\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Facilities Master Plan Athletics Committee Eva Klein & Associates Brailsford & Dunlavey Kurt Salmon & Associates RMF Engineers Martin Alexiou Bryson Protection Engineering Group ISES
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Introductions • Scope & Schedule • Methodology • ECU’s Objectives - Discussion • Agenda
Introduction Introduction \\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan – Greg Wachalski, AIA Regional Vice President – Jennifer Zirkle, LEED AP Jennifer Zirkle LEED AP Assistant Project Manager – Peter Isaac Assistant Project Manager j g – Thomas Falace Project Analyst
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY B&D serves as a catalyst for building community y g y Staff Staff Relationship Relationship Experience Experience Focus Focus Services Services Interdisciplinary Your Agents / Over 350 “Quality of Concept / Experienced / Shared Values University Life” through Cross Trained Projects in 48 Facilities Implementation States States
Schedule Schedule Scope Scope \\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan &
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Task 1 – Project Initiation (April 2009) Athletics Committee Meeting Campus & Facility Tour Preliminary Stakeholder Interviews Review of Existing Documents Task 2 – Market Analysis (May & June 2009) Analysis of Comparable Facilities Focus Groups Detailed Stakeholder Interviews (Coaches, Staff, Maintenance, Business, Development) Task 3 – Program Review (June & July 2009) Program Gap Analysis Outline Program Development Program Coordination Preliminary Capital Budget Development D Documentation t ti
Methodology Methodology \\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Value Management Demand Ideal Program Debt Capacity (Cost) ( ) (Value) (Value) Value must exceed cost Value must exceed cost
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Value Management Demand Ideal Program Debt Capacity (Cost) (Cost) (Value) (Value) ECU’s Mission & Values C &
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Each team will be evaluated for: Practice facility Competition facility Spectator support Spectator support Training Administration Iconography (support of brand)
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Strategic Drivers Competitive Pressure Competitive Pressure Limited Coaching Contact Limited Coaching Contact • Drill & training stations Title IX Compliance • Weather mitigation • Evaluation technology a uat o tec o ogy Recruiting – Athletes & Recruiting Athletes & • Recruiting support Coaches Enhanced Teaching Retention – Coaches • Film • Flexibility Donor Interests •Privacy / Acoustical Separation Consistency of Image & Maximizing Athleticism y g M di Medical Support l S t Standards Academic Support
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Strategic Drivers Participation & Scholarship Competitive Pressure Competitive Pressure Opportunities •Teams Title IX Compliance •Roster sizes Recruiting – Athletes & Recruiting Athletes & Equal Facilities Equal Facilities Coaches •Practice space •Practice times Retention – Coaches •Administrative Administrative Donor Interests •Support •Spectator Consistency of Image & y g Standards
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Strategic Drivers Competitive Pressure Competitive Pressure Title IX Compliance Expression of Commitment Recruiting – Athletes & Recruiting Athletes & •Comfort & luxuries •Comfort & luxuries •Competitive advantages Coaches •Celebration of legacies Retention – Coaches •Architecture & materials Courting Process Donor Interests •Greeting / Waiting Consistency of Image & y g •Tour sequence •Closing areas Standards “Arms Race” Factors
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Strategic Drivers Competitive Pressure Competitive Pressure Title IX Compliance Recruiting – Athletes & Recruiting Athletes & Coaches Retention – Coaches Opportunity to Succeed Commitment to Excellence Donor Interests Consistency of Image & y g Standards
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Strategic Drivers Competitive Pressure Competitive Pressure Title IX Compliance Recruiting Recruiting – Athletes & Athletes & Coaches Retention – Coaches Random Perspectives Donor Interests Cost Implications Consistency of Image & Feasibility Implications y g Standards
\\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Strategic Drivers Competitive Pressure Competitive Pressure Title IX Compliance Recruiting – Athletes & Recruiting – Athletes & Coaches Retention – Coaches Donor Interests Consistency of Image & Master Plan Integration Competition for Status Competition for Status Standards Architecture & Materials
Objectives – Discussion ECU s ECU’s \\ Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan
Recommend
More recommend