[PPT] - Capital Program State of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

Capital Program

State of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICE | FACILITIES PLANNING UNIT 2015-17

SLIDE 2 FACILITIES PLANNING UNIT (FPU)

Established during 2013-15 legislative session (POP 102)
Executive Order 12-17: Infrastructure Planning and Investment
Focused on 10-year strategic investment plan for the state

REVISING THE PROCESS

Mandate 10-year agency plans focused on key outcome areas
Establish prioritization criteria
Develop Total Cost of Ownership model

Overview BIENNIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS PRIORITIZATION PLANNING, POLICY & STANDARDS STRATEGIC OUTCOMES 10-YEAR AGENCY PLANS GOVERNOR’S 10-YEAR PLAN 10-YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT STRATEGY

10-Year

THE 10-YEAR PLAN

SLIDE 3 Overview INITIATIVES FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT (FCA)

Programmatic efgort to collect facility condition information
Pilot initiative focused on DAS, OYA and OLCC
Data stored in web-based platform capable of analyzing project- level

investments over long-range planning horizon DATA INTEGRATION AND VISUALIZATION

Collect and integrate agency-level data into CFO database
Utilize a range of visualization tools to inform and engage
Using spatial (map-based) analysis to better understand our portfolio

in a community context

Pilot initiative in 3D visualization allows multi-dimensional analysis

NATURAL HAZARD RISK ANALYSIS

Pilot initiative evaluating 61 buildings for seismic and fmood risks
Targeted prioritization plan for remediation

SLIDE 4 Overview BEING RESILIENT FLOODING LANDSLIDE EARTHQUAKE FIRE TSUNAMI

k

$

+

ï

BEING PREPARED ANALYSIS PLANNING MITIGATION PREPARATION EDUCATION

Q

ASSESSING HAZARDS RECOVERING QUICKLY LIVES SAVED COMMUNITIES RESTORED ECONOMIES REBOUND

SLIDE 5 Overview NATURAL HAZARDS PILOT INITIATIVE SEISMIC AND FLOOD ANALYSIS AGENCY-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP DAS + DOGAMI + PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY

111

BUILDINGS E BENEFIT/COST ANALYSIS TOOL RISK PRIORITIZATION LIST I FEMA RAPID VISUAL SCREENING I PROTECTION OF CULTURAL ASSETS I CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT TARGETED MITIGATION PROGRAM GOVERNOR'S RESILIENCE CABINET + INTERAGENCY HAZARD MITIGATION TEAM O R E G O N D E P A R T M E N T O F G E O L O G Y A N D M I N E R A L I N D U S T R I E S 1 9 3 7

SLIDE 6 PURPOSE

Aligns real estate and property planning with an agency's strategic

business objectives

A mid-term plan (2-5 years) encompasses the entire portfolio (owned

and leased)

More tactical than 10-year plan

STEPS

Existing Conditions Analysis (FCA)
Agency Facilities Needs Statement
Gap Analysis
Identify Alternative Strategies
Lifecycle Cost Analysis
Strategic Plan Recommendations
Tactical Plan (Short-term Implementation)
Master Plan (Site specifjc)

Overview ROAD TO 10-YEAR PLAN

SLIDE 7 Statewide Facilities FACT COUNT GSF Total Facilities (Including Higher Education) 6,698 54,175,063 Total Higher Education Facilities 1,320 28,018,285 Total Facilities (Non-Higher Education) 5,378 26,156,778 Total State-Owned Facilities 4,783 21,466,566 Total State-Owned Facilities > $1M Value 507 16,079,395 Total State-Owned Facilities < $1M Value 4,276 5,301,175 Total Leased Facilities (Offjce and Storage GSF) 595 4,690,212 Largest Agency by GSF (Corrections) 336 5,020,174 Largest Agency by Facilities (Parks and Recreation) 1,861 1,138,835 Largest Lease Tenant (Human Services) 126 1,843,767

$5.1

BILLION TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE

21.5

MILLION OWNED GSF

5,378

FACILITIES OWNED AND LEASED STATEWIDE

40,314

EMPLOYEES BUDGETED POSITIONS STATEWIDE SNAPSHOT

SLIDE 8 Statewide Facilities RANK/AGENCY COUNT GSF 1. Corrections 336 5,020,174 1,001 = 2. Administrative Services 108 4,327,419 863 = 3. Transportation 1,253 3,161,091 631 = 4. Military 292 2,967,097 592 = 5. Health Authority 42 1,246,955 249 = 6. Parks and Recreation 1,861 1,138,835 228 = 7. Forestry 408 872,232 175 = 8. Youth Authority 88 716,912 144 = 9. Fish and Wildlife 298 591,920 119 =

