CASE LAW AND ATTORNEY GENERAL UPDATE AY 2019 Judge Ryan Kellus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
case law and attorney general update ay 2019
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CASE LAW AND ATTORNEY GENERAL UPDATE AY 2019 Judge Ryan Kellus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 04, 2023 158 likes •390 views

CASE LAW AND ATTORNEY GENERAL UPDATE AY 2019 Judge Ryan Kellus Turner General Counsel and Director of Education Texas Municipal Courts Education Center March 29, 2019 Lubbock Lets g get ou our r du ducks in a a row row be before

slide-1
SLIDE 1

CASE LAW AND ATTORNEY GENERAL UPDATE AY 2019

Judge Ryan Kellus Turner General Counsel and Director of Education Texas Municipal Courts Education Center March 29, 2019 Lubbock

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Let’s g get ou

  • ur

r du ducks in a a row row be before we we start art sh shootin ting! g! TIME FRAME & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Part I

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Just Tuning In

Harris County Bail Suit – Odonnell (5th Circuit

  • p. 33 )
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Expectation of Privacy

Cell Service Location Information (CSLI) Carpenter v. U.S. (SCOTUS P. 12)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Supreme Court of Texas

Expunction – State v. T.S.N. (p.57- 58 )

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Reasonable Suspicion

FOGHAT

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1st Amendment

“Communicating in a Harassing Manner” – Wagner (CCA

  • p. 10)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Contempt

  • Luttrell v. El

Paso Cty. (p. 57)

  • In re Hesse ( p.

57)

  • Ex parte Reposa

(CCA p. 57)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Dogs

  • Washer v.

Borger- (p. 67)

  • Hereford v.

Frausto (p. 67)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Automobile Exception

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Part II

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cases Worth Mentioning

  • 1. Velasquez (CCA p. 43) – Article 28.01 Pretrial Hearing:

No Additional Notice When Held on Day of Trial

  • 2. Ex. Parte Macias (CCA p. 44) – When the State

Appeals per Art. 44.01, a Trial Court can do Nothing until it Receives an “Appellate Mandate”

  • 3. Marshall v. State ( p. 56) – Electing jury sentencing

does not preclude a Restitution Ordered from the Bench

  • 4. Rodriguez v. State ( p. 29) Double Jeopardy in

Municipal Ordinance Prosecution

  • 5. Timmins v. State (p. 34) Failure to Appear in Jail???
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Don’t Do It!

  • 1. Proenza (CCA p. 45) Do Not Comment on the

Weight of Evidence at Trial in Violation of Article 38.05, CCP.

  • 2. Pixler (p. 37) When it Comes to Junk Cars, Don’t

Confuse “Fines,” “Civil Penalties,” and “Administrative Penalties” under Sec. 683.0765 of the Transportation Code

  • 3. Morris (p. 47) Judge’s Should not Abuse Their

Discretion (or Defendants) by Using Electric Shocks from a Stun Belt to Maintain Court Decorum

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Part IV

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Drive More! Pay Less! Now with Free Constitutional Rights!!*

(*Terms and Conditions Apply)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fines, Costs, & Indigence

  • Ette ( CCA p .54)

Imposition of a fine by a jury not orally announced

  • William Johnson (p. 62)

Assessment of Costs After Judgment

  • Carl Johnson (p. 63)

Witness Mileage Fee (see also Macias p. 64 & Allen p.65)

  • Gonzalez (p. 64)

Indigent Status Does Not Bar Assessment of Costs CONTRAST with

  • Carreon (p. 63) Motion

to Revoke Probation in Violation of Bearden

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Ford v. State (CCA p. 21) Probable Cause for Theft

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Daniel (p. 17)

Community Caretaking Exception

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Suspicious Places???

  • Art. 14.03, C.C.P.

Dansby (p. 23)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Blood Draws:

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The E End d is s Just st t the Begin innin ing o

  • f

Somethin ing E Else se.

Thank You for Your Attention

E—MAIL: RTURNER@TMCEC.COM TWITTER: @RKELLUSTURNER