Californias SCP Californias SCP Implementation Update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

california s scp california s scp implementation update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Californias SCP Californias SCP Implementation Update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Californias SCP Californias SCP Implementation Update Implementation Update Bob Boughton Safer Consumer Products Branch Safer Consumer Products and Work Places Program California Department of Toxic Substances Control Safer Consumer


slide-1
SLIDE 1

California’s SCP Implementation Update California’s SCP Implementation Update

Bob Boughton Safer Consumer Products Branch

Safer Consumer Products and Work Places Program California Department of Toxic Substances Control Safer Consumer Products Summit September 18, 2013

http: / / www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/ ContentPrint.aspx?id= 11244

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Adoption of Regulations

Effective Date = > October 1 , 2 0 1 3

w w w .dtsc.ca.gov/ SCPRegulations.cfm Additional inform ation:

  • Statem ent of Reasons
  • Response to com m ents
  • Background, GRSP, hearings, etc.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Goal

California’s Safer Consumer Products regulation creates a predictable process for reducing toxic ingredients in consumer

  • products. It requires manufacturers of

products containing chemicals of concern to ask, “Is this ingredient necessary? Is there a safer alternative? Is that alternative feasible?”

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DTSC

How I t W orks: The SCP Regulations

  • Hazard traits
  • Existing authoritative lists
  • Exposures – other reliable information

Chemicals

  • Potential exposures to CCs in product

Products

(Product‐Chemical Combinations)

  • Removal / replacement notification options
  • Alternatives analysis process, reports

Alternatives Analysis

Candidate Chemicals List Priority Products List Alternatives Selection Regulatory Responses

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

DTSC

How I t W orks: The SCP Regulations

  • OEHHA hazard traits
  • Initial list – existing authoritative lists
  • Additions to the list –
  • Adverse public health & environmental impacts
  • Sensitive subpopulations & environmental receptors
  • Widespread adverse impacts
  • Structurally / mechanistically similar chemicals
  • Exposures – biological/environmental monitoring
  • Exposures – other reliable information

Chemicals Products

(Product‐Chemical Combinations)

Alternatives Analysis

Candidate Chemicals List Priority Products List Alternatives Selection Regulatory Responses

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Key Prioritization Principles

For each listed Priority Product there must be:

  • Potential exposure(s)

AND

  • Potential for significant or widespread adverse

impacts

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Prioritization Factors

  • Adverse Impacts and Exposures
  • CC properties, traits, env/tox endpoints
  • Potential human/enviro adverse impacts
  • Impact on sensitive subpopulations, endangered/threatened

species, impaired environments

  • Market presence of product
  • Potential exposures to the product
  • Exposure in households, workplaces and throughout

product’s life cycle

  • Adverse Waste and End-of-Life Effects
  • Availability of Information
  • Other Regulatory Programs
  • Alternative availability and feasibility

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Initial Priority Products List

  • ~230 Candidate Chemicals
  • No more than 5 products
  • Proposed list – 180 days

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Priority Product Work Plans

3-year work plans (1st in 1 year)

  • Consider all ~1200 Chemicals
  • Forecast product categories to be

evaluated during the next 3-year cycle

  • Public workshops prior to adoption of

each work plan

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Chemicals & Products

Petition Process

  • Anyone may petition DTSC to add /

remove a chemical, chemical list, or product

  • High priority for petitions by federal and

California regulatory programs

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

DTSC

How I t W orks: The SCP Regulations

  • OEHHA hazard traits
  • Initial list – existing authoritative lists
  • Additions to the list –
  • Adverse public health & environmental impacts
  • Sensitive subpopulations & environmental receptors
  • Widespread adverse impacts
  • Structurally / mechanistically similar chemicals
  • Exposures – biological/environmental monitoring
  • Exposures – other reliable information

Chemicals

  • CCs’ adverse impacts
  • Potential exposures to CCs in product
  • Adverse waste and end‐of‐life effects
  • Available reliable information
  • Other regulatory programs
  • Available safer alternatives

Products

(Product‐Chemical Combinations)

Alternatives Analysis

Candidate Chemicals List Priority Products List Alternatives Selection Regulatory Responses

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Responsibility for Com pliance

Products…sold, offered for sale, supplied, distributed, or m anufactured in California.

One

The Manufacturer

who makes the product or who controls the manufacturing process or has the capacity to specify the chemicals in the product

Two

The U.S. Importer

  • f the product

Three

Retailers

who sell the product in California

Assemblers

  • f products

containing Priority Product components

May opt-out by ceasing to order Priority Product

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Priority product notifications

Notification options in lieu of AA –

  • CoC free,
  • CoC removal,
  • product removal,
  • replacement with existing alternative, or
  • alternatives analysis threshold exemption

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Alternatives Analysis

Phased process

  • notification
  • preliminary report
  • final report

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What is AA?

Alternatives analysis is a scientific method for identifying, comparing and evaluating competing courses of action. In the case of chemical regulation, it is used to determine the relative safety and viability of potential substitutes for existing products or processes that use hazardous chemicals. Alternatives may include drop-in chemical substitutes, material substitutes, changes to manufacturing operations, and changes to component/product design. The methodology compares the alternatives to the regulated product and to one another across a variety of attributes, typically including public health impacts, environmental effects, technical performance and economic impacts on the manufacturer and the consumer. It can identify trade-offs between the alternatives and, if desired, generate an evaluation of the relative overall performance of the original product and its alternatives.

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Alternatives Analyses

  • -the point--
  • Goal - to reduce the chances of regretful

substitution and unintended consequences

  • How - inform decision makers with a

comprehensive study of relevant impact differences between alternatives and the original

  • Why - market share, brand image
  • externalized impacts = social costs

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

I D Product Rqm ts

  • Function, performance, standards &

legal requirements

  • Function of Chemical of Concern
  • Is the chemical necessary?
  • Is replacement chemical necessary?

I D* Alternatives

  • Meet product requirements
  • Reduce / eliminate CC
  • Reduce / eliminate exposure
  • Look at existing alternatives

Screening Alternative Chem icals

  • Determine relevant adverse

impacts

  • Compare chemical alternatives
  • Eliminate replacements with

greater adverse impacts

Next Steps

  • Prelim inary

AA report

  • 180 days
  • Work plan for 2nd

AA Stage

First Stage of Alternatives Analyses

* should ID chemical substitutions AND other alternatives.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Second Stage of Alternatives Analysis

Step 1 – I D Relevant Com parison Factors

  • In conjunction with exposure

pathways & lifecycle phases

  • Quantitative / qualitative

analysis

  • Available information

Step 2 – Com pare Priority Product & Alternatives

  • Quantitative / qualitative

analysis

  • Relevant factors
  • exposure pathways
  • life cycle segments
  • Available information

Step 3 – Alternatives Selection Decision

  • Final AA

Report

  • 1 year
  • Reason &

justification for decision

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Guidance Developm ent

Prelim Stage Draft Guide- available for public com m ent next w inter – w orkshops Second Phase Draft- available for public com m ent next sum m er Anticipated Final Guide circa Decem ber 2 0 1 4

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Approach

Rigorous AA evaluations scientifically assess the presence or release of harmful substances through production, use, and end-of- life phases, as well as account for impacts to a variety of media and endpoints. Identify burden shifting of an environmental impact from one stage in a product chain to another, from one hazard endpoint to another, from one impact category to another, between impacts and resource efficiency, between media or between countries or different times, etc. Making the data sources, assumptions made and decision-making methods transparent and well documented is fundamental to completion of a quality AA.

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Purpose of the guidance

The purpose of this document is to provide useful methods and tools to assist responsible entities in fulfilling the requirements of Alternatives Analysis. Overall, the intention is to equip users with the background they need to effectively integrate life cycle thinking and safer design into product development processes. Here, Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) takes into consideration all relevant environmental interactions associated with a product from a process chain perspective. This is in contrast to focusing only on site-level impacts (i.e., manufacturing facility environmental foot-print) or on single environmental impacts (such as carbon foot-print).

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

W hen is it good enough?

Effort should lead to being able to discrim inate betw een alternatives and the base product, and to justify conclusions = inform ed com parison Decision m aking; relative to corporate value system - com panies m ake decisions now … so tell us how you did it.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

DTSC

How I t W orks: The Safer Consumer Products Regulations

  • OEHHA hazard traits
  • Initial list – existing authoritative lists
  • Additions to the list –
  • Adverse public health & environmental impacts
  • Sensitive subpopulations & environmental receptors
  • Widespread adverse impacts
  • Structurally / mechanistically similar chemicals
  • Exposures – biological/environmental monitoring
  • Exposures – other reliable information

Chemicals

  • CCs’ adverse impacts
  • Potential exposures to CCs in product
  • Adverse waste and end‐of‐life effects
  • Available reliable information
  • Other regulatory programs
  • Available safer alternatives

Products

(Product‐Chemical Combinations)

  • Technical guidance
  • Removal / replacement notification options
  • Alternative Analysis Threshold notification option
  • Alternatives analysis process, options & timeframes
  • Alternatives analysis reports

Alternatives Analysis

Candidate Chemicals List Priority Products List Alternatives Selection Regulatory Responses

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Regulatory Responses

  • Additional information to DTSC
  • Additional information to consumers
  • Use restrictions
  • Sales prohibitions
  • Additional safety measures / controls
  • End-of-life product stewardship
  • Research funding

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Goal

California’s Safer Consumer Products regulation creates a predictable process for reducing toxic ingredients in consumer products. It requires manufacturers to ask, “Is this ingredient necessary? Is there a safer alternative? Is that alternative ingredient feasible?

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Further inform ation

w w w .dtsc.ca.gov/ SCPRegulations.cfm

Bob Boughton Bob.boughton@dtsc.ca.gov ( 9 1 6 ) 3 2 3 -9 5 8 6

29