competition in two layer
play

Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Sergio Gmez - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Sergio Gmez Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona (Spain) CCS / DOOCN-XI 2018 Thessaloniki Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Outline Motivation Competition dynamics Ground


  1. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Sergio Gómez Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona (Spain) CCS / DOOCN-XI 2018 Thessaloniki

  2. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Outline  Motivation  Competition dynamics  Ground State  Optimization  Results 2

  3. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Structure  Multiplex network 3 3

  4. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks 4 4

  5. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks 5 5

  6. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks 6 6

  7. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks 7 7

  8. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks 8 8

  9. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Dynamics  Individuals can choose between several alternatives 9 9

  10. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Dynamics  Individuals can choose between several alternatives  Using several alternatives at once has a cost 10 10

  11. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Dynamics  Individuals can choose between several alternatives  Using several alternatives at once has a cost  Sharing an alternative with peers is beneficial 11 11

  12. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Dynamics  Individuals can choose between several alternatives  Using several alternatives at once has a cost  Sharing an alternative with peers is beneficial 12 12

  13. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Dynamics  Individuals can choose between several alternatives  Using several alternatives at once has a cost  Sharing an alternative with peers is beneficial 13 13

  14. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Dynamics  Individuals can choose between several alternatives  Using several alternatives at once has a cost  Sharing an alternative with peers is beneficial benefit benefit cost 14 14

  15. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Dynamics  Individuals can choose between several alternatives  Using several alternatives at once has a cost  Sharing an alternative with peers is beneficial benefit benefit cost Competition between layers 15 15

  16. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Structure Interconnected Multiplex multilayer network network 16

  17. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Mathematical description  Adjacency (or weights) tensor node i in layer a connects to node j in layer b  De Domenico et al: Mathematical formulation of multilayer networks Physical Review X 3 (2013) 041022 17 17

  18. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Mathematical description  Supra-adjacency matrix adjacency (or weights) matrix of layer a  interaction matrix between layers a and b  Solé-Ribalta et al: Spectral properties of the Laplacian of multiplex networks Physical Review E 88 (2013) 032807 18 18

  19. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Mathematical description  Supra-adjacency matrix multiplex network adjacency (or weights) matrix of layer a  interaction strength between layers a and b  Solé-Ribalta et al: Spectral properties of the Laplacian of multiplex networks Physical Review E 88 (2013) 032807 19 19

  20. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Mathematical description  Supra-adjacency matrix multiplex network adjacency (or weights) matrix of layer a  interaction strength between layers a and b   Hypotheses  All nodes same interlayer strength  No self-loops  Symmetry Solé-Ribalta et al: Spectral properties of the Laplacian of multiplex networks Physical Review E 88 (2013) 032807 20 20

  21. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Mathematical description  Two-layer multiplex networks Gómez et al: Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks Physical Review Letters 110 (2013) 028701 21 21

  22. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Related dynamics  Diffusion in multiplex networks Laplacian Diffusion time 22

  23. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Results  Superdiffusion! Gómez et al: Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks Physical Review Letters 110 (2013) 028701 23 23

  24. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Results  Superdiffusion! Solé-Ribalta et al: Spectral properties of the Laplacian of multiplex networks Physical Review E 88 (2013) 032807 24 24

  25. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Competition dynamics  Variables probability of node i being active in layer a  25

  26. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Competition  Hamiltonian where Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 26 26

  27. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Competition in two-layer multiplex  Variables  Hamiltonian Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 27 27

  28. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Competition in two-layer multiplex Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 28 28

  29. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Competition in two-layer multiplex Minimum value when all p i = 1 Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 29 29

  30. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Competition in two-layer multiplex Minimum value when all p i = 0 Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 30 30

  31. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Competition in two-layer multiplex Minimum value when all p i = 0.5 Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 31 31

  32. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Magnetization  All p i = 1 M = +1 All nodes in first layer  All p i = 0.5 M = 0 All nodes equally in all layers  All p i = 0 M = -1 All nodes in second layer Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 32 32

  33. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Ground state  Minimize with the constraints solution inside the hypercube Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 33

  34. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks Ground state Quadratic programming problem  Minimize with the constraints solution inside the hypercube Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 34

  35. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Gradient  Zero gradient equation  Hessian Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 35 35

  36. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Ground state conditions  If inside and Hessian positive definite is feasible solution  is the ground state   Else  Ground state lies in one side of the hypercube  If Hessian not positive definite NP-hard problem Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 36 36

  37. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Asymptotic limits  When  When Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 37 37

  38. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Asymptotic limits  When Other terms negligible Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 38 38

  39. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Asymptotic limits  When Minimum value when M = 0 Other terms negligible all p i = 0.5 Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 39 39

  40. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Asymptotic limits  When Other term negligible Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 40 40

  41. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Asymptotic limits  When If s ( 1 ) > s ( 2 ) M = +1 If s ( 1 ) < s ( 2 ) M = -1 Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 41 41

  42. Competition in two-layer multiplex networks  Asymptotic limits Localized activity in Mixed activity in first layer all layers (supposing s ( 1 ) > s ( 2 ) ) Gómez-Gardeñes et al: Layer-layer competition in multiplex complex networks Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2015) 20150117 42 42

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend