Columns Picture here Environmental Justice in Ireland: Problems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

columns picture here
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Columns Picture here Environmental Justice in Ireland: Problems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Columns Picture here Environmental Justice in Ireland: Problems & Prospects ine Ryall Environmental Justice Access to an effective remedy to enforce environmental law & environmental rights and obligations Aarhus Convention Aarhus


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Columns Picture here

Environmental Justice in Ireland: Problems & Prospects Áine Ryall

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Environmental Justice

Access to an effective remedy to enforce environmental law & environmental rights and obligations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aarhus Convention

Aarhus Convention & EU environmental law International & EU law standards How does Ireland measure up?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

An effective remedy?

Aarhus Convention - Article 9 Sets down minimum standards for access to justice in environmental matters

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Aarhus - Article 9

Standing rules

  • especially role of ENGOs

Aim is to deliver “wide access to justice” Standard of (judicial) review “Adequate & effective” remedies Interim (injunctive) relief – where appropriate “Timely” remedies Costs - “not prohibitively expensive”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Aarhus - Role of the Courts?

Courts in the spot light Judicial experience & expertise in environmental matters? Evolution/trends in the case law?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Aarhus – High Expectations

A powerful legal tool to challenge/stop controversial projects? More “access” to the courts Stronger role for the courts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Aarhus/EU law – Irish response

Initially – extremely minimalist response Tardy & piecemeal legislative reaction Judicial implementation Sweetman v An Bord Pleanála [2007] IEHC 153

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Aarhus/EU law – Irish response

The costs conundrum C-427/07 Commission v Ireland (July 2009) Role of judicial discretion as to costs liability

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Aarhus/EU law – Irish response

Special costs rule in certain environmental cases PDA – section 50B PDA – section 50B (revised) EMP Act 2011 – Pt 2 (Minimal consultation and discussion)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Aarhus/EU law – Irish response

Costs issues remain problematic Obvious gaps in scope of special costs rule Uncertainty → further litigation on costs issues

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Aarhus/EU law – state of play

Costs are still “prohibitively expensive” where an individual or ENGO lacks resources to engage a lawyer to represent them Extremely limited civil legal aid system Still a very significant role for judicial discretion as to costs liability → unpredictability

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Aarhus/EU law – state of play

The rise of the lay litigant Impact of Case C-260/11 Edwards, April 2013? “Wide access to justice” – ensure that the public plays an active role in environmental protection

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Aarhus/EU law – state of play

Beyond the costs conundrum: Standard of review If O’Keeffe principles are not Aarhus- complaint, then what standard of review is acceptable?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Aarhus/EU law – state of play

Interim/injunctive relief → undertaking in damages (potentially prohibitive) Availability of court judgments online Information about Aarhus rights

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Aarhus/EU law – state of play

Some developments in Court of Justice of EU case law: Case C-240/09 LZ, March 2011 Case C-416/10 Križan, January 2013 Case C-420/11 Leth, March 2013

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ireland - implementation in the spotlight

European Commission enforcement activity Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (18 September 2013 → ???) Irish courts – judicial implementation efforts are ongoing

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Future Directions?

Time to move beyond piecemeal policies & reactive legislative interventions A strategic reform agenda – set access to environmental justice in context

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Future Directions?

A new vision of environmental governance in Ireland Robust policies and strong environmental leadership Raise profile of environmental protection issues

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Future Directions?

Innovative ways of providing a ‘voice’ for the environment + credible environmental oversight Access to justice: How best to fund environmental litigation in the public interest? Role of technical expertise to assist the courts in environmental cases?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

What lies ahead?

A moving target Will we see a significant increase in environmental litigation? What is environmental litigation seeking to achieve? Are there other means of achieving these ends?

Mapping the Future of Environmental Justice

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Research Project

Faculty of Law, UCC Identify key issues & consider potential means

  • f improving access to

environmental justice in Ireland

Mapping the Future of Environmental Justice

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mapping the Future

  • f Environmental Justice Project

International Round- table discussion (February 2013) Research visit to Sweden – focus on specialist environmental courts (April 2013) Working paper – in preparation Website – to follow

environmentaljustice.ie Twitter – @EnvJusticeUCC