Cluster Report Climate, Energy and Mobility ERA-LEARN, Discussion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cluster report climate energy and mobility
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cluster Report Climate, Energy and Mobility ERA-LEARN, Discussion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cluster Report Climate, Energy and Mobility ERA-LEARN, Discussion paper 15.05.2019 Tour de Table Page 2 first-name LAST-NAME BADGE/TABLE which-networks-and-initiatives-are-you-representing Lucie BEAUMEL GREEN VEHICLES INITIATIVE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Cluster Report ‘Climate, Energy and Mobility’

ERA-LEARN, Discussion paper

15.05.2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tour de Table

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 2

first-name LAST-NAME BADGE/TABLE

which-networks-and-initiatives-are-you-representing

Lucie BEAUMEL GREEN VEHICLES INITIATIVE

European Green Vehicles Initiative Association

Beata BIBROWSKA JPI URBAN EUROPE

JPI URBAN EUROPE

Karen BÖHME JPI URBAN EUROPE

JPI Urban Europe, EXPAND, SUGI

Jonas BYLUND JPI URBAN EUROPE

JPI Urban Europe

Almudena CARRERO

ACT,ERA.MIN, ERA4CS, AXIS, GEOTHERMIA, SOLAR ERANET, BIODIVERSCEN,

Evelyn ECHEVERRIA

German Federal Ministry of Research and Innovation, NKS-Umwelt

Jan-Arne EILERTSEN ERA-LEARN

ERA-LEARN

Michael ERDMANN EUROFUSION

EUROfusion Coordinator Unit

Hans Arne FRØYSTEIN EURAMET/ EMPIR

EURAMET eV and EMPIR

Emilia GENANGELI EUROFUSION

EUROfusion Administration

Enrique GIRON CLEAN HYDROGEN

Clean Hydrogen

Charles GIRY-DELOISON JPI CULTURAL HERITAGE

JPI Cultural Heritage

Ken GUY Maurice HANEGRAAF

TNO

Angus HUNTER ERA-LEARN

ERA-LEARN

Christophe JOST OCEANERA-NET

OCEANERA-NET Cofund

Karoliina KOHO BANOS CSA

BANOS CSA

Carina LEMKE FORESTVALUE

ForestValue

Bruno MASTANTUONO CLEAN SKY JU

Clean Sky JU

Angels ORDUNA-CAO SPIRE CPPP

SPIRE cPPP

Ragnhild RØNNEBERG ERA NET ACT

ERA NET ACT (Accellerating CCS technologies)

Julija SAKOVICA Helen SPENCE-JACKSON EIT-KIC CLIMATE

EIT Climate KIC

Piotr SWIATEK

Team drafting Co-Funded Partnerhip in HUE Cluster 4

Mª Ángeles VALBUENA Chris YOUNG BESTF / DEMOWIND

BESTF and DemoWind ERA-NETs

Eleni ZIKA BBI JU

Biobased Industries Joint Undertaking

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

Partnership analyses in relation to the cluster ‘Climate, Energy and Mobility’ under Pillar II “Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness” of Horizon Europe (Commission proposal):

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 3

The intervention areas of the cluster ‘Climate, Energy and Mobility’: ▬ Climate science and solutions ▬ Energy supply ▬ Energy systems and grids ▬ Buildings and industrial facilities in energy transition ▬ Communities and cities ▬ Industrial competitiveness in transport ▬ Clean transport and mobility ▬ Smart mobility ▬ Energy storage The cluster includes 52 fully relevant partnerships, networks or governance structures: ▬ 26 P2Ps (21 ERA-NET Cofunds, 2 JPIs, 2 EJP Cofunds, 1 Art 185 initiative) ▬ 2 cPPPs ▬ 5 Art 187 ▬ 9 ETIPs ▬ 6 ETPs ▬ 3 EIT-KICs ▬ 1 EIPs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview current networks and governance structures

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 4

▬ large variety of partnerships (only omission is FET Flagships). ▬ most populated area is ‘energy supply’ - broad range of partnership types. ▬ least populated area is ‘buildings and industrial facilities in energy transition’. ▬ ERA-NET Cofunds are more frequent in the climate and energy sub-clusters. ▬ The mobility sub-cluster is dominated by A187s and ETPs.

5 10 15 20 25 30

Climate science and solutions Energy supply Energy systems and grids Buildings and industrial facilities in Energy Transition Communities and Cities Industrial Competitiveness in Transport Clean transport and mobility Smart mobility Energy Storage

  • Nr. and Type of Fully Relevant Networks per Intervention Area

ERIC EIP ETP/ETIP ERA-NET Cofund JPI EJP FET cPPP EIT A185 A187

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Overview current partnerships related to the interventions areas

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 5

▬ Two of the nine intervention areas (climate science and solutions, energy supply) have a relatively high concentration of partnerships ▬ Significant number of partnerships that are cross- cutting (links to at least two intervention areas) ▬ A187 ECSEL, EIP Smart Cities & Communities and JPI Urban Europe are the most cross-cutting

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Connections between partnerships and networks to the sub-cluster ‘Climate’

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 6

Formal Connection: Several JPIs and their associated Cofunds Existing collaboration: Lack of evidence of collaboration between partnerships that appear to have some synergy

CLIMATE

P2Ps PPPs

Article 185

EMPIR PRIMA

ERA-NET Cofund

ACT AXIS EN-SUGI ERA4CS ERA-PLANET FACCE ERA-GAS Waterworks2015 Waterworks2017 SC5-21-2019-2020 LC-SFS-20-2019 SFS-31-2019 LC-CLA-09-2019

JPI

Climate FACCE Urban Europe Water

EIP

Smart Cities and Communities Water

  • Art. 187

CleanSky2 ECSEL FCH

cPPP

EeB EGVI

ETIP/ETP

ETP WssTP ETIP ZEP

EIT-KIC

Climate

ERIC

ECCSEL LifeWatch EMSO ICOS Eur-Argo

FET EJP

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Connections between partnerships and networks to the sub-cluster ‘Energy’

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 7

Formal Connection: JPI Urban Europe and its Cofunds Existing collaboration: Geothermica ERA-NET Cofund is represented on the Steering Board of ETIP Deep Geothermal

ENERGY

P2Ps PPPs

Article 185

EMPIR

ERA-NET Cofund

ACT BESTF3 CSP ERANET Demowind Demowind2 ENSCC EN-SUGI ERANet SmartGridPlus EN SGplusRegSys GEOERA GEOTHERMICA OCEAN-ERA-NET Cofund SOLAR-ERA.NET Cofund Solar Cofund2 LC-SC3-ES-9-2019

JPI

Urban Europe

EIP

Smart Cities and Communities

  • Art. 187

ECSEL FCH

cPPP

EeB FoF

ETIP

Bioenergy Deep Geothermal Ocean Photovoltaics PV Sec RHC SNET SNETP Wind ZEP

EIT-KIC

InnoEnergy

ERIC

ECCSEL

EJP

CONCERT EUROfusion

FET

Coordinating influence of the SET-Plan

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Connections between partnerships and networks to the sub-cluster ‘Mobility’

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 8

Formal Connection: JPI Urban Europe and its Cofunds

  • Art. 187s and cPPPs that were

derived from their associated ETPs Existing collaboration: JPI Urban Europe and JPI Climate have collaborated (with NORFACE) to implement T2S (ERA-NET Cofund on ‘transformations to sustainability’)

MOBILITY

P2Ps PPPs

Article 185

AAL2 EMPIR

ERA-NET Cofund

EMEurope ENSCC ENSUF EN-SUGI ERANet SmartGridPlus EN SGplusRegSys T2S MG-4-6-2019

JPI

Urban Europe Climate

EIP

Active and Healthy Aging Raw Materials Smart Cities and Communities

  • Art. 187

CleanSky2 ECSEL FCH SESAR Shift2Rail

cPPP

FoF EGVI

ETP

ACARE ALICE ERRAC ERTRAC Waterborne

EIT-KIC

InnoEnergy Urban Mobility

FET EJP ERIC

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Main observations and questions

Main observations: ▬ All types of partnerships/networks (apart from FET Flagships) are represented in this Cluster ▬ With some notable exceptions, the apparent level of connectivity between the various networks and partnerships is weak. ▬ Apart from the energy sub-cluster (where the coordinating influence of the SET-Plan is apparent), the connections between the P2P and non-P2P world are limited. Questions to consider: ▬ What is the level of synergy, cooperation and engagement between JPI Climate, the Climate KIC and other partnerships that are aimed at reducing climate impacts ▬ Are there any frameworks (like the SET-Plan) that could foster more collaborative activity between the P2Ps and the other partnerships/networks in the mobility areas ▬ What would be the benefits of strengthening cooperation between partnerships/networks that appear to have synergies ▬ What are the main barriers to collaboration between partnerships that have synergetic objectives, activities and/or stakeholders and the critical enabling factors for such collaboration

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thank you.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Session 1: Conclusions

▬Are there any important aspects missing in the Discussion Paper? ▬What have been the main strengths and achievements of the existing partnership landscape? ▬What have been the main challenges?

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Session 2: Guiding Questions

Past and current experiences

▬ What kind of interactions did/do you have with other (P2P, PPP) networks and which are these networks? ▬ How did/does this contribute to achieving your partnership’s objectives and/or improve performance?

Ideas for future developments

▬ What are the challenges of the new partnership proposal? ▬ How could cooperation between different types of partnerships be improved to support the reformation of the partnership landscape? ▬ How can your partnership contribute to increase coherence in the partnership landscape? ▬ Which actions need to be taken? By whom?

ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis Page 12