10. Public Safety

33 382,866 77 = 11. OLCC 2 281,605 57 = 12. Education 18 275,081 56 = 13. Veterans Affairs 2 196,782 3: =

14. State Lands

14 87,785 18 = 15. Aviation 24 75,416 16 =

16. Employment

3 64,176 14 = 17. PERS 1 60,220 13 = TOTAL FACILITIES BY AGENCY (GSF)

SLIDE 10 Statewide Facilities *Buildings with replacement value greater that $1 million

1+1+2+1+2+3+9+21+26+81+47+3:+6:+100,+4+9

1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1 1 5 2 4 7 23 49 62 197 114 97 170 247 184 21

1862

ee THOMPSON’S MILL STATE HERITAGE SITE AGE DISTRIBUTION (BUILDINGS BY CONSTRUCTION DECADE)*

53

MEAN FACILITY AGE (YEARS) ee

'62

MEAN CONSTRUCTION YEAR

SLIDE 11

4.6

MILLION LEASED SF 83+19+L 8:+12+L GSF Count 20% 80% 13% 87% LEASED OWNED Statewide Facilities LESSEE LEASES LSF RENT/MO $/SF 1. Human Services 139 2,007,478 $2,540,215 $1.27 2. Transportation 77 387,234 $457,072 $1.18 3. State Police 44 378,970 $424,601 $1.12 4. Justice 23 356,522 $464,924 $1.30 5. Employment 31 228,288 $263,568 $1.15 LEASED FACILITIES (OWNED VS. LEASED) TOP 5 LESSEES (AGENCIES)

SLIDE 13 Statewide Facilities TEN YEAR LEASE OUTLOOK (LEASE EXPIRATION LSF*/YEAR)

92+92+100,+4+59+3:+27+12+6+13+11

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 184 127 84 42 32 14 10 6 5 11 854,326 941,137 697,859 545,318 369,555 242,905 99,737 53,558 110,499 93,842 2.5M LEASED SF SHORT-TERM LEASE RENEGOTIATION/ CONSOLIDATION POTENTIAL 395 LEASES

| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

*Leased Square Footage LEASE EXPIRATION YEAR | LEASES | TOTAL LSF

SLIDE 14

0.91%

2014 FCI FACILITY CONDITION INDEX

54

YEARS AVERAGE FACILITY AGE

284

RSF/FTE AVERAGE BUILDING DENSITY

0.85

$/RSF AVERAGE MONTHLY OPERATING COST*** DAS Facilities FACT COUNT GSF Total DAS Facility Holdings 119 4,353,207 Total DAS-Owned Facilities 45 3,397,396 Agency Transfered Holdings* 74 955,811 DAS-Leased Facilities 15 21,517 Uniform Rent Facilities 27 2,253,829 Self Support Facilities 10 549,157 Non-Revenue Facilities 8 594,410 Largest Facility (Capitol Mall Parking Structure) 420,000 Largest Uniform Rent Facility (Portland State Offjce) 252,105 Largest Tenant (Human Services) 22 375,559 FTE in DAS Facilities** 8,214 * Facilities transfered from another agency to DAS for future disposition ** Uniform Rent Facilities Only *** Average monthly operating cost per RSF; include administration, custodial, landscaping, energy analyst, building security, HVAC, electricity, service and repair, utility costs, state police security, contracts and inventory AGENCY SNAPSHOP

SLIDE 15 1. Salem 1,001 = 2,792,574 | 35 | 82% 2. Portland 121 = 341,132 | 3 | 10% 3. Hillsboro 32 = 85,630 | 1 | 3% 4. Clackamas 25 = 67,379 | 1 | 2% 5. Pendleton 1: = 51,741 | 2 | 2% 6. Eugene 12 = 29,420 | 1 | 1% 7. Central Point 9 = 24,867 | 1 | 1% DAS Facilities LOCATIONS (OWNED GSF) TOTAL OWNED GSF | COUNT | % TOTAL GSF

SLIDE 16 DAS NET 1 FACILITY GROWTH TREND 1910-2000 (DECADE) DAS Facilities TOTAL GSF BY DECADE | FACILITY COUNT BY DECADE CUMULATIVE GSF GROWTH BY DECADE | % OF TOTAL GSF BY DECADE

81+21+H

80%

89+13+H

12%

98+3+H

3%

99+2+H

2%

9:+1+H

1%

9:+1+H

1%

9:+1+H

1% SALEM 6,579 PORTLAND 977 HILLSBORO 221 PENDLETON 196 CENTRAL POINT 95 EUGENE 76 CLACKAMAS 71

0+1+2+9+11+1:+2:+43+57+92+100,

1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2,489 | 1 53,250 | 6 262,205 | 8 13,243 | 1 315,806 | 5 329,953 | 4 436,159 | 7 503,603 | 3 1,163,038 | 6 312,997 | 3 2,489 | <1% 55,739 | 2% 317,944 | 9% 331,187 | 10% 646,993 | 19% 976,946 | 29% 1,413,105 | 42% 1,916,708 | 56% 3,079,746 | 91% 3,392,743 | 100% *Net = Total Facility Growth - Dispositions EMPLOYEES IN DAS UNIFORM RENT FACILITIES BY CITY (FTE)

SLIDE 17 DAS Facilities 2014 981 = 191,191 | 3% 2013 941 = 184,830 | -2% 2006 1,001 = 195,946 | Baseline TOTAL ANNUAL MBTUs 1 | PERCENTAGE CHANGE

65

kBTU 2/GSF/YEAR

86

24%

2014 DAS AGENCY EUI AVERAGE EUI (NORTHWEST) PERCENTAGE DIFFERENCE kBTU 2/GSF/YEAR *EUI = Energy Use Intensity 1 MBTU = A unit of energy equivalent to 1,000,000 British Thermal Units 2 kBTU = A unit of energy equivalent to 1,000 British Thermal Units ENERGY USE 2014 ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI)*

EUI =

kBTU 2/GSF/YEAR

| |

SLIDE 18

86+8+7+L 62+32+8+L

Facility Condition 2.4% 13.9% 2014 FCI 2023 FCI FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT PILOT SUMMARY CURRENT (2014) AND 10-YEAR FCI* | PERCENT OF TOTAL BUILDINGS BY FCI CONDITION DEFERRED MAINTENANCE + CAPITAL RENEWAL CURRENT REPLACEMENT VALUE *FCI

| | | |

DAS + OLCC + OYA = 111 FACILITIES FACILITY CONDITION INDEX Condition FCI Range Description B Good 0 - 5% In new or well-maintained condition with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other defjciencies. B Fair 5 - 10% Subject to wear and soiling, but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. B Poor 10 - 60% Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. B Very Poor >60% Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal now necessary. DEFINITIONS

SLIDE 19 Facility Condition FACILITY CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT (FCA) PILOT CURRENT (2014) AND 10-YEAR FCI | PERCENT OF TOTAL BUILDINGS BY FCI CONDITION Year/Condition Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total FCI 2014 85% 8% 8% 0% 0.91% 2023 8% 31% 61% 0% 21.2% 86+8+7+L 62+32+8+L .91% 21.2% 2014 FCI 2023 FCI

101+L 101+L

11.8% 21.6% 2014 FCI 2023 FCI

57+12+32+2+L 6+5+87+3+L

9.9% 25% 2014 FCI 2023 FCI Year/Condition Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total FCI 2014 0% 0% 100% 0% 11.8% 2023 0% 0% 100% 0% 21.6% Year/Condition Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total FCI 2014 56% 11% 31% 2% 9.9% 2023 6% 5% 86% 3% 25% DAS | 45 BUILDINGS OLCC | 2 BUILDINGS OYA | 64 BUILDINGS

SLIDE 20 Facility Condition 2014 FCA RENEWAL COSTS (PRIORITY EXPENDITURES) 2014 PILOT AGENCY EXPENDITURES BY FCA PRIORITY FCA Priority DAS OLCC OYA Priority 1 $1,620,958 $3,685,200 $5,122,543 Priority 2 $3951,271 $505,123 $6,300,493 Priority 3 $495,337 $34,424 $4,802,821 Total $6,067,566 $4,224,747 $16,225,858 CRV $665,555,937 $35,796, 142 $164,575,708 DAS 402+1,001+2= $6,067,566 OLCC 1,001+138+9= $4,224,747 OYA 814+1,001+6= $16,225,858 * Add 40% for project soft costs (design and engineering fees, permits, project management, etc.)

