Comparison and Interaction Now and Future as China Economist Surveys - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Comparison and Interaction Now and Future as China Economist Surveys - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Chinese-US Economies in Comparison and Interaction Now and Future as China Economist Surveys Key outcome of the 19 th CPC National Congress: Chinese society's principal contradiction has changed 40 yeas ago: the ever-growing material and
Key outcome of the 19th CPC National Congress: Chinese society's principal contradiction has changed
40 yeas ago: the ever-growing material and cultural needs of
the people VS the low level of social production
Today : the people's ever-growing need for a better life VS
unbalanced and inadequate development
2
better life unbalanced and inadequate development Green growth no absolute poverty Industry upgrade
Xi Jinping at the 19th CPC National Congress: “the principal contradiction now facing Chinese society is between unbalanced and inadequate development and the people's ever-growing needs for a better life”
HCRAI explains China’s growth story : (Human Capital tal Relati ative vely ly Ad Advanc nced ed Inve vest stmen ent t )
Both countries have made great achievements during 1950-2014 in economy and social development. Both countries invest persistently in human capital, both care about social fairness and human development level.
China China India India
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
per capita GDP
CHINA INDIA
HDI Comparison of Sub-indexes
4
China caught up with India in terms
- f education index
in 1950s and the gap tends to widen. China’s longevity index surpassed India’s since 1960s. China’s per capita GDP surpassed India‘s until 1992, and gradually widened after 2000.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
EIc EIi
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
LIc LIi
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
IIc IIi
5
Contents
Perception of China - US Competitiveness Perception of Economic Development Gaps between China and the US Assessment of the Future Economic Development Tendency of China and the US Recommendations on Future Development of the World
The Survey about China-US Economic Futures
To learn about how economists perceive the industrial competitiveness of China and the US, we conducted a survey by distributing questionnaires to the e-mail addresses on China Economist's contact list and China Economist WeChat public platform from May 9 to May 18, 2017.
6 China's eastern region 70% central region 18% western region 10%
- verseas
2% universitie s 69% research institutes 14% enterprise s and governme nt agencies 17%
In this survey, we collected 131 valid questionnaires from universities (69.2%),research institutes (14%) and enterprises and government agencies (16.8%). According to the 127 valid questionnaires in which respondents indicated their regions, economists participating in this survey are from China's eastern region (70.1%), central region (18.1%), western region(10.2%) and overseas (1.6%).
China's eastern region 70% central region 18% western region 10%
- verseas
2% universitie s 69% research institutes 14% enterprise s and governme nt agencies 17%
Chinese and US Competitiveness Is Fueled by Different Drivers
The US leads China in terms of talent, creativity, social system, industrial system integrity and financing availability. China leads the US in terms of infrastructure, cost competitiveness and government driving force, which is reflected in China's unique industrial competitiveness under the leadership of a strong government
8
US is fuelled by talent, creativity and financing availability. Chinese is fuelled by government driving force, infrastructure and cost competitiveness
Technical Capacity and Cost Are Respectively the Biggest Barriers to Competitiveness Improvement for China and the US
In our survey, economists believed that rising cost (49.6%) and export restrictions (20%) are important barriers to the improvement of industrial competitiveness for the US, whereas inadequate technology (44%), the lack of brand influence (23.2%), surging cost pressures (16%), insufficient national image and cultural influence (12.8%) are the key barriers to the improvement o f industrial competitiveness for China.
9
10
Contents
Perception of Competitiveness of China –Us Perception of Economic Development Gaps between China -US Assessment of the Future Economic Development Tendency of China and the US Recommendations on Future Development of the World
Economists Believed that China's Economy will Grow at 5.2% and the US 2.4% in the Coming Two Decades
Economists forecast that the average growth rate of China's economy in the coming two decades will be 5.2%
Economists forecast that the average growth rate of the US economy in the coming two decades will be 2.4%
11
Economic climate index from previous surveys conducted by China Economist
Chinese economists are optimistic about
the current development of China's economy.
12
China will Catch up with the US in GDP by around 2034 and in per capita GDP by 2077 at the earliest
13
Based on the economic aggregate of China and the US in 2016 and the survey data in Figure 5 above, the result of calculation also indicates that China's economic aggregate will equal the US level during 2033- 2034. It will take over 60 years for China to catch up with the US in per capita GDP.
Economists Believed that China's Manufacturing Technology Will Equal the US Level by around 2045
Economists believed that China's manufacturing technology
will equal the US level by around 2045. In other words, upon the centennial of the founding of the People's Republic of China, China's real economy will stand at the forefront of the world.
14
Economists Believed that the USD/RMB Exchange Rate Will Reach 5.4 or so 20 Years from 6.7 Now
15
With respect to the USD/RMB exchange rate 20 years from now, 40% of respondents believed that it will reach 1:5-7; 36% of respondents believed that it will reach 1:3-5; 20.8% of respondents believed that it will exceed 1:7; and 3.2% of respondents believed that it will stay below 1:3. In summary, the economists forecasted that the mean value of the USD/RMB exchange rate 20 years from now will be about 1:5.4.
16
Contents
Perception of Competitiveness of China –Us Perception of Economic Development Gaps between China -US Assessment of the Future Economic Development Tendency of China and the US Recommendations on Future Development of the World
Over 61% Economists Believed that a China-US Trade War Is Unlikely
With respect to whether a serious trade war is likely to break out
between China and the US in the coming three years, 61.6% of respondents believed that it is unlikely; 16.8% of respondents believed that it is highly likely; and 21.6% of respondents expressed uncertainty.
17
Over 67% of Economists Believed that China- US Trade Enjoys Great Potential
We believe that the confidence of economists on the stability and
potential of China-US trade relations derived from an understanding on the complementarity of economic development
- f the world.
18
With respect to assessment of the growth potential of China- US trade, 67.2% of respondents believed that China and the US are highly complementary in economic development with great growth potential of two-way trade; 27.2% of respondents considered that the complementarity between China and the US in economic development is diminishing and the growth potential of trade is insufficient; and 5.6% of respondents expressed uncertainty.
Economists Believed that China's Debt Is More Sustainable
Hence, economists are more confident in China's debt
sustainability in comparison with the US (faster GDP growth and essentially domestic liabilities).
19
With respect to China's and US's debt sustainability, 35.2% of respondents believed that China's debt is more sustainable; 29.6% of respondents believed that US's debt is more sustainable; and 35.2%
- f respondents
expressed uncertainty.
More Than 81% Economists Believed that China and the US will Cooperate and Compete with Each Other
With respect to assessment of China-US mainstream economic relations
20 years from now, 81.6% of respondents believed that the two countries will create a mutually beneficial relationship where competition and cooperation coexist; 11.2% o f respondents believed that China and the US will become strategic partners; 4.8% of respondents considered that a conflict between China and the US is inevitable in the short run.
21
Contents
Perception of Competitiveness of China –Us Perception of Economic Development Gaps between China -US Assessment of the Future Economic Development Tendency of China and the US Recommendations on Future Development of the World
Key outcome of the 19th CPC National Congress: Chinese society's principal contradiction has changed
40 yeas ago: the ever-growing material and cultural needs of
the people VS the low level of social production
Today : the people's ever-growing need for a better life VS
unbalanced and inadequate development
22
better life unbalanced and inadequate development Green growth no absolute poverty Industry upgrade
Xi Jinping at the 19th CPC National Congress: “the principal contradiction now facing Chinese society is between unbalanced and inadequate development and the people's ever-growing needs for a better life”
- 1. Mutual Trust
It seems that Trump has more fans in China. What do Europeans and Americans think about China?
Chinese believe that different countries have different ways to the future. IF we believe there is only one way to the future, it will be difficult to have policy
- coherence. Confucius(BC551~BC479) : with good will we can have Harmony
without sameness (but we are all wearing the same suits!)
23
With respect to the scoring of economic policy within the first 100 days of Trump's presidency (full score is 5 points), 91.2%
- f respondents gave a rating above the
passable level, among whom 5.6% gave a full score, while only 8.8% of respondents gave a failure rating. Converted into centesimal system, the
- verall rating of Trump's "first 100 days"
in office by economists is about 76.32, which is generally above the global rating
- n Trump's presidency.
- 2. Make Full Use of Each Country’s Advantages
China is facing diminishing low cost competitive
advantage, and will pursue green development. Europe and US will benefit from China’s green growth.
24
- 3. Domestic Dynamics the Most Important
Growth Factor
The Domestic Market will Be Vital to China's Industrial Development. There are still 30 million poor people in China living on less than one dollar a
- day. By 2020, there will be no absolute poverty in China, which will be a great
achievement.
25
With respect to assessment of what kind of industrial policy China will adopt, 60% of respondents believed that China should focus on expanding the market share o f premium domestic products; 24.8% of respondents believed that China should continue to expand its international market share; and 11.2% of respondents expressed uncertainty
Looking forward
Xi Jinping meets Trump
26
China’s wisdom to benefit the world the Belt and Road initiative Opening to the world Carry out the Paris Climate Agreement US First One wall between US and Mexico made only in America withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement It is lucky that the world is a multipolar world today !