Closing Budget Gaps With Asset Sales ABA 2012 Spring Meeting and 7 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Closing Budget Gaps With Asset Sales ABA 2012 Spring Meeting and 7 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Closing Budget Gaps With Asset Sales ABA 2012 Spring Meeting and 7 th Annual State & Local Procurement Symposium April 19-20, 2012 Washington, D.C. Harriet M. Welch, Partner The Issue to be Addressed State and Local Government Fiscal
The Issue to be Addressed – State and Local Government Fiscal Stress
Recurring revenue shortfalls due to Great
Recession
Recurring expenditure increases due to fixed
labor/benefits agreements
Inability to achieve balance in short term (1-5
years)
Attempts to achieve balance causing reduction in
core services
Solution requires current cash infusions
2
The Budgetary Benefits from Asset Sales
Monetizing functioning assets unlocks asset value
to close budget gaps with return (repayment) of asset equity over time (utilities, buildings, parks, etc.) Goes beyond selling surplus assets.
Urban renewal/economic development/land bank
assets sold to developers may enhance revenues (PILOT agreements; impact fee agreements)
Proceeds of asset sale usually not restricted but
must applied prudently and accurately to alleviate deficit
3
The Techniques to Effect Asset Sales
Sale and leaseback; may require creation or use
- f conduit on behalf on public entity
True sale transaction (California model) Assignment of tax benefits to new owner, current
bondholders redeemed?
Use of EU-type senior “project bonds” (GO or
- ther guaranteed source) and subordinated debt
paid from revenue flow
Lease facilities with up-front investor payment
(i.e., parking facilities); P3
Ground lease to retain public asset ownership and
regulation
Sale of easements for land use control
4
Legal Issues Involved in Asset Sales
Need to find state law authority to sell assets if
not surplus – to third party or government “subsidiary”
Referenda requirements and fair valuation of
assets – protecting the public interest
Effect of asset sale “privatization” on credit
ratings; use of private sector anchor tenant to generate revenue/boost credit rating
Effect on labor agreements and benefits if assets
and facilities sold
5
Legal Issues Involved in Asset Sales (cont’d.)
Tax-exempt status of interest on bonds which
financed sold assets
Continued public management or privatization of
sold assets
Proceeds of securitizing tax payment streams not
a “revenue” for budget purposes (Lance v. McGreevey (2004)– NJ)
Risk of loss to the public if sold assets are the
collateral for the financing to raise budget revenues.
6
The Need for Revision of State Laws to Effect Asset Sales
Statutes which authorize asset sales to generate
budget revenues; authorize public assets to be rented or leased rather than owned; empower conduits to own assts and lease to public entities and private sector entities
Statutes which authorize true sales; address
asset “ownership” issue; develop the concept of a special purpose vehicles (SPV) which absorbs the financial risk and leases facilities to government
Statutes which set parameters for valuation of
assets and regulation of public assets under SPV
- wnership
7
The Need for Revision of State Laws to Effect Asset Sales (cont’d.)
Statutes which address labor
agreements/employee benefits when assets held in trust for investors or by SPV
Statutes which permit mortgaging public assets
and use as collateral
Statutes which address treatment of mortgaged
public assets upon default in financing
Statutes which follow the 2007 ABA Model
Procurement Code and adopt design-build methods for public infrastructure procurement
8
UK-Type Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Financing
Establish legal alternatives to traditional municipal
bonds to finance infrastructure with equity participation and governmental use and leasing
Shift risk of loss to investors with
senior/subordinate structure with only obligation
- f public entity to lease for use and regulate
Include asset sales in P3 transaction to generate
budget revenues
9
Federal Funding and Tax Incentives
Amend IRC to provide new category for asset sale
tax-credit bonds with relaxation of private activity bond rules
Provide matching federal dollars/loan guarantees
for asset sale financings (ABA HOD Resolution 105, 2009)
Provide federal funding subsidies for rehabilitation
and transition of sold assets from public sector use, if applicable
10
Harriet M. Welch
Harriet Welch focuses her practice on public finance, project finance, securities and municipal bond issues. She has more than 20 years of public finance experience in California and more than 30 years of public finance experience overall. Harriet represents California bond issuers, investment bankers, letter of credit banks and borrowers on tax exempt financings. She has served as bond counsel for the County of Los Angeles on a variety of financings, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, the State Public Works Board, the California Educational Facilities Authority, the California Health Facilities Financing Authority, California Municipal Finance Authority and the City of Los Angeles. Harriet’s practice has focused extensively in recent years on bond counsel engagements for colleges, universities, private schools and other nonprofit organizations. She has written articles, including “Everything You Wanted to Forget About Tax Exempt Financing,” for the Western Association of College and University Business Officers and other industry groups, and been a speaker at industry conferences. Since 1997, she has served as bond counsel on financings for more than 30 California colleges and universities. She has been active in developing tax exempt financing for religiously affiliated schools in California. Harriet has also served as disclosure counsel to the State Public Works Board and the City of San Diego. She has extensive experience on lease revenue financings and certificates of participation, limited obligation bonds and
- TRANS. She has served as bond counsel on California land-based financing as well as counsel to bondholders in
connection with work-outs of these financings. During the past six years, Harriet has served and is serving in California as bond counsel on 66 financings; disclosure and underwriter’s counsel on 42 financings; borrower’s counsel on 27 financings; and issuer counsel
- n more than 75 financings. These financings aggregate more than $23.3 billion.
+1.213.689.5158 harriet.welch@ssd.com Practice Focus Public & Infrastructure Finance; Public Sector; Fiscal Stability Invitiative Education The Catholic University of America, J.D., Member, Catholic University Law Review, 1978 Loyola University New Orleans, B.A., 1975 Admissions California, 1988
11
Harriet M. Welch (cont’d.)
Harriet also has experience representing clients in financing matters for transactions in Bulgaria, Palestine and
- Israel. In particular, she has provided advice in the structuring of the securitization of real property installment
contracts in international jurisdictions; debt structuring for the Higher Commission of Investment and Finance of the Palestinian National Authority; proposed refinancing of electric generating facilities for the municipality of Nablus; and the proposed construction of local municipal shopping centers in the cities of Nablus, Ramallah and Jenin. Harriet is a frequent speaker on tax exempt financings. She spoke at the 2010 California Public Finance Conference and the 2010 National Association of Bond Lawyers’ Bond Attorneys (NABL) Workshop on “Educational Facilities, Cultural Facilities and Other Non-Healthcare 501c-3 Financings.” She has been selected as a Southern California Super Lawyer in a survey of her peers distributed by Thomson Reuters each year since 2007. In 2007 Harriet was named a fellow of the American College of Bond Counsel. She is past president of the California Association of Bond Lawyers and a former board member of the Women Lawyers Association of Los
- Angeles. She is a member of NABL and the executive committee of the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles
County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC). She is also on the Development Committee of the Catholic Education Foundation.
Representative Experience
- Serving as bond counsel for $70,503,000 California Educational Facilities Authority Revenue
Bonds (University of La Verne), Series 2010.
- Serving as bond counsel for $25.5 million California Municipal Finance Authority Tax Exempt
Revenue Bonds (Mater Dei High School Project), Series 2010A, 2010B, 2010C and 2010D.
- Serving as bond counsel for $1.5 billion County of Los Angeles 2010 Tax and Revenue
Anticipation Notes, Series A & B.
- Serving as bond counsel for $137,650,000 California Municipal Finance Authority Solid
Waste Revenue Bonds (Republic Services, Inc. Project), Series 2010.
+1.213.689.5158 harriet.welch@ssd.com Practice Focus Public & Infrastructure Finance; Public Sector; Fiscal Stability Invitiative Education The Catholic University of America, J.D., Member, Catholic University Law Review, 1978 Loyola University New Orleans, B.A., 1975 Admissions California, 1988
12
Closing Budget Gaps With Asset Sales
ABA 2012 Spring Meeting and 7th Annual State & Local Procurement Symposium
April 19-20, 2012 Washington, D.C.
Harriet M. Welch, Partner Squire Sanders (US) LLP 213.689.5158 harriet.welch@squiresanders.com
339974