Community asset transfer (CAT) and devolution of service delivery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

community asset transfer cat
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Community asset transfer (CAT) and devolution of service delivery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Community asset transfer (CAT) and devolution of service delivery in Wales Prepared by Community Matters : The National Federation of Community Organisations 1 Welcome Introductions House Keeping The way we will work together Handouts 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Community asset transfer (CAT) and devolution of service delivery in Wales

1

Prepared by Community Matters : The National Federation of Community Organisations

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Welcome

2

Introductions House Keeping The way we will work together Handouts

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The National Federation of Community Organisations est. 1945

  • 853 Members including:
  • 749 community organisations
  • 57 Local Federations of Community

Organisations and other local supporting organisations

  • 47 Local Authorities and Housing

Associations

  • Reach : 4.500 + organisations via our

e bulletin

  • 96% manage a community building
  • 56% of buildings owned by LA
  • 25% under £15K turnover
  • Average of £80K turnover
  • Just over half employ staff

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Community Matters Services

  • Free Advice service (phone and email)
  • Legal and Accountancy Clinic
  • Extensive Online information and

guidance sheets, specimen policies and procedures and model documents covering, for example, governance, strategic leadership, financial management, managing an asset, and managing volunteers and employees

  • The VISIBLE

TM Quality Standards and

the PreVISIBLE tool

  • Your Value – our social impact tool
  • A full bespoke consultancy and training

service

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Role of Community Matters

  • Advocate and lead on policy for both national and local government

concerning the community sector, community empowerment, CAT, and preparing for commissioning.

  • Delivery Partner in national programmes including currently the My

Community Rights programme and the new Our Place scheme.

  • Long experience of supporting COs and LAs in negotiation of long leases

and successful CATs

  • Team of expert consultants in field of asset management, business

planning, legal and financial issues, governance, and community empowerment and engagement.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The term ‘Community Asset Transfer’ is defined as ‘where the Council transfers land

  • r buildings into the ownership or

management of a Voluntary and/or Community Sector organisation or social enterprise’’.

6

What is CAT

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Most usual model for asset transfer?

Usually for less than market value

  • 1. Freehold transfer
  • 2. Long Lease – 25+ years

For Community Asset Transfer options 1 and 2 are the normal expectations

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Other forms of asset transfer

  • 3. Short term lease e.g. 10 years
  • 4. A very short term lease – 2-3 years
  • 5. An annual licence

Option 3 may be used e.g. where the building has a short life. Options 4 and 5. Are sometimes used when either party has identified major risks or wants to take an incremental approach and does not want to over commit initially.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Not a format for asset transfer

A Service Level Agreement (SLA)

  • r Management agreement is

not a right to occupy, although it may be a useful adjunct to an

  • ccupation
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Clauses to watch out for within leases

  • Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
  • Break clause

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Asset lock

Freehold transfers or long leases will contain an ‘asset-lock’ - clauses that prevent the asset being assigned or sold on for unintended financial gain and the loss of any agreed community benefits

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Claw back and disposal of agricultural land and change of use

12

  • Claw back applies to freehold transfers
  • The claw-back principle can be applied to enable a

selling owner to bind the buyer and other future

  • wners to pay overage if the land becomes more

valuable as a result of a new use arising from the grant

  • f a future planning permission
  • Disposal of agricultural land and change of use-

Usually applies for more commercially based disposals

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Formats for asset transfer

13

Using CAT handout let us consider the various formats – strengths, weakness and risks If you had the your choice which one would you prefer for your community? Why?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Myth busters

  • Disposal at an undervalue
  • State Aid –applies to both CAT and

service contracts

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The case for local devolution

Offer the prospect of:

Better quality,' joined-up' forms of service delivery based on community priorities.

Local authority main programmes and budgets are better targeted at community needs and priorities.

A territorial focus for crosscutting measures, which emphasise

  • utcomes for citizens.

the opportunity for enhanced community participation and partnerships with local authorities.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Local authority approach to devolution of services

  • Project-specific approaches. Good first approach. The

quickest and easiest way of securing community engagement e.g. small environment projects or play areas.

