Computational Methods for Automated Generation of Enzyme Mutants - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

computational methods for automated generation of enzyme
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Computational Methods for Automated Generation of Enzyme Mutants - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Computational Methods for Automated Generation of Enzyme Mutants Kasper Primdal Lauritzen Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen June 25, 2012 Slide 1/10 Outline 1 Backgound 2 Methods 3 Results 4 Outlook Kasper Primdal Lauritzen


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Computational Methods for Automated Generation of Enzyme Mutants

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen

Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen

June 25, 2012 — Slide 1/10

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

1 Backgound 2 Methods 3 Results 4 Outlook

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 2/10

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

Goal

Get from WT structure to activity estimate of mutants in an automated process.

Model

Candida Antarctica lipase B (CalB). An esterase, tested for amidase activity.

Evaluation

Interpolation between ES and TI states. Rough estimate, points to promising candidates.

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 3/10

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methods

3 central steps

  • Structure Preparation
  • Mutating
  • Interpolation / Evaluation

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 4/10

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methods

Structure Preparation

Crystal Structure obtained from PDB (1LBS)

Preparation steps

  • Crystal Waters
  • Protonation
  • Substrate Placement
  • Initial Optimization

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 5/10

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methods

Substrate Placement

R2 R1 O N H Nε2 HNδ1 H Oγ Nε2 H HNδ1 R1 R2 N H O Oγ ES TI TS

His224 Ser105 Substrate His224 His224 Ser105 Ser105 Substrate Substrate

H Nε2 HNδ1 R1 R2 H O N Oγ

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 6/10

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methods

Mutation

  • PyMOL has a library of rotamers for each amino acid.
  • Loop over each rotamer, optimize with PyMOL and

evaluate energy with MOPAC.

  • Choose rotamer with lowest energy as canonical mutant.
  • Place mutant in TI structure and optimize
  • Generate ES from optimized TI

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 7/10

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Methods

Interpolation

  • 10 interpolation frames to represent the reaction scheme.
  • Constrain the position of Ser105 Oγ and the substrate

carbonyl carbon in each frame.

  • Optimize the remaining structure
  • Evaluate the energy of each frame.

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 8/10

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results

Time Requirements

  • A more strict initial optimization does not result in

faster mutant optimizations.

  • A single mutant optimization can be done in roughly 24

hours.

Wildtype L140K L140R L140N L140Q 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Optimization time

WT vs. mutants

GNORM=5 GNORM=2

T i m e i n d a y s Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 9/10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Outlook

  • Link MOPAC with each script (!)
  • Try every mutation
  • Multi-fold mutations
  • Automatic interpolation evaluation

Kasper Primdal Lauritzen (Dept. of Chemistry) — Automated Enzyme Mutation — June 25, 2012 — Slide 10/10