SLIDE 21 PILOT AGENCY FCI 10-YEAR INVESTMENT OUTLOOK Facility Condition * Add 40% for project soft costs (design and engineering fees, permits, project management, etc.) Agency GSF CRV Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Total Cost/GSF DAS 3,398,743 $931,786,363 $16,489,268 $80,371,863 $16,367,063 $113,228,194 $33 OLCC 313,000 $50,114,598 $6,019,127 $3,431,207 $1,363,398 $10,813,732 $35 OYA 722,025 $230,405,992 $39,798,866 $9,341,838 $8,360,952 $57,501,655 $80 Total 4,433,768 $1,212,306,953 $62,307,261 $93,144,909 $26,091,413 $181,543,582 $41

28+23+68+28+27+101+8+9+21+9

TOTAL INVESTMENT NEEDED TO MAINTAIN 2014 FCI AT YEAR 10 BY PRIORITY*

62+43+3+5+7+9+6+3+7+11

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $25M $0 $5M $10M $15M $20M .25 FCI .75 FCI PILOT AGENCY 10-YEAR ANNUAL INVESTMENT CURVE TOTAL INVESTMENT NEEDED TO MAINTAIN 2014 FCI AT YEAR 10 BY PILOT AGENCY Target Annual Investment Range To Maintain An Acceptable FCI

17+1+1+1+1+7+1+1+1+1

SLIDE 22 PILOT AGENCY FCI 10-YEAR INVESTMENT OUTLOOK Facility Condition Agency GSF CRV Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Total Cost/GSF DAS 3,398,743 $931,786,363 $16,489,268 $80,371,863 $16,367,063 $113,228,194 $33 OLCC 313,000 $50,114,598 $6,019,127 $3,431,207 $1,363,398 $10,813,732 $35 OYA 722,025 $230,405,992 $39,798,866 $9,341,838 $8,360,952 $57,501,655 $80 Total 4,433,768 $1,212,306,953 $62,307,261 $93,144,909 $26,091,413 $181,543,582 $41 TOTAL INVESTMENT NEEDED TO MAINTAIN 2014 FCI AT YEAR 10 BY PRIORITY 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $8,839,184 $7,163,004 $22,090,327 $10,883,493 $9,655,211 $37,444,944 $2,994,349 $3,425,342 $7,484,627 $3,247,715

25+1:+5:+2:+27+101+8+9+21+9

DAS FCI 10-YEAR ANNUAL INVESTMENT CURVE TOTAL ANNUAL INVESTMENT TO NEEDED TO MAINTAIN 2014 FCI

SLIDE 23 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $8,839,184 $7,163,004 $22,090,327 $10,883,493 $9,655,211 $37,444,944 $2,994,349 $3,425,342 $7,484,627 $3,247,715

25+1:+5:+2:+27+101+8+9+21+9

DAS FCI 10-YEAR ANNUAL INVESTMENT CURVE TOTAL ANNUAL INVESTMENT TO NEEDED TO MAINTAIN 2014 FCI Facility Condition * Add 40% for project soft costs (design and engineering fees, permits, project management, etc.)

SLIDE 24 3D CITIES PLATFORM FOR VISUAL COMMUNICATION Visualization Special Achievement in GIS 2015 Award Winner VIEW ONLINE: https://cloudciti.es/scenes/547fab69052ca20800715d70

SLIDE 25 REVENUE BUILDING

SLIDE 26 REVENUE BUILDING: DENSITY BY FLOOR (RSF/EMPLOYEE) LOW HIGH

SLIDE 27 MILL CREEK - NORTH MALL NORTH MALL OFFICE EMPLOYMENT STATE LANDS AGRICULTURE ARCHIVES HUMAN SERVICES

SLIDE 28 MILL CREEK - NORTH MALL: FEMA 100-YR FLOOD PLAIN NORTH MALL OFFICE EMPLOYMENT STATE LANDS AGRICULTURE ARCHIVES HUMAN SERVICES

