co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

co amorphous simvastatin and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improved physical stability for co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Lbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen and Riikka Laitinen* *corresponding author Aim of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Improved physical stability for co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling

Korbinian Löbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen and Riikka Laitinen*

*corresponding author

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Simvastatin Glipizide

Aim of the study

 In this study, the drug pair simvastatin-glipizide (SVS-

GPZ) in different molar ratios was processed by mechanical activation (ball milling (BM) or cryomilling (CM)).

 The aim was to prepare molecularly mixed co-

amorphous systems of the two drugs, which would have improved physical stability.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Intensity

21.8 (GPZ) 18.6 (GPZ) 15.6 (GPZ)

SVS-GPZ 1:2 BM SVS-GPZ 1:1 BM 2theta/ SVS-GPZ 2-1 BM

Preparation of the mixtures

 Cryomilling was able to produce co-amorphous

mixtures with all SVS-GPZ ratios (2:1, 1:1 and 1:2).

 In contrast, ball milling was successful only for 2:1

and 1:1 mixtures.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Glass transition temperature

 All co-amorphous mixtures were found to have one

composition-dependent Tg value between the individual Tg values of the pure drugs, indicating formation of a one-phase system.  The higher the amount of GPZ in the mixture was, the higher was the observed Tg.

Material Observed Tg [C] Theroretical Tg [C]1 SVS 32.6±0.22 GPZ nd3 SVS CM 31.5±2.4 GPZ CM 69.9±0.3 SVS-GPZ 2:1 BM 41.1±6.2 42.3 SVS-GPZ 1:1 BM 46.3±6.6 48.4 SVS-GPZ 2:1 CM 41.5±5.1 42.3 SVS-GPZ 1:1 CM 46.7±5.2 48.4 SVS-GPZ 1:2 CM 53.6±5.3 54.9

1Form Gordon-Taylor equation; 2by quench cooling in DSC; 3GPZ degraded after melting

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Interaction between SVS and GPZ

 However, the calculated Flory-Huggins interaction

parameter (χ = 5.5 ± 2.0) suggested that favourable interactions were not likely between SVS and GPZ and that these two molecules might not be miscible with each other in the equilibrium state.

 This was confirmed by FTIR measurements which

showed that there were no interactions between SVS and GPZ in the co-amorphous mixtures.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PCA - score plot

 A PCA analysis of the IR data showed a clear difference

between the crystalline mixtures and the processed (amorphous) formulations.

 SVS CM and GPZ CM form their own clusters in the

score plot, with the 2:1, 1:1 and 1:2 samples (amorphous physical mixture (APM), BM, CM) placed in between, independent of the production technique.

 Thus, no interactions exist

between SVS and GPZ in the co-amorphous mixtures since the PCA model classifies APMs similar to the co- amorphous mixtures.

  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

10 20 30

  • 10
  • 5

5 10 15 20

GPZ CM GPZ CM 1:2 CM 1:2 APM 1:1 CM 1:1 APM 1:1 BM 2:1 CM 2:1 BM 2:1 APM SVS CM SVS CM 1:2 PM 1:1 PM

PC-2 (30%) PC-1 (65%)

2:1 PM

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PCA – loading plot

 The loading plot shows that PC1 explains the

difference in composition and PC2 explains the difference between crystalline and amorphous state.

4000 3500 3000 1500 1000 500

SVS/GPZ 1:1 PM- 1:1 CM GPZ CM - SVS CM PC-2

Loading Wavenumber (cm-1)

PC-1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Storage stability

 For the evaluation of physical stability, the amorphous

samples were stored at 4C/0% RH, 25C/0% RH and 25C/60% RH.

 Stability studies revealed a higher storage stability for the

co-amorphous mixtures compared to the corresponding amorphous physical mixtures.

 The stability of the co-amorphous mixtures increased as a

function of increasing GPZ content.

 The most stable mixtures (1:1 and 1:2 CM) were stable for

  • ver two months at all storage conditions.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Conclusions I

 Mechanical activation was successfully applied to

  • btain co-amorphous mixtures of two BCS class II

drugs, simvastatin (SVS) and glipizide (GPZ).

 Increased storage stability was observed despite the

lack of stabilizing interactions between SVS and GPZ.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conclusions II

 The most stable mixtures were stable for over two

months at all storage conditions.

 The improved stability can be attributed to the

formation of SVS-GPZ molecular mixture where GPZ acts as a stabilizing component (anti-plasticizer), which is beneficial for stability even in the absence of molecular interactions.

The full work has been published: Korbinian Löbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen, Riikka Laitinen: Co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations show improved physical stability without evidence of intermolecular interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, in press. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.02.004