Novel Transport Phenomena with Chirality, Vorticity and Magnetic field
- Jun. 23~25, 2019
Jinfeng Liao
1
Novel Transport Phenomena with Chirality, Vorticity and Magnetic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Jun. 23~25, 2019 Novel Transport Phenomena with Chirality, Vorticity and Magnetic field Jinfeng Liao 1 Fascinating New Frontiers of XQCD It is all about quarks & gluons under extreme conditions! 2 Spin: Chirality, Vorticity
1
It is all about quarks & gluons — under extreme conditions!
2
SPIN UP SPIN DOWN Magnetic Polarization Rotational Polarization Chirality Polarization
Interesting interplay —> highly nontrivial phenomena!
3
QCD matter under extremely strong vorticity and magnetic fields!
4
What happens to the spin DoF in the fluid??? A nearly perfect fluid (of energy-momentum)
5
~100 people, 4.5 days
6
Chirality 2015,2016,2017 @ UCLA Chirality 2018 @ Univ. Florence Chirality 2019 @ Tsinghua Univ.
7
arXiv:1906.00936
8
9
Weyl semimetal (non-degenerated bands)
TaAs NbAs NbP TaP
Dirac semimetal (doubly degenerated bands)
ZrTe5 Na3Bi, Cd3As2
“Fluid Spintronics” Condensed matter, cold atomic gases, neutron stars, cosmology, plasma physics, etc [Chiral Matter workshops @ RIKEN, NTU]
10
If a Dirac fermion’s mass is zero —> axial U(1) global phase symmetry!
Ψ → eiαγ5Ψ
5 = ¯
Axial current Classically conserved
5 = 0
In this case, chirality becomes well defined.
Right Handed (RH) Left Handed (LH)
L = ¯ Ψ(iγµ∂µ)Ψ
ΨR = 1 + γ5 2 Ψ ΨL = 1 − γ5 2 Ψ
Phase symmetries: independent U(1) for RH and LH sectors!
11
If a nonzero Lagrangian mass term is added: axial symmetry is explicitly broken.
Axial current is no longer conserved:
5 = 2im¯
The mass controls the degree of such breaking. In QCD, for light flavors (u & d), Lagrangian mass is small:
QCD has chiral symmetry (to very good approximation)!
12
The missing symmetries: while the Lagrangian has (approximate) chiral symmetry, the vacuum and hadron spectrum do not have that. QCD vacuum is not empty, but a complicated, nonperturbative, emergent form of condensed matter. [It accounts for 99% of the mass of our visible matter in universe.]
13
* Spontaneously broken chiral symmetry in the vacuum is a fundamental property of QCD. * A chirally symmetric quark-gluon plasma at high temperature is an equally fundamental property of QCD!
Could we see direct experimental evidence for that?
14
* Quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is created in such collisions. * It is PRIMORDIALLY HOT ~ trillion degrees ~ early universe.
* Is chiral symmetry restored? CHIRAL FERMIONS
15
* C_A is universal anomaly coefficient * Anomaly is intrinsically QUANTUM effect Chiral anomaly is a fundamental aspect of QFT with chiral fermions. V V A Broken at QM level: Classical symmetry:
[e.g. pi0—> 2 gamma]
16
Twisting gluon fields around spacetime boundary Mobius strip Gluon topological structures play key role in confinement and chiral symmetry breaking.
17
How to observe their effects experimentally?
QCD anomaly: gluon topology —> chirality imbalance
18
Quarks
Net chirality <—> topo fluctuations & chiral restoration
19
Pz = −A√s 2
Pz = +A√s 2
QGP’s way of accommodating this angular momentum
20
NR UR Heavy ion collisions:
∂ ∼ fm−1
21
Jiang, Lin, JL, PRC2016; Shi, Li, JL, PLB2018; … The local vorticity pattern is strongly influenced by the bulk flow. The averaged vorticity reflects the global orbital angular momentum.
22
Low energy High energy
How does a many-body system cope with a sizable angular momentum? Orbital motion (vorticity); Spin alignment (polarization). Fluid vorticity Macroscopic Individual spin Microscopic
23
Dirac Lagrangian in rotating frame: Under slow rotation: Rotational polarization effect!
24
[CAN BE STUDIED ON THE LATTICE: Yamamoto, Hirono; …]
Rotational polarization effect! For thermally produced particles: “equal-partition” of angular momentum
~ !· ~ J T
25
Expect larger signal at LOW beam energy HIC!
An exciting discovery from STAR Collaboration at RHIC: The most vortical fluid!
26
26
STAR Collaboration, Nature 2017
27
ω ≈ (9 ± 1) × 1021s−1
The most vortical fluid!
Existing puzzles: Splitting between hyperons & anti- hyperons; Local polarization azimuthal patterns.
Jiang, Lin, JL, PRC2016; Shi, Li, JL, PLB2019; Becattini, et al; Csernai, et al;
28
29
[Talks by: H. Taya, R. Ryblewski, E. Speranza, A. Kumar, Gallegos Pazos, @ Chirality 2019] [Talk by Hongo and by Yang @ this conference ]
[Yin Jiang, JL, PRL2016; Huang, Fukushima, Mameda, Chernodub, …]
Let us consider pairing phenomenon in fermion systems. There are many examples: superconductivity, superfluidity, chiral condensate, diquark, … We consider scalar pairing state, with J=0.
~ S = ~ s1 + ~ s2
~ J = ~ L + ~ S
Rotation tends to polarize ALL angular momentum, both L and S, thus suppressing scalar pairing.
~ L ~ L
30
Maybe in low energy collisions: In-medium mass correction due to rotation??
31
Maybe also for nucleon-pairing?!
32
Large isospin density in low energy collision: Possible effect from rotation?
33
[Hui Zhang, Defu Hou, JL, arXiv: 1812.11787.] Spin-1 Rho condensation is favored by rotation!
34
The angular momentum together with large (+Ze) nuclear charge —> strong magnetic field!
35
[Kharzeev,McLerran,Warringa;Skokov,et al; Bzdak-Skokov; Deng-Huang; Skokov-McLerran; Tuchin; ...]
[Bloczynski-Huang-Zhang-Liao]
E, B ∼ γ ZαEM R2
A
∼ 3m2
π
36
Quantitative simulations confirm the existence of such extreme fields!
[Many interesting B-field induced effects: di-electron; polarization splitting; quarkonium v2; D meson v1; …] Huang, Liao, et al PLB2012
37
Chirality & Anomaly & Topology Magnetic Field Electric Current Q.M. Transport
38
[Kharzeev, Fukushima, Warringa, McLerran, …]
Intuitive understanding of CME:
Magnetic polarization —> correlation between micro. SPIN & EXTERNAL FORCE Chiral imbalance —> correlation between directions of SPIN & MOMENTUM
Transport current along magnetic field
~ J = Q2 2⇡2 µ5 ~ B
39
Anomaly --> Chirality --> * This is a non-dissipative current! * Indeed the chiral magnetic conductivity is P-odd but T
(In contrast the Ohmic conductivity is T
and dissipative.)
CME is macroscopic chiral anomaly — a remarkable phenomenon!
40
Symmetry; Lagrangian; Conservation laws; ……
Thermodynamics; Transport; Fluid Dynamics; ……
Quantum Field Theory Kinetic Theory Fluid Dynamics
Weakly Interacting Strongly Interacting
WHAT ABOU the “SEMI”-SYMMETRY??? i..e ANOMALY?! — classical symmetry that is broken in quantum theory
41
Usual (classical) transport equation: [Son, Yamamoto; Stephanov, Yin; Chen, Wang, et al; Hidaka, Pu, Yang; Huang, Shi, Jiang, JL, Zhuang; …] Chiral transport equation:
42
It would be remarkable to actually “see” this new hydrodynamics at work in real world materials!
[Son, Surowka; Kharzeev, Yee; Hidaka, Yang; …]
43
The quark-gluon plasma is a subatomic CHIRAL MATTER.
In-Plane Out-of-Plane
Can we observe CME in heavy ion collisions?? 1) (nearly) chiral quarks 2) chirality imbalance 3) strong magnetic field
44
[Kharzeev 2004; Kharzeev, McLerran, Warringa,2008;…]
strong radial blast: position —> momentum
45
Very difficult measurement: * Zero average, only nonzero variance; * Correlation measurement with significant backgrounds; * Signal likely very small These correlations are sensitive to CME contributions, however they are also sensitive to many non-CME backgrounds!
x (In-plane) y (Out-of-plane)
46
CME expectation:
γSS < 0 , δSS > 0
γOS > 0 , δOS < 0
Transverse Momentum Conservation (TMC)
γ < 0 , δ < 0
Local Charge Conservation (LCC) Resonance decay: similar to LCC
γOS > 0 , δOS > 0
Background contribution to gamma is due to nonzero v2!!
