computable dyadic subbases
play

Computable dyadic subbases Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Second - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Computable dyadic subbases Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Second Workshop on Mathematical Logic and its Applications 5-9 March 2018, Kanazawa Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 1 / 24 What is atomic


  1. Computable dyadic subbases Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Second Workshop on Mathematical Logic and its Applications 5-9 March 2018, Kanazawa Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 1 / 24

  2. What is atomic information? Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  3. What is atomic information? Yes No Boolean Values { 0 , 1 } = 0 1 Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  4. What is atomic information? Yes No Boolean Values { 0 , 1 } = 0 1 ◮ ψ : ⊆ { 0 , 1 } ω → X : { 0 , 1 } ω -representation (partial surjective map from { 0 , 1 } ω to X ). Foundation of TTE theory [Weihrauch,...]. Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  5. What is atomic information? Yes No Boolean Values { 0 , 1 } = 0 1 ◮ ψ : ⊆ { 0 , 1 } ω → X : { 0 , 1 } ω -representation (partial surjective map from { 0 , 1 } ω to X ). Foundation of TTE theory [Weihrauch,...]. 1 Yes = Sierpinski Space S ⊥ Undefined Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  6. What is atomic information? Yes No Boolean Values { 0 , 1 } = 0 1 ◮ ψ : ⊆ { 0 , 1 } ω → X : { 0 , 1 } ω -representation (partial surjective map from { 0 , 1 } ω to X ). Foundation of TTE theory [Weihrauch,...]. 1 Yes = Sierpinski Space S ⊥ Undefined → S ω : embedding into S ω (= P ω ). ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ⋆ Every second countable space ( X , ( B n ) n ∈ N ) can be embedded into S ω by ϕ ( x )( n ) = 1 iff x ∈ B n . Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  7. What is atomic information? Yes No Boolean Values { 0 , 1 } = 0 1 ◮ ψ : ⊆ { 0 , 1 } ω → X : { 0 , 1 } ω -representation (partial surjective map from { 0 , 1 } ω to X ). Foundation of TTE theory [Weihrauch,...]. 1 Yes = Sierpinski Space S ⊥ Undefined → S ω : embedding into S ω (= P ω ). ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ⋆ Every second countable space ( X , ( B n ) n ∈ N ) can be embedded into S ω by ϕ ( x )( n ) = 1 iff x ∈ B n . ◮ ψ : ⊆ S ω → X : S ω -representation. Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  8. What is atomic information? Yes No Boolean Values { 0 , 1 } = 0 1 ◮ ψ : ⊆ { 0 , 1 } ω → X : { 0 , 1 } ω -representation (partial surjective map from { 0 , 1 } ω to X ). Foundation of TTE theory [Weihrauch,...]. 1 Yes = Sierpinski Space S ⊥ Undefined → S ω : embedding into S ω (= P ω ). ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ⋆ Every second countable space ( X , ( B n ) n ∈ N ) can be embedded into S ω by ϕ ( x )( n ) = 1 iff x ∈ B n . ◮ ψ : ⊆ S ω → X : S ω -representation. ⋆ A S ω -embedding ϕ induces a S ω -representation ϕ − 1 . Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  9. What is atomic information? Yes No Boolean Values { 0 , 1 } = 0 1 ◮ ψ : ⊆ { 0 , 1 } ω → X : { 0 , 1 } ω -representation (partial surjective map from { 0 , 1 } ω to X ). Foundation of TTE theory [Weihrauch,...]. 1 Yes = Sierpinski Space S ⊥ Undefined → S ω : embedding into S ω (= P ω ). ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ⋆ Every second countable space ( X , ( B n ) n ∈ N ) can be embedded into S ω by ϕ ( x )( n ) = 1 iff x ∈ B n . ◮ ψ : ⊆ S ω → X : S ω -representation. ⋆ A S ω -embedding ϕ induces a S ω -representation ϕ − 1 . ⋆ Enumeration-based { 0 , 1 } ω -representation ψ S ω : ⊆ { 0 , 1 } ω → S ω . A S ω -representation ψ induces a { 0 , 1 } ω -representation ψ S ω ◦ ψ . Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 2 / 24

  10. Yes No 0 1 = Plotkin’s T ⊥ Undefined Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 3 / 24

  11. Yes No 0 1 = Plotkin’s T ⊥ Undefined → T ω : embedding into T ω . ◮ ϕ : X ֒ Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 3 / 24

  12. Yes No 0 1 = Plotkin’s T ⊥ Undefined → T ω : embedding into T ω . ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X : T ω -representation. ⋆ A T ω -embedding ϕ induces a T ω -representation ϕ − 1 . Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 3 / 24

