4
play

4 Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting October 8, 2013 Slide 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WINONA BRIDGE 4 Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting October 8, 2013 Slide 1 COMMITTEE FOCUS TOPICS Meeting 1 Meeting 4 Project Overview Railings and Barriers Bridge Piers/Overlooks River Connection/Ped-Bike Meeting 2


  1. WINONA BRIDGE 4 Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting October 8, 2013 Slide 1

  2. COMMITTEE FOCUS TOPICS Meeting 1 Meeting 4 • Project Overview • Railings and Barriers • Bridge Piers/Overlooks • River Connection/Ped-Bike Meeting 2 Meeting 5 • Bridge Piers/Overlooks • River Connection/Ped-Bike • Bridge Abutments and Retaining Walls • Lighting, Landscaping, Signage Meeting 3 Meeting 6 • Lighting, Landscaping, Signage • Bridge Abutments and Retaining Walls • Other Items • Railings and Barriers • Wrap Up Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 2

  3. CULTURAL RESOURCES GUIDANCE • Consider the design of the new bridge as an integral part of a two-bridge conceptual unit. Within that unit, the historic bridge is a “fj rst among equals” and is considered the more signifj cant structure of the two. It was there fj rst. • The new bridge is not a stand-alone structure and should not be a design “statement” , “gateway” or a “signature bridge.” • Any new construction should not destroy historic materials, features, or spatial relationships that characterize the historic bridge. This could apply to the abutment areas where the new bridge is in very close proximity to the historic bridge. Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 3

  4. CULTURAL RESOURCES GUIDANCE • The new design and construction should be difg erentiated from the historic bridge -- i.e., no replicas, no “mimicking” any historic elements – BUT – • The new design and construction should be compatible with the historic bridge and its materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing. • The new bridge should not compete with the historic bridge or diminish the design stature of the historic bridge. • Height is an issue, and the new bridge should not have strong or exaggerated vertical elements that compete visually with the historic bridge. • Ornamentation, particularly attached or applied ornamentation, on the new bridge should be minimal. This can be assessed on a case-by-case basis and may be a diffj cult issue in terms of public art and symbolic features. Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 4

  5. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CIRCULATION Bikeway Plan p � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ������� ������� ������ ������������ ������������ ������������ I ����������������� Bikeways � � � Trail Path � � � � � � Bike Lane � ������� � � � Goodview � ��������� Wide Shoulder u t Recommended 61 ������ Mountain Bike Trails ��� ��������� ������ ) � ������ 43 City Limits ��������� ������ ����������������� ��� � � ��� �������� � � � ������ �������� ����� ����� ������� ��������� ��������� �������� ���� ��� ������� ������ � � u t � � 14 ����� � � ��� ���� � � � � ������ �������� � � ������� � ������� � � ����� ���������� � HILLSDALE TOWNSHIP ������ ������ ������ � ���������� � ������� �������� � ������ � � � � ���� ���� ���������� �������� � � � � ���������� ������ � � ����������� � � � ����� � � � � � � ������ � � ������ ������ | p �������� ����������� ������� 14 t t u ��������� u � � � � ������ 61 � � � t u � � ������ 14 HOMER TOWNSHIP � p ��������� ������ ���������������������������������� � ������ ���������������������������������� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �������������������������������� �������������������������������� 14 t t u u 61 I ) � �������������� 43 ����� � � � 4 ����� ������������ � � 4 21 44 � ���������� � � � ������������ � � ) ���� 43 ��� ����� �������� ��� ������ ��� WILSON TOWNSHIP ���������� This map was compiled from a variety of sources. This information is provided with the understanding that conclusions drawn from such information are solely the responsibility of the user. The GIS data is not a legal representation of any of the features depicted, and any assumption of the legal status of this map is ��� hereby disclaimed. ��������� ������� ������ ������ �������� ������ ������ ������ ���� ���� � � 4 ������ �������� 17 ���� 0 0.25 0.5 1 ������� Miles Februrary 2012 Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 5

  6. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CIRCULATION S. Approach Riverview Dr. Existing Waterfront Trail Huff St. Shoreline Railroad 2nd St. 3rd St. 4th.St. New Bridge 85851 Winona Existing Bridge 5900 St. Abutment Bridge Trail Sidewalk Potential Path Project Area Including Acquisition Shoulder Bikeway At-Grade Trail Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 6

  7. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CIRCULATION N. Approach Marina Parking Business Abutment New Bridge 85851 Existing Bridge 5900 Existing Bridge 5930 Stone Steps Shoreline to Remain Main Channel Back Channel Boathouses Bridge Trail At-Grade Trail Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 7

  8. RIVER CONNECTION South Approach Riverfront Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 8

  9. RIVER CONNECTION South Approach Riverfront Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 9

  10. RIVER CONNECTION Potential Vertical Access Considerations • Accessible Route Evaluation - Currently Under Review by MnDOT • Levee Impact • Visual Impact (Scale of the Potential Structure) • Cost • Maintenance • Route Comparison • Height from Deck to Grade Below - Approx. 58 ft (6-Story Building) • Potential Number of Stair Risers - Approx. 116 • Potential Length of Ramp at 5% - Approx. 1160 ft • Distance between Pier 8 and 4th St. Intersection - Approx. 1100 ft • Total Distance Traveled from Pier 8 to 4th St. Intersection and Back - Approx. 2200 ft Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 10

  11. RIVER CONNECTION Vertical Access Concept A - Stair Riverview Dr. Existing Waterfront Trail Huff St. Shoreline Railroad 2nd St. 3rd St. A 4th.St. New Bridge 85851 Winona Existing Bridge 5900 St. Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 11

  12. RIVER CONNECTION Vertical Access Concept A - Stair Overall Stair Size Height - 58’ Length - 30’ Width - 15’ Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 12

  13. RIVER CONNECTION Vertical Access Concept B - Stair Riverview Dr. Existing Waterfront Trail Huff St. Shoreline Railroad 2nd St. 3rd St. B 4th.St. New Bridge 85851 Winona Existing Bridge 5900 St. Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 13

  14. RIVER CONNECTION Vertical Access Concept B - Stair Overall Stair Size Height - 58’ Length - 30’ Width - 15’ Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 14

  15. RIVER CONNECTION Vertical Access Concept C - Switchback Riverview Dr. Existing Waterfront Trail Huff St. Shoreline C Railroad 2nd St. 3rd St. 4th.St. New Bridge 85851 Winona Existing Bridge 5900 St. Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 15

  16. RIVER CONNECTION Vertical Access Concept C - Switchback Overall Ramp Size Height - 58’ Length - 160’ Width - 30’ Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 16

  17. RIVER CONNECTION Vertical Access Concept D - Switchback Riverview Dr. Existing Waterfront Trail Huff St. Shoreline Railroad D 2nd St. 3rd St. 4th.St. New Bridge 85851 Winona Existing Bridge 5900 St. Winona Bridge Visual Quality Review Committee Meeting 4 Slide 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend