Challenges & Opportunities of pre-treatment for AD Plants Mike Bullard Managing Director, UTS Biogas Ltd
Contents • Introduction to UTS/Anaergia • “pre-treatment” agricultural systems In contrast to • “pre-treatment” SSO waste systems • Conclusions
Case-studies in the presentation Biogas plant May Biogas plant Dagenham, London Farm, Ely, Cambs Manure/grass Biogas plant, Yorkshire
About Anaergia/ UTS Biogas • Global technology leader in the recovery of value from organic waste streams Proven portfolio of proprietary technological solutions around • anaerobic digestion core • Flexible project delivery options, including process turnkey supply, DBOO (including financing) • Over 20 years of design and operating experience Core technologies used in over 1,600 digester plants with over 355MW • of capacity from biogas • UTS Biogas Ltd is the sole delivery agent for all Anaergia products in the UK and Ireland (UK based technical and project management) • In the UK: 9 plants operational, 4 larger facilities in-build. Turnkey design construct commission services; pre-treatment, biogas • production and utilisation; digestate management. CHP and BtG. EPC or technology supply. 4
Anaergia’s Technology Platform Built On In-house Manufacturing, R&D and Exclusive Partnerships Organics Pre-treatment Core Technology Post Treatment Organics Extrusion Solids Separation Residuals Drying DB Technologies Anaergia / UTS Therma-Flite (Exclusive Partner) Hydraulic Mixing Membranes Anaergia / UTS Fibracast (Subsidiary) Recyclable Recovery Service Box Gasification DB Technologies Anaergia / UTS KIV (Exclusive Partner) Materials Handling Biogas Upgrading Anaergia / UTS Greenlane (Partner) Anaerobic Digesters Anaergia / UTS
Pre-treatment; what’s the problem?
Key issues • Heterogeneity – good pre-treatment produces homogeneity in the feed material • Contamination – good pre-treatment removes contaminants effectively • Accessing the organics – good pre-treatment capture a high proportion of organics for AD • Recyclates recovery – good-pre-treatment enhances recyclate value • Keeping the organics clean – boosts gas yields • Achieving PAS110 – all of the above needed to achieve PAS110 and thus meet end of waste criteria
May Farm Digestate Storage Tank Secondary Fermenters Primary Fermenters CHP Area Pasteurisers & Separator
May Farm process flow Output-Fibre Incoming Separator Separated Solid Digestate Solid Feed Digestate Storage Tank Buffer Tank Weighbridg e Batch pasteurisatio n Conditioning Maceration Feed Primary Secondary hopper Fermenter Fermenter Conditioning CHP Desulphurisatio n Output Output Output Liquid Electricity Heat digestate
Grass/ manure Biogas plant
Grass/ manure Biogas plant Output-Fibre Incoming Incoming Separator Separated Solid Digestate Solid Liquid Digestate Storage Tank Receptio Weighbridge n tank Conditioning Feed Fermenter hopper Stone Trap CHP Desulphurisation Output Output Output Liquid Electricity Heat digestate
Static pre-treatment solution
Mobile pre-treatment solution
Dagenham Composting building
Output-Fibre Hall Incoming Separator Separated Solid Digestate Waste Digestate Storage Tank Buffer Tank Weighbridg e Batch pasteurisatio Reception building n Biowaste Maceration Preparation Primary Secondary Receptio equipment Fermenter Fermenter n tank CHP Desulphurisatio n Output Output Output Liquid Electricity Heat digestate
SSO treatment - Key process design parameters - Process design parameter Unit Value Solid concentration organic fraction % of wet 25 – 35 Volatile solids organic fraction % of dry 85 – 95 Solid concentration input digester % of wet 25 - 30 Solid concentration output digester % of wet 10 - 15 kg VS/(m 3 *d) Organic loading digester 6.5 – 8 Hydraulic retention time (HRT) digester Days 40-60 Specific biogas production Nm 3 /t VS 680 – 750 Nm 3 /t wet Specific biogas production 130 – 150 Contamination levels % (w/w) 3-25%
MSW / SSO treatment - Low contamination -
SSO upfront processing system: Hammer Mill Hammers disintegrate contaminants • (glass, plastic) • Organic fraction for AD is ‘contaminted‘ with glass, plastic • The more the SSO contamination level as more water is required to process the SSO • Challenged by contamination > 10% - Grit and plastic separation systems are required if highly contaminated SSO is treated • More process water = greater digester size = greater costs • Biobags are an issue • Not suitable for processing biowaste with high green waste content • Heavy parasitic power consumption • Reject stream needs to be pressed to reduce moisture content • Difficulty dealing with heterogenous wastes 19
Other SSO: alternative upfront processing systems 20
Impacts of poor pre-treatment • Poor removal of contraries leading to build up of silts, sediments, plastics floating layers. • Loss of digester capacity – silting and additional water addition • Potential toxicity • Failure to achieve PAS110 (plastics) • Extra costs of post-process digestate screening • Additional mixing causing higher electricity consumption • Greater organics carry-over in residual waste stream; loss of biogas yield and potential recycling target issues • Blockages • Additional pump wear and tear – increased opex • Heterogeneity – loss of gas yield
Conclusions • Hammer-mill and turbo-separator systems available in the market place: – Require significant amounts of process water and therefore have cost impacts on remainder of plant design – Do not cope with high levels of impurities – Do not recover high proportions of organics – Leave a dirty residual stream – Have high opex costs – Do not give a clean organics stream • The waste industry needs something better!
Thank you Mike Bullard Mike.bullard@uts-biogas.com 0044 1480 477608
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR MULTIMODAL TREATMENT IN PAIN & OUD
Challenges & Opportunities for the Challenges & Opportunities for the
Promotion of Point of Use Water Treatment in Nepal Challenges and
Domestication of the Harmonised Seed Security Project (HASSP) through the
40th International Society of City and Regional Planners Young Planners
India-Japan-China Trilateralism Challenges and Opportunities Challenges and
HCV Prevention, Testing and Access to Care and Treatment in a Post-ACA World:
R Regional School District #6 l h l D #6 Low Enrollment Challenges and
2006 International Conference on Nanotechnology, April 26-28, 2006 Atlanta,
The Opportunities and Challenges of Waste-Recycling for Semiconductor Plants
Emerging Energy Technology Forum Programs & Opportunities for Alaska
Evaluating PAS110, the Anaerobic Digestate Quality Protocol and ASRS
Anaerobic Digestion on Dairy Farms for Electrical Generation Williams
Presenter: Patrick Dube Company: Water Environment Federation Presentation
HERAKLION 2019 7 th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste
Biogas production assessment for a semi-continuous anaerobic co- digestion
County-Wide Solid Waste System Feasibility Study & Site Analysis
BIOGAS TECHNOLOGY FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS Group profile Est. 1990 Est. 2000
A PRACTICAL MODEL FOR FULL-SCALE OPTIMISATION OF THE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Agenda 1. Overview 2. Organics Recycling in the US Georgia Recycling
HIGHER EDUCATION BLOCK GRANT HE4-1 1 First round projects Contracts fully
BC ORGANICS PROJECT Introduction to Anaerobic Digestion and the BC Organics