates; unexpected decline rates in wells; and wells not performing as expected.

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

VALUE PROPOSITION

3

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

TIMING GEOGRAPHY & GEOLOGY STRUCTURE PERMEX IS A JUNIOR OIL & GAS COMPANY AT AN INFLECTION POINT OF GROWTH

(Owns & Operates on Private, State & Federal Land in Texas & New Mexico)

  • Permian Basin of West Texas &

South East New Mexico

  • Formations include the San Andres,

BoneSpring, and Wolfcamp

  • ~40M shares outstanding
  • Approximately 13% Management

& Insider Ownership

  • Zero debt on balance sheet
  • Acquired over 6,500+ acres at a

discount during downcycle (2015 – 2018)

  • Paid approximately $2,000/acre
  • Currently land values in this area as

high as $95,000/acre

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PORTFOLIO OF HIGH QUALITY ASSETS

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION SUMMARY OF OIL & GAS ASSETS

Over 6,500 net acres

  • f held by production
  • il and gas assets in

Texas & New Mexico

50 shut-in opportunities to be brought back

  • nline (“PDNP”)(1)

6,500+

50

Over 145 oil and gas wells owned and operated by corporation 32 Salt water Disposal (“SWD”)(3) wells eliminating water disposal fees and decreasing OPEX

143+

32

59 producing Oil & Natural Gas wells (“PDP”)(2) 2 Water Supply Wells (“WSW”)(4) allowing for waterflood secondary recovery (“EOR”)

59 2

(1) PDNP stands for Proved Developed Non-Producing reserves. (2) PDP stands for Proved Developed Producing reserves. 3. A salt water disposal well is a disposal site for water collected as a by-product of oil and gas production. 4. A hole in the ground drilled to obtain water for the purpose of injecting water into an underground formation in connection with the production of petroleum or natural gas.

4

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION SUMMARY OF OIL & GAS ASSETS

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2019 RESERVES SUMMARY

$ Amounts in USD OIL (MBBL) GAS (MMCF) FUTURE NET INCOME(1) PRE-TAX PRESENT VALUE (10%) Proved Developing Producing 637 76 $33,366,420 $12,228,960 Developed Non-Producing 272 17 $12,712,270 $6,553,770 Undeveloped 3,855 395 $162,692,200 $55,876,030 Total Proved 4,779 500 $209,224,520 $74,921,900 Total Probable 3,702 7,506 $160,046.340 $69,663,260 Total Proved + Probable 8,481 8,006 $369,270,860 $144,585,160 FINDING & DEVELOPMENT COST (per bbl) OPERATING NET BACK @ $45 WTI prices (per bbl) RECYCLE RATIO $8.95 $23.16 2.6x 5

(1) Future net income is estimated using forecast prices and costs. Future net income has been presented on a before tax basis. Estimated values of future net income disclosed herein do not represent fair market value. Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RESERVES – GROWTH ORIENTED

6

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

1.3 7.2 9.0 9.8

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 2016 2017 2018 2019 (M)

2P Reserves (MBOE)

Source: Corporation Disclosure

2P Reserves (BOE) 7.5x Reserve Growth

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF | $34 $115 $142 $145

$- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 2016 2017 2018 2019 USD $mm

Present Value of 2P Reserves discounted at 10%

PV of 2P Reserves discounted at 10% 4.4x Reserves Value Growth

slide-7
SLIDE 7

DELIVERABLES SINCE IPO (MAY 2018)

7

80 240

50 100 150 200 Pre IPO July 2018

(Boepd)

Gross Production (boepd) Permex completed the acquisition of the ODC San Andres unit and the W.J A Taylor unit located in Gaines County, Texas in July

  • 2018. The other major working interest partner on the field with

Permex is Occidental Petroleum Corp (NYSE: OXY), an international oil and gas exploration and production company with operations in the United States, Middle East and Latin

  • America. Occidental Petroleum has a market capitalization of

approximately $USD 46.8 billion as of January 3rd, 2019.

