Classified Streams Anti-degradation Must support aquatic life Meet - - PDF document

classified streams
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Classified Streams Anti-degradation Must support aquatic life Meet - - PDF document

10/15/2012 Possible Procedure to set DO Criteria for Newly Classified Streams Matt Combes Streams Community Ecologist Missouri Department of Conservation Classified Streams Anti-degradation Must support aquatic life Meet water


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/15/2012 1

Possible Procedure to set DO Criteria for Newly Classified Streams

Matt Combes Streams Community Ecologist Missouri Department of Conservation

Classified Streams

Anti-degradation Must support aquatic life Meet water quality criteria:

Current standards (5.0 mg/L DO) OR develop appropriate standards

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/15/2012 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/15/2012 3

  • “Do they even have any life in them to protect?”
slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/15/2012 4

Characteristics of Unclassified Sites (Watershed)

Mean watershed area (km2)

C = 196 (0.73 - 2382) U = 23 (0.44 - 578) X = 0.62 (0.03 - 1.5)

  • Fish
slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/15/2012 5

Isn’t DO naturally lower in these small headwater streams? OK, so they have fishes. But do those fishes need 5 mg/L O2 to thrive?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/15/2012 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/15/2012 7

  • !

"!#$!%#&%' (## ))%% %

*%+*,-./0#$) "%"%%%1%2% $!-$%% %#3!

45*6"7, ! 89:*5 ;,9*5,*

  • <

<. 9*=4,*65",9 >

  • <

?9:75"" / .. @ 8 ,,5"0*65",9 < > @/@ *7 7368**

  • //

@ 9,45"*65",9 / / @ 8 :8 6,

  • /

@/ 95"893,9

  • </
  • 69"=6,68
  • <<

.. 8 "3"*,75""

  • @@

>> *:,973675""

  • @

> *395-,*65",9

  • @

>< 850736*65",9

  • .

/ 4"35 93,9 >

  • /<

653,*:,9 > @ . 77"*65",9 >

  • /<

,"39 *3",9 ,9 < / / *"*65",9

  • @@

>>

  • 5"*3-75""
  • </

9,*65",9

  • @.

8 :*-33,3-75"" / / @ 8 :*395-,3-75""

  • .

> 9"0,369393,9 . . @/ 9,,:68

  • .

> *36,9"9,8, =, . >

  • 436,75""
  • /
  • A6""=93,9

>

  • .

0 ,"*65",9 /

  • .

90,7368**

  • ./

"0,9*"45*6 < . . 8 ,05 < . . 09,,"*"45*6 >. . >@ 9"0,*-33,*"45*6 >. . >@ * ,",9737 > . > =, 8 6, / > /

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/15/2012 8

Joined Chronic DO value to predicted species list for all segments on the MORAP 1:100,00 VST. Selected most sensitive species value as criteria for the segment. Thus each segments DO criteria is the most sensitive community members’ critical minimum dissolved

  • xygen concentration times 2 plus 20%.

45*6"7, ! 89:*5 ;,9*5,*

  • <

<. 9*=4,*65",9 >

  • <

?9:75"" / .. @ 8 ,,5"0*65",9 < > @/@ *7 7368**

  • //

@ 9,45"*65",9 / / @ 8 :8 6,

  • /

@/ 95"893,9

  • </
  • 69"=6,68
  • <<

.. 8 "3"*,75""

  • @@

>> *:,973675""

  • @

> *395-,*65",9

  • @

>< 850736*65",9

  • .

/ 4"35 93,9 >

  • /<

653,*:,9 > @ . 77"*65",9 >

  • /<

,"39 *3",9 ,9 < / / *"*65",9

  • @@

>>

  • 5"*3-75""
  • </

9,*65",9

  • @.

8 :*-33,3-75"" / / @ 8 :*395-,3-75""

  • .

> 9"0,369393,9 . . @/ 9,,:68

  • .

> *36,9"9,8, =, . >

  • 436,75""
  • /
  • A6""=93,9

>

  • .

0 ,"*65",9 /

  • .

90,7368**

  • ./

"0,9*"45*6 < . . 8 ,05 < . . 09,,"*"45*6 >. . >@ 9"0,*-33,*"45*6 >. . >@ * ,",9737 > . > =, 8 6, / > /

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/15/2012 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/15/2012 10

Conclusions

This method allows the criteria to match the predicted fish communities DO needs. It could be applied statewide by testing other species. It should only be applied to segments where >90% of the predicted community has been tested.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/15/2012 11