Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction with Biochar Systems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

carbon sequestration and emission reduction with biochar
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction with Biochar Systems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction with Biochar Systems Johannes Lehmann Cornell University, USA Initial Motivation for Biochar 500-8000 years old (Central Amazon, Brazil) Biochar Product is NOT New but never did account for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction with Biochar Systems

Johannes Lehmann

Cornell University, USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Initial Motivation for Biochar

500-8000 years old (Central Amazon, Brazil)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Biochar Product is NOT New

The National Greenkeeper, Feb 1933

…but never did account for biochar differences and different uses

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Biochar Molecular Property

Nguyen et al, 2010, EST 44, 3324–3331 McBeath et al, 2011, OG 42, 1194-1202 Mao et al, 2012, EST 46, 9571-9576

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Biochar Persistence

Lehmann et al., 2015 Earthscan Cut-off ‘biochar’

Molecular condensation

500

Global data set

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Natural Biochar-type Soil Carbon

Reisser et al 2016, Frontiers in Earth Sci

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pyrolysis-Biochar System

Lehmann, 2007, Frontiers in Ecol Env

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Climate Mitigation: Harnessing Large Fluxes

Lehmann, 2007 Nature 447: 143-144

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Biochar Systems

Other C fluxes than soil C Other GHG (CH4, N2O)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Bioenergy Production through Pyrolysis

GJ per Mg of dry, ash-free feedstock example system based on slow pyrolysis at 450C followed by tar-cracking at 800C (Woolf et al., 2014 ES&T)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

World Bank Report, 2014

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions

Life-Cycle Assessment

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Climate Change Mitigation – Life Cycle

Whitman et al, 2010, Carbon Management 1, 89-107 Whitman et al, 2013, Org. Geochem.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Biochar Systems Effects on GHG

Cowie et al., 2015, Earthscan

n=16 global studies with 51 scenarios

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Systems View!

(b) (b) (b)

Roberts et al, 2010, Environmental Science and Technology 44, 827–833

Effects on crop growth

  • r soil GHG not included!

(kg CO2e t-1 DM biomass) Pyrolysis+biochar: -864 Combustion: -987 Offsetting NG for heat

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Biochar Systems Effects on GHG

Gaunt and Cowie, 2009, Earthscan

Emissions per unit of feedstock utilised (t CO2e t-1 feedstock)

Slow pyrolysis, 10-year period

Facility at 1 t/hr = emissions reduction of 7,200-34,000t CO2e /yr

Effects on crop growth or soil GHG not included!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Biochar as a Soil Amendment

Carbon Product

Carbon persistence Surface area and functional groups Electron shuttle and fused arom.

Nutrient Product

Nutrient enrichment Nutrient availability Sterilization Denaturing of pollutants Fertilization Pollution avoidance GHG reduction (+ C sequestration) Soil Health GHG reduction + C sequestration Pollution reduction by leaching and gas emissions Soil remediation Inoculant carriers Signaling (plant-plant; plant-MO)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Crop Yield Responses

Woolf et al., 2018, Adv. Soil Sci.

Global dataset as a result of greater nutrient+water use efficiency etc.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Van Zwieten et al. 2015, Earthscan

Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions with Biochar

(n=30 studies)

Application rate in field studies : in incubation studies:

Average reduction 55%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Energy Generation

Roberts et al, unpubl.

No energy capture, no crop Centralized plant Avoided storage Biochar to corn

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Climate Change Mitigation

Roberts et al

No energy capture, no crop

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 emit. red. emit. red. emit. red. emit. red. emit. red. emit. red. emit. red. feedstock collection chipping pyrolysis construction dismantling biochar application reforesting avoided fossil fuel avoided fertilizer stable C soil N2O avoided chip storage GHG (kg CO2e t-1 DM)

  • 1076
  • 664
  • 649
  • 648
  • 457
  • 933
  • 915
  • 2. stover,

LPG, corn

  • 3. stover, NG,

corn

  • 4. stover, LPG,

asparagus

  • 5. PBT,

forest

  • 6. stover(c)

NG, corn

  • 7. stover(c)

NG, asparagus

  • 1. wood

waste, LPG, asparagus

Centralized plant Avoided storage Biochar to corn

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Financing the GHG Reduction

Roberts et al, unpubl.

No energy capture, no crop Centralized plant Avoided storage

10% increased yield (/t DM)

Biochar to corn

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Re-Coupling of Nutrient Cycles

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Recycling of Dairy Manure using Biochar

Enders, 2018, Report

Value as ingredient of potting mix:

  • appr. $1,900 ton-1

83% from C value (as potting mix) No contaminants (heavy metal, PAH, PCB, dioxin/furans, etc.) No pollutants from manure (pathogens, hormones, antibiotic) www.pyrolysis.cals.cornell.edu

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Recycling of Dairy Manure

Proposal to NYSERDA, 2019 Group of Fengqi You

Maximum Potential (NYS per year): $272M value for farmer $1.3B value for retail $114M reduced transportation

(96% weight reduction; 10 mi transportation)

$4-15M reduced GHG

($20-80/t CO2e)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Biochar: Important for the Tool Basket?

Site adapted Flexible Up-to-date

Tools

(No-till, mulching, intercropping, composting, etc)

Climate-smart Conservation Agroforestry Manure Magmt.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cornell Pyrolysis Facility - Tour

www.pyrolysis.cals.cornell.edu