Partnership

January 2020

Since going public in May of 2018, Permex has achieved the following:

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected Source: Corporation Disclosure

$115 $145 $0 $50 $100 $150

$USD (M)

PV of 2P Reserves Discounted at 10% (US $M)

5,200 6,500 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Pre IPO July 2018

(Acres)

Land Scale (acres)

January 2020 Pre IPO

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

January 2020 Pre IPO Pre IPO

slide-8
SLIDE 8

INVESTOR CONSIDERATIONS

(1) 'Held By Production’ A provision in an oil or natural gas property lease that allows the lessee to continue drilling activities on the property as long as it is producing a minimum paying amount of oil or gas. (2)The American Petroleum Institute gravity measures how heavy or light a petroleum liquid is compared to water. An API above 10 indicates it is lighter than water. (3) Operating Netback is calculated by adding oil and gas sales with realized gains and losses on derivatives and subtracting royalty expense, operating expense and transportation expense.

8

  • Acreage: Owns over 6,500+ acres (100% HBP(1)) of producing oil and gas assets

▪ Paid approximately $2,000 per acre - current direct offset land value ranges from $10,000 - $95,000 per acre

  • Current Gross Field Production: 240 boepd (90% Oil)

▪ Light sweet oil with average American Petroleum Institute (“API”)(2) gravity of between 39º to 49º

  • Production Growth:

▪ H2 2020 Target: 500 – 1,000 boepd

  • Reserves: 2P reserves of ~9.8M barrel of oil equivalents (“BOE’s”)

▪ Present Value (10%) valued at USD$145M (MKM Engineering)

  • Balance sheet: No Debt
  • Horizontal Scale: ODC San Andres asset provides vertical to horizontal conversions
  • Operating Netbacks(3): Approximately USD$23.16 at $45 WTI (low cost environment)
  • Capital Structure: No drawn debt & tightly held share structure at ~40M shares outstanding

KEY HIGHLIGHTS:

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ASSET ACQUISITION CRITERIA

9

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

Management actively assesses deal flow in targeted plays to find attractive acquisition opportunities with the objective of generating the highest IRR with the lowest geologic risk Key PointsConsidered:

  • Go where you know

▪ Stick to areas where Management has prior operating history and expertise ▪ Focus on Permian and Delaware

  • Target smaller “bite-size” acquisitions

▪ Operators no longer require a large acreage position to be successful ▪ Better full cycle economics typically achievable on acquisitions of smaller, less publicized assets

  • Look for attractive base-case returns

▪ Project must be profitable in a low commodity price environment ▪ Run acquisition and project level rate of return analysis at current strip pricing

  • “Not all rock is the same”

▪ Even within well-known unconventional plays, there’s significant differentiation in rock/reservoir quality ▪ Look for assets in areas near the end of the development cycle with significant offsetting data

  • Fully developed infrastructure with service deployment

▪ Existing market infrastructure and deployed service companies are essential for operational success

GOAL: TO ACQUIRE PROVEN ASSETS AT AN ATTRACTIVE PRICE

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • A relative valuation analysis

highlights the value proposition that Permex presents when compared to the industry average based on either a reserve or production basis

  • Permex’s valuation represents
  • nly 4.22% of the industry

average on a reserve basis

  • Permex’s valuation is ~30.1%
  • f the industry average on a

production basis

JUNIOR OIL & GAS PEER COMPARISON

Source: Corporation Disclosure, Gravitas Securities Inc, and Thomson Reuters Note: As at January 1st, 2019

10

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

Peer Average: $7.35 Peer Average: $38,062

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TEXAS PROPERTIES

11

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

  • Low cost re-entries
  • Acid stimulations
  • Refracturing
  • Secondary Recovery (Waterflooding)
  • In-fill drilling
  • Horizontal Leg Conversions
  • Target Horizontal formation is San Andres

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ODC SAN ANDRES UNIT & TAYLOR PROPERTY

(Horizontal well conversion candidate)

  • The ODC San Andres & Taylor property are located in Gaines County, Texas in the Midland basin

and covers 1,226 acres HBP. Currently there are 35 active wells, 2 shut in wells and 13 water injection wells

  • Permex plans to re-stimulate the producing wells, frac the wells that have low fluid entry, bring
  • nline the shut-in wells, as well as consider additional vertical and horizontal wells on the

property including conversion of vertical leg to horizontal within the wells

  • Since there are no depth restrictions, Permex owns all basement rights on this property which

includes the highly sought after Wolfcamp, which can also be leased out for ancillary income

