co amorphous simvastatin and
play

co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improved physical stability for co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Lbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen and Riikka Laitinen* *corresponding author Aim of the


  1. Improved physical stability for co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Löbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen and Riikka Laitinen* *corresponding author

  2. Aim of the study  In this study, the drug pair simvastatin-glipizide (SVS- GPZ) in different molar ratios was processed by mechanical activation (ball milling (BM) or cryomilling (CM)).  The aim was to prepare molecularly mixed co- amorphous systems of the two drugs, which would have improved physical stability. Glipizide Simvastatin

  3. Preparation of the mixtures  Cryomilling was able to produce co-amorphous mixtures with all SVS-GPZ ratios (2:1, 1:1 and 1:2).  In contrast, ball milling was successful only for 2:1 and 1:1 mixtures. 18.6 (GPZ) 21.8 (GPZ) 15.6 (GPZ) SVS-GPZ 1:2 BM Intensity SVS-GPZ 1:1 BM SVS-GPZ 2-1 BM 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2theta/

  4. Glass transition temperature  All co-amorphous mixtures were found to have one composition-dependent T g value between the individual T g values of the pure drugs, indicating formation of a one-phase system.  The higher the amount of GPZ in the mixture was, the higher was the observed T g . Observed T g [  C] Theroretical T g [  C] 1 Material 32.6±0.2 2 SVS nd 3 GPZ SVS CM 31.5±2.4 GPZ CM 69.9±0.3 SVS-GPZ 2:1 BM 41.1±6.2 42.3 SVS-GPZ 1:1 BM 46.3±6.6 48.4 SVS-GPZ 2:1 CM 41.5±5.1 42.3 SVS-GPZ 1:1 CM 46.7±5.2 48.4 SVS-GPZ 1:2 CM 53.6±5.3 54.9 1 Form Gordon-Taylor equation; 2 by quench cooling in DSC ; 3 GPZ degraded after melting

  5. Interaction between SVS and GPZ  However, the calculated Flory-Huggins interaction parameter ( χ = 5.5 ± 2.0) suggested that favourable interactions were not likely between SVS and GPZ and that these two molecules might not be miscible with each other in the equilibrium state.  This was confirmed by FTIR measurements which showed that there were no interactions between SVS and GPZ in the co-amorphous mixtures.

  6. PCA - score plot  A PCA analysis of the IR data showed a clear difference between the crystalline mixtures and the processed (amorphous) formulations.  SVS CM and GPZ CM form their own clusters in the score plot, with the 2:1, 1:1 and 1:2 samples (amorphous physical mixture (APM), BM, CM) placed in between, independent of the production technique.  Thus, no interactions exist 20 1:1 PM 2:1 PM between SVS and GPZ in the 15 1:2 PM co-amorphous mixtures since 10 PC-2 (30%) the PCA model classifies 5 APMs similar to the co- SVS CM 0 SVS CM 2:1 APM 1:1 BM amorphous mixtures. 1:1 APM 2:1 BM 1:2 APM -5 2:1 CM 1:1 CM GPZ CM 1:2 CM GPZ CM -10 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 PC-1 (65%)

  7. PCA – loading plot  The loading plot shows that PC1 explains the difference in composition and PC2 explains the difference between crystalline and amorphous state. GPZ CM - SVS CM PC-1 Loading SVS/GPZ 1:1 PM- 1:1 CM PC-2 4000 3500 3000 1500 1000 500 Wavenumber (cm -1 )

  8. Storage stability  For the evaluation of physical stability, the amorphous samples were stored at 4  C/0% RH, 25  C/0% RH and 25  C/60% RH.  Stability studies revealed a higher storage stability for the co-amorphous mixtures compared to the corresponding amorphous physical mixtures.  The stability of the co-amorphous mixtures increased as a function of increasing GPZ content.  The most stable mixtures (1:1 and 1:2 CM) were stable for over two months at all storage conditions.

  9. Conclusions I  Mechanical activation was successfully applied to obtain co-amorphous mixtures of two BCS class II drugs, simvastatin (SVS) and glipizide (GPZ).  Increased storage stability was observed despite the lack of stabilizing interactions between SVS and GPZ.

  10. Conclusions II  The most stable mixtures were stable for over two months at all storage conditions.  The improved stability can be attributed to the formation of SVS-GPZ molecular mixture where GPZ acts as a stabilizing component (anti-plasticizer), which is beneficial for stability even in the absence of molecular interactions. The full work has been published: Korbinian Löbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen, Riikka Laitinen: Co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations show improved physical stability without evidence of intermolecular interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, in press. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.02.004

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend