Conflict of Interest HRT: New Evidence on a Old Topic Conflict of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

conflict of interest
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Conflict of Interest HRT: New Evidence on a Old Topic Conflict of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

10/19/2018 Conflict of Interest HRT: New Evidence on a Old Topic Conflict of Interest None Off label drug use Mirena IUD Gabapentin Marcelle I. Cedars, M.D. Effexor Professor and Director Division of Reproductive


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/19/2018 1

HRT: New Evidence on a Old Topic

Marcelle I. Cedars, M.D. Professor and Director Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility UCSF

Conflict of Interest

  • Conflict of Interest

– None

  • Off –label drug use

– Mirena IUD – Gabapentin – Effexor – Clonidine

Problems in Peri- Postmenopausal Women

  • Abnormal uterine bleeding
  • Vasomotor symptoms
  • Genital atrophy
  • Decrease in skin collagen
  • Rapid bone loss
  • Increase in coronary heart disease
  • Increase in Alzheimer’s disease
slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/19/2018 2

Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT) over the decades

1966 “Feminine Forever” 1980’s – cohort and case/control Studies – support MHT reduces CHD and osteoporosis 1992 – American College of Physicians Recommends MHT to prevent CHD 1995 PEPI trial 2002 WHI – E+P 2004 WHI - ERT 2015 ELITE

WHI vs. Observational studies

Manson JE, et al. 2006; 13:139

Patient Characteristics: Age the “timing” hypothesis

  • Grodstein et al. J Womens Health 2006

– Nurse’s Health Study: evaluating time from menopause – women near menopause reduced CV risk (RR 0.66 CI: 0.54-0.80)

  • Manson et al. NEJM 2007

– WHI: coronary calcium – women 50-59, coronary calcium score lower in women on ET vs. placebo (OR 0.69 CI: 0.48-0.98)

  • ELITE Trial – Hodus HN 2015

– Protection from CIMT changes in younger women

Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study (DOPS)

  • 1006 women
  • Randomized 45-58 years, last vaginal

bleeding 3-24 months prior to enrollment and increased FSH

  • Randomized, open-label, trial of estrogen

(2mg daily), triphasic estradiol + norethisterone (uterus) vs. no treatment

Schierbeck LL, BMJ 2012

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/19/2018 3

DOPS - 2012

Schierbeck LL, BMJ 2012

DOPS - 2012

  • At 10 years, reduced overall mortality
  • Reduced heart failure, MI
  • No “apparent” increased risk cancer,

VTE

Breast Cancer

Risk Factors

  • Low body weight
  • High mammographic breast density
  • Late menopause

Breast Cancer Risk Factors

  • Was there truly a “protective” effect of

estrogen in the E-only arm – WHI?

  • Estrogen

– Role of estrogen deprivation

  • Whether natural or via anti-estrogens

(tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitors)

– Estrogen as a pro-apoptotic

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/19/2018 4

Breast Cancer The ‘Gap’ Hypothesis

  • Starting estrogen remote from menopause

decreases risk while treatment within 2 years increases breast cancer risk

  • The ‘gap hypothesis’ and the ‘timing

hypothesis’ are thus in conflict

Breast Cancer

Risk Factors

  • Low body weight
  • High mammographic breast density
  • Late menopause
  • Starting close to menopause
  • 2 years after stopping HRT – risk

equivalent to never users

Role of Progestational Agents

  • Gompel, Climacteric 2018

– Estrogen alone lowest risk

  • Not indicated with uterus in situ

– Synthetic progestins higher risk

  • Higher affinity for glucocorticoid receptor
  • Also androgen receptor and mineralocorticoid

– Natural progesterone risk lowest

The “Menopausal Syndrome”

  • Epidemiological Studies: proximity to

menopause, not associated with aging, relieved with estrogen

– Vasomotor Symptoms – Vaginal dryness/dyspareunia – Difficulty sleeping/insomnia – Mood and depression – Changes in cognitive function

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/19/2018 5

Trouble Sleeping by Cycle Day

Kravitz, H. M. et al. Arch Intern Med

Hot Flashes worsen Sleep

  • 20 healthy premenopausal women

receiving GnRHa

  • 80% concordance between

subjective/objective VMS (sVMS/oVMS)

  • Sleep efficiency (actigraphy) worse with
  • VMS, quality worse with sVMS

(questionnaire)

Joffe H, Menopause 2013 PMID 23481119

Duration of VMS

Avis, NE: JAMA Int Med 2015

Verbal Memory

Decrement in immediate (A) and delayed (B) verbal recall Epperson JCEM 2013

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/19/2018 6

Adjusted OR for CES-D > 16 Across Menopausal Transition

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Pre Early Peri Late Peri Post HT Users

Bromberger, J Affect Disord 2007

Estradiol and Depressive Disorders

(Soares et al., Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:529)

  • 50 perimenopausal women aged 40-55 with irregular

menstrual periods and FSH > 25 IU/L meeting criteria for major depressive, dysthymic, or minor depressive disorder by DSM-IV blindly randomized to transdermal estradiol (0.1 mg) or placebo for 12 wks

  • Remission of depression observed in 17 of 25 (68%)
  • n E2 and 5% on placebo
  • Regardless of DSM-IV diagnosis, subjects responded

similarly to E2

Estrogen for Depression Prevention

Gordon, J JAMA Psychiatry 2018

Estrogen and the Brain

  • Direct effects

– Enhances synaptic plasticity, neurite growth, hippocampal neurogenesis and long-term potentiation (memory) – Protects against apoptosis and neural injury – Stimulates aceytlcholine (memory), serotonin, noradrenalin – Decrease deposition of b-amyloid – Promotes morphological and electrophysiological correlates of learning and memory

