Cedar City Valley Groundwater Management Plan Water Advisory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cedar city valley
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cedar City Valley Groundwater Management Plan Water Advisory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cedar City Valley Groundwater Management Plan Water Advisory Committee Update October 25 th , 2018 Prior Appropriation Doctrine Divert water to beneficial use Priority date First in time, first in right Loss of right Role of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Cedar City Valley Groundwater Management Plan

October 25th, 2018

Water Advisory Committee Update

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Divert water to

beneficial use

  • Priority date
  • First in time, first in

right

  • Loss of right

Prior Appropriation Doctrine

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Role of the State Engineer

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Role of the State Engineer

  • Office of Record (Since 1903)
  • Measures and Distributes water

to entitled water right holders

  • Gatekeeper to provide order and certainty
  • Reduces conflict
  • Protects investments
  • Respect for existing rights
  • Public waters appropriated

according to policy set by legislature

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cedar City Valley Policy Since 1966

  • All pending unapproved applications on

file will be rejected.

  • All future applications to appropriate

ground water from the Cedar City Valley will be rejected.

  • Granting of additional extensions of

time in which to submit proof on all pending applications will be critically reviewed.

  • Divided Groundwater Valley into

Separate sub basins

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Groundwater Management Plans

  • Legislation enacted in 2006
  • Established Section 73-5-15 of Utah Code
  • Tool to help the State Engineer distribute

groundwater

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Section 73-5-15

  • (2)
  • (a) The state engineer may regulate groundwater

withdrawals within a specific groundwater basin by adopting a groundwater management plan in accordance with this section for any groundwater basin or aquifer or combination of hydrologically connected groundwater basins or aquifers.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Section 73-5-15

  • (2)
  • (b) The objectives of a groundwater management

plan are to:

  • (i)

limit groundwater withdrawals to safe yield;

  • (ii) protect physical integrity of the aquifer; and
  • (iii) protect water quality
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Section 73-5-15

  • (1) As used in this section:
  • (a) “Critical management area” means a

groundwater basin in which the groundwater withdrawals consistently exceed the safe yield.

  • (b) “Safe yield” means the amount of groundwater

that can be withdrawn from a groundwater basin

  • ver a period of time without exceeding the long-

term recharge of the basin or unreasonably affecting the basin’s physical and chemical integrity.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Safe Yield

  • Recharge is a starting point
  • May be less than recharge to protect physical

integrity of the aquifer and water quality

  • Recharge is verified from a water budget
  • Inflows (recharge) = Outflows (discharge) +

Change in storage

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Groundwater Balance

Recharge

  • Precipitation
  • Seepage from irrigation
  • Seepage from streams and

canals

  • Subsurface inflow

Discharge

  • Well pumping
  • Subsurface outflow
  • Evapotranspiration (Lake

evaporation and plant transpiration)

  • Valley springs
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Section 73-5-15

  • (3)(b) The state engineer shall base the

provisions of a groundwater management plan

  • n the principles of prior appropriation (No

consideration on the nature of use)

  • (4)(c) but may consider voluntary arrangements
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hydrologic Data

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Hydrologic Studies

  • Geology and ground-water resources of Cedar City and

Parowan Valleys, Iron County, Utah. Thomas and Taylor (1946)

  • Ground-water resources of the Parowan-Cedar City

drainage basin, Iron County, Utah. Bjorklund, Sumison, and Sandberg (1978)

  • The geology of Cedar Valley, Iron County, Utah, and its

relation to ground-water conditions. Hurlow (2002)

  • Hydrology and Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in Cedar

Valley, Iron County, Utah. Brooks and Mason (2005)

  • Investigation of land subsidence and earth fissures in Cedar

Valley, Iron County, Utah. Knudsen, Inkenbrandt, Lund, Lowe, and Bowman (2014)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Safe Yield

  • Safe Yield: 21,000 AF/yr
  • Current Well Depletion:

28,000 AF/yr

  • Potential (approved) Well Depletion:

50,000 AF/yr

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Safe Yield and Depletion Comparison

21,000 28,000 50,000 Safe Yield Current Depletion Depletion Amount of Approved Groundwater Rights 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000

(Amounts are in acre-feet per year)

7,000

Deficit

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Current (2000-2013 Average) Depletion by Use

Irrigation 21,400 Industrial 90 Domestic & Stock 400 Subsurface Outflow 1,000 Municipal 5,300

Total: 28,000 AF/yr

(Amounts are in acre-feet per year)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Depletion Amounts of Approved Groundwater Rights By Use

Irrigation 36,500 Stock 950 Domestic 190 Mining 1,700 Other 300 Municipal 10,400

Total: 50,000 AF/yr

(Amounts are in acre-feet per year)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Approaches

  • Augment groundwater supply
  • Decrease depletions
  • Groundwater Management Plan
  • Priority regulation
  • Other voluntary arrangements
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Utah Code Section 73-5-15

  • (4)(b) For critical management areas,

the State Engineer shall allow for gradual implementation of the groundwater management plan

  • (4)(c) but may consider voluntary

arrangements

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Priority Regulation Option

  • List water rights and associated

depletion amounts in order of priority

  • Create a schedule of when water rights

will no longer be distributed groundwater

  • Start with most junior rights until

depletion amounts for remaining rights equal safe yield

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Draft Plan

  • Reduction Schedule
  • Use Reporting and Tracking
  • Voluntary Arrangements
  • Updated Change Application and

Appropriation Policy

slide-28
SLIDE 28

QUESTIONS?