CIPFA Statistics 2006 Analysis Results Strategy and Resources - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CIPFA Statistics 2006 Analysis Results

Strategy and Resources Committee 24 May 2007

Shropshire and Wrekin Fire Authority Strategy and Resources Committee 24 May 2007 Document tabled at Agenda Item 7 CIPFA Statistics Analysis

2

CIPFA Statistics analysed to benchmark Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service with other English Fire and Rescue Services Service Assessments will expect evidence that we have carried this out.

Introduction

3

The following two values are quoted on the following graphs:

• Correlation Coefficient
• Looking for a relationship between the two

variables and is expressed between -1 and +1

• Coefficient of Determination R2
• The certainty of the line of best fit and is

expressed between 0 and +1

4

Operational Staff Costs

5

• 1. Employees Operational Costs WT & RDS

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

London F&EPA Merseyside West Midlands Greater Tyne and Wear South Yorkshire Surrey West Yorkshire Cleveland Cheshire Hertfordshire Avon Buckinghamshire Berkshire Durham Leicestershire Bedfordshire Lancashire Nottinghamshire Warwickshire Essex Northamptonshire Humberside Derbyshire Kent Hampshire Staffordshire East Sussex North Yorkshire Cambridgeshire Hereford & Dorset Gloucestershire Suffolk West Sussex Oxfordshire Wiltshire Shropshire Norfolk Northumberland Cumbria Lincolnshire Cornwall Somerset Devon Isle of Wight

Costs (£1000) per 1000 Population Wholetime Retained Linear (Retained) Linear (Wholetime)

Shropshire

Employee Costs

Correlation -0 .6 4 0 2

6

• 2. Correlation - Area/Employee Costs (WT) per 1000 Population

R2 = 0.1824 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Hectares (1000's) Costs (£1000) per 1000 Population

Wholetime Employee Costs

Correlation -0 .4 2 7 0

SFRS

7

Retained Duty System Employee Costs

• 3. Correlation - Area/Employee Costs (RDS) per 1000

Population

R2 = 0.283 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Hectares (1000's) Costs (£1000) per 1000 population

Correlation 0 .5 3 1 9

8

• 4. Correlation - Area/Employee Costs (Control) per 1000 Population

R

2 = 0.0169

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Hectares (1000's) Costs (£1000) per 1000 population

Control Room Employee Costs

Correlation -0 .1 2 9 8

9

Officers

Population – Area - Officers

1

• 5. Relationship between population, area and officers

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

A re a /P o p u la tio n /O ffic e rs 1/10 Hectares per Person Hectares per Officer Population per Officer Linear (Population per Officer)

• Expon. (Hectares per Officer)

Correlation 0 .9 4 6 5 R2=0.8958

11

Flexible Duty Officers / Population

Correlation 0 .8 0 6 2

• 7. Correlation All Flexi Duty Officer/Population

R

2 = 0.6501

50 100 150 200 250 300 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Number of Flexi Officers

BVPI Data Source

12

Area Managers

Correlation 0 .5 8 8 3

• 8. Correlation Area Managers/Population

R

2 = 0.5952

5 10 15 20 25 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Area M anagers

13

Group Managers

Correlation 0 .5 4 7 2

• 9. Correlation Group Managers/Population

R

2 = 0.7133

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Group M anagers

14

Station Managers

Correlation 0 .6 4 9 5

• 10. Correlation Station Managers/Population

R

2 = 0.7366

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Population (1000) Statio n M an ag ers

15

Flexible Duty Officers / Area

Correlation 0 .0 3 8 9

• 11. Correlation All Flexi Duty Officers/Area

R

2 = 0.0069

20 40 60 80 100 120 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) All F lexi Du ty O fficers

BVPI Data Source

16

Area Managers

Correlation 0 .1 1 7 0

• 12. Correlation Area Managers/Area

R

2 = 0.0137

5 10 15 20 25 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Area M anagers

17

Group Managers

Correlation 0 .0 1 9 6

• 13. Correlation Group Managers/Area

R

2 = 0.0008

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Group M anagers

18

Station Managers

Correlation -0 .0 1 6 7

• 14. Correlation Station Managers/Area

R

2 = 0.0136

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Station Managers

19

Watch and Crew Managers

• 15. Area/Population per Watch&Crew Manager

1 2 3 4 5 6 London F &EPA W es t M idlands T y ne and W ear M ers ey s ide G reater M anc hes ter C lev eland W es t York s hire Is le of W ight Av on South York s hire Berk s hire H ertfords hire Lanc as hire Es s ex Surrey N ottingham s hire Kent H am ps hire Eas t Sus s ex Bedfords hire W es t Sus s ex C hes hire D erby s hire Buc k ingham s hire Staffords hire D ors et H um bers ide Leic es ters hire D urham W arw ic k s hire O x fords hire D ev on C am bridges hire N ortham ptons hire Suffolk G louc es ters hire H ereford & W orc es ter W ilts hire N orfolk Som ers et C ornw all Linc olns hire Shrops hire C um bria N orth York s hire N orthum berland

H ectares/Po p u latio n (1000's) p er W M & C M

1000's Hectares per WM&CM 1000s Population per WM&CM Linear (1000s Population per WM&CM) Power (1000's Hectares per WM&CM)

Shrops hire

20

Watch and Crew Managers / Population

Correlation 0 .9 8 5 6

• 16. Correlation WM+CM./Population

R

2 = 0.9715

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000

Population (1000) Number of WM +CM .

