Commissioning Roundtable Closeout: Challenges & Successes - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
commissioning roundtable
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Commissioning Roundtable Closeout: Challenges & Successes - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 04, 2024 308 likes •448 views

Massachusetts School Building Authority Deborah B. Goldberg, State Treasurer and Receiver-General James MacDonald John K. McCarthy Chairperson Chief Executive Officer Executive Director Commissioning Roundtable Closeout: Challenges &

slide-1
SLIDE 1

John K. McCarthy Executive Director

Massachusetts School Building Authority

www.MassSchoolBuildings.org

Deborah B. Goldberg, State Treasurer and Receiver-General Chairperson James MacDonald Chief Executive Officer

Commissioning Roundtable

Closeout: Challenges & Successes

slide-2
SLIDE 2

▪ Training ▪ O&M Documentation Review ▪ T&M Support, Year 1 ▪ Punchlist Completion Review ▪ CIL Update

Construction Phase

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Closeout Phase

▪ Final Report

▪ Project Info ▪ OPR Compliance ▪ CIL ▪ Recommendations ▪ CxA Documentation ▪ CM/GC Documentation

Massachusetts School Building Authority

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Post-Occupancy

▪ Seasonal/Deferred Testing ▪ 10-Month Review ▪ Cx Certificate of Completion

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

John K. McCarthy Executive Director

Massachusetts School Building Authority

www.MassSchoolBuildings.org

Deborah B. Goldberg, State Treasurer and Receiver-General Chairperson James MacDonald Chief Executive Officer

Commissioning Roundtable

Building Envelope Commissioning

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Outline of Peer Review Discussion

6

  • How are comments on drawings

provided?

  • Is a review after designer’s 60%

submission needed?

  • What do Cx Agents do when

comments are not incorporated?

  • Peer review of submittals
  • Other topics; general discussion
slide-7
SLIDE 7

How are comments on designer’s drawings provided?

7

  • As mark-ups on drawings, or
  • As written comments

describing the condition (how are comments like those at right described?), or

  • As both?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Is a review after designer’s 60% submission needed?

8

  • Are comments from 35%

usually incorporated?

  • Are documents usually

complete enough?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What should Cx Agents do when comments are not incorporated by the designer?

9

  • Due to disagreement with

comments?

  • Due to lack of attention?
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Peer review of contractor submittals

10

  • Done in series or parallel with the designer?
  • If in parallel, how are substitutions handled?
  • Done as email comments when possible?
  • No comment by just not acting?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Construction Observations and Field Performance Verification Testing

11

  • Frequency
  • Test type and appropriateness
  • What happens when there are leaks?
  • Process of signing off on modifications
  • Tracking through completion and signing off on

results (even if leakage still present?)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Questions and Discussion

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Contact Information:

Rachel O’Brien Rachel.Obrien@MassSchoolBuildings.org 617-720-4466

13