c urrent s chedule b uses 2010 2011 tier 1 7 45 2 25
play

C URRENT S CHEDULE & B USES 2010/2011 Tier 1 7:45 2:25 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M ULTI -T IER S CHEDULING S CHEDULING FOR S CHOOL T RANSPORTATION Guilford County Schools Transportation Department January 2011 jh C URRENT S TATUS Transportation Resources are Strained Results of remedial efforts to date: Results of


  1. M ULTI -T IER S CHEDULING S CHEDULING FOR S CHOOL T RANSPORTATION Guilford County Schools Transportation Department January 2011 jh

  2. C URRENT S TATUS Transportation Resources are Strained  Results of remedial efforts to date: Results of remedial efforts to date:   Combined under-utilized buses – Reduced fleet by 10 buses to forego the  purchase of additional buses.  In 2008, 634 operational buses  In 2009, 628 operational buses  In 2010, 624 operational buses I 2010 624 ti l b Implemented the shuttle point concept; increased ridership per bus; reduced  operational buses - 2004 Increased replacement bus passenger capacity  Future Concerns:  Continued increased student population – Ridership increase for 2010/2011 –  305 students Continued increased of educational programs and schools  Increased bus routing requirements Increased bus routing requirements – Federally mandated unfunded initiatives Federally mandated unfunded initiatives  – McKinney-Vento Act, NCLB Measurement of routing effectiveness and efficiency by the State will become  more stringent due to State/local budget cuts Increased transportation expenditures – fuel, salaries, equipment, parts 

  3. T HE PROPOSAL : M ULTI -T IERED S CHEDULING  Opportunities  To improve school bus transportation  Reduce the number of buses in operation  Reduce school bus costs  Reduce school bus costs  Increase state funding  Decrease local funding  Provide separate transportation for middle and high school students  Provide other tangible benefits to GCS

  4. E XPLANATION E XPLANATION M ULTI -T IER S CHEDULING C ONCEPT A multi-tiered schedule (MTS) assigns one bus to three or more schools to transport students to/from school each day. Utilizing the MTS concept, school instructional times are coordinated so that each bus can make up to three bus runs each morning and afternoon. h i d ft School instructional times are established on three separate levels in order to maximize the efficient use of t l l i d t i i th ffi i t f school buses.

  5. MTS C ONCEPT S TRATEGIES  The optimal bus run time is 45 minutes  Increased instructional day for elementary students by 15 minutes per day  Reallocate resources to support high school option schools or other non-traditional schools to increase participation  Reduce transportation expenditures by reducing the number of buses/drivers required to transport students  Increase efficiency, i.e., increase state funding; decrease LEA funding allocated to the Transportation Department

  6. C URRENT GCS I NSTRUCTIONAL S CHEDULES C URRENT GCS I NSTRUCTIONAL S CHEDULES T RADITIONAL S CHOOLS Tier 1 – Elementary & Middle Schools y 7:40 – 2:20, 7:45 – 2:25, 7:50 – 2:30, 7:55 – 2:35 7:30 – 3:05 Oak Hill Elementary 7:40 – 2:35 Jackson Middle & Kiser Middle Ti Tier 2 – Middle & High Schools 2 Middl & High S h l 8:35 – 3:30, 8:40 – 3:35, 8:45 – 3:40, 8:50 – 3:45

  7. E XAMPLE - D UDLEY /S MITH T RANSPORTATION Z ONE C URRENT S CHEDULE & B USES 2010/2011 Tier 1 7:45 – 2:25 Alderman, Archer, Bessemer, Foust 7:55 – 2:35 Frazier, Gillespie, Hunter, Peck, Vandalia 7:40 – 2:35 Jackson Middle Total Tier 1 Buses – 55 Tier 2 8 40 8:40 – 3:35 Allen, Smith 3 35 All S ith 8:50 – 345 Hairston, Dudley Total Tier 2 Buses - 69 Total Tier 2 Buses 69

  8. A PPLICATION OF C RITERIA E XAMPLE : D D UDLEY /S MITH T RANSPORTATION Z ONE /S T Z P ROPOSED M ULTI -T IER S CHEDULE Tier 1 7:30 – 2:25 Alderman, Archer, Bessemer, Foust, Frazier, Gillespie, Hunter, Peck, Vandalia – 45 Buses Tier 2 8:15 – 3:10 Dudley, Smith – 41 Buses 8:15 3:10 Dudley, Smith 41 Buses Tier 3 9:00 9:00 – 3:55 Allen, Hairston, Jackson – 38 Buses 3:55 Allen Hairston Jackson 38 Buses

