Challenges around Execution and Evaluation of Innovative Study Designs and their use in Regulatory Decision-Making: A Reflection from a Pharma Company
Rebecca Lumsden, PhD - Director, Europe & International Regulatory Policy
Challenges around Execution and Evaluation of Innovative Study - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Challenges around Execution and Evaluation of Innovative Study Designs and their use in Regulatory Decision-Making: A Reflection from a Pharma Company Rebecca Lumsden, PhD - Director, Europe & International Regulatory Policy The Case for
Rebecca Lumsden, PhD - Director, Europe & International Regulatory Policy
Private Confidential 1
Private Confidential 2
Sources: Drug Discovery and Development: Understanding the R&D Process, www.innovation.org; CBO, Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2006; Forbes, Matthew Herper, “The Truly Staggering Cost Of Inventing New Drugs”, February 10, 2012
Negotiation for Reimbursement 27 member States EMA Filing Pre-Clinical Research Closed & Open Innovation
Clinical Trials
EMA Approval for Sale HTA Approval Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
5,000 10,000 Compounds 250 Compounds
3 – 6 Years 6 – 7 Years
5 Therapies 1 Therapy
2 – 5 Years
Number of Patients/Subjects
20-100 100-500 1000-5000
Regulatory Review Drug Discovery Pre Clinical Testing
PhV Monitoring
Total Cost: $2 - $4 Billion USD New therapies don’t reach patients until here
Private Confidential 3
RWE for indirect comparisons
Modelling, simulation & extrapolation
Adaptive statistics Umbrella & Basket studies Platform studies with Master protocols, Historical controls
Electronic medical records, patient registries (RWE) Wearable devices, phone applications
AI & digital Tools
Private Confidential 4
Private Confidential 5
autoimmune disease. Regulatory and reimbursement authorities showed a generally positive response to the use of RWE in granting conditional approval in area of high unmet medical need leading to a faster and lower cost development.
Response was that ‘RWE data would not provide a decisive comparison, since there could be a lot of bias and data analysis can be problematic’. It was explicitly stated that they wanted data owned and generated by the company (i.e. conduct a confirmatory RCT).
Private Confidential 6
Private Confidential 7
Private Confidential 8
Complex Innovative Trial Designs Model-informed Drug Development Biomarker Qualification Real World Evidence Benefit/Risk Assessment Patient Voice
EMA FDA PMDA China Extrapolation Framework PDUFA VI
Private Confidential 9
Traditional Approach to register a modified release product Clinical Efficacy Trial Bioavailability Trials PK/PD BRIDGE
efficacious
(equivalent or lower concentrations)
Bioavailability Trials MIDD Approach: PK/PD Bridge
Private Confidential 10
)
Private Confidential 11
Private Confidential 12
Private Confidential 13
Private Confidential 14
Section 3: Potential Opportunities and Challenges
Private Confidential 15