12

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-13
SLIDE 13

$0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00

Sources: December19, 2016 CreditSuisse report titled:Energy in2017; March22, 2017 Forbes articletitled:UpsideSurprise: OilSuperstarPermian Keeps Delivering Note:Assumes $3.00/MMBtu GasPrice;12m avg.NYMEX asof10/5/2017

  • 12mavg. NYMEX: $58.41/bbl

“San Andres wellscan achievebreakeven whenoil is as lowas $29 perbarrel” David Williamson – Founding Partner, MonadnockResources

13

PROVEN RESERVOIR PERMEX – BASIN ECONOMICS COMPARISON

Break-even Oil Prices (WTI, $/bbl): U.S. Onshore Resource Plays

Permex’s target areas (Permian - San Andres) have some of the lowest break-evens of all US resource and conventional plays

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-14
SLIDE 14

140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Mack Energy Nemo Fund Redmon Crownquest E ROperating N&GPermian Henry Enduring Merit Oxy Texlad Parallel PPCOperating Silver Creek Trey Walsh Sandridge ElkMeadows Element Pacesetter Wishbone Apache Sheridan Riley Ring Energy Steward ForgeEnergy KinderMorgan 30 25 20 15 10 5 Steward Riley Wishbone Element PPC Operating Henry E R Operating WindyCove Verdugo-Pablo SilverCreek Apache Custer &Wright

Source:Drilling Infoas ofSeptember12, 2017 (1) Datafilteredtoshow companiesthathave morethantwoactivehorizontalwellpermitsintheSan Andresreservoir,withthe status ofAtTotalDepth, Drilling,Permitted (2) Graph excludes operators with a single activepermit

Regional Map of San Andres Horizontal Drilling Permits (1) San Andres HorizontalDrillingPermits (Yoakum and Cochran) Since 2016

Total Measured Depth

Less than 6,000ft. More than 6,000ft. 30 29 28 75 76 77

90 89 88

PERMEX PETROLEUM CORPORATION Element Petroleum Op III,LLC Elk Meadows Resources LLC Forge Energy, LLC Riley Exploration OPG Co, LLC Ring Energy Inc. Steward Energy II,LLC Wishbone Texas OperatingCo, LLC All Other Drilling Permits: Operator Apache Corporation E R OperatingCompany

14

SAN ANDRES – PERMITTING & HISTORICAL ACTIVITY

San Andres Horizontal Drilling Permits (Permian Wide) since 2012(2)

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Source:1 DerrickandFactsetas ofOctober5,2017 Note: Midland Focused Group includes: CPE, FANG, LPI, PE, and RSPP; Delaware Focused Group includes: CDEV, CXO, MTDR, REN, and WPX; Mid-Con Focused Group includes: CLR, GST, JONE, NFX, andSD;Rockies Focused Groupincludes: BBG,BCEI,SRCI,and XOG; BakkenFocused Groupincludes: HK,NOG, OAS,QEP,andWLL;EagleFordFocused Groupincludes: CRZO,LNR,PVAC, SBOW, SEA,andSN;AppalachiaFocused Groupincludes: AR,COG,ECR,EQT,GPOR,REXX,RICE,andRRC (1) REIandbasinindexsharepricesperFactsetas ofOctober5,2017 (2) Adjusted for $132.2 million PDP value and $12million infrastructure value (3)RepresentsREI’simplied EV/undevelopedSan Andresacreagevalue.Assumes REIproveddevelopedPV10valueof$225mm as ofYE2016.

15

Jul16’

1H 2017 2016 2H 2015 1H 2015 2012-2014

Aug13’ Jan15’ Feb15’ Aug15’ Sept.15’ Sept 15’ Oct15’ Nov 15’ Oct15’ Nov 15’ Dec 15’ Dec 16’ Dec 15’ Dec 15’ Dec 15’ Feb16’ Mar 16’ Mar 16’ Apr16’ May 16’ May 16’ Jun16’ Jul16’ Oct16’ Sept 16’ Sept 16’ Jun16’ Oct16’ Oct16’ Dec 16’ Dec 16’ Dec 16’ Dec 15’ Jan17’ Apr17’ May 15’ Jun16’ Dec 14’ May 12’ Apr17’ Jun17’ Feb17’ Jul16’ Sept 16’ Feb17’ Nov ‘16 Apr16’

Sophisticated Investors Accumulating Acreage Positions in the San Andres - Trend is Accelerating

