Complicated Sensory Systems ACCESSING AAC Brenda Del Monte MA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
complicated sensory systems accessing aac
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Complicated Sensory Systems ACCESSING AAC Brenda Del Monte MA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 04, 2023 237 likes •591 views

Complicated Sensory Systems ACCESSING AAC Brenda Del Monte MA CCC-SLP Gina Norris OTR/L Melanie Conatser OTR/L As of 2018 There are nearly 1.7 million children who have enrolled in the Medicaid Childrens Health Insurance Program

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Complicated Sensory Systems ACCESSING AAC

Brenda Del Monte MA CCC-SLP Gina Norris OTR/L Melanie Conatser OTR/L

slide-2
SLIDE 2

As of 2018

  • There are nearly 1.7 million children who have enrolled in

the Medicaid Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) in Arizona.

  • This is an increase of more than 40% since 2013. Medicaid

provides Assistive Technology (AT) device coverage when states support the acquisition of the equipment.

  • Arizona has consistently elected the 1915(i) benefit of the

Home and Community Based State Plan Option and provides medically necessary AT assessments, equipment, and training through AHCCCS, it’s own unique expression of Medicaid.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)

  • AAC devices are often necessary when individuals with

disabilities require an alternative or assistive means of communication.

  • These devices serve as a voice for those who are not able to

speak in a way that others can understand them.

  • AAC devices are covered by AHCCCS and there are currently

5 entities that were awarded contracts to evaluate and recommend devices for the state of Arizona.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AZ is special

  • Arizona is less exclusive than other states (in

terms of evaluations and viable candidates).

– For example, some teams will not recommend AAC for

those with CVI

  • This reflects lack of knowledge of CVI, rather than the

ability of the non verbal client

– Others do not refer those that can’t use their hands for

direct select

  • Again, this has to do of the lack of understanding

alternative access

– Verbal clients are often excluded from a referral for AAC

without analysis of the effectiveness of their verbal speech

– In AZ, the SLP is allowed to include an OT

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Our Study

  • AAC research often examines single device access method,

diagnosis specific communication, single case studies or a single language system.

  • This study looked at data from over 180 deidentified AAC

evaluations that were conducted in the state of Arizona in 2017 in an effort to better understand how multiple diagnoses impact AAC recommendations.

  • The results demonstrated the importance of a specialist in

the areas of vision, visual perception delays, complex motor systems, delayed sensory systems and dual sensory delays.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Age

  • 43% between the ages of 2-5
  • 23% between the ages of 6-8
slide-7
SLIDE 7

When is vision fully developed? Depth perception? Who is trained on motor and vision development?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Diagnosis

  • 41% Autism
  • 24% Seizure Disorders
  • 20% Cerebral Palsy
  • 19% Cognitive Impairment
  • 13% Down Syndrome
  • 7% chromosomal abnormality
  • 5% premature (less than 35 weeks)
  • 2% Developmental Delay
  • 42% had OTHER diagnosis even more rare than the

above categories This adds up to way more to 100% due to dual diagnosis

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Diagnosis

  • 52% have a dual diagnosis
  • Why so many diagnosis?

– Do they qualify for more services? – Does it get them a better school placement? – Do those looking at AAC have complicated bodies? – Are SLPs alone qualified to assess alternative communication?

Diagnosis

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 41% had the autism diagnosis
  • 33% of those were a dual diagnosis
  • What does that mean?

– Complicated sensory and motor systems qualify for the autism diagnosis – In some cases there is no way to differentially diagnosis the source of a deficit

Autism Diagnosis

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Let’s take a look at these complicated bodies

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Vision

  • 50% had vision within functional limits
  • This makes a vision impairment a higher

incidence than Autism

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Talk Points

  • Why is this important?

– We nee a professional in on this

  • Who studies the development of the vision

system as it relates to motor?

– Occupational therapists

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Vision Continued

  • 12% CVI

– All evaluators must understand more about this diagnosis

  • 12% Strabismus
  • 4% Astigmatism
  • 11% nearsighted
  • 7% farsighted
  • 22% have glasses
  • 8% have glasses but won’t wear

them

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hearing

  • 80% have hearing within functional limits
  • 70% of those with hearing issues also have

visual impairments

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Talk Points

  • Who is trained in looking at dual sensory loss?

– Occupational Therapists

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sensory and Self Regulation

  • 62% report deficits in this area

Calming

;...,;.;.........,-'

T

  • '

e-'-, chniques

S EU:· REGUlATJON

~

  • :;,:

Thinking '-.::::

~

Strategies,.,/

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Talk Points

  • What percentage can focus, motor plan, attend,

access AAC better with a sensory diet?

