SLIDE 1
Climate Change and the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan Deirdre Des - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Climate Change and the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan Deirdre Des - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Climate Change and the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan Deirdre Des Jardins California Water Research Sierra Club California Water Committee Recent drought in Southwest 2011-12: 500-1000 year drought in Texas 2012-13: 500-1000 year
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Drought and Climate Change
➲ Many climate change models predict significant drying in
Southwest & Sierra Nevada mountains by mid-century
➲ Huge risk of increase in frequency and severity of droughts
➲
NOAA snowpack Jan 2014
SLIDE 4
Drier Climate Change Models
➲ Example: US Geological Survey, California Water Science
Center, Randy Hanson et. al. 2012
➲ Global Fluid Dynamics Lab GCM model (used in 2006, 2009,
& 2012 California Climate Adaptation Strategy modelling)
➲ A2 greenhouse gas scenario (medium-high emissions) ➲ Forecasts 17% reduction in Sacramento River flows by 2030
and 34% by 2080
➲
R.T. Hanson, L. E. Flint, A. L. Flint, et. al., , A method for physically based model analysis of conjunctive use in response to potential climate changes, Water Re- sources Research, v. 48
SLIDE 5
SLIDE 6
Projected reduction in Sacramento River flows
(R. Hanson et. al. 2012)
SLIDE 7
Change in frequency of wet & dry years
(R. Hanson et. al. 2012)
SLIDE 8
California Climate Change Adaptation Strategy climate models predict significant drying Sarah Null and Josh Viers, UC Davis, 2012
➲ Six Global Climate models used for the state of California 2012
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy modelling, two GHG sce- narios (low & medium-high)
➲ All 12 projections showed a significant increase in dry and criti-
cally dry years by the end of the century
➲ Almost all models also showed significant decrease in wet
years
Sarah Null and Josh Viers, Water and Energy Sector Vulnerability to Climate Warming in the Sierra Nevada: Water Year Classification in Non-Stationary Climates, CEC White Pa- per, July 2012.
SLIDE 9
Decrease in wet years and increase in dry & critically dry years for almost all models by midcentury
(Null & Viers 2012)
SLIDE 10
Change in Wet & Dry years averaged over all 6 GCM models
(Null & Viers 2012)
SLIDE 11
Bay Delta Conservation Plan climate change modelling
➲ Uses projections from 115 Global Climate Model / Greenhouse
Gas Emissions scenario combinations (Lawrence Livermore National Lab)
➲ Classifies 115 GCM / scenario climate projections into “more
warming, less warming” and “more drying, less drying”
➲ Forecasts 13-15% reduction in Sacramento River flows under
drier scenarios
SLIDE 12
BDCP classification: 115 GCM / scenarios
➲ Q1: Drier, less warming ➲ Q2: Drier, morewarming ➲ Q3: Wetter, more warming ➲ Q4: Wetter, less warming
SLIDE 13
BDCP ensemble models: Feather River
SLIDE 14
BDCP forecast change in inflow to reservoirs
SLIDE 15
BDCP wetter & drier climate change forecasts not published
➲ Only released internally to BDCP Steering Committee ➲ Not included in any of BDCP EIR drafts ➲ Not discussed at any BDCP public meetings
SLIDE 16
What does BDCP EIR use for water delivery forecasts?
➲ “Central Tendency” projection ➲ Throws out 50% of drier models and 50% of wetter models,
then averages projections of remaining models
➲ Essentially assumes wetter & drier futures equally likely ➲ Disguises risk to water deliveries
SLIDE 17
Example: Feather River flows
SLIDE 18
BDCP & Reservoirs
➲ BDCP relies on South Delta pumps in dry years ➲ BDCP EIR water delivery forecasts assume draining Shasta,
Trinity, & Folsom reservoirs to minimum pool to meet export targets
SLIDE 19
Shasta reservoir repeatedly drained to minimum pool in repeat of 87-92 drought
SLIDE 20
BDCP & Sea Level Rise
➲ BDCP EIR does not model performance of tunnels under high
levels of sea level rise
➲ EIR uses value of 18 inches for sea level rise ➲ Even with tunnels, salinity intrusion could drastically curtail ex-
ports by 2100
➲ Tunnels may at best be a short term solution
SLIDE 21
US Army Corps of Engineers Modelling
1.68 m sea level rise (high value for 2100)
SLIDE 22
We can do better
➲ For the Sacramento Delta and San Francisco Bay ➲ For salmon and pelagic fish in the Delta ➲ For migrating birds
SLIDE 23
SLIDE 24
SLIDE 25
SLIDE 26
Sierra Club Alternative
➲ Accept peak water and environmental limits ➲ Reduce risk to economy and environment by investing in local
water efficiency and water reuse
➲ Focus on sustainability and environmental stewardship ➲ New growth needs to come from reductions elsewhere ➲ Most cost-effective and least energy-intensive alternative
SLIDE 27
SLIDE 28
Urban Water Conservation
➲ Big savings could be achieved by replacing thirsty lawns and
plantings with low-water landscape, installing smart irrigation technology, and utilizing rainwater and greywater
➲ More consumer education campaigns and aggressive rebate
programs for more efficient appliances
SLIDE 29
Major Investments in Repairs
➲ About 10% of urban water is lost through leaks in aging distri-
bution infrastructure, wasting energy as well as precious sup- plies
➲ New technology allows more efficient location and repair of
leaks
SLIDE 30
Water meters, detailed usage reports and tiered rates
➲ Tiered water rates, drought rates, and home usage reports give
customers detailed feedback and an incentive to conserve
➲ Eliminate fixed rates for all large landscapes, expand meters to
all dwellings in state
➲ Use separate meters in multi-family housing and separate me-
ters for landscaping to increase data and billing options
SLIDE 31
Urban water recycling
➲ In 2009, DWR estimated that recycling municipal wastewater
could save up to 2.3 million acre-feet
➲ Some California cities already use recycled water for aquifer
recharge, which helps make the strategy more affordable and less resource intensive
SLIDE 32
Agricultural water efficiency
➲ Agriculture uses 75 percent of California’s water ➲ Agricultural conservation strategies—including weather-based
irrigation controllers, drip irrigation and climate-appropriate crop selection—could yield over 3.4 million acre-feet in water sav- ings
SLIDE 33
Managing groundwater sustainably
➲ California is one of the few states in the nation that does
not regulate groundwater
➲ Failure to coordinate and moderate groundwater use has
led to unsustainable levels of overdraft
SLIDE 34
For More Information
➲ The entire text of Sierra Club California’s Sustainable Al-
ternatives policy paper can be accessed online: http://california2.sierraclub.org
➲ California Water Research
http://h20research.com/
SLIDE 35