Oct-16 Dec-16 Feb-17 Apr-17 Jun-17 Aug-17 100 50 150 Indexed Prices 25.2% 2.8% (3.6)% (11.3)% (18.6)% (28.5)% (40.6)% (54.4)%

REI Bakken Index Eagle FordIndex Midcon Index RockiesIndex Appalachia Index Midland Index Delaware Index

Ring Energy Current Implied Market Value $/Undeveloped Acre: $6,250(1)(3) Steward Energy/Manzano Aug.2016 $/Undeveloped Acre: $4,766(2) Riley Permian Summer2016 $/Undeveloped Acre: N/A Windy Cove/Monadnock Resources July2017 $/Undeveloped Acre: N/A 3 2 2 0 9 8 7 7 7 5 6 7 9 8 8 0 9 8 Energy Hunter Resources,Inc. Monadnock Resources Riley Exploration Group Ring Energy Inc. Steward Energy IILLC PERMEX PETROLEUM CORPORATION Steward Energy II LLC Riley Exploration Group Monadnock Resources Ring EnergyInc.

as of October 05, 2017 price indexed to 100 on (10/5/16)(1)

Ring Energy (REI) has Outperformed Delaware Basin Peers by ~25%

SAN ANDRES – MARKET RECEPTION

Recent Activity in the Region: Transacted and Implied San Andres Acreage Value

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

TEXAS – GAINES COUNTY ASSET

500 IP

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TEXAS – GAINES COUNTY ASSET (CONT’D)

17

Target Acquisition Areas

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

SAN ANDRES WELL ECONOMICS (TYPE CURVE)

Single Well Economics Forecast Results

Initial Rate of Return 200% Net Present Value $4,852,000 EBITDA $7,940,000 Payout (months) 10 Oil Breakeven $31.070

Decline Assumptions

IP Rate BOPD 572 Initial Decline 34.5% B Factor 1.29 Oil EUR MSTB 419

Economic Analysis Input Parameters

Oil Price $60.00/Barrel Discount Rate 10% Well Cost $2,500,000 Working Interest 100% Net Revenue Interest 85% Monthly Operating $5,000 Operating Cost/Barrel Oil $10.00/Barrel

Source:Management estimates

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-19
SLIDE 19

NEW MEXICO PROPERTIES

BLUE SKY UPSIDE

19

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

  • Bone Springs – Wolfcamp formations
  • In fill spot drilling of Yates formations
  • Horizontal 1 – 1.5 mile drilling

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-20
SLIDE 20

HENSHAW PROPERTY

  • The Henshaw property sits on 1,880 net

acres

  • The Henshaw lease contains multiple

productive or potentially productive horizons including the Grayburg, Bone Springs and the highly sought after Wolfcamp

  • Restoration of producing wells and acid

treatments are currently on the agenda

20

OXY YATES PROPERTY

  • The Oxy Yates property sits on 680 net acres
  • The Oxy Yates lease is producing from the

shallow Yates sand of the Permian which has a 50 – 60 feet thick payzone.

  • Opportunities to drill proved undeveloped

wells are continuously evaluated

  • Production will be optimized through acid

treatments, clean-out of the wellbores, and downhole pump replacements

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

(Shallow Infill Drilling - Waterflood EOR candidate) (Horizontal Drilling - Waterflood EOR candidate)

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MANAGEMENT TEAM

  • Mehran Ehsan has an impactful 12 years of experience in the oil & gas industry, by leading numerous teams in the successful creation of multiple upstream oil and gas companies
  • Mehran was engaged as owner of O&G Draft Proposed Program, manager in mergers, acquisitions & divestitures, personally facilitating over $87M in capital syndication and injection
  • Mehran has authored various articles, with presence as a guest speaker and judge in both the oil and gas industry and academia related events

Mehran Ehsan – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director

  • Scott Kelly has over 15 years of experience acting as a senior officer and/or director of various private and public companies with large scale resource assets in North and South America
  • Mr. Kelly obtained his Bachelor of Commerce degree from Royal Roads University in 2001 and has since helped manage companies through all stages of their life cycle

Scott Kelly – Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary & Director

  • Barry Whelan has more than 40 years of experience as a geologist and engineer, initiating his career in the oil and gas industry with Gulf Oil’s international operations, quickly becoming a

renowned industry expert in oil and gas

  • Represented a diverse array of energy market participants including oil, gas and other resources based companies with clients ranging from global energy concerns to start-up companies

Barry Whelan – Chief Operating Officer & Director

  • Connie Hang has over 17 years of finance, accounting and management experience in a variety of industries, including the energy sector
  • Acted as an independent financial consultant since 2009 and has served over 40 public and private companies, which span across Vancouver based companies to foreign controlled entities
  • Connie is a Member of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada and holds a Bachelor of Accounting Science from University of Calgary

Connie Hang – Controller

  • Dale Lee is the current President & CEO of DL Petroleum & Engineering Consulting and has more than 25 years experience in the oil & gas sector
  • As a reservoir engineer, he has been active in natural resource and industrial development companies with natural resource holdings in oil & gas worldwide
  • In 1994 Dale earned his Professional Engineering status with The Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta

Dale Lee – Petroleum Engineer

  • Earl Tobin has more than 30 years of experience working as a geologist, using his expertise to build and grow both public and private oil & gas companies
  • His career has focused on full cycle exploration, from regional geologic mapping and reservoir modeling to field development and planning
  • Earl is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers, and Geoscientists of Alberta, the Project Management Institute, and Canadian and American Society of Petroleum Geologists

Earl Tobin – Geologist

21 CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

  • Justin Kates is a partner of DuMoulin Black, practicing primarily in the areas of securities, corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate and commercial law
  • He advises clients from all stages of development ranging from early stage to large public companies
  • Justin received his J.D. from the University of Western Ontario and his Bachelor of Business Administration from Western Michigan University

Justin Kates – General Counsel & Advisor

slide-22
SLIDE 22

DIRECTORS & ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS

22 Doug Urch- Director

  • Edward A. Odishaw currently serves as the President of Austpro Energy Corp. and worked as Barrister and Solicitor with the law firm of Swinton & Company in Canada from 1972 to 1992
  • He acts as Chairman of the Board of many energy and resource companies in both Canada and the U.S. such as Austpro Energy Corp. and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.

Edward A. Odishaw – Barrister, Solicitor & Director

  • Leslie Thomas has over 35 years experience as a petroleum geologist
  • He was successful in the discovery of several very profitable oil fields such as the S.W. Werewolf Field of Haskell County and the HMT Field of Stonewall County
  • Since 1986 he has been acting as an independent geologist generating oil and gas prospects in the Permian Basin and Eastern Shelf of the Basin

Leslie M. Thomas – Geologist & Advisor

  • Kit H. Maddox has more than fifteen years' experience as an Independent Petroleum Landman
  • He has a thorough knowledge of land data systems and is called upon to verify, summarize and update mineral, royalty and surface ownership information
  • Kit earned a Bachelors degree in Electronics and attained the rank of E-5, Electronics Technician, ET2, Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist

Kit H. Maddox – Petroleum Landman & Advisor

  • Wayne Schoen has over 40 years of experience as a petroleum engineer
  • He formed Schoen Oil Company, LLC in February 2016 offering oil and gas consulting services to area operators in the West Central Texas region
  • Wayne graduated with a BS and MS in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University in 1974 and 1976, respectively

Wayne Schoen – Petroleum Engineer & Advisor Technical Advisors

  • Mr. Dorrins is a professional geologist and has been involved in global oil and gas companies including Amoco, BP, Shell and Junex, amongst others
  • Ms. Goldstein is a reservoir engineering technologist and a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) with 20+ years of industry experience

Peter Dorrins – Geologist, Advisor Diana Goldstein – Engineer, Advisor

  • Doug Urch has over 35 years experience in the oil and gas industry
  • Mr. Urch has been a director for a number of listed (TSX & AIM) and private companies, offering financial management services
  • For the last 10 years, Doug was the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary for Bankers Petroleum

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

  • Greg Montgomery has over 27 years experience in the oil and gas industry
  • In the past 5 years, he has been a self-employed business consultant who has held the office of CFO for Oiltanking North America, Samarus Energy Consulting, Coast Energy, Laser

Midstream and Enbridge Energy Partners.

Greg Montgomery – General Counsel & Director

slide-23
SLIDE 23

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

23

(1) The options outstanding at March 31, 2018 have an exercise price in the range of $0.40 to $0.50 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 9.68 years. (2) Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share at a price of $0.50, expiring on May 16, 2021, or $0.25, expiring on May 8, 2021

Note: All $ amounts in CAD

Note: $0.20 shareholders have all been voluntarily locked up for 1 year from the date of issuance, and certain of such shareholders have also voluntarily entered into 36-month lock-up agreements with timed release dates. Certain $0.40 shareholders have been voluntarily locked up for 1 year from the listing of the IPO.

Management Shares have all been voluntarily locked up for 3 years from the listing of the IPO (May 18, 2018):

On listing date: No release 6 months after listing date: 1/4 of the escrow securities 12 months after listing date: 1/5 of the remaining escrow securities 18 months after listing date: 1/4 of the remaining escrow securities 24 months after listing date: 1/3 of the remaining escrow securities 30 months after listing date: 1/2 of the remaining escrow securities 36 months after listing date: The remaining escrow securities Share Price $0.05 52 Week High – Low* $0.185 - $0.025 Basic Shares Outstanding 40.02M Options 3.24M

1

Warrants 4.81M

2

Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding 48.07M Market Cap. Basic $2.00M Market Cap. FD $2.40M Cash Balance / AR $190,000 Enterprise Value 2.15M Management % Ownership ~%15 *52 Week High - Low is based on closing price

Trading Symbol CSE: OIL

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-24
SLIDE 24

OIL & GAS DISCLOSURES

Oil Reserves All estimates of reserves and future net income contained in this presentation with respect to the Corporation's properties are derived from reserves reports prepared by MKM Engineering, an independent qualified reserves evaluator, effective December 31, 2016. MKM Engineering's evaluation was carried out in accordance with standards set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook, prepared jointly by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum (Petroleum Society). It should not be assumed that the present value of estimated future net income presented represents the fair market value of the reserves. There is no assurance that the forecast prices and costs assumptions will be attained and variances could be material. The recovery and reserve estimates of the Corporations crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas reserves provided herein are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated reserves will be recovered. Actual crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein. All future net income is estimated using forecast prices and costs. Future net income has been presented on a before tax basis. Estimated values of future net income disclosed herein do not represent fair market value. The estimates of reserves and future net income for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net income for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation. Barrels of Oil Equivalent Barrel of oil equivalents or BOEs may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A BOE conversion ratio of 6 mcf: 1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude

  • il as compared to natural gas is significantly different than the energy equivalency of the 6:1 conversion ratio,

utilizing the 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value. Drilling Locations This presentation discloses drilling locations in two categories: (i) proved locations; and (ii) potential drilling

  • pportunities. Proved locations, which are sometimes collectively referred to as “booked locations”, are derived

from the Corporation’s most recent independent reserves evaluation as of December 31, 2016 and account for drilling locations that have associated proven reserves, as applicable. Potential drilling opportunities are internal estimates based on the Corporation’s prospective acreage and an assumption as to the number of wells that can be drilled per section based on industry practice and internal review. Potential drilling opportunities do not have attributed reserves or resources. The Corporation has, based on the December 31, 2016 reserve report and management's current internal estimate, net proved locations and identified potential drilling opportunities. Potential drilling opportunities have specifically been identified by management as an estimation of our experience in drilling activities based on evaluation of applicable geologic, seismic, engineering, production and reserves data on prospective acreage and geologic formations. The drilling locations on which the Corporation will actually drill wells will ultimately depend upon the availability of capital, regulatory approvals, seasonal restrictions, oil and natural gas prices, costs, actual drilling results and other factors. While certain of the potential drilling opportunities have been de-risked by drilling of wells by the Corporation or other

  • perators in close proximity to such potential drilling opportunities, the majority of other potential drilling
  • pportunities are farther away from existing wells where management has less information about the

characteristics of the reservoir and therefore there is more uncertainty whether wells will be drilled in such locations and, if drilled, there is more uncertainty that such wells will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. Oil and Gas Metrics This presentation contains metrics commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry. Each of these metrics is determined by the Corporation as set out below. These metrics are "F&D Cost", "Operating Netback" and "Recycle Ratio". These metrics do not have standardized meanings and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. As such, they should not be used to make comparisons. Management uses these oil and gas metrics for its own performance measurements and to provide shareholders with measures to compare the Corporation's performance over a period of time, however, such measures are not reliable indicators of the Corporation's future performance and future performance may not compare to the performance in previous periods. "Finding and development costs" or "F&D costs" are calculated by dividing the sum of the total capital expenditures for the year [inclusive of the net acquisition costs and disposition proceeds] (in dollars) by the change in reserves within the applicable reserves category [inclusive of changes due to acquisitions and dispositions] (in boe). F&D costs includes all capital expenditures in the year [inclusive of the net acquisition costs and disposition proceeds] as well as the change in future development costs required to bring the reserves within the specified reserves category on production. Management uses F&D as a measure of the Corporation's ability to execute its capital programs (and success in doing so) and of its asset quality. "Operating netback" is calculated by adding oil and gas sales with realized gains and losses on derivatives and subtracting royalty expense, operating expense and transportation expense. "Recycle ratio" is calculated by dividing the operating netback (in dollars per boe) by the F&D costs (in dollars per boe) for the year. The Corporation uses recycle ratio as an indicator of profitability of its oil and gas activities.

24

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CONTACT US

25

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

CANADIAN OFFICE: Suite 2300 1066 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC, V6E 3X2 U.S. TEXAS OFFICE: Suite 3100 325 North Saint Paul Street Dallas, TX 75201 U.S. NEW MEXICO OFFICE:

  • Ste. 1000

500 4th St. NW, Albuquerque, NM 87102 admin@permexpetroleum.com

slide-26
SLIDE 26

APPENDIX

26

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-27
SLIDE 27

THE PERMIAN BASIN America’s Most Important Oil And Gas Resource

Q2 2017 http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/oil-gas/major-oil-gas-formations/permian-basin/

Investor takeaway

The Permian Basin has long been one of America's most vital energy producing regions. However, its importance is growing now that producers discovered how to unlock the oil and gas trapped in the tight rocks stacked below the surface. These companies are just starting to scratch the surface, which suggests that this legacy oil basin's best days could very well be ahead of it.

  • Over $24 bn invested in the region in 2017.
  • Largest petroleum-producing basin in the U.S.
  • 2nd largest oil field in the world behind Saudi

Arabia's Ghawar field.

  • The Permian accounts for about 30% of the

country's oil production.

  • Output totaling more than 3M barrels per day.
  • The Permian now accounts for 471 rigs – 40% of all

the U.S. oil rigs and 22% of Global rigs.

  • The basin produced a prodigious 29 bn bbls of oil

since 1921.

  • Potential to produce another 20 bn bbls of oil from

tight rock resources alone.

BRE A K E VE N CO ST S U.S. $ PER BARREL WEST TEXAS INTERMEDIATE *Price neede to cover operating on existing wells SOURCES: CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE; CIBC WORLD MARKETS; FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS, WOOD MACKENZIE, OXFORD INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY STUDIES, COMPANY ESTIMATES

U.S. SHALE VS. OILSANDS

Oilsands breakeven costs are now comparible to some of the most prolific U.S. shale basins

NATIONAL POST

$38 $35 $33 $33 $29 $24

O ther U .S . (non-shale) O ther U .S . (shale) P ermian (D elaw are) P ermian (C entral) E agle F

  • rd

P ermian (Midland)

U.S . LIG HT O IL*

$37 $40 $45 $49 $57 $60

S uncor E nergy Inc. C enovus E nergy Inc. ME G E nergy Inc. S A G D (solvents only) S A G D (w ith solvents) S A G D

O ILS AN DS

*Price needed to cover operating on existing wells

comparable

27

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-28
SLIDE 28

THE DELAWARE BASIN America’s Hottest Oil And Gas Resource

DELAWARE BASIN The Delaware Basin constitutes roughly 10,000 square miles, or 6.4 M acres, extending from the southern New Mexico counties of Eddy and Lea southward into the west Texas counties of Reeves, Loving, Ward and Pecos. Given drilling and completion costs that generally range from $4 M to $8 M per well, depending on lateral length, expected pre-tax internal rates of return exceed 50%, at $50 to $55 per barrel of oil. Few, if any, oil and gas plays in the U.S. offered comparable returns in early 2017.

DELAWARE BASIN GEOGRAPHY DELAWARE BASIN, MULTI – STACKED PLAY

28

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

UNDERSTANDING THE SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR

Pumpjack at Permex’s ODC San Andres Unit #70

The San Andres is the gift that keeps on giving. The formation has produced billions of barrels of oil over several decades and it is not finished yet.

