CCSF FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Management Team September 16, 2016 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Management Team September 16, 2016

CCSF FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

1

PLANNING TEAM tBP/Architecture Phil Newsom Architect, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge, Project Manager Amy Jane Frater AICP, LEED AP Educational Facilities Planner

2

AGENDA

• Purpose and Process
• Findings of Needs Assessment
• Discussion: Organizational

Philosophy

• Next Steps

3

PURPOSE & PROCESS

4

PURPOSE OF THE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Provides a roadmap for facilities improvement, renovation, replacement, and new construction based on the Education Master Plan.

• Build a 21st century community college that meets the needs of students

today & tomorrow.

• Create a flexible, living strategy that is driven by educational vision.
• Modernize CCSF facilities to serve for the next 10 years and beyond.
• Include our community in the decision-making process.
• Fulfill Accreditation requirements for facilities planning.

5

2014 CCSF EDUCATION MASTER PLAN GOAL 1: Advance student achievement in meeting educational goals. GOAL 2: Transform and sustain College infrastructure. GOAL 3: Provide new and expanded

• pportunities for organizational

development and effective innovation.

6

Facility Master Plan (FMP) is the basis for:

• Facilities Budgeting
• 5-Year Construction Plans
• State Funding Proposals

(IPP/FPPs)

• Campus Standards
• Bond Planning
• Project Schedules
• Project Planning & Design

7

PLANNING PROCESS & SCHEDULE

8

www.ccsf.edu/fmp

• Project information
• Sign-up for mailing list
• Address to submit comments

9

Phase 1 Needs - FINDINGS

• Issues
• Facilities Condition Index
• Space Needs Analysis
• Goals

10

FACILITIES ISSUES

• District-wide
• Ocean Campus
• More Locations

11

DISTRICT-WIDE ISSUES

• Positives
• Students First
• Re-imagine the campus at each location as a

learning environment.

• Every program should have a home.
• Core student services need a consistent brand at

each location.

• Collegiate space at each location.
• Some facilities are outdated.
• Flexible tech-rich multi-use educational

environments rather than just ‘computer labs.’

• Take more advantage of opportunities to pool

facilities – more bang for the buck.

12

OCEAN CAMPUS ISSUES

• Inefficient Organization
• Outdated Facilities
• Circulation Conflicts
• Safety
• Need Study Space
• Need High Tech Space
• Need Community Space
• Neighborhood Integration
• Balboa Reservoir

Fort Mason Site (Civic Center)

• Inefficient Layout
• Need Study Space

Civic Center

• Neighborhood Security
• No Collegiate Space

John Adams

• Underutilized Space
• Better Outdoor Space

Mission

• Underutilized Space

Airport

• Outdated Space
• No Collegiate Space

CENTERS ISSUES

Chinatown/North Beach

• Underutilized Space
• Unused Café

Downtown

• Outdated Space
• Inefficient Space
• Need Collegiate, Study

Space

• Neighborhood Security

Gough Street District Offices

• Vacate

Evans

• Outdated Layout

Southeast

• Outdated Space
• Underutilized Space
• Inactive Space
• Need Collegiate Space

CENTERS, DISTRICT OFFICES ISSUES

Chinatown/ North Beach

• Underutilized Space
• Unused Café

Downtown

• Outdated Space
• Inefficient Space
• Need Collegiate, Study

Space

• Neighborhood Security

Gough Street District Offices

• Vacate

Evans

• Outdated Layout

Southeast

• Outdated Space
• Underutilized Space
• Inactive Space
• Need Collegiate Space

CENTERS, DISTRICT OFFICES ISSUES

2012 FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)

• Compares Cost of Repair to

Cost of Replacement

• Prepared by State Chancellor’s

Office

17

18

19

SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Develop a strategy for “Good Space – Right Space” per state standards for space.

20

Campus Lecture Labs Office Library/ Study AVTV/ Instructional Media

Ocean 179% 114% 120% 85% 54% More Locations 253% 194% 77% 52% 105%

EXISTING CAPACITY LOAD RATIOS

Source: CCSF 2015 Space Inventory, CCSF Five Year Construction Plan

<100% means ‘need more space’ >110% means ‘too much space’

Year Enrollment (Fall) FTES (Fall) WSCH (Fall) ACTUAL (State)

2014 46,734 23,147 347,208

NEAR TERM (State)

2020 58,413 32,750 491,252

LONG TERM (State)

2026 73,055 41,739 626,080

HIGHEST ACTUAL(State)

2008 67,485 36,775 551,630

ENROLLMENT FORECAST Source: 2015 State Forecast of Enrollment & WSCH for Facilities Planning

22

SPACE NEEDS – Ocean Campus 2026-27

Source: CCSF Enrollment Data, 2015 State Forecast of Enrollment & WSCH, CCSF Five Year Construction Plan, 2015 Space Inventory (Adjusted)

OCEAN

HAVE NEED DIFFERENCE

(= Have - Need) Type of Space 2015 Space Inventory ASF Need Ocean ASF

Ocean ASF

Unprogrammed

2,600

2,600

Classroom

118,900 107,000

12,000

Labs

163,900 100,800

63,100

Office

120,200 102,500

17,700

Library/Study

81,600 129,100

• 47,500

AVTV Instructional Media

18,900 36,300

• 17,400

Total Cap Load ASF

506,100 475,700

30,500

23

SPACE NEEDS – Centers 2026-27

Source: CCSF Enrollment Data, 2015 State Forecast of Enrollment & WSCH, CCSF Five Year Construction Plan, 2015 Space Inventory (Adjusted)

CENTERS

HAVE NEED DIFFERENCE

(= Have - Need) Type of Space 2015 Space Inventory ASF Need Centers ASF

Centers ASF

Unprogrammed

22,400

22,400

Classroom

109,100 87,200

21,900

Labs

181,500 76,500

105,000

Office

76,900 88,500

• 11,600

Library/Study

27,200 79,100

• 51,900

AVTV Instructional Media

4,100 16,300

• 12,200

Total Cap Load ASF

421,100 347,600

73,500

24

Facilities Master Plan Goals

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116

Our first principle is to serve students with what is most important to them: community and

• technology. These elements are becoming inextricably intertwined.

The entire physical environment of each campus can be a learning environment. The physical environments of District locations should be developed around this principle. We want to move toward a future when we no longer plan for technology as a special feature, it will become part of the baseline of facilities development. There are many types of community: learning, social, formal, informal. We will plan facilities that encourage more interaction in study, academics, outside of class with peers/faculty/staff/mentors, group study, and socialization around academics. Technology is assumed, ubiquitous. Technology and community are redundant (no longer needed, superfluous), not separate.

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116

GOAL

EMP 1 Student Achievement EMP 2 College Infrastructure EMP 3 Institutional Innovation

• 1. Students first.

X

• 2. Create an environment that promotes the “whole” student and promotes

well-being.

X X

• 3. Create spaces that promote collaborative social and community learning.

X X

• 4. Create spaces that promote collaborative social learning.

X X

• 5. Create facilities that support and develop a sense of community

X X

• 6. Create spaces for formal and informal study for individuals and groups.

X X X

• 7. Develop a one-stop shop for first contact Student Services.

X X

• 8. Second contact services location to support students where they are.

X X

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116

GOAL

EMP 1 Student Achievement EMP 2 College Infrastructure EMP 3 Institutional Innovation

• 9. Develop facilities that create a convenient ‘flow’ between related Student

Development/Student Services functions.

X X

• 10. Provide appropriate space for support services at all District locations.

X X X

• 11. Provide appropriate space for support staff.

X X X

• 12. Provide spaces that support instruction and support services

appropriately and equitably.

X X X

• 13. Provide a venue for all-College events.

X X

• 14. Provide good space that is right-sized and fits the College enrollment.

X X X

• 15. Commitment to a high quality of design for new and older

spaces/buildings.

X

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116

GOAL

EMP 1 Student Achievement EMP 2 College Infrastructure EMP 3 Institutional Innovation

• 16. Provide intuitive wayfinding and better signage.

X X

• 17. Provide universally accessible design.

X X X

• 18. Provide facilities that are sustainable and maintainable.

X

• 19. Develop an aesthetically pleasing, collegiate environment at each

location.

X

• 20. Ensure feelings of personal and educational safety.

X X

• 21. Use Total Cost of Ownership analysis to develop facilities that are cost

effective to construct and maintain.

X

• 22. Plan for near-term improvements that will improve facilities to support

instruction and support services during implementation of long-range plans.

X X X

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116 More goals drafted 082916:

GOAL

EMP 1 Student Achievement EMP 2 College Infrastructure EMP 3 Institutional Innovation

• 23. Develop safe pathways within every District location, and between each

campus and its surrounding community. X

• 24. Improve access between each campus and the surrounding community

for all transportation modes, such as pedestrians, bicycles, transit and vehicles. X

• 25. Continue to accommodate vehicles at the Ocean Campus.

X

ORGANIZATIONAL PHILOSOPHY

ORGANIZATIONAL PHILOSOPHY

• 1. “One College with multiple locations” - Does that mean?
• 2. EASE: Need space space at every location?
• 3. Locate related instructional programs together?
• 4. Duplication or consolidation of labs?
• 5. What are the ‘front door’ Student Development services?
• 6. How should there be a ‘flow’ to Student Development - clustered or dispersed?
• 7. Should some instructional and student service functions be clustered?
• 8. Location of offices? Dispersed? Clustered?
• 9. Location of study space? Centralized, or distributed with other uses?

10.Approach for excess space at Centers?

32

NEXT STEPS

33

NEXT STEPS OPTIONS WORKSHOP Monday, Oct 17, 1:30 – 5 pm Monday ,Oct 17, 6 – 9:30 pm PREFERENCE WORKSHOP Tuesday, Nov 1, 6-9:30 pm Wednesday, Nov 2, 1:30 – 5 pm All College members & project mailing list will receive an email invitation, including the workshop locations.

34

QUESTIONS?

35

Management Team September 16, 2016

CCSF FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

36