  • Thematic – e.g. crime and disorder, education, the

environment, and housing management

  • Area-based – wide range of policy areas and service

delivery

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Models for Service Devolution

 Budget comes with the transfer of service.  Total cut in service unless community council take it on.  Partnerships – co-design/co- production.  Do you know of/can you think of any services that might be effected by this?

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Handout. Models for

devolution of services

18

Using the handout let us consider the various formats:

  • Strengths, opportunities, weakness and risks.
  • Is there anything else you would like to add?
  • If you had the your choice which one would

you prefer for your community? Why?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Background for asset transfer and service devolution

 Cuts to local authority funding.  Having to do more, better, for less.  Public assets which have become liabilities.  Difficult decisions re cuts in service delivery – some

  • nly providing what they must because of the

budget cuts  A cost to the community in terms of blight, lost services and lost opportunities

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Policy drivers for CAT and devolution of services

  • 2003 Welsh assembly gives green light

for greater asset transfer to communities

  • Commitment reconfirmed in 2009 –

Social Enterprise Action Plan

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Policy drivers for CAT and devolution of services

21

  • Local Government Act 2000:
  • Drew attention to the role of local authorities

as community leaders

  • Introduced the wide ranging power for L.A.s

to “do anything which they consider is likely to achieve” the promotion of economic, social and environmental well-being of their area to achieve sustainable development

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Policy drivers for CAT and devolution of services

  • Local Govt (Wales) Measure 2011 put community councils on

the same footing as Local Authorities re the power of well being.

  • Welsh govt. set a financial limit re power of well being under

section 137 Local Govt Act.

  • Based on electorate number multiplied by set amount –

changing annually. April 2014 £7.20

  • Note - Williams Commission report advocating reduction in

number of local authorities and amalgamation of community councils in Wales

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Policy drivers for CAT and devolution of services

  • December 2003
  • Rules relaxed re power to transfer an asset at less

than market value.

  • Requirement to gain specific consent of the National

Assembly for Wales no longer required where undervalue is less than £2m

  • BUT local authority has to be satisfied this will help

secure “promotion or improvement of the economic, social or environmental well-being of the area”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Policy drivers for CAT and devolution of services

Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009:

  • give local authorities more power and freedom to respond to local

needs

  • a duty on local councils to promote democracy - putting local

authorities at the forefront of the drive to reconnect people with public and political decision-making.

  • empowering citizens and communities to become involved in the

design and delivery of local public services and improving their communities

  • new rights for the citizen to have more information and influence
  • ver the local decisions
  • new powers to hold politicians and officials to account
slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Policy drivers for CAT and devolution of services

  • Wales Programme for Improvement (WPI) 2002 and

reformed through the Local Government (Wales) Measure 2009.

  • Local authorities are being encouraged to develop a

corporate, strategic approach to service delivery and the use of resources. This could include an asset management strategy and a procurement strategy, both set within the overall vision for the area (the Community Strategy).

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The opportunity

 There is a need to balance the cost of the service or value of the asset to the local authority in pure £’s with the value it does/could bring to the community  Move towards local delivery and control of services

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

The opportunity

 Local people can have a greater say and play a part.  Empowers local communities  Puts local organisations in control  Encourages pride of place  Generates wealth in our communities

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

The opportunity

  • Local organisations often best placed to manage

services and facilities in their local communities

  • It empowers local communities, puts local
  • rganisations in control, encourages pride of place
  • Deliver better services to specifically meet the

needs of the community

  • Local knowledge, use of volunteers and hands-on

management contributes towards community empowerment

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

The potential outcomes

  • Better service to meet the needs of the

community

  • Community engage because it is THEIR

community – it impacts on their lives

  • Sense of ownership power, control and

commitment therefore willingness to take part

  • Lower overheads and better value-for-money
  • More intensive use of any asset.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Requires innovation

  • Reality check - Change can be frightening but

change is happening whether we like it or not and assets and services are threatened

  • Innovation required – being prepared to at

least consider doing things differently

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Requires innovation

  • Are you prepared to
  • Review current practices?
  • Take on the barriers and challenges?
  • Create a new vision with and for your

community?

  • Take your community with you on a new

journey?

  • Lead the field and make the vision a reality?
slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Policy drivers include The Power to promote or improve

Economic, Social or Environmental Well-Being  Can you meet any criteria set for the transfer of an asset

  • r a service?

 Governance arrangements and policies and procedures fit for purpose?  Demonstrate professional management e.g. Clerks to CiLCA standard?  Quality Assurance? VISIBLE. PreVISIBLE. PQASSO and

  • thers.

32

Can you?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Should you?

  • Risk management.
  • Are you risk aware as opposed to risk

averse?

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Risk Management

  • Barry Quirk Review of Community Management And

Ownership Of Public Assets

  • “there are no substantive impediments to the transfer of

public assets to communities, the risks can be minimised and managed – secret is all parties working together; this needs political will, managerial imagination and a business-focused approach from both public and community sectors

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Common identified risks for asset transfer and devolution

  • f services.
  • Viability or liability?

 Due diligence.  What are the financial risks?  What other risks are there? TUPE?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Common identified risks

  • What are the benefits to both the community

council and local people?

  • Is the service/ asset valued by the local community?
  • Have you conducted public consultation and taken

your community with you?

  • Are people prepared to pay more to keep the asset
  • r service?

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Common identified risks

 Do you have the necessary staff skills, experience, knowledge and capacity?  Can you afford to refurbish the asset or take on the service and maintain it?  Would the service/asset pay for itself and any extra staff?  Could this be an opportunity for community action and getting volunteers involved in their community?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Common identified risks.

  • Do you have all the policies and procedures you

need in place?

  • Free Tool to use – Community Matters’ Pre

VISIBLE specifically designed to ensure legal compliance for community organisations running assets.

  • Tells you what you need, why you need it and sign

posts to model documents

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Management of the asset

  • Would you manage the building yourself
  • r perhaps lease to a

community/voluntary organisation?

  • If so you would need (as landlord) to set

some criteria, a risk management and application process

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

The benefits of asset transfer/devolution of services to the community

 Long proven history of community organisations delivering:  Civic participation.  Community safety  Social cohesion - generations working together  Volunteering – contributing to society, and as a pathway to work  Advice and information leading to financial inclusion– debt, welfare benefits etc  Leisure activities – isolated and socially excluded have a route to new friends

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

The benefits of asset transfer/devolution of services to the community  Activities and services for children and young people, the elderly, the isolated, the depressed  Good neighbour schemes  Exclusion and equality  Improvements to the local economy  Environmental projects

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

How can a local councillor help and support CAT?

  • Wealth of local knowledge
  • Local champion,
  • Cascading information,
  • Encourage response to consultation, ensuring

community have a voice.

  • Conduit for communication
  • Taking their community with them
slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

How can a local councillor help and support CAT?

  • First port of call for informal discussions and/or

expressions of interest with VCS groups re their ideas and plans.

  • Important role as facilitators during the process,

helping ensure that community groups get appropriate help and support from the council,

  • Ensure that a 'Can Do' attitude is maintained by all

parties even as challenges and issues arise.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Group Exercise

Group exercise in small groups using the handout Followed by feedback session

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

How can Community Matters help?

Support package

  • Advice line for one-off quick answers
  • Information sheets
  • Model documents and policies
  • Operating Standards like VISIBLE
  • Your Value – a tool to measure social value
  • Community Assets Matter training
  • Specialist advice on leases, contracts, negotiations, business planning
  • Developing the capacity of local authorities and community groups
slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Feedback time

Please complete the evaluation exercise Your comments are valued

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

The Next Step

For the next training session please consult with your Clerk (who will have been sent a training schedule) or check the OVW website www.onevoicewales.org.uk/training

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Thank you

Have a safe journey home