commissioning possible our experience with
play

Commissioning Possible Our experience with commissioning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Commissioning Possible Our experience with commissioning Supporting organisations to bid for contracts Supporting public sector bodies to engage with VCSE organisations Developing consortiums Procuring providers to work with


  1. Commissioning Possible

  2. Our experience with commissioning • Supporting organisations to bid for contracts • Supporting public sector bodies to engage with VCSE organisations • Developing consortiums • Procuring providers to work with communities • Managing contracts

  3. The commissioning cycle

  4. Public Contracts Regulations 2015 • Introduction of the Light Touch Regime (LTR) • Emphasis on engaging with the market pre- competition • Financial standing • Lots • Contracts Finder • New regulations to reserve contracts for mutuals /social enterprises, however…

  5. Which process/es apply?

  6. Qualifying conditions (Reg 77): • has a public service mission linked to the delivery of the services. • reinvests profits in order to achieve its objectives (and any distribution must be on a participatory basis). • involves a degree of employee ownership or participation in management or requires the active participation of employees, users or stakeholders. • the authority has not awarded it a reserved contract for the services in the past 3 years.

  7. Remember… • Regardless of the process the following principles apply: o Transparency o Non-discrimination o Proportionality o Mutual recognition (between EU states to allow for free movement of goods) • The PCR applies to contracts, not grants

  8. Reviewing services

  9. Reviewing services • If you’re already delivering a service you have an ability to shift the thinking of a commissioner • Be clear about challenges and unexplored opportunities • If you’re not an incumbent be positive about your delivery but be careful about pitching for work • Create the conditions where you can bid • Recognise constraints and the changing environment and establish expertise

  10. The commissioning cycle

  11. Assessing needs and priorities

  12. Assessing needs and priorities • Commissioners may formally issue a call for evidence • Be careful about how evaluation may be seen: 1. Issue X is a problem 2. Process Y is the solution 3. We deliver solution Y 4. So fund us • A pitch for work may discredit the evidence • Let your evidence stand on its merits – imply steps 3 & 4 • Create the conditions for a successful bid rather than directly pitch

  13. The commissioning cycle

  14. Specifying services

  15. Specifying services – design challenges • Commissioners face constraints o Public Contracts Regulations o Funding cuts o Decommissioning o Fit with the broader system • Commissioners may not know what they want • Commissioners may have to buy services they don’t understand • Nervous commissioners may over-specify

  16. Specifying services – market scoping • Some commissioners have a better understanding of market provision than others • Some may go to market without any understanding of who is likely to be willing to deliver • It’s important you try to understand the market you’re in • Information asymmetry can create imbalances of power in markets

  17. Procurement

  18. Procurement – before bidding • What the commissioner wants to buy is more important than what you want to sell • Don’t see the invitation to bid as a way of securing funding for an existing service • Apply your skills and assets to solving their problem • Don’t work for a bad client • Read the specification • Ask questions and get clarification • Develop a bespoke delivery model that meets the specification

  19. Procurement – when bidding • Ask questions • If you think there’s something wrong or unfair with a process then raise the issue when it emerges – you can’t complain after the process has run its course • Ask questions • Don’t submit the bid on the day of the deadline • Ask questions

  20. Procurement – common errors • Talking about your organisation rather than the proposed service • Talking about things that are important to you, not the commissioner • Not giving examples • Not using available space/too many words • Bad editing • Irrelevant information in proposals • Overselling/underselling • Information not specific enough

  21. Procurement - track record Don’t just list achievements. For any example given a panel is likely to ask: • So what? • Is there proof? Quality and relevance is better than quantity and breadth Avoid saying “we have links with” if you can be more specific about the relationship

  22. Procurement – track record • How you will apply your track record is critical • Your track record is often in your staff rather than the organisation • You can buy a track record with good recruitment • Organisational processes • In house training

  23. Procurement – the problem with large organisations • Is the commissioner important to them? • Organisational changes can overpower local relationships • Are they too rigid in their approach? • Brand awareness can be a negative • Distant management/governance • Development teams don’t manage services • Track record across the organisation isn’t as convincing as may be assumed

  24. Partnerships • The commissioner may want a lead contractor who will be accountable for other delivery partners • All partnerships need management • Think about how organisations will work together and how boundaries between organisations will be managed • Think about the impact of diverse systems (eg complaints, HR, accounting, recruitment)

  25. 3 organisations

  26. 6 organisations

  27. 6 organisations

  28. Procurement - risks • Recruitment risks – can you hire a member of staff? How long will it take? What happens if you can’t appoint • Management risks – cost of partnership working/is there understanding of the delivery environment • User engagement risks – it’ll often take longer than is assumed/is there an ability to flex delivery or change the approach/’people like me’ issues

  29. Procurement - feedback • Feedback is constrained • Commissioner can’t reveal contents of other successful/unsuccessful bids • Too late to complain about aspects of bidding process other than assessment • Be positive and seek informal feedback

  30. Delivery

  31. Delivery challenges • Partnership issues – management and relationships • Providers getting into difficulties with other work • Monitoring and evaluation under-resourced • Administrative challenges • Staff changes • Issues with sub-contractors All these issues can affect the way the commissioner buys in future

  32. Overall

  33. Overall • What does the commissioner want to buy? What problem do they want solved? • How can you help them? • Is the work deliverable? • Have you done this before? • Who else will bid? • Do you want to work for them?

  34. Led by: Greater Manchester Centre for Voluntary Organisation St Thomas Centre Ardwick Green North Manchester M12 6FZ T: 0161 277 1000 W: www.ambitionforageing.org.uk

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend