CAPITOL COMPLEX D E N V E R , MASTER PLAN C O L O R A D O J B C - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

capitol complex
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CAPITOL COMPLEX D E N V E R , MASTER PLAN C O L O R A D O J B C - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CAPITOL COMPLEX D E N V E R , MASTER PLAN C O L O R A D O J B C / C D C P R E S E N TAT I O N JANUARY 16, 2015 AGENDA Todays Agenda: 1. 2. Agency


slide-1
SLIDE 1 JANUARY 16, 2015 CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN D E N V E R , C O L O R A D O J B C / C D C P R E S E N TAT I O N
slide-2
SLIDE 2 Today’s Agenda: 1.
  • 2. Agency Findings
3. 4.
  • 5. Benchmark Analysis
6. AGENDA CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 1
slide-3
SLIDE 3 Key Finding:
  • STATE CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT AUDIT
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 2
slide-4
SLIDE 4
MASTER PLAN OBJECTIVES CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 3
slide-5
SLIDE 5 MASTER PLAN SCOPE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
  • 1. Human Services Building
  • 2. 1570 Grant Building
  • 3. State Services Building
  • 4. State Office Building
  • 5. State Capitol Building
  • 6. Capitol Annex
  • 7. Power Plant
  • 8. Legislative Services Building
  • 9. Centennial Building
10. DOLE Building 11. Merrick Parking Structure
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
4
slide-6
SLIDE 6 MASTER PLAN SCOPE
  • 6
t h A v e n u e Kipling St 700 Kipling St 690 Kipling St CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 5
slide-7
SLIDE 7 MASTER PLAN SCOPE 8th Avenue Logan Street
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
6
slide-8
SLIDE 8 17th Ave 20th Ave Pierce St Reed St MASTER PLAN SCOPE
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
7
slide-9
SLIDE 9 G
  • l
d e n R d Interestate 70 C
  • l
f a x A v e n u e MASTER PLAN SCOPE
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
8
slide-10
SLIDE 10 Downing St. 62nd Avenue West Building East Building North Building MASTER PLAN SCOPE
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
9
slide-11
SLIDE 11 6th Street Ute Avenue MASTER PLAN SCOPE
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
10
slide-12
SLIDE 12
» »
»
  • BUY
BUILD LEASE/BUY/BUILD ANALYSIS CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
  • 11
slide-13
SLIDE 13
» » » » »
  • LEASE/BUY/BUILD ANALYSIS
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 12
slide-14
SLIDE 14 LEASE/BUY/BUILD ANALYSIS CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN Line StatusQuo Buildat Lincoln&Colfax(8) 1560Broadway 101W.Colfax FinancingAssumptions: 1 OwnedbuildingRSF: 493,000 598,592 305,667 COPamortizationschedule: 20 years 2 Continued3rdpartyleasedspace(after3rdpartiesvacate): 704,221 211,221 105,629 398,554 COPinterestrate: 6.00% 3 Totaltenantpool: 704,221 704,221 704,221 704,221 4 5 FinancedCosts 6 Assumedclosing/startdate:(1) 7/1/2016 7/1/2016 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 7 Purchase/buildprice/RSF(w/parking): N/A $315.65 $250.00 $385.00 8 Purchase/buildprice(w/parking): N/A $155,615,450 $149,648,000 $117,681,795 9 Spacefitup/RSF:(2) N/A $55.00 $45.00 $25.00 10 Spacefitup:(2) N/A $27,115,000 $26,936,640 $7,641,675 11 Totalamountfinanced: N/A $182,730,450 $176,584,640 $125,323,470 12 Annualdebtservice,COPorotherbondfinancing: N/A $15,709,652 $15,181,286 $10,774,275 13 14 YR13debtservice: N/A $47,128,957 $45,543,859 $32,322,825 15 YR120debtservice(debtisfullyamortizedafter20years): N/A $314,193,047 $303,625,729 $215,485,503 16 17 OperatingExpenses: 18 YR13buildingopex:(3) N/A $12,130,265 $16,822,530 $8,520,981 19 YR130buildingopex:(3) N/A $173,152,261 $213,953,657 $110,690,343 20 Annualcapitalrenewalreserve: N/A $1.75 $3.00 $2.75 21 Totalannualcapitalrenewalreserve: N/A $862,750 $1,795,776 $840,584 22 YR13capitalrenewalreserve: N/A $2,588,250 $5,387,328 $2,521,753 23 YR130capitalrenewalreserve: N/A $25,882,500 $53,873,280 $25,217,528 24 25 ThirdPartyTenantIncome: 26 Durationofthirdpartyincome:(4) N/A N/A Through6/30/20 Through4/30/23 27 YR13estimatedthirdpartyincome: N/A N/A ($13,874,380) ($4,156,211) 28 YR130estimatedthirdpartyincome: N/A N/A ($27,247,882) ($16,159,544) 29 30 Parking: 31 GarageConstruction@1555Sherman(1560Broadwayscenarioonly): N/A N/A $8,600,000 N/A 32 YR13ParkingIncome:(5) N/A ($3,776,220) ($517,260) ($4,329,000) 33 YR130ParkingIncome:(5) N/A ($37,762,200) ($14,483,280) ($43,290,000) 34 35 UpFrontCashFundedItems: 36 3rdpartyleasecostreservefund:(6) N/A $0.00 $13.53 $7.44 37 Total3rdpartyleasecostreservefund:(6) N/A $0 $8,101,450 $2,275,000 38 39 Continued3rdPartyLeasedSpaceinDenverCBD: 40 Continued3rdpartyleasedspace(AVGover30Years): 704,221 211,221 146,363 418,054 41 YR13blendedaverageleaserate:(7) $21.50 $21.50 $21.50 $21.50 42 YR13blendedaverageleasecost:(7) $45,420,927 $13,623,356 $21,192,199 $29,898,359 43 YR130blendedaverageleaserate:(7) $33.14 $33.14 $33.14 $33.14 44 YR130blendedaverageleasecost:(7) $700,062,723 $209,973,784 $132,282,191 $409,831,293 45 46 YR13occupancycost: $45,420,927 $71,694,608 $91,255,727 $67,053,708 47 YR130occupancycost: $700,062,723 $685,439,393 $678,705,145 $704,050,122 48 YR130NPV(6.0%)occupancycost: $281,722,360 $330,768,342 $340,290,405 $322,081,793 49 50 IfGeneralFundfunded(noCOPfinancing): 51 Initialappropriation(build/purchasepriceplusfitup+1560garage): N/A $182,730,450 $185,184,640 $125,323,470 52 YR130occupancycostif100%cashfunded: $700,062,723 $553,976,796 $551,664,055 $613,888,089 = CostsapplicabletobothYR13andYR130scenarios 53 = CostamountsapplicabletoYR13scenario 54 ResidualValue(est.75%ofpurchaseprice+fitup): $0 ($137,047,838) ($132,438,480) ($93,992,603) = CostamountsapplicabletoYR130scenario $0 $20,000,000 $40,000,000 $60,000,000 $80,000,000 $100,000,000 StatusQuo Buildat Lincoln& Colfax(8) 1560 Broadway 101W. Colfax YR1 3occupancycost: YR13occupancycost: $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 $700,000,000 $800,000,000 StatusQuo Buildat Lincoln& Colfax(8) 1560 Broadway 101W. Colfax YR1 30occupancycost: YR130occupancycost: $0 $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 $250,000,000 $300,000,000 $350,000,000 Status Quo Buildat Lincoln& Colfax(8) 1560 Broadway 101W. Colfax YR1 30NPV(6.0%)occupancycost: YR130NPV(6.0%)occupancy cost: 13
slide-15
SLIDE 15
»
  • AGENCY FINDINGS
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
  • Leased
  • 14
slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Co-locate agency stafg to increase effjciency
» DNR, DOR, and HCPF
  • Maintain leased space for expanding agencies
» HCPF, DOE
  • Increase space use effjciency through renovatjons
» Target 220 SF / FTE Key Recommendatjons for Agencies: AGENCY RECOMMENDATIONS CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
slide-17
SLIDE 17
»
  • »
  • »
  • »
  • maintenance.
  • FACILITY CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
16
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • FACILITY CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
17
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • URBAN DESIGN FINDINGS
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 18
slide-20
SLIDE 20
» » »
  • »
» URBAN DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ACTIVE BUILDING FACADES ON NEW BUILDINGS AND CAFE SEATING DISTINGUISHED BIKE LANES UNIFORM LIGHTING UNIFORM TREE CANOPY PEDESTRIAN BULB OUTS DISTINCT PAVING MATERIALS XERISCAPIC PLANTING BUILDING SIGNAGE SEATING AREAS WAYFINDING SIGNAGE CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 19
slide-21
SLIDE 21
» » »
  • URBAN DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
C O L O R A D O W E L C O M E 1313 SHERMAN STREET D I R E C T O R Y Capitol Complex District Signage - Vehicular/Ped Level Direction Signage for P i t P ki V hi l CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC D D D D D D D D D D M M M M M M M M M M M M P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4'-6" 6" The Colorado State Capitol Building, located at 200 East Colfax Avenue in Denver, Colorado, is the home of the Colorado General Assembly and the offces of the Governor of Colorado and Lieutenant Governor
  • f
Colorado. The building is intentionally reminiscent of the United States
  • Capitol. Designed by Elijah E.
Myers, it was constructed in the 1890s from Colorado white granite, and opened for use in November 1894. The distinctive gold dome consists of real gold plate, frst added in 1908, commemorating the Colorado Gold Rush. The building is part of Denver's Civic Center area. Serving as the beginning of the Capitol Hill district, the historic building sits slightly higher than the rest of downtown Denver. The main entrance hall is open 180 feet (55 m) to the top of the dome, about the height of an 18-story building. Additionally, the offcial elevation of Denver is measured
  • utside
the west entrance to the building, where the ffteenth step is engraved with the words "One Mile Above Sea Level." From this step, at 5,280 feet (1,609 m), the sun can be seen setting behind the Rocky
  • Mountains. A second mile high
marker was set in the 18th step in 1969 when Colorado State University students resurveyed the
  • elevation. In 2003, a more
accurate measurement was made with modern means, and the 13th step was identifed as being
  • ne mile (1.6 km) high, where a
3rd marker was installed.[2] Serving as the beginning of the Capitol Hill district, the historic building sits slightly higher than the rest of downtown Denver. The main entrance hall is open 180 feet (55 m) to the top of the dome, about the height of an 18-story building. Additionally, the offcial elevation of Denver is measured
  • utside
the west entrance to the building, where 4'-0" 3" C O L O R A D O S T A T E C A P I T O L CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 20
slide-22
SLIDE 22
» » » » URBAN DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
21
slide-23
SLIDE 23 URBAN DESIGN OVERALL VISION EAST CAPITOL DEVELOPMENT SITE WEST LAWN COLFAX AS GRAND BOULEVARD NORTH SHERMAN INFILL SITE SOUTH SHERMAN INFILL SITE TWO ADDITIONAL STORIES TO GARAGE CAPITOL MALL STATE LAND BOARD INFILL SITE LINCOLN AND COLFAX INFILL SITE RTD INFILL SITE CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 22
slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Case Studies for Benchmarking
» 10 states were iden
  • ed for research
and analysis » 3 states were shortlisted for further interviews » Analysis based on available documents and informa
  • n regarding statewide
and capitol complex facili es BENCHMARKING CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 23
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Colorado
» State Popula
  • n: 5.2M (US 2010
Census) » Capital City Popula
  • n: Denver, 600,000
(US 2010 Census) » Facili es Management Organiza
  • n:
Decentralized » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Currently underway COLORADO CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 24
slide-26
SLIDE 26 ARIZONA
  • Arizona Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 6.4M (US 2010 Census)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Phoenix, 1.5M (US 2010 Census)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Modi
ed Decentralized » Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Legisla ve Governmental Mall Commission (LGMC) » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Last prepared in 1989
  • Lease purchase agreements in 2010 changed the Arizona
Department of Administra
  • n (ADOA) building system
dras cally
  • ASU / AIA prepared State Capitol Centennial Plan in 2012
  • ADOA does not have space standards policy
Arizona Capitol Complex Aerial view of Capitol Museum and adjacent House of Representatives and Senate Buildings CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 25
slide-27
SLIDE 27 IOWA
  • Iowa Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 3.0M (US 2010 Census)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Des Moines, 206,688 (US Census 2010)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Centralized
» Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Capitol Planning Commission » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Last prepared in 2010
  • Stated goal of reducing statewide leased space holdings to
15% of inventory
  • Department of Administra
ve Services (DAS) prepares ve year plans including capital construc
  • n and renova
  • n
funding requests
  • New Construc
  • n projects are planned under the Capitol
Complex Master Plan 2010 Iowa Capitol Complex CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 26
slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Kansas Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 2.8M (US 2010 Census)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Topeka, 127,473 (US 2010 Census)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Centralized
» Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Department of Administra
  • n (DA) and Capitol Preserva
  • n Commi
ee » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Master Plan currently under development KANSAS Kansas Capitol Complex Rendering of New Visitors Center and Offj ce Extension to the Capitol (Image credit: Treanor Architects)
  • Agencies prepare
ve-year facili es plans
  • Capital construc
  • n budgets are reviewed by the Joint
Commi ee on State Building Consruc
  • n
  • A 13 year mul
  • phase plan to renovate the Kansas
Statehouse was completed in 2013 at an es mated cost of $285 million
  • The new visitors center was constructed on top of the
garage and provides a connec
  • n between visitor parking
and the Statehouse north wing ground
  • or
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 27
slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Oregon Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 3.8 Million (US Census 2010)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Salem, 154,637 (US Census 2010)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Modi
ed Decentralized » Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Legisla ve Administra
  • n Commi
ee » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Area Plan last prepared in 1992, Capitol Master Plan prepared in 2009 OREGON Oregon Capitol Complex Section through capitol proposed concourse level and additional hearing rooms (Image Credit: Oregon State Capitol Master Plan 2009)
  • Department of Administra
ve Services (DAS) established State Facili es Planning Process manual in 2012
  • Capital Projects Advisory Board (CPAB) established
review process for major capital construc
  • n, deferred
mainaintance and major leases.
  • Capital Planning Commission (CPC) was re-established in
2009 to advise DAS regarding state buildings in Salem and Keizer. CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 28
slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Texas Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 26M (US Census 2010)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Aus
n, 842,592 (US Census 2010) » Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Modi
ed Centralized » Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Texas Facili es Commission with Preserva
  • n Board
» Capitol Complex Master Plan: Last prepared in 1989. Statewide facil es plans includes Capitol Complex (2011) TEXAS SUPREME COURT BUILDINGTUNNEL JOHN H. REAGAN BUILDING TUNNEL TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION and ROBERT E. JOHNSON BUILDING TUNNEL SAM HOUSTON BUILDINGTUNNEL Engrossing & Enrolling g CAFETERIA GIFTSHOP GIFTSHOP Public Welcome! Enter Press Corps House Mail Senate Mail LOADING DOCK TO 13TH ST. & COLORADO ST. AUDITORIUM SEAL COURT W M C E N T R A L C O U R T O p e n
  • a
i r R
  • t
u n d a 204 406 306 208 410 402 310 504 302 216 418 318 508 220 206 E1.002 E1.210 215 217 214 213 219 003 006 E1.020 E1.024 E1.034 015 E1.012 E1.016 E1.028 E1.036 038 E1.010 E1.014 E1.026 E1.030 032 E1.018 E1.022 01 1 E1.008 Office of the First Lady & Governor's Appointments 102 102A 424 324 512 606 702 802 904 704 804 712 812 716 710 810 610 320 420 312 412 304 404 212 414 314 506 218 422 322 510 608 708 808 714 814 706 806 E1.908 316 416 308 408 E1.004 House Appropriations Senate Finance LBB Senators: E1.600’s through E1.800’s State Representatives: E1.200’s through E1.500’s E1.200's E1.900's E1.300's E1.800's E1.400's E1.700's E1.500's E1.600's Baby Changing Stations E E E E E E E E LIGHT COURT LIGHT COURT CENTRAL GALLERY LIGHT COURT LIGHT COURT LIGHT COURT LIGHT COURT ELEVATORS TO CAPITOL NORTH WING Texas Capitol Complex First Floor Plan of the Capitol Extension
  • Texas Facili
es Commission (TFC) uses Facili es Condi
  • ns
Index to prior ze projects with input from agencies
  • TFC prepares biennial Statewide Facilites Master Plan
  • At the forefront of land mone
za
  • n / P3 strategy.
