Congressional Budget Office November 16, 2018 How Taxes Affect the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

congressional budget office
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Congressional Budget Office November 16, 2018 How Taxes Affect the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Congressional Budget Office November 16, 2018 How Taxes Affect the Incentive to Invest in New Intangible Assets National Tax Association 111th Annual Conference on Taxation Paul Burnham Tax Analysis Division CBO In Taxing Capital Income:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Congressional Budget Office

National Tax Association 111th Annual Conference on Taxation

November 16, 2018

Paul Burnham Tax Analysis Division

How Taxes Affect the Incentive to Invest in New Intangible Assets

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1 CBO

In Taxing Capital Income: Effective Marginal Tax Rates Under 2014 Law and Selected Policy Options, the Congressional Budget Office calculated the tax burden

  • n income from investments in tangible assets.

In this report, CBO extends that analysis to investments in intangible assets.

Congressional Budget Office, Taxing Capital Income: Effective Marginal Tax Rates Under 2014 Law and Selected Policy Options (December 2014), www.cbo.gov/publication/49817.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2 CBO

Distribution of Business Investment Among Structures, Equipment, and Intellectual Property Products, 1966 to 2016

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3 CBO

Detailed equations can be found in Congressional Budget Office, Taxing Capital Income: Effective Marginal Tax Rates Under 2014 Law and Selected Policy Options (December 2014), Appendix A, www.cbo.gov/publication/49817.

  • The tax wedge:

– The before-tax rate of return that must be achieved to justify an investment minus the after-tax rate of return

  • The effective tax rate:

– The tax wedge divided by the before-tax rate of return

Measures of the Tax Burden

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4 CBO

  • Taxes included for C corporations:

– Corporate income taxes – Individual income taxes on interest, dividends, and capital gains

  • Taxes included for pass-through entities:

– Individual income taxes – Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) taxes on pass-though income

  • f sole proprietors and general partners
  • Taxes excluded from analysis:

– Estate and gift taxes – State and local taxes

Taxes Included in Measures of the Tax Burden

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5 CBO

  • Prospective marginal investments (that is, those that are expected to just break

even)

  • Investments by established profitable companies
  • Investments in five types of intangible assets:

– Purchased software – Assets resulting from research and development – Entertainment, literary, and artistic originals – Assets derived from mineral exploration and development – Brand identity arising from advertising

Types of Investments to Which Measures of the Tax Burden Apply

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6 CBO

Analysis of the Permanent Features

  • f Pre-2018 Law
slide-8
SLIDE 8

7 CBO

  • a. Bonus depreciation for purchased software is not included because it was scheduled to expire in 2020.
  • b. Expensing of $15 million of movie development costs is not included because it was scheduled to expire in 2018.

Asset Type Predominant Cost-Recovery Method Purchased Software Three-year amortizationa Research and Development Expensing and the research and experimentation credit Entertainment, Literary, and Artistic Originals Income forecast method (which recovers costs at roughly the rate of assets’ economic depreciation)b Mineral Exploration and Development Expensing (except for 30 percent of investment by integrated oil and gas companies, which is amortized over five years) Brand Identity Arising From Advertising Expensing

Cost-Recovery Methods Under the Permanent Provisions

  • f Pre-2018 Law
slide-9
SLIDE 9

8 CBO

Effective Tax Rates and Tax Wedges, by Type of Intangible Asset

Effective Tax Rate (Percent) Tax Wedge (Percentage points) All Intangible Assets 3 0.1 Purchased software 37 2.5 Research and development

  • 31
  • 1.0

Entertainment, literary, and artistic originals 31 1.8 Mineral exploration and development 6 0.3 Brand identity arising from advertising

  • 2
  • 0.1

All Tangible Assets 28 1.6

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9 CBO

Analysis of the 2017 Tax Act

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10 CBO

  • Provisions affecting intangible assets only:

– Temporary expansion of bonus depreciation to include development and production of motion pictures and television programs – Five-year amortization of research and development expenses beginning in 2022 – Reduction in the orphan drug credit

  • Provisions affecting both intangible and tangible assets:

– Permanent reduction of the corporate income tax rate to 21 percent – Permanent increase in section 179 expensing – Temporary increase in bonus depreciation

  • Provisions affecting both intangible and tangible assets but excluded from analysis:

– Temporary reduction in the individual income tax rate – 20 percent deduction for pass-through entities – Limits on interest deductibility

Provisions of the 2017 Tax Act That Affect Intangible Assets

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11 CBO

a. CBO’s computations account for only the permanent features of tax law in effect during 2017. They exclude provisions that were scheduled to expire. b. Provisions in effect in 2022 include bonus depreciation, which is scheduled to phase out by 2027. c. The permanent provisions of the 2017 tax act apply in 2027 and beyond.

Effective Tax Rates on Capital Income Under Pre-2018 Law and the 2017 Tax Act (Equity-Financed C Corporations Only)

Pre-2018 Law a Provisions of the 2017 Tax Act in Effect in 2022 b Permanent Provisions of the 2017 Tax Actc All Intangible Assets 11 12 15 Purchased software 41 22 28 Research and development

  • 14

11 11 Entertainment, literary, and artistic originals 38 13 27 Mineral exploration and development 11 10 10 Brand identity arising from advertising 8 8 8 All Tangible Assets 35 21 24

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12 CBO

Capturing the Tax Effects of Multiyear Development Periods and the Risk of Failure

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13 CBO

Although effective tax rates are a reliable measure of the tax burden associated with different statutory tax rates and methods of cost recovery, they do not adequately capture the effect of multiyear development periods or the risk of failure. Those phenomena require an investor to consider rates of return in three different states in order to decide whether to invest.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14 CBO

  • The development state, in which the investment temporarily generates no

return, although its success is still anticipated

  • The failure state, in which the investment does not generate any return and

success is no longer anticipated

  • The success state, in which an investment must generate an above-market

return to offset the lack of returns in the development and potential failure states

Three States Investors Must Consider in the Presence of Multiyear Development Periods and Failure Risks

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15 CBO

This table illustrates only the effects of risk. Development-period effects are more complicated, but tax wedges are still a more reliable indicator

  • f their effect on the tax burden than are effective tax rates.

Standard State (No risk) Success State (50 percent risk of failure) Before-Tax Rate of Return 6 percent 12 percent After-Tax Rate of Return 4 percent 8 percent Tax Wedge (Before-tax rate of return minus after-tax rate of return) 2 percentage points 4 percentage points Effective Tax Rate (Tax wedge divided by after-tax rate of return) 33 percent 33 percent

Calculations of the Tax Burden in the Standard State and the Success State

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16 CBO

  • Oil exploration and well development by integrated companies

– 6-year development period – 10 percent failure rate

  • New drug research and development

– 12-year development period – 90 percent failure rate

  • Motion picture development and production

– 3-year development period – 50 percent failure rate

Three Types of Investments Used to Illustrate the Tax Effects

  • f Multiyear Development Periods and Failure Risks
slide-18
SLIDE 18

17 CBO

Rates of Return and Tax Wedges for Three Types of Intangible Assets Under Pre-2018 Law

Oil Well Development New Drug Research and Development Motion Picture Development and Production Success-State After-Tax Rate of Return Standard after-tax rate of return (Percent) 4.8 4.8 4.8 Development-period wedge (Percentage points) 0.6 1.4 0.2 Risk wedge (Percentage points) 0.6 55.6 5.0 Total (Percent) 6.0 61.8 10.0 Success-State Tax Wedge Standard tax wedge (Percentage points) 0.7

  • 0.9

3.1 Development period’s contribution (Percentage points) 0.1 0.1 0.1 Failure risk’s contribution (Percentage points) 0.1 1.2 1.5 Total (Percentage points) 0.9 0.4 4.7

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18 CBO

a. CBO’s computations account for only the permanent features of tax law in effect during 2017. They exclude provisions that were scheduled to expire. b. Provisions in effect in 2022 include bonus depreciation, which is scheduled to phase out by 2027. c. The permanent provisions of the 2017 tax act apply in 2027 and beyond.

Tax Wedges for Three Types of Intangible Assets Under Pre-2018 Law and the 2017 Tax Act

Pre-2018 Law a Provisions of the 2017 Tax Act in Effect in 2022 b Permanent Provisions of the 2017 Tax Act c Standard Tax Wedge Oil Well Development 0.7 0.6 0.6 New Drug Research and Development

  • 0.9

* 0.1 Motion Picture Development and Production 3.1 0.4 1.9 Success-State Tax Wedge Oil Well Development 0.9 0.7 0.8 New Drug Research and Development 0.4 5.0 5.1 Motion Picture Development and Production 4.7 0.9 3.0

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19 CBO

  • The tax burden on investment in intangible assets is generally lower than the

tax burden on investment in tangible assets.

  • The 2017 tax act increases the tax burden on research and development

beginning in 2022, but it reduces the tax burden on most other types of intangible assets.

  • The success-state tax wedge is a more reliable measure of the tax burden than

either the standard tax wedge or the effective tax rate because it accounts for multiyear development periods and the risk of failure.

  • Using the success-state tax wedge illuminates the additional tax burden placed
  • n research and development by the 2017 tax act.

Summary of Results