  • Who addresses and is trained in sensory and self

regulation? Occupational Therapists

– 43% present with sensory seeking behaviors which can look like stimming on the device – 47% can be easily over stimulates which should be considered when selecting number of buttons on a screen

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Talk Points

  • What percentage can focus, motor plan, attend,

access AAC better with a sensory diet?

  • Who addresses and is trained in sensory and self

regulation? Occupational Therapists

– 43% present with sensory seeking behaviors which can look like stimming on the device – 47% can be easily over stimulates which should be considered when selecting number of buttons on a screen

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Upper Extremity Use

  • 60% were found to be within

normal limits

  • 23% decreased strength –

access could be fatiguing if not positioned appropriately

  • 12% Limited Use
  • 4% No Functional Use of Upper

Extremities

When a person is resistant to using AAC all day long, who is looking at the role of upper extremity use? – Occupational therapists

  • ,...,

; ,c > .

  • • ~

:_~

  • ......

Upper Extremity

Weight Bearing

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Ambulation

  • 68% Walk independently
  • 32% don’t – which means they have

equipment to physically support them

  • 27% (48/181) required mounting equipment
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Communication

  • How are we measuring receptive language skills?

– 57% can follow one step directions – 36% can follow two step directions – Total: 93% report ability to follow directions within motor ability

  • Facial expression may be a more obvious indicator of

receptive language but it is VERY difficult to measure

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Verbal Ability

  • 2% had the diagnosis of apraxia

– Is this under diagnosed and possibly therefore undertreated?

  • 28% have intelligibility less than 80%
  • 6% report echolalia
  • Are we under referring those that repeat

lagnuage by calling echolalia “language”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

So what does AAC look like in these complicated bodies?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Touch Access Method

  • 87% were able to use touch access (158)
  • 32% required a keyguard for accurate access

(50)

  • 34% required the red upon selection feature

to meet visual and/or sensory needs (53)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Alternative Access

  • Switches 3%

– (6 total- 4 head switches; 1 with hand; 1 with finger) – 66% could not hit the switch with their hand

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Talk Points

  • Why do SLPs and teachers do hand over hand with

switches? Let’s find individual switch sites – with your OT?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Eye Gaze / Headpointing

  • Eye Gaze – 9% (16 total)

– 56% have vision issues (9/16) – One even legally Blind

  • Headpointing – 1% (1 total)

– Possibly due to activation even when eyes are closed makes this access method seem less reliable

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Layouts

Out of the 178 who qualified for a communication device

  • 18% started at 2-9 buttons (32)
  • 43% (77) started between 15-20 buttons
  • 15% started between 24-42 buttons
  • 24% (42) started at 60 or more buttons
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Over 80% started with 15 or more buttons.

[1] j~1

£""'~

·

<j_

~ •i &

e

. - . ~

  • ..

)

,.. -~ ....... ~ , . ~ 'o'ammo·

G 4 ~

~.

O},S(9~

!1~1-1

ll))

  • ~

~

,A'"'"'-6

~

;· ,

  • ;~

.

~ ~

riJ

WORDS

  • •

Up

  • -..

~

  • ·- -

~

  • M
  • .

ei

~;;

  • .I,?
  • l. E:l
  • ~

~,

~

=- ~ 1

~

, ~

!t ~

~

?

,.c,c-,

e,s

.

~., @

la

y~

~

.

·(:\.

~

..

,, l ~

  • '

(J -:i -

t.,1 el '' •

~ 9

  • •

t1ll !

S tf 6 lo ~

14

.n

Q

a q/ -b:J> ~

l!L '1 !I! ~

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Who did qualify?

  • Everyone with a motor impairment qualified
  • Everyone who had a vision impairment qualified
  • Everyone with a hearing impairment qualified
  • Everyone with a cognitive impairment qualified
  • Everyone with a language impairment qualified

178 (98%)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Who did NOT qualify?

  • 2% (3 total)
  • Diagnosis – Autism
  • Proficiently Verbal
  • Became engrossed in the device and non

verbal infront of the device

  • In all case, when family saw their child’s

reaction to the device, they do longer wanted the systen

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Who did NOT qualify?

  • An unknown number of people that were

never referred to due to their complicated body

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Preliminary Conclusions

  • An AAC evalautionis more than just

communication

  • Motor Matters
  • Vision Matters
  • Sensory and Self Regulation Matters
  • ACCESS TRUMPS LANGUAGE