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

PROVEN RESERVOIR

San Andres Formation

  • Over 30 bbl produced from the Permian over the past 90 years with

approximately 12 bbl and two Trillion Cubic Feet from the San Andres

  • The San Andres is a Permian Age Carbonate Reservoir (conventional)

that traditionally produced from vertical wells across much of the Permian Basin

  • Formation depth from 4,500’-5,500’ (in Texas)
  • 312 horizontal San Andres wells have been permitted in Texas on the

Central Basin Platform and the Norwest Shelf in the past 12 months (as of 03/30/2019)

Permex’s current assets have the capacity for exceptional infill drilling or lateral conversion within the 70 foot thick San Andres formation, the company is already producing from this zone.

Source: US Department of Energy & Drilling Info

Permian Basin Geology

Confidential – Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Permex Petroleum Corporation For discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell – Past performance is not indicative of future results – Actual production may not be as projected

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

PERMIAN BASIN CROSS SECTIONS

Central Basin Platform

Yates Grayburg San Andres Clear Fork Wichita - Albany Bone Spring Wolfcamp

Delaware Basin Midland Basin

Wolfberry

2,000’ 3,000’ 4,000’ 5,000’ 6,000’ 7,000’ 8,000’ 9,000’ 10,000’

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

SAN ANDRES CROSS SECTION

San Andres 1 Mile Horizontal Multistage (12 stage) Hydraulic Fracturing

KEY PLAY DRIVERS

HORIZONTAL SAN ANDRES

Extensive play area between Legacy fields Stratigraphic trapping Connect to entire pay zone via hydraulic fracturing Efficient SWD

  • perations required

Potential anywhere verticals produced Laterally discontinuous porosity zones Vertical heterogeneity (avg 2’ facies changes) Horizontals effectively exploit laterally bound vertical facies 200’ to 400’ in most areas High water cuts can challenge economics

CSE: OIL OTCQB: OILCF |

slide-33
SLIDE 33

CSE: OIL | 33 CSE: OIL | 33 CSE: OIL | 33

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

Option 1: Horizontal San Andres Dolomites (Unconventional Oil Play):

  • Hydrocarbon-charges shallow stratigraphic objective (4,500’-5,500’), very large areal extent
  • Project is in known oil field, provides significant upside potential for scale
  • Numerous producing, with major, historical conventional oil production
  • Opportunity to develop a significant new unconventional play (est. 200-400 MBOE per well)
  • Have offset horizontal analog for play. Gross potential in excess of MMBOE

Option 2: Vertical Down-space and implement Waterflood (Conventional Oil Play):

  • Successful area waterfloods utilize 10 to 20-acre spacing units. Lease currently drilled on 40 acre pattern with a few

20 acre spacings

  • Requires 4 new wells and re-equipping certain existing wells
  • Area waterfloods achieve 1.5:1 secondary to primary recovery ratio

Total Reserve Potential Exceeds Three MMBOE1 from a Single Objective

(1) Million barrels of oil equivalent

slide-34
SLIDE 34

CSE: OIL | 34 CSE: OIL | 34 CSE: OIL | 34

SAN ANDRES WELL ECONOMICS

San Andres (1.0 mile lateral) San Andres (1.5 mile lateral)

Average Well Cost $2.2MM $2.6MM Cost per DSU $640k (1) $960k (2) Locations per DSU 6 (1 Bench) 6 (1 Bench) Acreage Cost per Location $107k $160k Well Cost + Acreage Cost per Location (3) $2.3MM $2.8MM Net EUR at 75% NRI (MBoe) 258 400 F&D ($/Boe) $8.94 $6.89 LOE ($/Boe) 4 $9.23 $5.95 F&D + LOE ($/Boe) $18.17 $12.84 Net Returns (5) Fully Loaded Net Returns (6) Net Returns (5) Fully Loaded Net Returns (6) Discounted Net ROI 2.8x 2.3x 3.9x 3.6x Undiscounted Net ROI 4.1x 3.9x 5.7x 5.4x Net IRR 134% 119% 262% 244%

(1) $1,000 / acre times 640 acres (2) $1,000 / acre times 960 acres (3) Includes infrastructure cost (4) LOE assumes $15k per month for the first year and $10k per month thereafter (5) Excludes location acreage cost (6) Includes location acreage cost Note: Assumes $50/bbl