Commissioning Possible Our experience with commissioning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

commissioning possible our experience with
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Commissioning Possible Our experience with commissioning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Commissioning Possible Our experience with commissioning Supporting organisations to bid for contracts Supporting public sector bodies to engage with VCSE organisations Developing consortiums Procuring providers to work with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Commissioning Possible

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Supporting organisations to bid for

contracts

  • Supporting public sector bodies to engage

with VCSE organisations

  • Developing consortiums
  • Procuring providers to work with

communities

  • Managing contracts

Our experience with commissioning

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The commissioning cycle

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Introduction of the Light Touch Regime (LTR)
  • Emphasis on engaging with the market pre-

competition

  • Financial standing
  • Lots
  • Contracts Finder
  • New regulations to reserve contracts for

mutuals/social enterprises, however…

Public Contracts Regulations 2015

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Which process/es apply?

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • has a public service mission linked to the delivery of

the services.

  • reinvests profits in order to achieve its objectives (and

any distribution must be on a participatory basis).

  • involves a degree of employee ownership or

participation in management or requires the active participation of employees, users or stakeholders.

  • the authority has not awarded it a reserved contract for

the services in the past 3 years.

Qualifying conditions (Reg 77):

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Regardless of the process the following principles

apply:

  • Transparency
  • Non-discrimination
  • Proportionality
  • Mutual recognition (between EU states to allow

for free movement of goods)

  • The PCR applies to contracts, not grants

Remember…

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Reviewing services

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • If you’re already delivering a service you have an

ability to shift the thinking of a commissioner

  • Be clear about challenges and unexplored
  • pportunities
  • If you’re not an incumbent be positive about your

delivery but be careful about pitching for work

  • Create the conditions where you can bid
  • Recognise constraints and the changing environment

and establish expertise

Reviewing services

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The commissioning cycle

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Assessing needs and priorities

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Commissioners may formally issue a call for evidence
  • Be careful about how evaluation may be seen:
  • 1. Issue X is a problem
  • 2. Process Y is the solution
  • 3. We deliver solution Y
  • 4. So fund us
  • A pitch for work may discredit the evidence
  • Let your evidence stand on its merits – imply steps 3 & 4
  • Create the conditions for a successful bid rather than

directly pitch

Assessing needs and priorities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The commissioning cycle

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Specifying services

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Commissioners face constraints
  • Public Contracts Regulations
  • Funding cuts
  • Decommissioning
  • Fit with the broader system
  • Commissioners may not know what they want
  • Commissioners may have to buy services they don’t

understand

  • Nervous commissioners may over-specify

Specifying services – design challenges

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Some commissioners have a better understanding of

market provision than others

  • Some may go to market without any understanding of

who is likely to be willing to deliver

  • It’s important you try to understand the market you’re

in

  • Information asymmetry can create imbalances of

power in markets

Specifying services – market scoping

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Procurement

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • What the commissioner wants to buy is more

important than what you want to sell

  • Don’t see the invitation to bid as a way of securing

funding for an existing service

  • Apply your skills and assets to solving their problem
  • Don’t work for a bad client
  • Read the specification
  • Ask questions and get clarification
  • Develop a bespoke delivery model that meets the

specification

Procurement – before bidding

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Ask questions
  • If you think there’s something wrong or unfair with a

process then raise the issue when it emerges – you can’t complain after the process has run its course

  • Ask questions
  • Don’t submit the bid on the day of the deadline
  • Ask questions

Procurement – when bidding

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Talking about your organisation rather than the

proposed service

  • Talking about things that are important to you, not the

commissioner

  • Not giving examples
  • Not using available space/too many words
  • Bad editing
  • Irrelevant information in proposals
  • Overselling/underselling
  • Information not specific enough

Procurement – common errors

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Procurement - track record

Don’t just list achievements. For any example given a panel is likely to ask:

  • So what?
  • Is there proof?

Quality and relevance is better than quantity and breadth Avoid saying “we have links with” if you can be more specific about the relationship

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • How you will apply your track record is critical
  • Your track record is often in your staff rather than the
  • rganisation
  • You can buy a track record with good recruitment
  • Organisational processes
  • In house training

Procurement – track record

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Is the commissioner important to them?
  • Organisational changes can overpower local

relationships

  • Are they too rigid in their approach?
  • Brand awareness can be a negative
  • Distant management/governance
  • Development teams don’t manage services
  • Track record across the organisation isn’t as

convincing as may be assumed

Procurement – the problem with large organisations

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • The commissioner may want a lead contractor who will

be accountable for other delivery partners

  • All partnerships need management
  • Think about how organisations will work together and

how boundaries between organisations will be managed

  • Think about the impact of diverse systems (eg

complaints, HR, accounting, recruitment)

Partnerships

slide-25
SLIDE 25

3 organisations

slide-26
SLIDE 26

6 organisations

slide-27
SLIDE 27

6 organisations

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Recruitment risks – can you hire a member of staff?

How long will it take? What happens if you can’t appoint

  • Management risks – cost of partnership working/is

there understanding of the delivery environment

  • User engagement risks – it’ll often take longer than is

assumed/is there an ability to flex delivery or change the approach/’people like me’ issues

Procurement - risks

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Feedback is constrained
  • Commissioner can’t reveal contents of other

successful/unsuccessful bids

  • Too late to complain about aspects of bidding process
  • ther than assessment
  • Be positive and seek informal feedback

Procurement - feedback

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Delivery

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Partnership issues – management and relationships
  • Providers getting into difficulties with other work
  • Monitoring and evaluation under-resourced
  • Administrative challenges
  • Staff changes
  • Issues with sub-contractors

All these issues can affect the way the commissioner buys in future

Delivery challenges

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Overall

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • What does the commissioner want to buy? What

problem do they want solved?

  • How can you help them?
  • Is the work deliverable?
  • Have you done this before?
  • Who else will bid?
  • Do you want to work for them?

Overall

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Led by: Greater Manchester Centre for Voluntary Organisation St Thomas Centre Ardwick Green North Manchester M12 6FZ T: 0161 277 1000 W: www.ambitionforageing.org.uk