  • Capitol Extension (667,000 SF) was constructed in 1993
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 29
slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Virginia Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 8M (US 2010 Census)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Richmond, 204, 214 (US 2010 Census)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Centralized
» Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Department of General Services & Bureau of Facili es Management » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Last prepared in 2005 / Updated in 2010 VIRGINIA Virginia Capitol Complex Photos of new Visitors Center / Capitol Extension (Image courtesy of Commonwealth of Virginia)
  • Division of Real Estate Management created in 2005 (a
er 2003 audit), to focus on statewide facili es management
  • Real estate strategic plans are prepared since 2008
  • DGS maintains capital and deferred maintainance
projects planning tool - Facili es Inventory Condi
  • ns &
Assessment System (FICAS) to priro ze projects
  • Capitol Complex master plans prepared every
ve years
  • Bundling of controlled maintainance for mul
ple years through bond funding CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 30
slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Wisconsin Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 8M (US 2010 Census)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Richmond, 204, 214 (US 2010 Census)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Centralized
» Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Department of General Services & Bureau of Facili es Management » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Last prepared in 2005 / Updated in 2010 WISCONSIN Washington Capitol Complex
  • Division of State Facilites (DSF) has two divisions managing
Facili es Development (DFD) and Facili es Management (DFM)
  • State Building Commission (WBC) oversees planning
and major capital and renova
  • n projects. DSF provides
technical assistance to WBC CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 31
slide-33
SLIDE 33 COMPARISON OF 10 STATES CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 32
slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Minnesota Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 5.3 Million (US 2010 Census)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Saint Paul, 285,068 (US 2010 Census)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Modi
ed Centralized » Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Plant Management Division » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Last prepared in 2013 MINNESOTA Artist’s rendering of proposed legislative offj ce building to be built just north of the Capitol Minnesota Capitol Complex
  • Real Estate and Construc
  • n Services (RECS) maintain,
  • perate, and manage all State real estate assets
  • Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board (CAAPB)
is mandated to develop a comprehensive use plan for the Capitol Complex. Capitol Preserva
  • n Commission (CPC)
  • versees the Cap
  • l
  • Long terms plans are linked to capital budget process by
Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB). MMB has established criteria for budgets and project priori za
  • n
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 33
slide-35
SLIDE 35 MINNESOTA
  • Minnesota links agency strategic plans
with budget process and requires agencies to include controlled maintenance requests as part of their budget planning considera
  • n
  • Controlled Maintanance projects are
funded by a dedicated funding source (by statute this is set at 1% of current replacement value of facili es)
  • Bond funding for controlled
maintainance
  • Adopted innova
ve space standards that embrace evolua
  • n of work place
  • Use of Enterprise Real Property System
(Archibus) to standardize the Facility Condi
  • ns Assessment process
  • 160,000 SF new Senate Majority
Building is planned in 2013 CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 34
slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Utah Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 2.85M (US Census 2010)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Salt Lake City, 189,314 (US Census 2010)
» Management Typology: Centralized » Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: State Capitol Preserva
  • n Board
» Capitol Complex Master Plan: No document found, however State Capitol Preserva
  • n Board is obligated to prepare a long-range plan of the complex
annually UTAH Aerial view of Utah Capitol Complex (Image courtesy of Utah Governor’s offj ce of Economic Development) Utah Capitol Complex
  • Division of Facili
es Construc
  • n and Management
(DFCM), State Building Board, and Capitol Preserva
  • n
Board work in concert
  • Utah State Building Board is required to develop and
maintain a ve-year plan that includes a priority list of capital development
  • Utah has developed a robust list of criteria for capital
projects, building renewal, and controlled maintenance projects CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 35
slide-37
SLIDE 37 UTAH
  • Each agency prepares a facility
master plan and capital budgets with assistance from DFCM.
  • Integra
  • n of Facility Condi
  • n
Assessment process (FCA) with ve year planning process. Use of Facility Management System.
  • Uses BOMA data rates to benchmark
and budget facili es management rate
  • Utah is currently in the process of
upda ng statewide space standards.
  • Utah has a dedicated source of
revenue from the general fund to fund controlled maintenance (set at 1.1% of the replacement value / $43 million in 2005 to $100 million in 2015) CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 36
slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Washington Highlights
» State Popula
  • n: 6.73M (US 2010 Census)
» Capital City Popula
  • n: Olympia, 46,478 (US 2010 Census)
» Facili es Management Organiza
  • n: Centralized
» Statutory Authority Over Capitol Complex Planning: Department of Enterprise Services, with input from State Capitol Commi ee and Capital Campus Design Advisory Commi ee » Capitol Complex Master Plan: Last prepared in 2006, update currently under development WASHINGTON Washington Capitol Complex
  • Agencies are required to submit stategic plan and facil
es plan every two years
  • Department of Enterprise Services (DES) was created in
2011 to to manage the process of folding these plans into a long range state-wide facili es plan
  • DES works with State Capitol Commi
ee (SCC) to determine Capitol Complex growth / space needs CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 37
slide-39
SLIDE 39 WASHINGTON
  • The O
ce of Financial Management Facili es Oversight Unit (OFM) priori zes projects that are submi ed to the Legislature based on published criteria
  • Washington is using an alterna
ve
  • nancing structure under Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) 63-20 rule It allows for a nonpro t corpora
  • n to be
set up for the sole purpose of issuing tax exempt bonds and to enter into a development agreement to construct a facility, for a tax exempt purpose, for the government
  • Bond funding for controlled
maintanance CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 38
slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • Planning
» A minimum of one full- me facili es planning FTE should be added to the sta
  • f the o
ce
  • f the state architect (OSA) to maintain and coordinate the implementa
  • n of the capitol
complex master plan. » A new statutory requirement should be considered to include statewide planning to prepare and regularly update the statewide long range facili es plans.
  • Facili
es Condi
  • ns Assessment
» Review and upgrade of the exis ng facili es management system is needed that would help track and monitor facili es opera
  • ns and maintenance budgets
» Benchmarking of the exis ng lease rates for agencies for facili es and maintenance could be considered using the standards published by BOMA (also used by Utah)
  • Funding
» Dedicated source of funding for controlled maintenance to about 1.5 to 2% of the replacement value of exis ng assets. Such as proposal was considered by the State but has not been adopted.
  • Alterna
ve Financing » Con nued use of alterna ve nancing structures (also used by the State of Washington) RECOMMENDATIONS CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 39
slide-41
SLIDE 41 RECOMMENDATIONS Priority Recommendations System Remodels Opportunities CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 40
slide-42
SLIDE 42 RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Priority
Recommendations CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 41
slide-43
SLIDE 43 RECOMMENDATIONS System Remodels
  • CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN
42
slide-44
SLIDE 44 RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Opportunities
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 43
slide-45
SLIDE 45
»
» basis
»
  • FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS
CAPITOL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN 44