can transition formfactors reveal diquark correlations
play

Can Transition Formfactors Reveal Diquark Correlations? Ralf W. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Can Transition Formfactors Reveal Diquark Correlations? Ralf W. Gothe for the CLAS Collaboration Diquark Correlations in Hadron Physics: Origin, Impact and Evidence September 23-27, 2019, ECT*, Trento, Italy v NN* Experiments: The best


  1. Can Transition Formfactors Reveal Diquark Correlations? Ralf W. Gothe for the CLAS Collaboration Diquark Correlations in Hadron Physics: Origin, Impact and Evidence September 23-27, 2019, ECT*, Trento, Italy  γ v NN* Experiments: The best access to the baryon and quark structure?  Analysis and New Results: Exclusive, quasi-free, and final state interaction!  Outlook: New experiments with extended scope and kinematics! This work is supported in parts by the National Science Foundation under Grant PHY 1812382. 1 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  2. Can Transition Formfactors Reveal Diquark Correlations? Ralf W. Gothe for the CLAS Collaboration Diquark Correlations in Hadron Physics: Origin, Impact and Evidence September 23-27, 2019, ECT*, Trento, Italy  Are dressed quarks fictious model creatures? Do we have evidence that they exist?  Why are quarks in DIS pointlike? What is the difference between a large-x valence quark and a dressed quark?  When does (precocious) scaling set in? What does it mean? This work is supported in parts by the National Science Foundation under Grant PHY 1812382. 2 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  3. Spectroscopy 3 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  4. Quark Model Classification of N* Dietmar Menze L P + q³g D 13 (1520) + q³qq S 11 (1535) J + N-Meson + … ∆ (1232) Roper P 11 (1440) 1135 MeV 1545 MeV 1839MeV 2130 MeV Mass 4 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  5. N and ∆ Excited Baryon States … Simon Capstick  Orbital excitations (two distinct kinds in contrast to mesons)  Radial excitations (also two kinds in contrast to mesons) 5 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  6. Build your Mesons and Baryons … ? Frank Wilczek, Physics Today, August 2000 6 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  7. Electron Scattering 7 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  8. Baryon Excitations and Quasi-Elastic Scattering Paticle and Nuclei, Povh et al., MAMI B Elastic Peak of H E = 246 MeV θ = 148 o Quasi-Elastic Peak in 16 O Deep Inelastic Scattering S. Stein et al., PR D22 (1975) 1884 8 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  9. Quark-Hadron Duality PRL 16 (1970) 1140, PR D4 (1971) 2901 E.D. Bloom and F.J. Gilman W = 1.9 GeV E’ = 17.6 GeV ν = 2.37 GeV Q 2 = 1.72 GeV m q = Q 2 /2 ν m q = 0.36 GeV p F = 0.67 GeV ∆ r F =  c * √9 π /2 r F = 0.79 fm ∆ p F Deep Inelastic Scattering S. Stein et al., PR D22 (1975) 1884 9 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  10. Baryon Excitations and Quasi-Elastic Scattering quasi-elastic off point-like constituents Deep Inelastic Scattering M. Breidenbach et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 935 10 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  11. Baryon Excitations and Quasi-Elastic Scattering hard and confined quasi-elastic e - hard soft Deep Inelastic Scattering S. Stein et al., PR D22 (1975) 1884 11 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  12. Transition Form Factors 12 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  13. Hadron Structure with Electromagnetic Probes  Study the structure of the nucleon spectrum in the domain Q 2 π,ρ,ω … where dressed quarks are the major active degree of freedom.  Explore the formation of excited nucleon states in interactions low of dressed quarks and their emergence from QCD. k N,N * , ∆,∆ * … 3q-core+MB-cloud K 2 µ N P 2 µ * Q 2 = − K µ 2 3q-core K 1 µ N P 1 µ not high pQCD 13 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  14. Hadron Structure with Electromagnetic Probes  Study the structure of the nucleon spectrum in the domain Quark mass extrapolated to the chiral limit, where q Q 2 π,ρ,ω … where dressed quarks are the major active degree of freedom. is the momentum variable of the tree-level quark low propagator using the Asqtad action. q N,N * , ∆,∆ * … meson dressed quark LQCD, DSE and … 3q-core+MB-cloud quark mass (GeV) confinement current quark 3q-core e.m. probe high pQCD 14 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  15. Hadron Structure with Electromagnetic Probes  The SM α s diverges as Q 2 approaches zero, but confinement and the meson cloud heal this artificial divergence as QCD Q 2 π,ρ,ω … k becomes non-perturbative. low N,N * , ∆,∆ * … 3q-core+MB-cloud 3q-core high pQCD 15 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  16. Hadron Structure with Electromagnetic Probes Rolf Ent  The pion, or a meson cloud, explains light-quark asymmetry Q 2 π,ρ,ω … of the sea quarks in the nucleon. low k N,N * , ∆,∆ * … 3q-core+MB-cloud 3q-core high pQCD 16 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  17. Data-Driven Data Analyses QCD Consistent Results Single Pion DSE, QM N*, Δ * LQCD Amplitude Reaction Models analysis Data Hadronic Electromagnetic Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, Vol. 22, 1330015 (2013) 1-99 production production 17 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  18. Data-Driven Data Analyses QCD Consistent Results Double Pion DSE, QM N*, Δ * LQCD Amplitude Reaction Models analysis Data Hadronic Electromagnetic Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, Vol. 22, 1330015 (2013) 1-99 production production 18 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  19. Data-Driven Data Analyses QCD Consistent Results DSE, QM N*, Δ * LQCD  Single meson production: Unitary Isobar Model (UIM) Fixed- t Dispersion Relations (DR) Amplitude  Double pion production: Reaction Models analysis Unitarized Isobar Model (JM)  Coupled-Channel Approaches: EBAC ⇒ Argonne-Osaka JAW ⇒ Jülich-Athens-Washington ⇒ JüBo Data BoGa ⇒ Bonn-Gatchina Hadronic Electromagnetic Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, Vol. 22, 1330015 (2013) 1-99 production production 19 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  20. Electrocouplings of N(1440)P 11 History 10 -3 GeV -1/2  Lowest mass hybrid baryon should be J P =1/2 + as Roper.  In 2002 Roper A 1/2 results were consistent with a hybrid state. 20 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  21. Transition Form Factors and QCD Models Roper resonance P 11 (1440) PDG 2013 update nrQM + q³g MAID LC QM + q³qq + N-Meson - q 2 q + … or q 3 G - … … all have distinctively different Q 2 dependencies  A 1/2 has zero-crossing near Q 2 =0.5 and becomes dominant amplitude at high Q 2 .  Consistent with radial excitation at high Q 2 and large meson-baryon coupling at small Q 2 .  Eliminates gluonic excitation (q 3 G) as a dominant contribution. Nick Tyler closes the 1-2 GeV 2 gap for single pion production. 21 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  22. Transition Form Factors and QCD Models Roper resonance P 11 (1440) I.T. Obukhovsky nrQM MAID LC QM q 3 +Nσ q 3 G  A 1/2 has zero-crossing near Q 2 =0.5 and becomes dominant amplitude at high Q 2 .  Consistent with radial excitation at high Q 2 and large meson-baryon coupling at small Q 2 .  Eliminates gluonic excitation (q 3 G) as a dominant contribution. Nick Tyler closes the 1-2 GeV 2 gap for single pion production. 22 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  23. Transition Form Factors and QCD Models Roper resonance P 11 (1440) G. Ramalho CSQM LF Holography  A 1/2 has zero-crossing near Q 2 =0.5 and becomes dominant amplitude at high Q 2 .  Consistent with radial excitation at high Q 2 and large meson-baryon coupling at small Q 2 .  Eliminates gluonic excitation (q 3 G) as a dominant contribution. Nick Tyler closes the 1-2 GeV 2 gap for single pion production. 23 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

  24. Roper Transition Form Factors in DSE Approach N(1440)P 11 J. Segovia et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 171801 CLAS Data CLAS Data DSE Contact Radial excitation … DSE Realistic longer tail … r R /r p =1.8 Inferred meson-cloud contribution … color must be screened … greater Anticipated complete result need for a meson- baryon cloud! Importantly, the existence of a zero in F 2 is not influenced by meson-cloud effects, although its precise location is. 24 Ralf W. Gothe ECT* 2019, Trento, Italy September 23-27, 2019

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend