Chirality and cosmology Marc Kamionkowski Johns Hopkins University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

chirality and cosmology
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Chirality and cosmology Marc Kamionkowski Johns Hopkins University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Chirality and cosmology Marc Kamionkowski Johns Hopkins University The gist Fundamental interactions are parity breaking maybe parity breaking is manifest in new cosmological physics (inflation, dark matter, dark energy, baryogenesis) as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Chirality and cosmology

Marc Kamionkowski Johns Hopkins University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The gist

  • Fundamental interactions are parity breaking
  • maybe parity breaking is manifest in new cosmological physics

(inflation, dark matter, dark energy, baryogenesis) as well?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Themes

Elegant mathematics Proofs of principle New observables

Some futuristic/academic Some possibly

  • bservable
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Subjects

  • Circular polarization of the CMB
  • From density perturbations
  • From gravitational waves
  • From chiral gravitational-wave background
  • Chiral gravitational waves
  • Pulsar timing arrays
  • Astrometry
  • 21-cm polarization
slide-5
SLIDE 5

collaborators

  • CMB: Keisuke Inomata
  • PTAs/astrometry: Selim Hotinli, Kim Boddy, Wenzer Qin, Liang Dai,

Andrew Jaffe, Enis Belgacem

  • 21-cm: Lingyuan Ji, Keisuke Inomata
  • TAM formalism: Liang Dai, Donghui Jeong
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cosmic microwave background

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Linearly polarized by anisotropic Thomson scattering

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Circular polarization of CMB

  • Does not arise at linear order in cosmological perturbations
  • Linear polarization from scattering of anisotropic radiation field
  • Circular polarization arises at second order from photon-photon

interactions anisotropic CMB background gives rise to anisotropic index of refraction that a given CMB photon passes through (Sawyer 2014; Montero-Camacho & Hirata, 2018)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

But what about circular polarization

  • Does not arise at linear order in cosmological perturbations

(Thomson scattering induces only *linear* polarization)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

But can be induced by propagation of linearly polarized light through birefringent medium

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Primordial density perturbations

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Now suppose primordial polarization or index-of- refraction tensor due to primordial GWs

  • Polarization and index of refraction now have B (as well as E) modes:
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Probably far from detectable

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Chiral photons from chiral GWs

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Pulsar timing arrays and gravitational waves

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Consider + polarized GW in +z direction

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Total angular momentum waves

  • Standard approach

(~ x) = X

~ k

˜ (~ k)ei~

k·~ x

<latexit sha1_base64="r7vn7xvk8LD8PZE1X7I/F4sfj0s=">ACNHicbVDJSgNBEO1xN25Rj14Kg6CXMCOKXgTRi+BFwSRCJoaenop0rPQXSOGIR/lxQ/xIoIHRbz6DXYWcH3Q8N6rKqrBamShlz3yRkbn5icmp6ZLczNLywuFZdXqibJtMCKSFSiLwNuUMkYKyRJ4WqkUeBwlrQOe7XazeojUziC+qm2Ij4dSxbUnCyVrN46qdtuenfoIDbLTgA32RMx/oTg98kipE+OrpbAFe5SBhqMAXYUJDcdtrFktu2R0A/hJvREpshLNm8cEPE5FGJNQ3Ji656bUyLkmKRT2Cn5mMOWiw6+xbmnMIzSNfHB0DzasE0Ir0fbFBAP3+0TOI2O6UWA7I05t87vWN/+r1TNq7TdyGacZYSyGi1qZAkqgnyCEUqMg1bWECy3tX0G0ueaCbM4FG4L3+S/pLpd9nbKu+c7pcOjURwzbI2ts03msT12yE7YGaswe7YI3thr8698+y8Oe/D1jFnNLPKfsD5+AQS86lN</latexit>

Ψklm(~ x) = 4⇡iljl(kr)Ylm(ˆ x)

<latexit sha1_base64="HSTMThdemOyUrYUP4HS/f9g0xME=">ACHnicbVDLSsNAFJ34rPUVdelmsAjtpiTSohuh6MZlBfuQJobJdNKOmTyYmRL6Je48VfcuFBEcKV/4zTNQlsPDBzOZc797gxo0Iaxre2tLyurZe2Chubm3v7Op7+20RJRyTFo5YxLsuEoTRkLQklYx0Y05Q4DLScf3Lqd8ZES5oFN7IcUzsA1C6lGMpJIcvW41BXVSnwWTsjUiGD5U4DmsQSumkN4xeO+ws8r8NZJs8gQSRVx9JRNTLARWLmpARyNB390+pHOAlIKDFDQvRMI5Z2irikmJFJ0UoEiRH20YD0FA1RQISdZudN4LFS+tCLuHqhJn6eyJFgRDjwFXJAMmhmPem4n9eL5HemZ3SME4kCfFskZcwKCM47Qr2KSdYsrEiCHOq/grxEHGEpWq0qEow509eJO2Tqlmr1q9rpcZFXkcBHIjUAYmOAUNcAWaoAUweATP4BW8aU/ai/aufcyiS1o+cwD+QPv6AdfFoHI=</latexit>

(~ x) = X

klm

klmΨklm(~ x)

<latexit sha1_base64="xQe3O6ogpr2giAP9qb9Dl8tMwI=">ACIHicbZDLSsNAFIYnXmu9RV26GSxC3ZREKnUjFN24rGAv0IQwmU7aoTNJmJkUS+ijuPFV3LhQRHf6NE7aFLT1wMDH/5/DmfP7MaNSWdaXsbK6tr6xWdgqbu/s7u2bB4ctGSUCkyaOWCQ6PpKE0ZA0FVWMdGJBEPcZafvDm8xvj4iQNArv1TgmLkf9kAYUI6Ulz6w58YCWnRHB8OEMXkFHJtxLh4xPYObMsSFznLd6ZsmqWNOCy2DnUAJ5NTz0+lFOEkVJghKbu2FSs3RUJRzMik6CSxAgPUZ90NYaIE+m0wMn8FQrPRhEQr9Qwan6eyJFXMox93UnR2ogF71M/M/rJiq4dFMaxokiIZ4tChIGVQSztGCPCoIVG2tAWFD9V4gHSCsdKZFHYK9ePIytM4rdrVycVct1a/zOArgGJyAMrBDdTBLWiAJsDgETyDV/BmPBkvxrvxMWtdMfKZI/CnjO8f9Uyi4A=</latexit>
slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Analogous expansions for vector fields in terms of three types (E, B, L)
  • f vector TAM waves
  • Analogous expansions for STF tensor fields in terms of 5 types (L, VE,

VB, TE, TB) of tensor TAM waves. Transverse-traceless are TE/TB

  • TAM formalism far more powerful for vector/tensor fields (than for

scalar) given the transformation properties (the “spin”) of these fields under rotations

slide-22
SLIDE 22

For PTA/astrometry

  • Is trivial to consider contribution of any given TAM wave to

PTA/astrometry observables

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

GW anisotropy with PTAs

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Bottom line

  • Isotropic signal must be established with high SNR before anisotropy

can be detected, and then only if anisotropy amplitude is O(1).

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Back to chirality!!

  • Anisotropy estimator easily modified to seek GW circular-polarization
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Anisotropy -à CP :: + à
  • L+l+l’ = even à

L+l+l’ = odd

  • So estimators for intensity anisotropy become estimators for circular-

polarization anisotropy by placing L+l+l’ even to L+l+l’ odd

  • One consequence: monopole (an overall GW chirality) not detectable
  • Numerically, CP dipole detectable with high SNR and for CP dipole

O(1)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

This is interesting!

  • ~nHZ GW background from SMBH-binary mergers
  • Local signal may well be dominated by one, or a handful of sources,

and if so, intensity should be anisotropic, and signal most generally circularly polarized to O(1)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Circular polarization of 21-cm radiation from dark ages

  • Hirata, Mishra & Venumadhav (2017) calculated circular polarization

from 21-cm line of neutral hydrogen from misalignment of 21-cm quadrupole and CMB quadrupole. Calculation performed with spherical tensors.

  • Our work (in progress): reformulate in terms of Cartesian tensors and

then use TAM to simplify calculation. Provide first numerical results

  • n “standard model” prediction (that arises from 2nd order in density-

perturbation amplitude)

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

arXiv:2005.10250

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Numerically….

  • Signal far too big to be seen any time soon, but conceivably

detectable with future lunar-based radio array

  • May be interesting cross-correlations with other observables (CMB B

mode, weak lensing, etc.)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Summary/conclusions

  • Calculational tools from TAM formalism allow dramatic simplification
  • f observables on a spherical sky, especially when vector/tensor

modes are involved and/or observables are 2nd order in perturbation theory

  • CMB circular polarization in standard model
  • Imprint of chirality of GW background on CMB CP
  • Elegant/compact formalism for PTA/astrometry probes of ~nHZ GW

background

  • CP of 21-cm radiation from dark ages