  9. A PPLICATION OF THE MTS P ROPOSAL A PPLICATION OF THE MTS P ROPOSAL FOR ALL T RADITIONAL S CHOOLS Zone Current Projected Reduction  Dudley/Smith 69 45 24  Grimsley/Page 62 43 19  Andrews/HPC Andrews/HPC 50 50 29 29 21 21   SE/Southern 65 51 14  NW/Northern 63 58 5  NE/Eastern 62 60 2  Ragsdale/SW Ragsdale/SW 60 60 58 58 2 2   Western 29 24 5  Total Buses 460 368 92  Redistribute – 30 to 50 buses  Out of Service – 42 to 62 buses 

  10. E STIMATED R EDUCTION IN T RANSPORTATION E XPENDITURES  Projected operating expense savings  Approx annual cost to operate 1 bus = $20,575 (not including driver salaries & benefits)  Range of buses taken out of service = 42 to 62 buses g  Potential range for reduction in operating expenditures = $864,150 to $1,275,650  Projected savings for driver salaries & benefits  Projected savings for driver salaries & benefits  GCS Cost/Mile (driver salaries & benefits) = $0.62  Estimated miles a driver drives each day = 80  Estimated net decrease in miles per day per bus out E i d d i il d b of service = 50 miles  50 miles x 42 x $0.62 x 180 = $234,360  50 miles x 62 x $0 62 x 180 = $345 960  50 miles x 62 x $0.62 x 180 = $345,960  Overall Projected Savings Overall Projected Savings - - $1.1M to $1.6M $1.1M to $1.6M

  11. O THER S AVINGS  Buses taken out of service can be added in as needed for future expansion (Considered credits needed for future expansion. (Considered credits by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction )  Assumed Efficiency Rate Increase – 3.8% to 5.6%

  12. C ABARRUS C OUNTY  Implemented Three-Tier Bus Plan 2009/2010  Increase in instructional hours  Additional flexibility in meeting instructional hours requirement q  Reduce absenteeism and turnover for bus drivers – most bus drivers would become full time employees  Increase safety on buses – savings allotted to the  Increase safety on buses savings allotted to the purchase of video camera systems for all buses  Financial benefits  Ti  Tier 1 - High Schools 7:15 to 2:15 (6 elementary schools 1 Hi h S h l 7 15 t 2 15 (6 l t h l 7:30 to 2:15  Tier 2 – Most Elementary Schools – 8:15 – 3:00  Tier 3 – Middle Schools – 9:00 – 4:00

  13. W AKE C OUNTY  Developed in 1993 p  Over a 11 year period added 40 buses instead of 160 buses based on ridership increases and new schools  Reduced the overall ride time for students  Reduced the overall ride time for students  Saved Wake Co $100M in transportation funding  Operates at 100% Efficiency  Tier 1 – 7:30 – 2:15  Tier 2 – 8:15 – 3:00 Ti 2 8 15 3 00  Tier 3 – 9:15 – 3:45

  14. U NION C OUNTY  Tier 1 – Elementary 7:30 to 2:00 y  Tier 2 – High 8:00 – 2:55  Tier 3 – Middle 8:45 – 3:45  Increased Efficiency Rating – 100%  Leveled Expenditures

  15. C HARLOTTE M ECKLENBURG S CHOOLS  Various start times for elementary and middle y grade levels  7:30 – 1:45 Elementary  8:30 – 2:45 Elementary  9:15 – 3:30 Elementary  8:00 – 3:00 Middle  8:45 – 3:45 Middle  8:45 – 3:45 Middle  7:15 – 2:15 High g

  16. P OSITIVE AND N EGATIVE A SPECTS OF M ULTI -T IER S CHEDULING Positive Negative Reduce number of buses Necessitates changes in the current traditional school instructional schedules Potential decrease in student ride time Increase traffic by buses through Improve student/bus ratio neighborhoods Corresponding bell schedules Elementary schools starting 10 minutes y g earlier in the morning. Separate middle and high school bus routes Decrease in per bus expenditures Increase in elementary instructional day Resources are increased without spending capital funds

  17. N EXT S TEPS  Develop Routing and Scheduling Plan for District p g g  Revise data in Routing System  Provide Schools and Parents with New Bus Routing and Scheduling Information  Advise DPI Transportation Services of Buses Taken out of Services Taken out of Services  Train Bus Drivers and Support Staff on Multi-Tier Plan and upcoming changes  Implementation - August 2011  Monitor Cost Savings (Efficiency Rating S September 2012) t b 2012)

  18. C OMMITTEE M EMBERS Carlvena Foster, Board of Education Member Tony Watlington, Strategic Planning Officer Sandra Culmer, Regional Executive Director Leigh Hebbard Director Athletics Leigh Hebbard, Director, Athletics Erik Naglee, Director, Title 1 Laurie Hogan, District Relations Andrew LaRowe – Chief Operations Officer Jeff Harris Jeff Harris – Director, Transportation Director, Transportation Curtis Stacey, Assistant Director, Transportation Jeff Stevens, Zone Supervisor D i Daisy Wilkins, Zone Supervisor Wilki Z S i

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend