CFD Simulation B Y : E V A N N E Y 1 2 / 1 6 / 1 4 Converging - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cfd simulation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CFD Simulation B Y : E V A N N E Y 1 2 / 1 6 / 1 4 Converging - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Converging Diverging Nozzle CFD Simulation B Y : E V A N N E Y 1 2 / 1 6 / 1 4 Converging Diverging Nozzle - Background Hour glass shaped nozzle HIGH Fully subsonic isentropic flow Velocity increases in converging section and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

B Y : E V A N N E Y 1 2 / 1 6 / 1 4

Converging Diverging Nozzle CFD Simulation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Converging Diverging Nozzle - Background

Hour glass shaped nozzle

Inlet of decreasing cross sectional area

Outlet of increasing cross sectional area

Used to accelerate pressurized fluid to supersonic speeds

Useful in many turbine and jet engine applications.

Reference 1

Outlet (Back) Pressure HIGH LOW

Fully subsonic isentropic flow

Velocity increases in converging section and decreases in diverging section

Flow becomes choked (Mach 1 at throat)

Upper limit of back pressure range for shocks

Converging section becomes time independent

Normal shock wave is formed near throat

Instantaneous property changes across shock

Pressure increase

Temperature increases

Velocity decreases

Shock wave location moves towards outlet

Shock is just at outlet. More complex shock patterns begin to occur

Flow pressure at exit is less than ambient pressure – Overexpanded nozzle

Fully supersonic isentropic flow (design condition)

Lower limit of back pressure for shocks in

  • verexpanded flow

Back pressure low enough that it equals the nozzle exit pressure

Shocks disappear

𝒆𝑩 𝑩 = 𝒆𝑾 𝑾 (𝑵𝟑 − 𝟐)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Aims

2)

This project aims to examine viscous boundary layer separation with shock waves in an over expanded supersonic nozzle.

1)

This project aims to examine inviscid and real flow in a 3D supersonic converging diverging nozzle and the development of normal shocks in the nozzle.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Geometry and Mesh

Geometry

The nozzle profile will aligned with that tested by Craig Hunter, NASA (profile depicted below)

Throat area At =4.317 in^2

Expansion ratio Ae/At = 1.797

Width 3.99in

Best mesh:

Profile:

Edge sizing with number of divisions per section

Bias towards wall

Sweep:

Swept through the width with bias towards edges

Mirrored over symmetry plane

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ANSYS Fluent Setup

INVISCID MODEL

Solver Settings:

Steady solver

Density based (as the flow is compressible)

Inviscid model

2nd order upwind

Boundary conditions:

Pressure inlet at inlet

Pressure outlet at outlet

No slip wall on sides and top plane

Symmetry on bottom plane of model

Material Properties:

Working fluid was standard air

Air as ideal gas model TURBULENT MODEL

Solver Settings:

Steady solver

Density based (as the flow is compressible)

K-Epsilon/K-Omega

2nd order upwind/1st order upwind

Boundary conditions:

Pressure inlet at inlet

Pressure outlet at outlet

No slip wall on sides and top plane

Symmetry on bottom plane of model

Material Properties:

Working fluid was standard air

Air as real gas (Soave Redlich Kwong) NPR = inlet total pressure / outlet pressure

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Inviscid Results

Mach: NPR 8.78 (isentropic) Mach: NPR 1.4 (shock)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Turbulent Results

Mesh 3 vs Empirical

NPR 1.4 NPR 2.0 NPR 3.0

Pressure Comparison Solver Study NPR 2.0 Velocity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

References

1.

http://www.ivorbittle.co.uk/Books/Fluids%20boo k/Chap[6pter%2013%20%20web%20docs/Chapte r%2013%20Part%203%20Complete%20doc.htm

  • 2. http://www.engapplets.vt.edu/fluids/CDnozzle/cdi

nfo.html

3.

Hunter, Craig A. “Experimental Investigation of Separated Nozzle Flows.” Journal of Propulsion and Power No. 3 Vol. 20. (2004)