47
Many interesting proposals
Bzdak, Koch, JL, 2012
A two-component decomposition model:
STAR PRL2014
48
49
Most measurements based on: gamma correlator + certain procedure to constrain backgrounds
Key challenge: weak signal versus strong backgrounds. Many new measurements at RHIC and LHC to help address this. Need quantitative predictions to help exp search!
49
arXiv:1611.04586 arXiv:1711.02496
Badly needed: Quantitative predictions for CME signal in heavy ion collisions!
50
AVFD: Anomalous-Viscous Fluid Dynamics
51
arXiv:1611.04586 arXiv:1711.02496 A versatile tool to quantitatively understand and answer many important questions about CME in HIC!
52
[We now also have MUSIC-AVFD!] 53
Upper: NO magnetic field Lower: with B field (along y+ direction)
54
Upper: Left-Handed (LH), with B field (along y+ direction) Lower: Right-Handed (RH), with B field (along y+ direction)
55
Chirality imbalance —> R/L asymmetry —> charge asymmetry
56
Excellent agreement! Many more detailed results reported in: Shi, Jiang, JL, et al: arXiv:1611.04586 [CPC]; arXiv:1711.02496 [Annals of Physics]
57
Include EBE fluctuations: Important for better understanding: * Interplay between signal and BKG; * Experimental analysis methods
58
[Schenke, Shen, Tribedy, 2019]
To quantify background correlations in state-of-art hydro framework
59
[Koch, Oliinychenko, 2019]
New development of particlization: the best way to quantify LCC
60
First attempt at full characterization of signal + known major backgrounds
New opportunity of potential discovery: Isobaric Collision @ RHIC
~2 billion data collected successfully in RHIC 2018 run; processing and analysis underway!
61
Key idea: contrasting two systems with identical bulk, varied magnetic fields. [Koch, et al, arXiv: 1608.00982]
Joint multiplicity-geometry cut: Vanishing difference in bulk properties, Sizable difference in magnetic fields!!!
Eccentricity is guaranteed the same! B field differs by 12~20% !
62
63
Look for absolute difference between isobars (after joint-cut)! Look for consistency between delta- and gamma-correlators!
[Shi, Zhang, Hou, JL, arXiv:1807.05604; paper in preparation]
CME + CSE —> gapless collective excitations, the CMW [Kharzeev, Yee, 2010; Burnier, Kharzeev, JL, Yee, 2011] Wave: propagating “oscillations” of two coupled quantities e.g. sound wave (pressure & density); EM wave (E & B fields) EM wave Chiral Magnetic Wave
64
CMW —> charge quadrupole of QGP —> elliptic flow splitting
[Burnier, Kharzeev, JL, Yee, PRL2011; and arXiv: 1208.2537] [STAR, PRL2015] [Also seen by ALICE@LHC]
charge quadrupole due to CMW transport
65
66
CME CMW A consistent trend: Turning-off at low energy? Chiral breaking/ restoration?
67
68
Chirality Topology Magnetic Field Vorticity
69
Strong influence by B field evolution; Significant theoretical uncertainty!
70
Very sensitive to initial axial charge; Significant theoretical uncertainty!
71
First calibration for the influence of the viscous transport on charge separation signal!
72
Kaons are sensitive to anomalous transport of s-quarks. Theory expectation: u,d ~ s
73
AVFD ALICE 2.76TeV
74
1 1.05 1.1
1 2 3 (a) Au+Au 200 GeV 20-30%
RΨm(∆S) ∆S″
1 1.05 1.11 2 3 (b) 40-50%
∆S″
m = 2 m = 3
1 1.05 1.11 2 3 (c) 60-70%
∆S″
1.2 1.6 2σ
Ψ σ Ψ
New a key tool for understanding different observables’ responses and sensitivity to signal and backgrounds
Insight from initial conditions: joint cut on Multiplicity-Eccentricity
75
[Shi, Zhang, Hou, JL, arXiv:1807.05604; paper in preparation]
100M EBE-AVFD events: Subject to joint-cut
76
Post-selection double-check: Identical v2 ! Getting two identical sample of isobar events for contrast
77
78 78
[Yu Guo, Shengqin Feng, Shuzhe Shi, JL, 1905.12613]
79
[Yu Guo, Shengqin Feng, Shuzhe Shi, JL, 1905.12613]
79
Vorticity
Vorticity + Magnetic field
For this to work: Requires long-lived late time magnetic field. Where does that come from??
80
[X. Guo, et al, arXiv:1904.04704] Important at low beam energy!
80