21

Watch and Crew Managers / Area

Correlation 0 .0 1 2 9

• 17. Correlation WM+CM/Area

R2 = 0.0167

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Hectares (1000)

Number of WM+CM.

2 2

Firefighters

23

Firefighters

• 18. Relationship between population,area and Ff.

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

P o p u la tio n /W T F f.

1/10 Hectares per Person 1000 Population per WT Ff. 1000 Population per firefighter (WT+RDS)

• Expon. (1000 Population per WT Ff.)

S h ro p s h ire

24

Firefighters / Population

Correlation 0 .9 8 3 5

• 19. Correlation Firefighters./Population

R

2 = 0.9673

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000

Population (1000)

Number of Firefighters (WT+RDS) Ff.

25

Correlation -0 .0 9 0 7

• 20. Correlation Firefighters./Area

R2 = 0.0082 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Hectares (1000) Number of Firefighters (WT+RDS)

Firefighters / Area

26

Wholetime Firefighters / Population

Correlation 0 .9 8 6 7

• 21. Correlation WT Ff./Population

R

2 = 0.9736

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Population (1000) Number of WT Ff.

27

Correlation -0 .2 5 2 5

• 22. Correlation WT Ff.Area

R

2 = 0.0638

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Hectares (1000) Number of WT Ff.

Shropshire

Wholetime Firefighters / Area

28

Retained Duty System Firefighters / Population

Correlation -0 .2 1 9 2

• 23. Correlation RDS Ff./Population

R2 = 0.0005 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Population (1000) Number of RDS Ff.

29

Retained Duty System Firefighters / Area

Correlation 0 .6 8 7 6

• 24. Correlation RDS Ff./Area

R2 = 0.4728 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Hectares (1000) Number of RDS Ff.

3

Fire Stations

31

Fire Stations / Population

Correlation 0 .8 3 4 5

• 25. Correlation Population/Fire Stns

R

2 = 0.6964

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Population (100,000) Fire Stations

32

Fire Stations (Ex Mets) / Population

Correlation 0 .7 2 1 5

25 (a). Correlation Population/Fire Stns (Ex Mets)

R

2 = 0.5206

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Population (100,000) Fire Stations

33

Fire Stations / Area

Correlation 0 .2 7 0 6

• 26. Correlation Area/Fire Stns

R

2 = 0.0732

20 40 60 80 100 120

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Area (hectares 1000) F ire S ta tio n s

34

Fire Stations (Ex Mets) / Area

Correlation 0 .6 1 1 2 26 (a) Correlation Area/Fire Stns (Ex Mets)

R

2 = 0.3735

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Area (hectares 1000) Fire Stations

35

Premises Expenditure / Fire Stations

• 27. Premises Expenditure/Stn

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Expenditure (£1000)

Shropshire Average

3 6

Pumps

37

Pumps / Population

• 28. Population[100,000]/Pumps

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Isle of Wight Cleveland Northumberland Bedfordshire Berkshire Warwickshire Durham Shropshire Northamptonshire Leicestershire Tyne and Wear Buckinghamshire South Yorkshire Gloucestershire Oxfordshire Cheshire Nottinghamshire Wiltshire Avon Somerset Cambridgeshire Surrey Dorset Suffolk Merseyside East Sussex Hertfordshire Derbyshire West Sussex North Yorkshire Lincolnshire Staffordshire Humberside Cumbria Hereford & Worcester Norfolk West Midlands Lancashire West Yorkshire Cornwall Greater Manchester Essex Devon Kent Hampshire London F&EPA

Population (100,000) Pumping Appliances

Shropshire

38

Population / Pumps

Correlation 0 .8 4 1 3

• 29. Correlation Population/Pumps

R2 = 0.7077 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Population (100,000) Pumps

39

Fire and Rescue Authority Area / Pumps

Correlation 0 .1 8 7 9

• 30. Correlation Area/Pumps

R

2 = 0.0353

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Area Hectares/100,000 Pumps

40

Pumps / Area

• 31. Area/Pumps

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Isle of Wight Cleveland Bedfordshire Berkshire Northumberland Warwickshire Durham Northamptonshire Shropshire Leicestershire Tyne and Wear South Yorkshire Buckinghamshire Cheshire Oxfordshire Gloucestershire Nottinghamshire Avon Wiltshire Surrey Cambridgeshire Somerset Dorset Merseyside Suffolk Hertfordshire East Sussex Derbyshire West Sussex North Yorkshire Staffordshire Lincolnshire Humberside Cumbria Hereford & Worcester Norfolk West Midlands Lancashire West Yorkshire Greater Manchester Cornwall Essex Devon Kent Hampshire London F&EPA

Pumping Appliances Hectares 1/10000

Shropshire

Population Sparcity

41

Operational / CFS Costs

• 32. Ratio Between Ops and CFS Expenditure

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Northumberland Surrey Lincolnshire Somerset Greater Manchester Hertfordshire Warwickshire West Yorkshire Cornwall Nottinghamshire Buckinghamshire East Sussex Cumbria Humberside West Sussex Oxfordshire Derbyshire Devon London F&EPA Merseyside North Yorkshire Hereford & Worcester Lancashire Shropshire West Midlands Hampshire Berkshire Gloucestershire South Yorkshire Avon Bedfordshire Isle of Wight Leicestershire Average Cleveland Suffolk Tyne and Wear Cambridgeshire Dorset Staffordshire Wiltshire Kent Essex Durham Cheshire Northamptonshire Norfolk

Operations Percentage of Budget CFS Percentage of Budget

Shropshire Average

Thank You

Questions?

42