Cash-flow analysis for the Catastrophic Expenses Fund Mara-Cristina - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cash-flow analysis for the Catastrophic Expenses Fund Mara-Cristina - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cash-flow analysis for the Catastrophic Expenses Fund Mara-Cristina Gutirrez-Delgado Economic Analysis Unit, Mexican Ministry of Health Second International Colloquium Dresden, April 2004. Contents. Background. Reform to the
Contents.
- Background.
- Reform to the Mexican General Health Law.
- The Catastrophic Expenses Fund.
- Results, conclusions and recommendations.
- Next steps.
Background.
The Mexican health system.
Private sector Middle class Poor
Urban/Rural
Public Private
Functions
Provision Financing Stewardship
Non-salaried workers in informal sector
Population groups
Federal and state departments
- f health
Social Security System
IMSS ISSSTE
Salaried workers in formal sector
Financial characteristics.
- 1. Level: insufficient investment (5.8% of GDP)
- 2. Source: predominance of out-of-pocket payments (55%)
- 3. Distribution
– Among populations: 1.7 times between insured and uninsured – Among states: 7 to 1 between the state with the highest expenditure on the insured and the one with the lowest
- n the uninsured
- 4. State contributions: 109 to 1
- 5. Allocation items: payroll expenditure vs. investment
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health, 2003.
Distribution of healthcare expenditure.
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003.
42%
3%
55%
Public Out-of-pocket Pre-paid services
Federal Gv´t State Gv´t
Social Security Uninsured
31.8%
6.6%
61.6%
31.8% 61.6%
Reform to the General Health Law.
System of Social Protection in Health.
Aims
- Offer financial protection to uninsured through a
public healthcare insurance scheme.
- Promote a culture of pre-payment among uninsured.
- Strengthen a culture of preventive healthcare.
- Decrease the number of uninsured families facing poverty
because of healthcare costs at point of delivery.
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003.
System of Social Protection in Health.
Healthcare goods and funds.
Personal health services (Popular Health Insurance) Public health goods Budget of the Federal Ministry of Health Catastrophic Expenses Fund Personal Health Services Fund Community Health Services Fund
Funds
- Catastrophic
interventions
- Essential health
interventions
- Stewardship function
- Information, research &
human resources development
- Community health
services
Goods
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003.
Structure of Financial Contributions.
Universal Health Insurance.
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003. **Proposal for future reform to ISSSTE Law.
Popular Health Insurance, SSPH
(informal sector, self- employed and unemployed)
ISSSTE (public-sector salaried employees) ** IMSS (private-sector salaried employees)
Federal Government
(social contribution)
State Gov´t
Public employer
Contributors Public Insurance Scheme
Federal Gov´t
Employee Employee Family Private employer
Federal government
(social contribution)
Federal government
(social contribution)
solidarity contribution
Structure of Financial Contributions.
SSPH.
Social Contribution Federal Solidarity Contribution State Solidarity Contribution Contributions to SSPH: USD$675.52 per family during 2004
89 % USD$675.52 USD$601.21 Personal Health Services 8 % 3 % USD$ 54.04 Catastrophic Expenses USD$ 20.27 Annual budget reserve
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003.
Family Contribution Operative reserve for drugs and medical material necessary for essential interventions According to socioeconomic conditions
The Catastrophic Expenses Fund.
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003.
Aim
Purchasing of covered catastrophic expenses.
Catastrophic expenses Those derived from the treatment of diseases which pose a financial burden to the SSPH. Coverage of catastrophic expenses will be gradual following criteria defined in the General Health Law.
Diseases or treatments that generate catastrophic expenses.
The General Health Council is responsible for the identification
- f diseases, definition of treatments and drugs that generate
catastrophic expenses for the SSPH.
Source: General Health Council,2003.
Total Dialysis Transplants Neonatal intensive care Rehabilitation
Category
Injuries HIV/AIDS Neuro-vascular Cardio-vascular Cancer
Category
5 1 3 2 12,8
No.
53 2 6 8 6
No.
Financial cash-flow.
CEF Covered Services
Interest Balance of annual budget reserve at end of tax year
Cash in-flow (income)
Payment to authorized providers (Operative expenses)
Cash out-flow (expenses)
Administrative expenses
8% of Federal & States contributions
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003.
Financial sufficiency.
Source: Mexican Ministry of Health,2003.
How many diseases or treatments can be covered with available resources?
- Short and mid-term financial sustainability.
- Selection of diseases, based on budgetary
resources, cost-effectiveness, infrastructure and national healthcare priorities, is responsibility of the National Commission of Social Protection in Health.
Available information.
Set 4 plus bone marrow transplant. 5 Set 1: 2004; Set 2: 2005; Set 3: 2006; Set 4: 2009; Set 5: 2010. 6 Set 3 plus kidney transplant. 4 Set 2 plus breast cancer. 3 Set 1 plus acute myocardial infarctation. 2 HIV/AIDS, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, cervix-uterine cancer. 1
Disease or treatment Set
Available information.
Short & mid-term projections.
Biometric: Target population; affiliation rates; incidence rates; mortality rates not included. Financial: Minimum daily wage, interest rates; inflation rates. Expenses: Annual number of cases per disease/treatment; annual average cost per case; annual administrative expenses; quarterly payment. Income: Quarterly budget income; interest accrued quarterly; balance of annual budget reserve at end of tax year.
Results under initial assumptions.
Paquete 1
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 4
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 3
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 5
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 6
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 2
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto
Results discounting the inflation effect.
Paquete 1
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 4
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 3
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 5
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 6
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 2
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto
Results under decrease of annual average cost per case.
Paquete 1
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 4
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 3
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año
Acumulado Gasto Paquete 5
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto Paquete 6
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año
Acumulado Gasto Paquete 2
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto
Results under increase of annual average cost per case.
Paquete 1
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 M i l e s d e m i l l
- n
e s d e p e s
- s
Año
Acumulado Gasto Paquete 4
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 M i l e s d e m i l l
- n
e s d e p e s
- s
Año
Acumulado Gasto
Paquete 3
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año
Acumulado Gasto Paquete 5
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 M i l e s d e m i l l
- n
e s d e p e s
- s
Año
Acumulado Gasto Paquete 6
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año
Acumulado Gasto Paquete 2
- 5
10 15 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Miles de millones de pesos Año Acumulado Gasto
Conclusions and recommendations.
- Key factor for sufficiency is the initial number of
diseases or interventions to be covered.
- Second most important factor is annual average cost
per case.
- Ratio between general and medical services inflation
rates is very important.
- Increases in target population show little impact in
cash-flow, but might become important once the “universal coverage” is attained.
- Results help recommending to policy-makers starting
- perations with most conservative set.
- Annual
evaluation
- f
CEF performance for implementing required adjustments.
Next steps
- Incidence and prevalence rates among target population for
the 53 diseases?
- Mortality rates among target population for the 53 diseases?
- Cost of treatment for the 53 diseases?
- Risk premiums for the 53 diseases?
- Operative reserve for the CEF?
- How much is needed to cover, in a
sustainable way, the 53 diseases?
- What is the best strategy for gradually