Consequences of the LHC results in the interpretation of ray - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

consequences of the lhc results in the interpretation of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Consequences of the LHC results in the interpretation of ray - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Consequences of the LHC results in the interpretation of ray families and giant EAS data Jean-Nol CAPDEVIELLE APC, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Diderot Remarkable cosmic ray events in the LHC energy range From X-emulsion Chambers Exotics,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Consequences of the LHC results in the interpretation of γ ray families and giant EAS data

Jean-Noël CAPDEVIELLE APC, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Diderot

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Remarkable cosmic ray events in the LHC energy range

  • From X-emulsion

Chambers

  • Centauros ?
  • Coplanar emission
  • Spikes in pseudo

rapidity distribution

  • Needs from EAS
  • Large multiplicities

and large Pt’s

  • Rising energy cross

sections

  • Exotics, fluctuation

artefacts or tracks to new physics ?

  • Phase transition to

QGP

  • Diquark breaking

mechanism

  • Fragmentation of

strings with very high tension

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Near 107GeV, 211 γ’s CERN Courier april 97

slide-5
SLIDE 5

JF2af2 and Strana 2 events with alignments in the stratosphere Nγ Eγ (TeV) Eth (TeV) JF2af2 211 1586 0.2 Strana 76 1400 2.

Strana from a russian balloon flight at 10g/cm2 JF2af2 at 100g/cm2

30 Hadrons in Strana (2500 TeV)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

String Model and di-quark breaking

Valence quark Valence diquark

π κ α α π κ = 〉 〈 ′ ≅ ′ =

2

Slope Regge : /fm GeV 1 2 1 Tension

T

p

L

q q

2 1q

q

3

q

The pair is created when the distance L exceeds a threshold value. Above a threshold energy, the di-quark is broken excluding recombination

  • f the leading cluster.

q q

Schwinger theory, tension 10 times larger for partners of valence diquark?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Very large tension for the diquark partners ?

1

q

3

q

2

q Maximal tension when the 3 valence quarks are at the largest distance from each other, then aligned.

Diquark separation

Energy threshold for valence diquark fragmentation √s = 4-5 TeV ? Minimal energy consumed at threshold and maximal probability of

  • bservation in cosmic rays

Most energetic gamma’s aligned in realtion with valence quarks?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

When E(cms) exceeds the threshold, the coplanar emission disappears, but non aligned clusters remain

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

CERN Courier

October 1981 Experiences ECHOS started in October 1978 0ne collision of 106 GeV (high multiplicity, spikes in the distribution of pseudo-rapidité) at first exposure

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hints of hot spots for QGP ? Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions, 82

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

TADJIKISTAN No alignements in super families above 7 TeV in CMS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Violation du scaling de KNO (1000 collisions) 1020 eV

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Energy densities above 30 GeV/Fm3

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Lateral distribution of γ’s simulated for LHCf

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

New guidelines from LHC

  • CMS, ATLAS and ALICE
  • Central pseudo rapidity densities larger

than expected in usual models !

  • dNch/dη = 4.47 ± 0.04(stat.) ±0.13(syst)

for s= 2.36 TeV (2.97 PeV in Lab.) √

  • dNch/dη = 6.01 ± 0.01(stat.) -0.62

+0.2(syst)

for s= 7 TeV (26.1 PeV in Lab.) √ NSD

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Guidelines inserted in Hybrid dual parton model

  • dNch/dη = 0.595 s0.13 for s > 0.9 TeV

  • dNch/dη = 0.74 s0.105 from UA5 data
  • Nch = 2.257 s0.195 for s > 0.9 TeV

  • Nch = -7 + 7.2 s0.127 from UA5 data
  • Landau Hydrodynamical model predicted a

behaviour (assuming a major part of CMS available energy converted in s0.25 whereas Feyman’s scaling and colliders were in favour of s0.13

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Alice 6.01 CMS 4.47  CMS 3.48 

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Change of p interaction near 2-3 EeV or progressive evolution of the collision with higher multiplicities and cross sections? Fe or fat proton ?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

CONCLUSION

  • A situation similar to the period

preceeding the discovery of the Charm.

  • Several simulations shows that

coplanar events as well as spikes could result from random groupings

  • However spikes close to fragmentation

region, as well as alignements concentrated near 3-5 TeV CMS energy could be investigated in LHC

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CONCLUSION

  • The faster increase of central rapidity

density (multiplication of chains in central region) suggests more muons in EAS, a maximum at higher altitude and lower primary mass in the knee region.

  • If those tendancies persists, the

maximum depth at UHE observed in AUGER would be explain by a pure proton composition.

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35