Coherent Bayesian inference on compact binary inspirals using a network of interferometric gravitational wave detectors
Christian R¨
- ver1, Renate Meyer1, and Nelson Christensen2
1The University of Auckland
Auckland, New Zealand
2Carleton College
Coherent Bayesian inference on compact binary inspirals using a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Coherent Bayesian inference on compact binary inspirals using a network of interferometric gravitational wave detectors over 1 , Renate Meyer 1 , and Nelson Christensen 2 Christian R 1 The University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand 2
1The University of Auckland
2Carleton College
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Hanford, WA Pisa, Italy Livingston, LA Hannover, Germany
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
total mass (mt = m1 + m2) luminosity distance (dL) 5 10 15 20 50 100 150 200
19
inclination angle (ι) luminosity distance (dL) π 2 π 50 100 150 200
20
(sun masses) 2 4 6 8 10
(radian) π 2 π
21
22
23
1 Ti
1W.R. Gilks et al.: Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice (Chapman & Hall / CRC, 1996).
24
25
Hanford Livingston Pisa (seconds) −0.15 −0.10 −0.05 0.00 = tc
26
declination (δ)
(radian) −0.55 −0.50 −0.45 −0.40
right ascension (α)
(radian) 4.60 4.65 4.70 4.75 4.80
coalescence time (tc)
(seconds) 9012.340 9012.344 9012.348
luminosity distance (dL)
(Mpc) 10 20 30 40 50 60
27
chirp mass (mc)
(sun masses) 2.685 2.695 2.705 2.715
mass ratio (η)
0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24
individual masses (m1, m2)
(sun masses) 2 3 4 5
28
chirp mass (mc) mass ratio (η) 2.685 2.690 2.695 2.700 2.705 2.710 2.715 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23
29
18.2h 18h 17.8h 17.6h 17.4h −34° −32° −30° −28° −26° −24° right ascension α declination δ
30
31
32
33
1 2
1 4
34
18h 30′ 18h 00′ 17h 30′ 17h 00′ −40° −35° −30° −25° −20° right ascension α declination δ
35
18h 30′ 18h 00′ 17h 30′ 17h 00′ −40° −35° −30° −25° −20° right ascension α declination δ
36
18h 30′ 18h 00′ 17h 30′ 17h 00′ −40° −35° −30° −25° −20° right ascension α declination δ
37
18h 30′ 18h 00′ 17h 30′ 17h 00′ −40° −35° −30° −25° −20° right ascension α declination δ
38
iteration log(p(θ|y)) 10 000 20 000 30 000 40 000 50 000 60 000 −79740 −79700 −79660 −79620
39
40