Combining Old and New Systems in Existing Buildings and Other - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

combining old and new systems in existing buildings and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Combining Old and New Systems in Existing Buildings and Other - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Combining Old and New Systems in Existing Buildings and Other Retrofit Tales By Paul Jewett CFAA Technician Number 11 Combining Old and New Systems in Existing Buildings and Other Retrofit Tales Disclaimer In this presentation all the job


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Combining Old and New Systems in Existing Buildings and Other Retrofit Tales

By Paul Jewett CFAA Technician Number 11

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Combining Old and New Systems in Existing Buildings and Other Retrofit Tales

Disclaimer

  • In this presentation all the job situations are
  • nes that I have been personally involved
  • with. Therefore:
  • 1. If you have never worked with me, then I am not

talking about you.

  • 2. Do not ask the manufacture of the equipment.

In the last 37 years I have worked with almost all the major manufactures sold in Canada at one time or another. So you can only guess.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Four Important Concepts of this Presentation

  • 1. Definitions for this presentation.

– I want us all to talk the same language.

  • 2. Why are they doing this work?

– Is it being done for the right reasons? A lot of the time it is not.

  • 3. Do not assume anything

– This is proof that Murphy's Law is correct 99% of the time.

  • 4. Classic Mistakes

– “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” -George Santayana

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definitions for this Presentation

  • So what's the difference – retrofit, system replacement, panel

replacement, upgrading?

  • Retrofit: An act of adding components or accessories to a system

that it did not have when manufactured, designed, or installed. (I got this from the Internet.)

  • System Replacement: To me, it means replacing all components

while keeping its original design and operation.

  • Panel Replacement: To me, it means replacing only the panel. All

field devices remain (except maybe the EOL’s) and the system

  • peration remains the same.
  • Upgrading: To me, this can mean anything from the system’s

firmware to anything described above. Sales people like to use the term a lot because it does not have a clear a meaning.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why are they doing this Work?

  • The first question I like to ask when someone says they

want to replace a panel or system is, “Why?”

  • These are the top 5 answers I have heard:

1. Intermittent troubles

  • What this means to me is “It’s driving us crazy and the boss wants it

fixed.” The real question is why is it going into trouble? Is replacing the panel going to stop it?

2. It does funny things when it goes into alarms

  • What this means to me is “Are we going to be in trouble if we have a

fire?” Sounds like a little more investigation is required.

3. Costing too much money for service

  • What this means to me is “is it cheaper just to replace it?”

4. Want new features

  • What this means to me is “I am hiding the truth.”

5. Doing renovations and need to bring it up to code.

  • What this means to me is “I ‘m doing it because I have to.”
slide-6
SLIDE 6

In Retrofit Do not Assume Anything

My personal top 5 are:

  • 1. Wiring
  • 2. Device Compatibility
  • 3. Documentation from the site
  • 4. Interfacing Control Panels
  • 5. Verbal Information
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Assume Nothing: Wiring Example: Older Two Stage System

  • Imagine that you are quoting an older hotel with

a two stage system to do a panel replacement.

  • You look at the control panel and you check out

the annunciator, devices, open a few junction boxes, check out the risers, look at the sprinklers, duct detectors, and all the usual stuff.

  • But what are some of the things that people

don’t check and make bad assumptions about?

  • For example, how about the pull station wiring?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assume Nothing: 2 stage Station with NC Key Switch

This style was popular in the 1960’s and early 1970’s. The GA circuit would only activate if there was a 1st stage alarm activated. In several cases I have seen the original panel replaced in the 1980’s, retaining the old wiring design.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

In Retrofit Assume Nothing: The 3 Wire 2 stage Station Configuration

This was very popular up to the late 1970’s and, like the last slide, you can find panels installed into the 1980’s with this style.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

In Retrofit Assume Nothing: The 2 Wire 2 stage Station Configuration

They worked on the principle that the 1st stage increased the current to the alarm threshold and when the GA key was turned it created a dead short and increased the current to the

  • maximum. They sometimes called the circuits counting zones.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Do not Assume Anything: Compatibility

  • Did you know that sometimes

a big name manufacturer doesn’t actually make all its

  • wn panels and devices, but

buys products and brand names them?

  • Don’t be fooled by the paint

and name on the outside. Check the inside (like on PC boards and the back of the detectors) to get information. Just because a detector has a manufacturer’s name on it does not mean that it is compatible with all its panels.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Do not Assume Anything: Compatibility Example

  • A senior’s retirement home required a control

panel replacement. In the tender it stated that the contractor was responsible for ensuring the panel was ULC listed with all the field devices.

  • The smoke detectors were conventional and a

lot them had been replaced over the years with what appeared to be identical models.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Do not Assume Anything: Compatibility Example

  • Actually, they were identical except that they

were brand named for a different manufacturer and that meant they were not ULC listed for the panel installed.

  • Well, I think you can guess the rest of the story.

The detectors were worth more money than the panel.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Do not Assume Anything: Documentation From The Site

The Scenario:

  • A large high rise hotel with an addressable system was

having a system replacement. Existing wire was to be reused, and the new system was from a different manufacturer – so all input devices had to be replaced.

  • All was well, except in the main floor area, which

seemed to go into alarm every couple of days at all different times for no apparent reason.

  • There had been no history of alarm problems with this

floor before the change, and wiring had been checked for capacitance and resistance between conductors .

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Do not Assume Anything: Documentation From The Site

By the process of disconnecting the circuit at different points it was determined that the problem was between the Lobby and the Rear

  • Corridor. At this point we started cutting holes in to the ceiling.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Documentation From The Site

In all of the inspection reports found going back at least 5 years there was no detector listed in this location. Solving the problem took approximately 100 hours.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Interfacing Control Panels

Existing System was a standard conventional system installed in the 1980’s

Main Lobby Annunciator

  • Stainless Steel

backlit design

  • Mounted by

security desk

slide-18
SLIDE 18

New small outbuilding panel was added from the same manufacturer and was connected to main annunciator.

Interfacing Control Panels

Simple interconnect, right? What could go wrong? Shortly after the new panel was installed they started to have intermittent ground faults and some mystery alarm. Funny things were happening. After a few years they replaced both systems. Too bad no one would believe me when I told them the problem was because the two systems commons were interconnected at the annunciator, causing the problems.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Gas Releasing Panel Interconnection

The most common configuration method is to have the releasing panel with just a relay interconnection to the fire alarm panel.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Gas Releasing Panel Interconnection

In this case the someone decided they did not need the local signaling because a building horn was already installed in the room.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Do not Assume Anything: Gas Releasing Panel Interconnection

  • So what happens when the service tech comes in

to do the annual inspection and bypasses the fire alarm signals?

  • Murphy’s Law tells us that’s when they were also

scheduled to service the air conditioning units in the releasing area –and yes the system went off – without any warning to the people in the room.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Do Not Assume Anything: Verbal Communication

  • A high-rise hotel system

installed in the late 1970’s had

  • nly corridor speakers. The
  • wner decided to update the

rooms floor by floor over a period of several years.

  • They decided to install suite

speakers to keep up to date. Before starting, the electrical contractor asked a fire alarm tech who was in the building at the time if it was OK.

  • So no modification was done

to the panel and no one consulted the manufacturer.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Do Not Assume Anything: Verbal Communication

  • As the tech completed each floor it was

verified by a local service company and accepted by the AHJ.

  • However, it only took about 5 floors to

notice that the volume level was decreasing greatly and soon the amplifiers were overloaded and cutting out.

  • So who is at fault if they had a fire and the

signals didn’t work?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Do Not Assume Anything: Verbal Communication

So who is at fault if they had a fire and the signals didn’t work?

–The hotel –The service company who verified the speakers –The tech who told them it would be OK (whose name no one remembers) –The electrical contractor

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Did you know…

  • Most old stand-alone EVC systems had no

Ground fault detection?

  • In fact, some old audio systems recommended

that the common negative of the power supply be connected to ground?

  • You could get a big surprise if you planned on

reusing the wire.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Classic Mistakes

  • My personal top 4 are:
  • 1. Not getting it in writing.
  • 2. Not asking the right question before you get

the job.

  • 3. Not pretesting equipment.
  • 4. Not having a backup plan.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Classic Mistakes: Not Getting it in Writing

  • The Situation:

– The Hotel was built in the early 1970’s and the system installed consisted of a fire alarm with Bells for signaling and combined emergency paging / music / ballroom audio system. – In the early 1990’s they decided to upgrade the audio system for music and ballrooms, but do so completely destroyed the emergency paging. The provincial fire marshal’s office came for his annual inspection and wrote them up to fix or replace it.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Classic Mistakes: Not Getting it in Writing

– After a short tendering period the hotel issued a

  • ne paragraph P.O. for replacement.

– So when we started the project we called the local fire hall and explained what had happened and what we where doing. – We did not even make any notes of the date or who we were talking to.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Classic Mistakes: Not Getting it in Writing

  • Six months later we were close to finishing, when
  • ne night, an alarm occurred. The fire

department responded and noticed the paging system had a sign saying it was not operational. The captain ordered the hotel to put on a fire watch until it was replaced.

  • The result was that we got back-charged by the

hotel for all the fire watch expenses – even though the fire alarm was still fully operational. It was a lot of money.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Classic Mistakes: Not Asking the Right Questions before Starting Work

My personal top 3 are:

  • 1. What if we find unrelated wiring installed inside

the conduit? Who will be responsible for removing it?

  • 2. Problems with shutdowns and interconnects

between buildings. (You only find out after you start disconnecting wires from the panel.)

  • 3. Drilling time. If you’ve worked in a hotel you

know what I mean. Sometimes you only get 2 to 3 hours a day –if you are lucky.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Classic Mistakes: Not Pretesting Equipment

  • Years ago I was an installation project manager for a

telephone exchange building project in the Caribbean. Before the equipment was to be shipped I requested that I come and test the panel personally to make sure there were no problems.

  • The manufacturer told me because it was big (5 full size

tubs) it was going to be a lot of work, and was not necessary anyhow, because they pretest all the components.

  • I insisted – and they set up a date for me to check it out.
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Classic Mistakes: Not Pretesting Equipment

  • When I arrived at the factory they were just finishing

up the connects.

  • When they connected the AC power the system started

to blow up transistors like popcorn.

  • Turned out that they tested all the modules but not the

connecting cables.

  • If I had not tested it before I left and connected the

power to it after it was installed in the Caribbean, I’m darn sure everyone would have blamed it on me!

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Classic Mistakes: Not Pretesting Equipment

  • So if you’ve ever wondered what happens

when you mix up the negative and positive on

  • ne of these connectors –now you know.
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Classic Mistakes: No Backup Plan

I got a call on a Friday afternoon at about 4:00 from a tech who I taught in class. He was doing a retrofit on an 8 story building and had a problem.

Existing Conventional System

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Classic Mistakes: No Backup Plan

What he was attempting to do was a retrofit from a conventional to an addressable system –in one day. PS: I know his use of isolators is questionable

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Classic Mistakes: No Backup Plan

His plan was working fine. He started

  • n the 8th floor and things were going
  • well. But when he got to the 5th floor

the system reported missing devices

  • n the 8th .
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Classic Mistakes: No Backup Plan

  • The problem was simple. He kept adding more and more

wire to the addressable circuit until he exceeded the maximum capacitance for the circuit.

  • The correction was to add an additional addressable circuit.
  • The problem was it was now 4:00 on a Friday and he couldn’t

get one until Monday morning.

  • This meant that he would have to put a fire watch on for the

weekend and have his crew come back on Monday to finish. (maybe).

  • He had no plan “B”.
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Questions?

Hope You Enjoyed The Presentation