Value-Based Commissioning Sarah Price Chief Officer, Haringey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

value based
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Value-Based Commissioning Sarah Price Chief Officer, Haringey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Value-Based Commissioning Sarah Price Chief Officer, Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group Outcomes for this meeting A shared understanding of what is meant by commissioning for value A shared understanding about how the CCG could


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Value-Based Commissioning

Sarah Price Chief Officer, Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outcomes for this meeting

  • A shared understanding of what is meant by

commissioning for value

  • A shared understanding about how the CCG

could use this approach to improve quality of care

  • Informing the Board about the next steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

How do we currently commission?

Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Commissioning 2013

Our aims with commiss ssio ioning ning are:  To raise standard rds s of care  To promote people’s independence and wellbeing  To offer the right care, at the right time in the right place Under usual ‘Payment by Results’ we pay hospitals for activity

– Every time someone attends an outpatient clinic – Every time someone has a diagnostic test – Every time attends A&E – Every time someone gets discharged from hospital their visit is ‘coded’ . This code triggers payment.

The incentives for hospitals are to bring people in and to ‘treat’

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Commissioning 2013

‘Block’ contracts for community services

– Community services (e.g. District Nurses, Community Nurses) receive an agreed annual payment – This payment does not change in line with how many people are being visited or treated

Commu muni nity ty Serv rvice ices s have e no fin inan ancia ial l in incent ntiv ive e to

  • ffer

er more re care re. .

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why we need to change

Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group

slide-7
SLIDE 7

We want people to stay well

  • So that we can focus on outcomes for people in

Haringey

  • We want to create the right incentives for:

– enabling people to remain independent – recover quickly – remain well in mind and body

  • To do this we need to focus on ou
  • utcome
  • mes
slide-8
SLIDE 8

We understand our health needs

  • A yo

young, g, ethn hnic ically ally div iverse rse and mobil ile e populati ation

  • n
  • Hig

igh h ra rates es of sm smokin ing g and in incre rease ase in in alcoho

  • hol

l re relate ated harm rm

  • Hig

igh h levels vels of common

  • n mental

tal health lth pro roblems ems

  • A si

signif ifica icant nt lif ife expec pectanc tancy y gap

  • 74% of over

r 65s s have e a long g term rm condit ition ion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What are we doing?

North London Committee of CCGs

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Working on Value

  • Patients, carers, clinicians, commissioners define
  • utcomes which matter to a population group (e.g.

people who suffer from psychosis, diabetes, mental health)

  • Together we prioritise these outcomes
  • We think about what and how we can measure
  • We cost out a ‘year of care ‘ or ‘bundle’ for a patient

group (e.g. frail elderly at high risk)

  • Providers work together in new ways to deliver
  • utcomes (e.g. keeping people well at home)
  • Commissioners focus on monitoring outcomes
slide-11
SLIDE 11

VALUE-BASED COMMISSIONING means changing how healthcare is organised, measured and reimbursed in order to improve the value of services

Value =

Health outcomes Cost

To reduce cost, the best approach might be to spend more on some services to reduce the need for others Excellent care is frequently the lowest cost Refers to total costs of the full cycle of care for the customer’s medical condition, not the cost of individual services The full set of outcomes that constitute the quality

  • f care for the customer
  • ver the complete care cycle
slide-12
SLIDE 12

The value-based system: Moving to a high-value delivery system has six interdependent elements

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The North Central London Value Based Commissioning Programme

The five Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) in North Central London (NCL) (Camden, Enfield, Haringey, Barnet and Islington) have embarked upon an ambitious two-year programme to shift the focus of commissioning away from activity, towards delivering improved outcomes for people. This will help us to measure and achieve value (best outcomes for cost). Who? Why? What? How? The NCL Value-Based Commissioning Programme aims to develop a common purpose across health and social care providers in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for people for every pound spent. Where such an approach has been implemented, as in stroke care across London, significant improvements in outcomes and cost have been achieved. Initially, the programme will focus on three population segments: Mental Health, Frailty and

Diabetes building a common framework of outcomes across each care pathway and looking at

new contracting mechanisms that will incentivise providers to work together to improve outcomes and drive out costs. The initial phase of this work (from now until the end of the year) will bring together a broad range

  • f clinical experts, commissioners , providers and patients to define the outcomes that really

matter to people. A three large stakeholder events are planned for November, which will be a fantastic opportunity to influence the definition of outcomes for these pathways.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Mental Health

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Frail & Older People

What is an outcome and why are they important?

3

Journey of the Event

Introduction & Context

1

David Cryer Jim Dodsworth

Terms of Art

2

Identifying Our Outcomes

4

Prioritising Our Outcomes

5

Value Agenda Overview

6

Exploring the Value Agenda & Next Steps

7

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Frail & Older People

Taking the Value Agenda Forward

Barnet Haringey Camden Islington Enfield

Anne Schlattl Ben Ellis Celia Smith David Cryer Fran Gertler Fredrik Johansson Helen Dunford Inti Khan Mousumi Basu-Doyle Nadia Raja Naser Turabi Pramod Prabhakaran Sam Jones Stuart Mackay-Thomas Suzanne Joels Tracy Brown Adam Webber Graham MacDougall Jennie Bostock Naheed Rana Nasrin Hafezparast Paul Allen Rachna Chowla Sian Therese Ann Mount Irina Goodluck Jean Aldous Juliana Bersani Karen Spooner Martins Charters Muyi Adekoya Tim Bowler Andy Murphy Clare Henderson Clarissa Murdoch Dan Windross David Davis Liz Brutus Martin Kuper Michelle Wheeler Sue Newton Tina Jegede Sheena Nixon Susanna Dale Catherine Herman Delia Thomas Greg Battle Helen Joyce Helen Pelendrides Helen Taylor Jonathan Carmichael Liz Evans Maurice Cohen Nicole Klynman Rachel Lissauer Rosaire Gray Sherry Tang Shirley Ip

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The next phase of work

North London Committee of CCGs

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Outcome framework definition

across three Segments:

  • 1. Mental Health
  • 2. Frail Older People
  • 3. Diabetes Mellitus
  • Build capability: Introduction to

value

  • Planning and delivery of Outcome

ASE Events

  • Set up and launch of Expert

Reference Groups

  • Segmentation definition
  • Research of existing outcomes

data

  • Survey service users to provide
  • utcomes ideas
  • Establish data architecture, and

data sources

  • Prepare for contracting
  • Develop contract and

reimbursement options

  • Agree detailed indicators/support IT

suppliers to develop data collection systems

  • Data collection to baseline outcome

frameworks

  • Develop activity and finance models

to appraise options

  • Support CCG selection of preferred

models

  • Build awareness and support in

provider market

  • IT and legal requirements
  • Build capability: Contracting for
  • utcomes
  • Understanding the different
  • utcomes based contract types
  • Reimbursement options
  • Understanding how IT systems

underpin value-based approaches

Phase 1 Sep – Dec 2013 Phase 2 Jan – Aug 2014 Phase 3 Aug 14 – Mar 2015

Programme Timeline & Objectives

  • Procure services
  • Provider engagement and support
  • Commissioning documentation

production (strategies, specifications,

  • Bespoke CCG support throughout

procurement

  • Build capability: Responding to value-

based approaches

  • Understanding Integrated Practice Units
  • Using real UK cases to illustrate

implementation challenges

  • Organisational reconfiguration options
  • Working across organisational

boundaries

  • Whole pathway outcomes measures

Capgemini / OBH / Beacon NCL CCG leads