CASPAR (Computer Assisted Self- Peer Assessment Ratings) An online - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

caspar
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CASPAR (Computer Assisted Self- Peer Assessment Ratings) An online - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CASPAR (Computer Assisted Self- Peer Assessment Ratings) An online management system for forming, supporting and assessing group work. Group work is a key skill for all graduates to possess becoming: increasingly important in higher


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CASPAR

(Computer Assisted Self- Peer Assessment Ratings)

An online management system for forming, supporting and assessing group work.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Group work is a key skill for all graduates to possess becoming: “increasingly important in higher education with the greater emphasis on skills and lifelong

  • learning. We want students not only to be effective

during their studies but also as future employees”

  • Group Work, The Higher Education Academy, viewed on 8 July 2009,

<http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/learning/assessment/Group>

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Students do not like group work.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Students do not like group work.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

All students asked, liked group work when it went

  • well. All agreed that when

the group dynamic works, group work has a positive impact on learning and assessment.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Issues with group work.

  • Fair individual mark allocation
  • The process needs to be assessed as well as

the end result and the tutor is not around for much of the work.

  • The tendency to enclose problems within the

group and inform tutor as last resort.

  • The dominator.
  • The members that never turn up.
  • The members that turn up and do nothing.
  • Personality clashes.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

GWAMP

Group Work Assessment in Media Practice

  • Project funded by HEFCE from 2000-2004.
  • The aim of the project was to find and share

good practice in group work and assessment, with a particular emphasis on media practice related disciplines. http://www.cemp.ac.uk/themes/groupworkassess ment/

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The key features of CASPAR are:

  • Sorts and manages students in groups
  • Students input marks and feedback comments on themselves and others
  • Ease of data management allows for multiple formative assessment

points

  • Students view graphs depicting their development over time
  • Students read feedback from their peers
  • Feedback can be anonymous or not
  • Provides an online group journal that helps students keep a record of

their project as it develops, and an easy way for staff to contact a group at a time

  • Tutor views student feedback and marks easily, all information at

fingertips

  • The system points out potential marking discrepancies and late

submission to aid moderation

  • A large amount of feedback generated
  • The system is flexible enough to be deployed effectively across a range
  • f learning and teaching situations and disciplines
  • CASPAR User Guide v2.0
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Computer Assisted Self/Peer Assessment as a solution

This approach brings with it the general benefits of peer assessment and has several additional benefits:

  • Students are more likely to contribute to the group process

if they know the effort will be rewarded.

  • It can provide them with feedback on their teamwork skills

and contribution to the group.

  • It can also help to divide the „product‟ mark more fairly in

relation to individual students‟ contribution to the group.

  • This approach is user-friendly and more productive than

traditional paper approaches to self-peer assessment.

  • Bloxham, S Teaching and Assessing Groups in Higer Education, The

Higher Education Academy, viewed on 12 June 2010, <http://www.psychology.heacademy.ac.uk/docs/doc/Teaching_and_assessi ng_groups.doc>

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Trial

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Assessment Criteria

 Contribution to the group discussions, meetings

and decision-making.

 Ability to carry out tasks allocated by the group.  Enthusiasm and effort in carrying allocated tasks.  Punctuality and attendance.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Other possible assessment criteria

 Researching, analysing & preparing material for

the task

 Support & encouragement of group members  Acceptance and willingness to act upon advice

and criticism

(It may be helpful to develop assessment criteria with students. This may increase their confidence in using them.)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Case Studies

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Findings

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Limitations of CASPAR

 specific rather than general software

development.

 small software development team  the process of importing students and assigning

groups is time consuming.

 feedback cannot be removed or moderated  editable projects?  yet another electronic platform for students to

access.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Is BlackBoard 9 the solution?