  • Indirect effects

– Vasculature – Immune system

NIA – Frontiers proposal – Bench to Bedside Estrogen as a case-study (2009)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/19/2018 7

Estrogen and the Brain

  • Alzheimer Disease

– Early and consistent symptom – loss of episodic memory (failing to recall appointments and events) – In the laboratory: estrogen reduces the formation of b-amyloid formation and diminishes hyperphosphorylation of tau protein

Estrogen and the Brain Alzheimer Disease

  • Observational studies suggest protection
  • Meta-analyses suggest risk reduction of

approximately 1/3

  • Contradicted by the WHIMS trial (ages 65-79)

– Risk of dementia increased two-fold with combined HRT – Impact noted within a few years, suggesting impact primarily on the vasculature – Past history of use associated with lowered incident risk of dementia (including Alzheimer Disease)

  • Initiation in older women WITH disease is not

beneficial

U.S Preventative Task Force

Gartlehner, JAMA 2017 Gross D, JAMA 2017

Long-term risk/benefit

Holm M, BJOG 2018

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/19/2018 8

Endocrine Society 2010 Endocrine Society 2010 Current Thinking

  • Estrogen most effective treatment
  • Bio-identical hormones

– no more effective – no evidence for improved safety

  • BZA/CE comparative efficacy

– Thromboembolic risk comparative – Long-term data lacking

Current Thinking

  • Best treatment population

– Young women < 60 years of age – < 10 years from menopause

  • Individualization

– Personal preference – Baseline risk – Characteristics of MHT (route, type, dose)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/19/2018 9

“Lowest Dose”

  • Start low

– Decreased stroke risk – Positive effects on symptoms

  • May take longer to document benefit

– Positive effects on bone – Safety re: endometrial protection when unopposed not confirmed – Safety re: CVD not confirmed

Route/Type

  • Blood pressure – impaired endothelial function

– Small impact of oral; no impact for transdermal – beneficial impact suggested with estradiol and drospirenone

  • Metabolic syndrome – menopause diabetogenic

– Reduced DM and insulin resistance with estrogen – Advantage of natural progesterone/non-androgenic progestins (drospeirenone, dydrogesterone)

Route/Type

  • CVD

– CRP – increased with oral and not transdermal; worsening affect with MPA – MMP-9 – increased by oral and not by transdermal – “first pass” effect on the liver (lipids) – endothelial function - improved with both (inhibited by MPA and NET)

  • Thromboembolic events (case-control study)

– Increased risk with oral – No increase with transdermal

Route/Type

  • Neuroprotection

– No differences available between oral and transdermal

  • Breast cancer

– No differences available between oral and transdermal – Increased risk with combined progestational agent

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/19/2018 10

Route

  • Transdermal

– Less negative effect on surrogate markers

  • Clotting factors, TG, CRP

– Decrease stroke risk – Decreased CV risk – not well documented

  • Vaginal

– For local symptoms

Type

  • Progestogen

– Daily combined vs. cyclical

  • Improved protection re: endometrial cancer
  • Increased breast cancer risk

– MPA vs. progesterone

  • Stroke risk: Progesterone < MPA

Mirena for Uterine Protection

Jareid M, Gynecol Oncol 2018

Duration

  • 3-5 years
  • Stopping guidelines

– Breast cancer risk after combined continuous for 7 years – Bone loss will resume – Vasomotor and vaginal symptoms may return

  • Long-term treatment
slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/19/2018 11

Impact of Stopping HT

MikolaTS 2015 JCEM

Impact of Stopping HT

MikolaTS 2015 JCEM Venetkoski M 2017 Menopause

Non-hormonal Alternatives

  • SSRI and SNRI have modest effect

– Avoid paroxetine with tamoxifen

  • Gabapentin equally effective to estrogen

– ER may have less side effects

  • Clonidine

– No comparative trials with estrogen – High side effect profile

Vaginal Relief – new alternatives

  • Ospemifene

– SERM – local effect on vaginal tissue – Minimal increase endometrial thickness – no histological changes – Neutral breast – Possible positive bone effect (bone markers) – Possible increased stroke risk

Archer DF, Menopause 2014

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10/19/2018 12

Behavioral therapy

  • Yoga appears in early studies to have

some benefit

  • Mindfulness, avoidance of triggers and

relaxation may offer benefit to some

  • New studies evaluating cognitive

behavioral therapy with reduction in sleep disturbances and depression

Individualization

  • Risk profile
  • Symptom profile
  • Patient preferences

Assess Risk

  • CV Risk

– http://my.americanheart.org/cvriskcalculator

  • Stroke Risk

– Bushnell, Annals Int Med 2014

  • Breast Cancer Risk

– http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/ – Discuss SERM if 5-year risk > 3% – First degree relative, BRCA+, personal history of biopsy with atypia

Assess Risk

  • Osteoporosis Risk

– http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.aspx?country=9

  • NAMS decision support tool

– Menopause 22(3): 247-253, 2014 – MenoPro App

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10/19/2018 13

Type – new alternatives

  • Combination – estrogen + SERM

– CEE 0.45mg + Bazedoxifene (BZA) 20mg – Vasomotor symptom relief – Vaginal symptom relief – Bone protection – albeit < MHT – Favorable lipid profiles – No adverse risk to bone/endometrium – No long-term studies of events

Lobo RA, Fertil Steril Pinkerton JV, J Women’s Health 2014 Pinkerton JV, JCEM 2014

Type – New combination therapies

  • Activella: E2 1mg + NETA 0.5mg daily
  • Femhrt: EE 5 mcg + NET 1mg daily
  • Ortho-prefest: E2 1mg + norgestimate

0.09mg

– Alternate 3 days unopposed E2 with combination

  • Combi-patch

– E2 with LVG or NETA