SLIDE 29 MILL CREEK - NORTH MALL: FEMA 500-YR FLOOD PLAIN NORTH MALL OFFICE EMPLOYMENT STATE LANDS AGRICULTURE ARCHIVES HUMAN SERVICES

SLIDE 30 MONTHLY OPERATING COST/RSF: VALUE COLORAMP SYMBOLOGY LOW HIGH

SLIDE 31 MONTHLY OPERATING COST/RSF: VALUE EXTRUSION SYMBOLOGY

SLIDE 32 ENERGY USE INTENSITY: VALUE COLORAMP SYMBOLOGY LOW HIGH

SLIDE 33 ENERGY USE INTENSITY: VALUE EXTRUSION SYMBOLOGY

SLIDE 34 SALEM - REGIONAL EXTENT: TERRAIN/ELEVATION STATE CAPITOL STATE PRISON STATE DATA CENTER STATE HOSPITAL

SLIDE 35 STATE CAPITOL STATE PRISON STATE DATA CENTER STATE HOSPITAL SALEM - REGIONAL EXTENT: TERRAIN/ELEVATION COLORAMP LOW HIGH

SLIDE 36 ONGOING WORK AND FUTURE INITIATIVES

Facility Conditions Assessments for Remaining Agencies
New Space Standards and Toolkit
Offjce Consolidation Plan and Model
Data Integration
Oregon Total Cost of Ownership Model
Design Excellence Program
Statewide Collaborative Planning Engine

Summary DOWN THE ROAD

SLIDE 37

Capital Program

State of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICE | FACILITIES PLANNING UNIT NATURAL HAZARDS PILOT INITIATIVE

SLIDE 38 Overview BEING RESILIENT FLOODING LANDSLIDE EARTHQUAKE FIRE TSUNAMI

k

$

+

ï

BEING PREPARED ANALYSIS PLANNING MITIGATION PREPARATION EDUCATION

Q

ASSESSING HAZARDS RECOVERING QUICKLY LIVES SAVED COMMUNITIES RESTORED ECONOMIES REBOUND

SLIDE 39 Overview NATURAL HAZARDS PILOT INITIATIVE SEISMIC AND FLOOD ANALYSIS AGENCY-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP DAS + DOGAMI + PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY

111

BUILDINGS E BENEFIT/COST ANALYSIS TOOL RISK PRIORITIZATION LIST I FEMA RAPID VISUAL SCREENING I PROTECTION OF CULTURAL ASSETS I CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT TARGETED MITIGATION PROGRAM GOVERNOR'S RESILIENCE CABINET + INTERAGENCY HAZARD MITIGATION TEAM O R E G O N D E P A R T M E N T O F G E O L O G Y A N D M I N E R A L I N D U S T R I E S 1 9 3 7

SLIDE 40

Capital Program

State of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICE | FACILITIES PLANNING UNIT STRATEGIC PORTFOLIO PLANNING

SLIDE 41 Overview PLANNING PRINCIPLES DESIGN FOR QUALITY Good building design contributes to higher employee productivity and better public

service. Aspire for the highest feasible level of environmental and architectural design.

STEWARD OUR INVESTMENTS Public investments must be properly maintained to ensure safety and reduce long-term

cost. Design high-performance buildings with the lowest total cost of ownership.

RIGHT-SIZE OUR PORTFOLIO Buildings have large environmental footprints, and are costly to build, operate and

maintain. Prioritize adaptive reuse of buildings and projects that maximize effjciency

and long-term utility. CONTRIBUTE TO THE WHOLE Our buildings serve key roles across the state and represent sizable community invest-

ments. Consider how a project impacts the community and helps achieve statewide

priorities. CONVEY OUR IDENTITY Our buildings represent the aspirations, integrity, and legacy of Oregonians. Ensure buildings contribute to an “image of accessibility and responsiveness of government”. BE RESILIENT Using science, data and community wisdom to protect against and adapt to risks, there- by making people, communities and systems better prepared to withstand catastroph- ic events—both natural and man-made—and able to bounce back more quickly and emerge stronger from these shocks and stresses.

SLIDE 42 PURPOSE

Aligns real estate and property planning with an agency's strategic

business objectives

A mid-term plan (2-5 years) encompasses the entire portfolio (owned

and leased)

More tactical than 10-year plan

STEPS

Existing Conditions Analysis (FCA)
Agency Facilities Needs Statement
Gap Analysis
Identify Alternative Strategies
Lifecycle Cost Analysis
Strategic Plan Recommendations
Tactical Plan (Short-term Implementation)
Master Plan (Site specifjc)

Overview ROAD TO 10-YEAR PLAN

SLIDE 43 Statewide Facilities FACT COUNT GSF Total Facilities (Including Higher Education) 6,698 54,175,063 Total Higher Education Facilities 1,320 28,018,285 Total Facilities (Non-Higher Education) 5,378 26,156,778 Total State-Owned Facilities 4,783 21,466,566 Total State-Owned Facilities > $1M Value 507 16,079,395 Total State-Owned Facilities < $1M Value 4,276 5,301,175 Total Leased Facilities (Offjce and Storage GSF) 595 4,690,212 Largest Agency by GSF (Corrections) 336 5,020,174 Largest Agency by Facilities (Parks and Recreation) 1,861 1,138,835 Largest Lease Tenant (Human Services) 126 1,843,767

$5.1

BILLION TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE

21.5

MILLION OWNED GSF

5,378

FACILITIES OWNED AND LEASED STATEWIDE

40,314

EMPLOYEES BUDGETED POSITIONS STATEWIDE SNAPSHOT

42+27+1:+9+5+H

GSF

TOTAL GSF | % TOTAL GSF

SLIDE 45 20% 13%

4.6

MILLION LEASED SF 83+19+L 8:+12+L GSF Count 80% 87% LEASED OWNED Statewide Facilities LESSEE LEASES LSF RENT/MO $/SF 1. Human Services 139 2,007,478 $2,540,215 $1.27 2. Transportation 77 387,234 $457,072 $1.18 3. State Police 44 378,970 $424,601 $1.12 4. Justice 23 356,522 $464,924 $1.30 5. Employment 31 228,288 $263,568 $1.15 LEASED FACILITIES (OWNED VS. LEASED) TOP 5 LESSEES (AGENCIES)

SLIDE 46 Statewide Facilities LESSEE LEASES LSF RENT/MO $/SF 1. Human Services 185 2,987,317 $4,718,895 $1.56 2. Transportation 77 387,234 $457,072 $1.18 3. State Police 44 378,970 $424,601 $1.12 4. Justice 23 356,522 $464,924 $1.30 5. Employment 31 228,288 $263,568 $1.15 LEASED FACILITIES (OWNED VS. LEASED) TOP 5 LESSEES (AGENCIES)

4.6

MILLION LEASED SF 83+19+L 8:+12+L GSF Count 80% 87% LEASED OWNED

SLIDE 47 Statewide Facilities TEN YEAR LEASE OUTLOOK (LEASE EXPIRATION LSF*/YEAR)

92+92+100,+4+59+3:+27+12+6+13+11

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 184 127 84 42 32 14 10 6 5 11 854,326 941,137 697,859 545,318 369,555 242,905 99,737 53,558 110,499 93,842 2.5M LEASED SF SHORT-TERM LEASE RENEGOTIATION/ CONSOLIDATION POTENTIAL 395 LEASES

| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

*Leased Square Footage LEASE EXPIRATION YEAR | LEASES | TOTAL LSF

SLIDE 48

SLIDE 49 GOALS

Improve Employee Quality of Life (Current and Future)
Improve Space Quality
Optimize Business Processes
Boost Productivity, Renew Workforce
Reinvest Savings into Programs

strategic plan NEW SPACE STANDARDS

SLIDE 50 3D CITIES PLATFORM FOR VISUAL COMMUNICATION Visualization Special Achievement in GIS 2015 Award Winner VIEW ONLINE: https://cloudciti.es/scenes/547fab69052ca20800715d70

SLIDE 51 REVENUE BUILDING

SLIDE 52 REVENUE BUILDING: DENSITY BY FLOOR (RSF/EMPLOYEE) LOW HIGH

SLIDE 53 MONTHLY OPERATING COST/RSF: VALUE COLORAMP SYMBOLOGY LOW HIGH

SLIDE 54 MONTHLY OPERATING COST/RSF: VALUE EXTRUSION SYMBOLOGY

SLIDE 55 3D GIS MAP APPLICATION: ROOM OCCUPANCY STATUS VACANT OCCUPIED