Committee Meeting #4 January 23, 2018 Agenda Project Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
committee meeting 4
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Committee Meeting #4 January 23, 2018 Agenda Project Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 15, 2023 141 likes •581 views

Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #4 January 23, 2018 Agenda Project Review Public Input and Responses Proposed zoning Development scenarios Evaluation of proposed street design Public Comments Next Steps 2

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #4

January 23, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Agenda

  • Project Review
  • Public Input and Responses

 Proposed zoning  Development scenarios  Evaluation of proposed street design

  • Public Comments
  • Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Study Area

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Timeline

Analyze existing and future conditions Identify

  • ptions

Evaluate

  • ptions

Revise

  • ptions

Evaluate revised

  • ptions

Preferred land use and street design

  • ptions

Late 2015 Spring 2016 Summer/ Fall 2016 Winter 2016-2017 Spring 2017 Summer 2017

March 8, 2016 September 14, 2016 July 25, 2017 Public meeting

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Existing Land Use

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Preferred Land Use

  • Two Mixed-Use Zones
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Existing Street

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Current Requirement

  • Major Arterial

96 feet

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Preferred Street Design

  • Hybrid

14th to 17th Street: Road Diet

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Preferred Street Design

  • Hybrid

17th to 25th Street: Improved Four Lane

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Preferred Street Design

  • Pedestrian Crossings

15th Street 19th and 21st Streets

(Median at 25th St)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Preferred Street Design

  • Parallel Bike Routes

12TH St 25TH St 17TH St 13TH St

Mill St

New Bike/Ped Crossing of Mill Creek

Chemeketa St

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Public Input

  • July 2017 Public Meeting
  • NEN and SESNA
  • Property

Owners

  • Court Street

Residents

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Height

  • Issue: Maximum height too high
  • Response: Reduce max. height from

65 to 55 feet in MU-1 zone 63 ft (57.5 ft) 57 ft (54 ft)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Setback

  • Issue: Impact on adjacent homes
  • Response: Increase setback from 5 to

10 feet in MU-1 zone

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10 feet 15 feet

Height: Setback

slide-17
SLIDE 17

1.5 feet of additional setback for every 1 foot of additional height

Height: Setback

slide-18
SLIDE 18

55 ft

Height: Setback

70 ft

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Height: Setback

70 ft 55 ft

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Ground Floor Height

  • Issue: Min. ground floor height too

high

  • Response: Reduce min. height in

both zones

14 ft MU-1 zone

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Leasing Out Parking

  • Issue: Desire to lease out parking
  • Response: Only prohibit new

standalone surface parking lots

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Existing Uses

  • Issue: Impact on existing businesses
  • Response: Allow them to remain
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Parking

  • Issue: Parking impacts
  • Response: Conduct a parking

management study

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Discussion

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Feasibility

  • Issue: Feasibility of development
  • Response: Create and test

development scenarios

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Development Scenarios

  • Redevelopment

 36,000 sf site  Proposed Mixed-Use 1 zone

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Development Scenario: Ideal

  • 4-story mixed use

Retail: 10,661 sf Housing: 24 units Parking: 50 spaces

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Development Scenario: Ideal

  • 4-story mixed use

Retail: 10,661 sf Housing: 24 units Parking: 50 spaces

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Development Scenario: Ideal

  • Parking

 Does not meet proposed code (17 spaces short)

  • Financial Feasibility

 Total cost: $9.2 million  Estimated value: $5.5 million  Not feasible under current market

Courtesy of David Glennie & Glennie Property Investments, Inc.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Development Scenario: Conforms

  • Smaller 4-story mixed use

Retail: 8,072 sf Plaza: 2,161 sf Housing: 18 units Parking: 50 spaces

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Development Scenario: Conforms

  • Smaller 4-story mixed use

Retail: 8,072 sf Plaza: 2,161 sf Housing: 18 units Parking: 50 spaces

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Development Scenario: Conforms

  • Less Development
  • Financial Feasibility

 Total cost (less): $7.2 million  Estimated value (less): $4 million  Not feasible under current market

Courtesy of David Glennie & Glennie Property Investments, Inc.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Economic Analysis

  • Rents today do not support

substantial investment

  • Proximity to catalyst areas supports

future revitalization

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Economic Analysis

  • Momentum more likely on west side
  • Area could support:

 Commercial: 160,000 sf feet  Residential: 160 units

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Economic Analysis

  • Help spur redevelopment

 Infrastructure improvements  Urban renewal district (funding, land assembly, etc.)  Mixed-use zoning

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Current Versus Proposed Code

Multiple zones Public hearing Lots of parking Auto-oriented Two flexible zones Administrative Less parking Pedestrian-

  • riented

Long-Term Vision Short-Term Benefits

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Discussion

  • Questions and Comments
slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Road Diet

  • Issue: Desire for full road diet
  • Response: Evaluate hybrid 1.5 years

after implementation

13th to 17th Street: Road Diet

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Proposed Criteria

  • Traffic volume
  • Diversion
  • Speed
  • Travel time
  • Intersection
  • perations
  • Safety
  • Bike and ped.

volumes

  • Property values
  • Investment and

redevelopment

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Discussion

  • Questions and Comments
slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Public Comment

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Next Steps

  • Adoption Process

 City Council initiation  Hearing at Planning Commission  Hearing at Council

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #4

January 23, 2018