  13. Yes No 0 1 = Plotkin’s T ⊥ Undefined → T ω : embedding into T ω . ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X : T ω -representation. ⋆ A T ω -embedding ϕ induces a T ω -representation ϕ − 1 . However, T can be encoded in S × S ◮ T can be embed into S × S (0 �→ (1 , ⊥ ) , 1 �→ ( ⊥ , 1) , ⊥ �→ ( ⊥ , ⊥ )). ◮ ι : T ω ֒ → S ω . Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 3 / 24

  14. Yes No 0 1 = Plotkin’s T ⊥ Undefined → T ω : embedding into T ω . ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X : T ω -representation. ⋆ A T ω -embedding ϕ induces a T ω -representation ϕ − 1 . However, T can be encoded in S × S ◮ T can be embed into S × S (0 �→ (1 , ⊥ ) , 1 �→ ( ⊥ , 1) , ⊥ �→ ( ⊥ , ⊥ )). ◮ ι : T ω ֒ → S ω . Therefore, → T ω induces an embedding ι ◦ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ϕ : X ֒ → S ω . ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X induces a S ω -representation ψ ◦ ι − 1 : ⊆ S ω → X . ◮ They indue { 0 , 1 } ω -representations. Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 3 / 24

  15. Yes No 0 1 = Plotkin’s T ⊥ Undefined → T ω : embedding into T ω . ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X : T ω -representation. ⋆ A T ω -embedding ϕ induces a T ω -representation ϕ − 1 . However, T can be encoded in S × S ◮ T can be embed into S × S (0 �→ (1 , ⊥ ) , 1 �→ ( ⊥ , 1) , ⊥ �→ ( ⊥ , ⊥ )). ◮ ι : T ω ֒ → S ω . Therefore, → T ω induces an embedding ι ◦ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ϕ : X ֒ → S ω . ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X induces a S ω -representation ψ ◦ ι − 1 : ⊆ S ω → X . ◮ They indue { 0 , 1 } ω -representations. If X is represented over T ω , then X is also represented over { 0 , 1 } ω . Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 3 / 24

  16. Yes No 0 1 = Plotkin’s T ⊥ Undefined → T ω : embedding into T ω . ◮ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X : T ω -representation. ⋆ A T ω -embedding ϕ induces a T ω -representation ϕ − 1 . However, T can be encoded in S × S ◮ T can be embed into S × S (0 �→ (1 , ⊥ ) , 1 �→ ( ⊥ , 1) , ⊥ �→ ( ⊥ , ⊥ )). ◮ ι : T ω ֒ → S ω . Therefore, → T ω induces an embedding ι ◦ ϕ : X ֒ ◮ ϕ : X ֒ → S ω . ◮ ψ : ⊆ T ω → X induces a S ω -representation ψ ◦ ι − 1 : ⊆ S ω → X . ◮ They indue { 0 , 1 } ω -representations. If X is represented over T ω , then X is also represented over { 0 , 1 } ω . Why do we study T ω -representation? Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 3 / 24

  17. Why T ω -representation? Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 4 / 24

  18. Why T ω -representation? T ω is more close to the space, so some information of the space can be reflected into the representation. ◮ Every n -dimensional second countable metrizable space can be embed n , which is a subspace of T ω with up to n copies of ⊥ [T 2002]. into T ω Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 4 / 24

  19. Why T ω -representation? T ω is more close to the space, so some information of the space can be reflected into the representation. ◮ Every n -dimensional second countable metrizable space can be embed n , which is a subspace of T ω with up to n copies of ⊥ [T 2002]. into T ω Order structures ( T , � ) and ( T ω , � ). ◮ Natural representation of a space with order. 0 1 ⊥ ⊥ Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 4 / 24

  20. Why T ω -representation? T ω is more close to the space, so some information of the space can be reflected into the representation. ◮ Every n -dimensional second countable metrizable space can be embed n , which is a subspace of T ω with up to n copies of ⊥ [T 2002]. into T ω Order structures ( T , � ) and ( T ω , � ). ◮ Natural representation of a space with order. Contains { 0 , 1 } ω as top elements. ◮ Sub-structure of the space can be represented with { 0 , 1 } ω . 0 1 ⊥ ⊥ Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 4 / 24

  21. Why T ω -representation? T ω is more close to the space, so some information of the space can be reflected into the representation. ◮ Every n -dimensional second countable metrizable space can be embed n , which is a subspace of T ω with up to n copies of ⊥ [T 2002]. into T ω Order structures ( T , � ) and ( T ω , � ). ◮ Natural representation of a space with order. Contains { 0 , 1 } ω as top elements. ◮ Sub-structure of the space can be represented with { 0 , 1 } ω . A bottomed sequence is an unspecified sequence. ◮ 10 ⊥ 10 .. = { 10010 .., 10110 ... } . 0 1 ⊥ ⊥ Arno Pauly and Hideki Tsuiki Computable dyadic subbases Kanazawa, March 2018 4 / 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend