Candidate Segments for Road Diets in Hampton Roads Presented to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Candidate Segments for Road Diets in Hampton Roads

Presented to HRTPO Board By Michael S. Kimbrel, Deputy Executive Director For Robert B. Case, Chief Transportation Engineer July 19, 2018

Agenda Item #12

Road Diet - Definition

2

“Roads are for getting to a place. Streets are for being in a place.” *

Road diets convert a road into a street

Ocean View Ave., Norfolk

Source: City of Norfolk (IMG_0618- trimmed.jpg)

* Charles Marohn, author of Thoughts on Building Strong Towns

Road Diet - Definition

• Reducing the

number of thru lanes

• Reusing the available

road width for:

– Two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) – Parking – Bike lanes – Etc.

3

Study Purpose

To identify candidate roadway segments and related information localities may consider for possible road diet implementation

4 Road Diet on South Plaza Trail, Va. Beach

Source: google maps

Project Steering Team

• Chesapeake

– Ben Camras

• Newport News

– Garrett Morgan

• Norfolk

– Jeff Raliski, John Stevenson

• Portsmouth

– Susan Wilson

• VDOT

– Eric Stringfield, Jerry Pauley

• Virginia Beach

– Bob Gey, Brian Solis, Wayne Wilcox, Ric Lowman

5

Study Methodology

• Conducted a literature review on how road

diets work.

• Applied that knowledge in the analysis

roadways in Hampton Roads.

6

Literature Review

• 1. Public response to road diets
• 2. Cost, construction, and post-construction
• 3. Transportation impacts

7

Public Response to Road Diets

Typically, road diets have been well- received by the public.

8

Cost, Construction, and Post-Construction

• Construction Cost:

– typically low

• Construction:

– typically quick to implement

• Post-Construction:

– can modify, even remove

9

Transportation Impacts

• Improved Safety
• Lower Vehicle Speeds
• Reduced Intersection Delay
• Reduced Crash Rates
• Increased Bicycle Use
• Increased Walking
• Increased Bus Ridership

10

Before After

Road Diet Candidates

A Road Diet may be desirable for:

– Segments with lower traffic volumes (less than 15,000 vehicles/day) – Segments with higher crash rates – Segments for which localities wish to accommodate cycling, bus transit, and walking – Segments for which localities wish to improve access to street-oriented land uses

• e.g. residential, shops, restaurants, parks, museums,

etc.

11

Application to Hampton Roads

12

HRTPO staff analyzed every 4-lane undivided roadway with low traffic volumes, noting:

– Crashes- location and rate – Bike/ped facilities in vicinity – People in area who bike, walk, or use transit to get to work – Existing bus routes – Existing or potential street-oriented land use

Maps Showing Bike/Ped/Transit

13

Observations

14

15

50+ Miles of Candidate Roadways

Next Steps

• Localities may use Study maps, data, and
• bservations to help select candidate roadway

segments to further investigate for possible Road Diet implementations.

• HRTPO staff recommends that localities conduct a

Road Diet Feasibility Determination (see FHWA Road Diet Information Guide) as part of such investigations.

16

Recommended Action

• Approve the final report for distribution under

Agenda Item #19-I.

17