A Time-Domain Veto for Binary Inspirals Search Gianluca M. Guidi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a time domain veto for binary inspirals search
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Time-Domain Veto for Binary Inspirals Search Gianluca M. Guidi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Time-Domain Veto for Binary Inspirals Search Gianluca M. Guidi Universit di Urbino- INFN Firenze-Urbino LIGO Visitor - CALTECH A Time-Domain Veto for Binary Inspirals search The distinction between actual gravitational waves from binary


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Time-Domain Veto for Binary Inspirals Search

Gianluca M. Guidi

Università di Urbino- INFN Firenze-Urbino LIGO Visitor - CALTECH

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A Time-Domain Veto for Binary Inspirals search

The distinction between actual gravitational waves from binary inspirals and false noise triggers with the same SNR and χ2 frequency distribution needs the implementation of a Veto which operates in the time domain.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The correlator and its statistic distribution

The Gaussian variables x(t) and y(t) are the correlation between the ITF output h(t) and the cosine and sine polarizations of the inspiral signal:

( )

* 2

( ) ( ) ( ) 2

ift c h

h f h f x t e df S f

π ∞ −∞

= ∫

  • (

)

* 2

( ) ( ) ( ) 2

ift s h

h f h f y t e df S f

π ∞ −∞

= ∫

  • The statistic normally considered is:

( ) ( ) ( )

2 2 2 2

x t y t t ρ σ + =

( )

* 2

( ) ( ) 2

c c h

h f h f df S f σ

∞ −∞

= ∫

  • with:

In absence of signal ρ2(t) has a χ2 distribution.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The correlator and its statistic distribution

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2 2 2

( ) ( ) x t x t y t y t t ρ σ − + − =

  • When a signal has been detected,

we can consider the statistic:

2 2 n

χ = ( )

* 2

( ) ( ) ( ) 2

ift c c h

h f h f e df S f

π ∞ −∞

= ∫

  • is the mean of x(t) for cosine component
  • f the template that has matched the signal.

x t Where

2( )

t ρ

Simulated data

2( )

t ρ

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Two Possible Time-Domain Vetoes

1) Analysis of the probalility that N uncorrelated values of exceed a fixed threshold before the time

  • f

coalescence.

2

ρ

  • 2

ρ

  • 2

ρ

  • 2) Analysis of the probability that the max
  • ver a time T exceeds a fixed threshold

before the time of coalescence.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1-Crossing Veto

We consider N uncorrelated times before the coalescence.

1 4

a

t f δ ≥

..

t

..

t

1 N

t

− N

t

coalescence

( )

( )

( )

2

2 2 2 2 2

Thr i

Thr i i n

P t d

ρ

ρ ρ χ ρ

=

< = ∫

  • Probability that the statistic at ti

does not exceed :

( )

2 Thr i

ρ

  • (

)

( )

2 2 1 N Thr tot i i i

P P t ρ ρ

=

= <

  • Probability that anyone of the N

values exceeds the thresholds:

slide-7
SLIDE 7

1-Crossing Veto ( )

( )

1 2 2 Thr N i i tot

P t P ρ ρ < =

  • N

tot

P p =

( )

2

10.55

Thr i

ρ =

  • (

)

( )

( )

1 2 2 10

0.95 0.995

Thr i i

P t ρ ρ < = =

  • Ex: We fix N=10 and choose a

confidence level of 5% ( = 0.05)

P

2

ρ

  • (

)

( )

2 2

, 1,

Thr i i

P t p i N ρ ρ < = ∀ =

  • Probability that the thresholds are

exceeded at least one time:

1

tot

P P = −

If we suppose that:

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1-Crossing Veto

Monte Carlo with 7 < SNR < 20 – simulated LIGO noise. SNR Number of crossing

= 0.05

P

= 0.2

P

= 0.1

P

= 0.01

P

( )

2

10.55

Thr i

ρ =

  • (

)

2

7.63

Thr i

ρ =

  • (

)

2

9.12

Thr i

ρ =

  • (

)

2

13.81

Thr i

ρ =

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Veto on the Maxima

2 max

ρ

  • We choose an interval of time

before the coalescence and find the maximum of

2

ρ

  • The distribution of the maxima follows a Fréchet distribution:

(1 )

1 ( )

F

x F F

x f x e

α

α σ

α σ σ

− +   −   

  =    

2

ρ

  • 2

max

x ρ =

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Veto on the Maxima

We fix a cofidence level C and find:

( )

F

x

F x e

α

σ

  −   

=

Threshold for C = 5%

( )

1 2 max

1 ln 1

Thr F

C

α

ρ σ

    =     −    

  • α and σF are the location and

shape parameters which can be found from the mean and stdv

  • f

( )

2 max

ln ρ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Veto on the Maxima

max

x ρ =

10% 5% 1%

The threshold of 6.5 corresponds to a confidence level of C = 0.02%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions and Perspectives

The two vetoes seems to work well and can be applied together to events which have triggered and passed the χ2 frequency veto. They need to be applied to real data and tuned on the real noise to understand which types of non-stationarities can be vetoed and develop possible improvements. I acknowledge Albert Lazzarini and Flavio Vetrano for having made possible my stay at CALTECH, and Giancarlo Cella and Peter Shawhan for fruitful discussions.