Canarsie Tunnel WHAT INFORMED OUR PLANNING PROCESS SO FAR? Input - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

canarsie tunnel what informed our planning process so far
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Canarsie Tunnel WHAT INFORMED OUR PLANNING PROCESS SO FAR? Input - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lines Fixing the Canarsie Tunnel WHAT INFORMED OUR PLANNING PROCESS SO FAR? Input from over 40 community meetings Most frequent comments: Buses need dedicated lanes Provide multiple options, including ferry Simple, direct


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Fixing the Line’s Canarsie Tunnel

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

WHAT INFORMED OUR PLANNING PROCESS SO FAR?

Input from over 40 community meetings Most frequent comments:

  • Buses need dedicated lanes
  • Provide multiple options, including ferry
  • Simple, direct inter-borough bus routing, connecting to

subways

  • Bike lanes should be physically separated
  • Street treatments should take emergency vehicle and

delivery access needs into consideration

  • Manhattan residents fear traffic spillover on narrow, mostly

residential side streets

  • Balance the needs of riders, residents and businesses.

Technical Analysis:

  • Current travel patterns
  • Traffic and transit modeling
  • Testing of multiple scenarios.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

SANDY DAMAGE

The Canarsie Tube was inundated with saltwater during Superstorm Sandy causing corrosion of cabling, circuit breakers and power and track equipment. The tunnel needs a complete overhaul Contract for Tube repairs awarded (April 2017) 15 Month Closure remains on schedule to begin April 2019 Bonus for early completion & $400,000-per-day penalty for delays

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

  • Ongoing Work:
  • Relocating ConEd ducts and power cables.
  • Installing Support of Excavation - sheet-piles on north side of E

14th St & Avenue B for new substation

  • Installing Support of Excavation - support piers on north side of

E 14th St & Avenue A for new entrance/shaft

  • Starting installation of Support of Excavation - sheet-piles on

south side of E 14th St & Avenue A for new entrance/shaft by middle of February.

  • Work is also underway at Bedford Ave Station in Brooklyn

MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION UPDATE

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

L SERVICE PLAN

L Servi

rvice operate rates s betw tween Bedford ford Av v and Rockaway way Pkwy wy 6-mi minute te fr frequency

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

CHALLENGE OF SERVING L CUSTOMERS

A total of 400,000 daily riders use the L:

− 225,000 use the Canarsie Tube under East River

− Nearly as many inbound passengers during the AM peak hour as in private vehicles on all six East River bridges and tunnels combined

− 50,000 travel solely in Manhattan

− Greater than busiest NYC Bus route (Bx12 - 48,000 riders/day) − 66% greater than current M14 ridership (30,000 riders/day)

− 125,000 travel solely in Brooklyn

slide-7
SLIDE 7

OUR STRATEGY

6

Temporary ferry service Temporary bus service Increased alternate subway service Station Access and Capacity Improvements More bike and pedestrian infrastructure Peak period traffic management strategies

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

SUBWAY SERVICE

  • Subway service increased on GJMZ
  • JZ trains run local from Myrtle Av to Marcy Av to serve

additional demand at Hewes St, Lorimer St, Flushing Av

  • Free MetroCard transfers between:
  • Broadway G and Lorimer St / Hewes St JMZ
  • Junius St 3 and Livonia Av L
  • 21 St G and Hunters Point Av 7
  • Weekends and Overnights, M runs to 96 St / 2nd Av

Transit Travel Paths of Current L Riders During Closure - AM Peak Hour

(Width of line corresponds to number of shifted riders)

E G M A J 7 G M M C

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

PERMANENT STATION IMPROVEMENTS

Prior to the tunnel closure, we are improving access to and capacity in stations along the , , and lines, that will provide alternatives to service. During the tunnel closure, we will also enhance stations along the line.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

INTER-BOROUGH BUS ROUTING

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

PROPOSED STREET TREATMENTS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BICYCLE NETWORK CONNECTIONS

Times Square Upper West Side Midtown Upper East Side Downtown

2,069 – 3,490 cyclists projected to enter Manhattan on the Williamsburg Bridge during AM rush hour (8A-9A)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

HOW TO MAKE L TRAIN CROSS-RIVER BUSES WORK

12

  • Combined frequency of about 70 buses per hour in

peak

  • Target: end-to-end bus run times of about 25

minutes

  • Near free-flowing speeds across the bridge
slide-14
SLIDE 14

13

IF WE DO NOTHING

  • Highly variable travel times across Williamsburg

Bridge: 10-40 minutes in AM Peak

  • Buses will be stuck in traffic and not be a reliable travel
  • ption
  • Significant crowding on the J and M trains
  • Some transit riders shift to for-hire vehicles, adding to

existing congestion

  • Peak hour demand for ferry will exceed capacity

Doing nothing is not acceptable

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14

OUTER ROADWAY:

  • Not wide enough for two true

lanes when buses, trucks are present

  • Queues for heavy right turn at

Clinton St in Manhattan lead to spillback congestion

INNER ROADWAY:

  • Buses and truck not

permitted on inner roadway

  • Traffic from BQE and local

streets backs up past inner/outer roadway split

WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE: EXISTING CONDITIONS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15

HOV 3 restrictions on all lanes are necessary to reduce traffic volume enough to make bus lane work

  • Shifting 2,200+ cars currently using
  • uter deck to inner deck for a bus

lane would lead to very long queues spilling on to local streets

  • Even with bus lanes on approach

streets, traffic sorting at ingress and egress of bridge slows buses to “do nothing” speeds

DURING THE SHUTDOWN

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16

OUTER ROADWAY:

  • Buses
  • Trucks
  • HOV 3+ to Clinton St

INNER ROADWAY:

  • HOV 3+ only

MANHATTAN BOUND

slide-18
SLIDE 18

17

THRU HOV 3+ BUS/THRU TRUCKS ONLY RIGHT TURN ONLY

WESTBOUND

2 4 CLINTON ST 1 2 3 4 3 1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18

HOV 3+ RESTRICTIONS ON WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE

Policy

  • Buses, Trucks & HOV 3+ Only
  • Manhattan-Bound & Brooklyn-Bound
  • All Lanes
  • Peak Hours (hours under development)
slide-20
SLIDE 20

19

Area Context

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

DELANCEY STREET

From Williamsburg Bridge to Bowery

  • Continues bus priority

from Williamsburg Bridge

  • Provides a safe bike

facility connecting the Williamsburg Bridge, Allen Street and Chrystie Street

  • Ongoing analysis of

traffic and curb regulations

  • Additional bus priority

for Kenmare Street under development

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21

ALLEN STREET

From Delancey Street to Houston

  • Maintains the

existing bike lane

  • M15SBS/local will

be able to use the bus lanes

slide-23
SLIDE 23

THE CHALLENGE WITHOUT THE TRAIN

22

50,000 Manhattan-only L Train riders will need a reliable replacement for high-volume subway service More people will walk along already congested sidewalks, magnifying pedestrian safety issues 14th St businesses need loading space during shutdown 14th St residents need local access and deliveries Residents of adjacent residential blocks have expressed concern about effects of spillover traffic

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23

HOW ARE PEOPLE GETTING AROUND ON 14TH STREET?

Existing Counts at Union Sq: 8-9 AM Peak Hour

slide-25
SLIDE 25

HOW 14TH STREET OPERATES NOW

24

Buses and traffic on 14th Street are slow due to: Heavy pedestrian volumes conflicting with vehicle turns Double parking Importance of moving north- south traffic on avenues

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25

Currently:

  • 6 Vision Zero priority intersections
  • Over 30,000 weekday bus

passengers

  • 21,000 people in autos or taxis

During L closure:

  • Pedestrian surges of up to 2x current

volumes at major intersections

14TH ST: PRIORITY CORRIDOR

slide-27
SLIDE 27

26

14TH ST DESIGN OPTIONS

DOT evaluated the following options:

  • Existing Conditions
  • Do Nothing (L Train Closes, No Bus Priority)
  • Short Busway (Third Av – Sixth Av)
  • Busway (Third Av – Eighth/Ninth Av)

Standard Select Bus Service bus lane design is not recommended because of

  • Need for additional pedestrian space on the

busiest blocks of 14th Street

  • Very frequent bus service would be undermined

by bus lane blockages

slide-28
SLIDE 28

27

14TH ST CORRIDOR DESIGN:

Why 3rd Ave?

  • Increases westbound bus speed/reliability at 1st Av
  • Reduces pedestrian conflict at Vision Zero priority intersections

Why 8th/9th Ave?

  • Additional effects on corridor traffic are limited
  • Allows for greater expansion of pedestrian space & loading zones
slide-29
SLIDE 29

28

PROPOSED 14TH ST LOCAL STOP CHANGES

Temporary M14A/D stop removal to allow for needed pedestrian space and easbound passing lane

5 Avenue Union Square West 3 Avenue Union Square

M14 SBS M14 SBS M14 A/D M14 A/D M14 A/D M14 A/D M14 A/D M14 A/D

M14A/D stops relocated to improved stop location, allowing for more pedestrian space where sidewalks are most congested Temporary M14A/D stop removal to allow for needed pedestrian space and eastbound passing lane

slide-30
SLIDE 30

29

14th STREET BUSWAY DESIGN

slide-31
SLIDE 31

30

14th STREET BUSWAY DESIGN

Pedestrian Space Temporary Bus Boarder

BUS STOP

Local Deliveries

slide-32
SLIDE 32

31

YES:

Buses Access-A-Ride vehicles Emergency vehicles Local delivery vehicles Cars accessing private garages

WHO CAN ACCESS THE BUSWAY?

NO:

Taxis & other FHV’s Private Cars Through-trucks

slide-33
SLIDE 33

32

BUSWAY OPERATION

Buses and Local Access Only Peak Hours (hours under development)

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000

Bus Riders Traffic Volume

14th Street Traffic Volume & Bus Ridership by Hour of Day

Traffic Volume Projected Ridership Existing Ridership

slide-34
SLIDE 34

33

14TH ST DESIGN OPTIONS

slide-35
SLIDE 35

34

TRAFFIC VOLUMES COMPARED TO BUS RIDERSHIP

3,077 6,992

  • 2,000

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000

14th St 12th St 13th St 15th St 16th St Bus Ridership

AM Peak hour: 8 to 9 AM

slide-36
SLIDE 36

13th St, Typical Design

13th STREET BIKE PATH

Existing: Wide travel lane Proposed: Two-way bike path on south curb Conceptual Intersection Design: Space for left turning vehicles

Left turn queuing space Maintain traffic flow at intersections

Project Limits

Precedent: Clinton St at Cherry St, MN

35

slide-37
SLIDE 37

13th STREET BIKE PATH

Why 13th Street?

  • Provides longest continuous east-

west connectivity (Ave C to 8th Ave), with potential to continue shared or standard lanes to Hudson St

Why not other streets?

  • 15th St & 16th St: Interrupted connection
  • 14th St: Heavy pedestrian and bus volumes
  • 12th St: Farther from 14th St

Route Selection

Route Selection Project Limits

36

  • Proximity to 14th Street retail and transit
  • Directly connects to new bike parking

hub on University Pl.

  • Fewer land use conflicts on blocks in

Union Square core

slide-38
SLIDE 38

13th STREET BIKE PATH

Route Selection

Why not a one-way pair?

  • Design would still require parking loss on 13th St
  • Pair of one-way bike lanes would nearly double

parking loss in the area

  • Two-way path is most efficient use of space

Route Selection

EXISTING TWO-WAY BIKE LANE ONE-WAY BIKE LANE

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • Additional conventional bike parking and

high capacity bike parking

  • Potential CitiBike expansion, valet service
  • Targeted pedestrian safety improvements,

including at Vision Zero priorities and subway entrances

ADDITIONAL BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN MITIGATIONS

38

slide-40
SLIDE 40

39

FERRY

Service Plan:

  • Weekdays/Sunday: 6 AM – midnight

Friday/Saturday: 6 AM – 2 AM (pending NYCDPR coordination)

  • Rush hours: 8 boats per hour per direction, carrying up to 1200

passengers per hour per direction

  • Fares will be integrated with the M14 SBS and M23 SBS
  • Transfer to these bus routes at temporary bus terminal at

Stuyvesant Cove (E 20th St and Avenue C)

  • Temporary landing modifications at N Williamsburg
  • Ongoing coordination with NYCEDC, NYCDOT, and NYCDPR

L Train Ferry NYC East River Ferry

slide-41
SLIDE 41

40

ALTERNATE SERVICE

slide-42
SLIDE 42

41

NEXT STEPS

Ongoing Through 2020

  • Construction at street level to support tunnel project

Winter 2018

  • Present conceptual plan and solicit feedback at community meetings/open houses
  • Present final plan to stakeholders and community

Winter/Spring 2018

  • Stakeholder outreach, design and service plan refinement

Spring 2018

  • Full M service restored
slide-43
SLIDE 43

42

NEXT STEPS

Summer/Fall 2018

  • Construction begins for street modifications

Summer 2018 - March 2019

  • Multiple weekend and overnight L closures to support tunnel project

Winter 2019

  • Completion of temporary street and/or site modifications for SBS service, bus terminal

and parking, and ferry operations April 2019

  • Start of Canarsie Tunnel Closure, alternative service plan begins
slide-44
SLIDE 44

43

APPENDIX

slide-45
SLIDE 45

44

slide-46
SLIDE 46

45

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Existing: Standard bike lanes Proposed: Upgrade bike lanes to two-way protected path Proposed: Bus Stop Treatment

E 20th St, Facing West

20th STREET BIKE PATH

Shorter, safer pedestrian crossings Pedestrians exposed to turning vehicles Proposed Expand corner Add concrete island Existing Long Pedestrian Crossing: 140’

slide-48
SLIDE 48

APPENDIX: 13th STREET BIKE PATH

47

13th St: 6th Ave – 5th Ave 3rd Ave – 1st Ave, Ave A – Ave B

EXISTING PROPOSED

13th St: Greenwich Ave – 6 Ave 5th Ave – 3rd Ave, 1st Ave – Ave A

EXISTING PROPOSED

13th Street

13th St: Ave B – Ave C

EXISTING PROPOSED

Route Details

Project Map

slide-49
SLIDE 49

APPENDIX: 13th STREET BIKE PATH

Greenwich Ave: 8th Ave – 13th St

EXISTING PROPOSED

Horatio St: 8th Ave – 13th St

EXISTING PROPOSED

Horatio St: Hudson St – 8th Ave

EXISTING PROPOSED

Network Connections: Horatio St, Greenwich Ave

Route Details

Project Map

slide-50
SLIDE 50

49

slide-51
SLIDE 51

50

slide-52
SLIDE 52

51

HOW WE EVALUATED OPTIONS

  • Aimsun traffic models developed for 14th

Street and adjacent side streets (12th through 16th Streets)

  • Accounts for:
  • Increased bus service
  • Proposed access changes
  • Related traffic diversions
  • Results include:
  • Person delay (including transit riders)
  • Vehicle delay
  • Projected changes to traffic volumes
  • Travel times
  • Loading and pedestrian space needs are

also prioritized outside of model

slide-53
SLIDE 53

52

14TH ST DESIGN OPTIONS

  • Person-Hours of Delay accounts for the

passengers on buses and in cars within the corridor

  • Significantly more passengers will be

carried on buses on 14th St than in cars

  • n side streets
  • Busway Plan offers the least overall

delay to all street users

slide-54
SLIDE 54

LOADING SURVEY

53

slide-55
SLIDE 55

LOADING SURVEY

54

slide-56
SLIDE 56

55

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-57
SLIDE 57

56

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-58
SLIDE 58

57

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-59
SLIDE 59

58

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-60
SLIDE 60

59

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-61
SLIDE 61

60

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-62
SLIDE 62

61

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-63
SLIDE 63

62

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION

slide-64
SLIDE 64

63

Insert Ave A – 10th Ave diagrams

EXISTING AM PEAK TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION