C URRENT S CHEDULE & B USES 2010/2011 Tier 1 7:45 2:25 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

c urrent s chedule b uses 2010 2011 tier 1 7 45 2 25
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

C URRENT S CHEDULE & B USES 2010/2011 Tier 1 7:45 2:25 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M ULTI -T IER S CHEDULING S CHEDULING FOR S CHOOL T RANSPORTATION Guilford County Schools Transportation Department January 2011 jh C URRENT S TATUS Transportation Resources are Strained Results of remedial efforts to date: Results of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING SCHEDULING

FOR

SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION

Guilford County Schools Transportation Department January 2011

jh

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CURRENT STATUS

Transportation Resources are Strained

Results of remedial efforts to date:

Results of remedial efforts to date:

Combined under-utilized buses – Reduced fleet by 10 buses to forego the purchase of additional buses.

 In 2008, 634 operational buses  In 2009, 628 operational buses

I 2010 624 ti l b

 In 2010, 624 operational buses

Implemented the shuttle point concept; increased ridership per bus; reduced

  • perational buses - 2004

Increased replacement bus passenger capacity

Future Concerns:

Continued increased student population – Ridership increase for 2010/2011 – 305 students

Continued increased of educational programs and schools

Increased bus routing requirements – Federally mandated unfunded initiatives Increased bus routing requirements Federally mandated unfunded initiatives – McKinney-Vento Act, NCLB

Measurement of routing effectiveness and efficiency by the State will become more stringent due to State/local budget cuts

Increased transportation expenditures – fuel, salaries, equipment, parts

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE PROPOSAL: MULTI-TIERED SCHEDULING

 Opportunities

 To improve school bus transportation  Reduce the number of buses in operation  Reduce school bus costs  Reduce school bus costs  Increase state funding  Decrease local funding  Provide separate transportation for middle and high

school students

 Provide other tangible benefits to GCS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

EXPLANATION EXPLANATION MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING CONCEPT

A multi-tiered schedule (MTS) assigns one bus to three or more schools to transport students to/from school each day. Utilizing the MTS concept, school instructional times are coordinated so that each bus can make up to three bus h i d ft runs each morning and afternoon. School instructional times are established on three t l l i d t i i th ffi i t f separate levels in order to maximize the efficient use of school buses.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MTS CONCEPT STRATEGIES

 The optimal bus run time is 45 minutes  Increased instructional day for elementary students by 15 minutes

per day

 Reallocate resources to support high school option schools or other

non-traditional schools to increase participation

 Reduce transportation expenditures by reducing the number of

buses/drivers required to transport students

 Increase efficiency, i.e., increase state funding; decrease LEA

funding allocated to the Transportation Department

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CURRENT GCS INSTRUCTIONAL SCHEDULES CURRENT GCS INSTRUCTIONAL SCHEDULES

TRADITIONAL SCHOOLS

Tier 1 – Elementary & Middle Schools y 7:40 – 2:20, 7:45 – 2:25, 7:50 – 2:30, 7:55 – 2:35 7:30 – 3:05 Oak Hill Elementary 7:40 – 2:35 Jackson Middle & Kiser Middle Ti 2 Middl & High S h l Tier 2 – Middle & High Schools 8:35 – 3:30, 8:40 – 3:35, 8:45 – 3:40, 8:50 – 3:45

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EXAMPLE - DUDLEY/SMITH TRANSPORTATION ZONE CURRENT SCHEDULE & BUSES 2010/2011 Tier 1 7:45 – 2:25 Alderman, Archer, Bessemer, Foust 7:55 – 2:35 Frazier, Gillespie, Hunter, Peck, Vandalia 7:40 – 2:35 Jackson Middle Total Tier 1 Buses – 55 Tier 2 8 40 3 35 All S ith 8:40 – 3:35 Allen, Smith 8:50 – 345 Hairston, Dudley Total Tier 2 Buses - 69 Total Tier 2 Buses 69

slide-8
SLIDE 8

APPLICATION OF CRITERIA EXAMPLE: D /S T Z DUDLEY/SMITH TRANSPORTATION ZONE

PROPOSED MULTI-TIER SCHEDULE

Tier 1 7:30 – 2:25 Alderman, Archer, Bessemer, Foust, Frazier, Gillespie, Hunter, Peck, Vandalia – 45 Buses Tier 2 8:15 – 3:10 Dudley, Smith – 41 Buses 8:15 3:10 Dudley, Smith 41 Buses Tier 3 9:00 3:55 Allen Hairston Jackson 38 Buses 9:00 – 3:55 Allen, Hairston, Jackson – 38 Buses

slide-9
SLIDE 9

APPLICATION OF THE MTS PROPOSAL APPLICATION OF THE MTS PROPOSAL

FOR ALL TRADITIONAL SCHOOLS

Zone Current Projected Reduction

Dudley/Smith 69 45 24

Grimsley/Page 62 43 19

Andrews/HPC 50 29 21

Andrews/HPC 50 29 21

SE/Southern 65 51 14

NW/Northern 63 58 5

NE/Eastern 62 60 2

Ragsdale/SW 60 58 2

Ragsdale/SW 60 58 2

Western 29 24 5

Total Buses 460 368 92

Redistribute – 30 to 50 buses

Out of Service – 42 to 62 buses

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ESTIMATED REDUCTION IN TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURES

 Projected operating expense savings

 Approx annual cost to operate 1 bus = $20,575 (not

including driver salaries & benefits)

 Range of buses taken out of service = 42 to 62 buses

g

 Potential range for reduction in operating

expenditures = $864,150 to $1,275,650

 Projected savings for driver salaries & benefits  Projected savings for driver salaries & benefits

 GCS Cost/Mile (driver salaries & benefits) = $0.62  Estimated miles a driver drives each day = 80

E i d d i il d b

 Estimated net decrease in miles per day per bus out

  • f service = 50 miles

 50 miles x 42 x $0.62 x 180 = $234,360  50 miles x 62 x $0 62 x 180 = $345 960  50 miles x 62 x $0.62 x 180 = $345,960

 Overall Projected Savings

Overall Projected Savings -

  • $1.1M to $1.6M

$1.1M to $1.6M

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OTHER SAVINGS

 Buses taken out of service can be added in as

needed for future expansion (Considered credits needed for future expansion. (Considered credits by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction )

 Assumed Efficiency Rate Increase – 3.8% to 5.6%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CABARRUS COUNTY

 Implemented Three-Tier Bus Plan 2009/2010

 Increase in instructional hours  Additional flexibility in meeting instructional hours

requirement q

 Reduce absenteeism and turnover for bus drivers – most

bus drivers would become full time employees

 Increase safety on buses – savings allotted to the  Increase safety on buses

savings allotted to the purchase of video camera systems for all buses

 Financial benefits

 Ti

1 Hi h S h l 7 15 t 2 15 (6 l t h l

 Tier 1 - High Schools 7:15 to 2:15 (6 elementary schools

7:30 to 2:15

 Tier 2 – Most Elementary Schools – 8:15 – 3:00  Tier 3 – Middle Schools – 9:00 – 4:00

slide-13
SLIDE 13

WAKE COUNTY

 Developed in 1993

p

 Over a 11 year period added 40 buses instead of 160

buses based on ridership increases and new schools

 Reduced the overall ride time for students  Reduced the overall ride time for students  Saved Wake Co $100M in transportation funding  Operates at 100% Efficiency  Tier 1 – 7:30 – 2:15

Ti 2 8 15 3 00

 Tier 2 – 8:15 – 3:00  Tier 3 – 9:15 – 3:45

slide-14
SLIDE 14

UNION COUNTY

 Tier 1 – Elementary 7:30 to 2:00

y

 Tier 2 – High 8:00 – 2:55  Tier 3 – Middle 8:45 – 3:45  Increased Efficiency Rating – 100%  Leveled Expenditures

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS

 Various start times for elementary and middle

y grade levels

 7:30 – 1:45 Elementary  8:30 – 2:45 Elementary  9:15 – 3:30 Elementary  8:00 – 3:00 Middle  8:45 – 3:45 Middle  8:45 – 3:45 Middle  7:15 – 2:15 High

g

slide-16
SLIDE 16

POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ASPECTS OF MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING

Positive Negative Reduce number of buses Potential decrease in student ride time Necessitates changes in the current traditional school instructional schedules Improve student/bus ratio Corresponding bell schedules Increase traffic by buses through neighborhoods Elementary schools starting 10 minutes Separate middle and high school bus routes y g earlier in the morning. Decrease in per bus expenditures Increase in elementary instructional day Resources are increased without spending capital funds

slide-17
SLIDE 17

NEXT STEPS

 Develop Routing and Scheduling Plan for District

p g g

 Revise data in Routing System  Provide Schools and Parents with New Bus

Routing and Scheduling Information

 Advise DPI Transportation Services of Buses

Taken out of Services Taken out of Services

 Train Bus Drivers and Support Staff on Multi-Tier

Plan and upcoming changes

 Implementation - August 2011  Monitor Cost Savings (Efficiency Rating

S t b 2012) September 2012)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Carlvena Foster, Board of Education Member Tony Watlington, Strategic Planning Officer Sandra Culmer, Regional Executive Director Leigh Hebbard Director Athletics Leigh Hebbard, Director, Athletics Erik Naglee, Director, Title 1 Laurie Hogan, District Relations Andrew LaRowe – Chief Operations Officer Jeff Harris – Director, Transportation Jeff Harris Director, Transportation Curtis Stacey, Assistant Director, Transportation Jeff Stevens, Zone Supervisor D i Wilki Z S i Daisy Wilkins, Zone Supervisor