Roberto Bolli, M.D.
Los Angeles, CA
c-Kit Stem Cell Therapy of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Roberto Bolli, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
American Heart Association Scientific Sessions American Heart Association Scientific Sessions c-Kit Stem Cell Therapy of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Roberto Bolli, M.D. Institute of Molecular Cardiology University of Louisville Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None UNLABELED/UNAPPROVED USES DISCLOSURE: None
Institute of Molecular Cardiology Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Primary Objective
c-kitpos CSCs in patients with ischemic heart failure. Secondary Objective
status, and promoting myocardial regeneration.
Trial opened to enrollment in February 2009 First CSC infusion July 17, 2009 FDA contacted in October 2004
2004 2012
IND application submitted on January 2006
2006
FDA approval on August 8, 2008
2008 2010
First patient enrolled on March 13, 2009 Last Patient Enrolled May 17, 2011
November 14, 2011
LVEF ≤ 40% A history of Q-wave MI with a residual scar (as
evidenced by ECG, cardiac MRI, low-dose dobutamine stress echo, and/or rest perfusion images on a sestamibi SPECT study)
Patient scheduled for CABG within 2 weeks of the initial
screening.
Enrollment
CABG & Tissue Harvesting
< 2 Weeks
At the time of CABG, the right atrial appendage is resected and prepared for CSC isolation CSC isolation and expansion
Enrollment
CABG & Tissue Harvesting
< 2 Weeks
4 ± 1 Months
assessment
Follow-Up
2 Years
CSC Infusion
CSC Rx
3
Follow-up
24h Week 1 Week 2 Week 4 Month 4
assessment
CSC Rx
Follow-up
Month 8 Year 1 Year 2
Ejection Fraction at 4 Months After CSCs Absolute EF Units
Baseline 4 months Pre-CSC 4 months Controls (n=7) CSC-treated (n=14)
20 40 60
30.3±1.9 38.5±2.8
P=0.001
30.1±2.4 30.2±2.5
5 10 15 20
4 months
P=0.001
8.2±2.0 12.3±2.1
Absolute EF Units
P<0.001
12 months
n=14 n=8
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Ejection Fraction (MRI) After CSC Therapy
4 months 12 months Pre-CSC n=8 n=8 n=5 27.5 35.1 41.2
Absolute EF units
P=0.004 P=0.013
5 10 15 20 25
Change in Ejection Fraction (MRI) After CSC Therapy
n=5 n=8
P=0.004
7.7±1.8
P=0.013
13.6±3.2
ΔEF (absolute EF units)
4 months 12 months
Baseline EF: 27.5%
10 20 30 40
20 40 60 80
Regional Ejection Fraction in Infarct-Related Segments After CSC Therapy
n=8 n=8 n=5
10.3 24.5 21.5 Pre-CSC 4 months 12 months
Absolute EF units
4 months 12 months
n=5 n=8
P=0.008 14.2±3.9 P=0.085 17.9±7.9
ΔEF (absolute EF units)
10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 50
P=0.008 n=8
24.5±6.4 10.3±6.9 Pre-CSC 4 months
P=0.085 n=5
21.5±7.3 3.5±6.7 Pre-CSC 12 months
Absolute EF units
Regional Ejection Fraction (MRI) in Infarct- Related Segments After CSC Therapy
20 40 60 80
20 40
Regional Ejection Fraction in Dyskinetic Segments After CSC Therapy
4 months 12 months Pre-CSC
n=7 n=7 n=4
3.9 7.9
Absolute EF units ΔEF (absolute EF units)
n=4 n=7
P=0.014 24.5±7.1 P=0.030 35.7±9.1 4 months 12 months
20 40 60 80
20 40 60 80
Regional Ejection Fraction in the Least Functional Segment After CSC Therapy
4 months 12 months Pre-CSC
n=8 n=8 n=5
2.7
Absolute EF units ΔEF (absolute EF units)
n=5 n=8
P=0.020 25.6±8.5 P=0.023 40.2±11.3 4 months 12 months
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Baseline 4 months Pre-CSC 4 months Controls (n=7) CSC-treated (n=14)
P=0.005
1.91 1.73 1.89 1.88
1 2 3 4 5
Global WMSI After CSC Treatment in Patients Who Have Completed 12 Month Follow-up
4 months Pre-CSC 12 months
P=0.010 P=0.008
n=8 1.99±0.08 1.73±0.10 1.68±0.12
Before CSCs 24 months after CSCs
10 20 30 40 50
Change in Infarct Size by CMR Using a Semi- automated (FWHM) Method After CSC Treatment
n=6 n=9 P=0.003
P<0.001
4 months 12 months 4 months 12 months Pre-CSC
Mass (g) Change in mass (g)
n=9 n=9 n=6
34.9 21.6 18.7
Change in Non-Viable Tissue by CMR After CSC Treatment
10 20 30 40 50 60
4 months 12 months Pre-CSC
Mass (g)
n=9 n=9 n=6
24.1 12.1 10.4
Change in mass (g)
P=0.001
P=0.013
n=9 n=6 4 months 12 months
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 100 150 200 250 300
4 months 12 months Pre-CSC
Mass (g) Change in mass (g)
4 months 12 months
n=9 n=9 n=6
151.1 162.6 177.8 n=9 n=6
7.6%
11.6±5.2 P=0.055
21.5%
31.5±11.0 P=0.035
Change in Viable Tissue by CMR After CSC Treatment
1 2 3 4
Baseline 4 months Pre-CSC 4 months Controls (n=7) CSC-treated (n=16)
P=0.172 P=0.003
2.0±0.0 1.7±0.2
New York Heart Association Score 4 Months After CSC Treatment
2.2±0.2 1.6±0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6
NYHA Score After CSC Treatment in Patients Who Have Completed 12 Month Follow-up
4 months Pre-CSC 12 months
P=0.024 P=0.004
n=10 2.4±0.22 1.8±0.20 1.5±0.17
20 40 60 80 Pre-CSC 4 months Baseline 4 months Controls (n=7) CSC-treated (n=16)
P<0.001
MLHFQ Score 4 Months After CSC Treatment
38.1±10.5 40.4±9.2 46.4±5.2 26.7±4.9
MLHFQ After CSC Treatment in Patients Who Have Completed 12 Month Follow-up
20 40 60 80 4 months Pre-CSC 12 months
P<0.001 P=0.007
n=10 41.7±7.5 27.7±6.9 23.5±8.0
i) Feasibility and safety The initial results of SCIPIO indicate that, in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy:
1.
Isolation, expansion, and infusion of a highly pure population of c-kitpos CSCs are feasible in virtually all cases.
2.
It is possible to obtain viable CSCs with high telomerase activity and telomeres >7 kbp.
3.
ii) Efficacy The initial results of SCIPIO indicate that:
4.
Infusion of CSCs results, 4 months later, in a reduction in infarct size, an increase in viable myocardium, and a marked improvement in LV EF, NYHA functional class, and quality of life (MLHFQ).
5.
These effects persist and are even more pronounced at 1 year.
The initial results of SCIPIO suggest that administration of autologous c-kitpos CSCs is feasible and safe and produces a sustained increase in viable myocardium, LV systolic function, and functional capacity in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Larger, Phase II studies are warranted.
Xian-Liang Tang Yiru Guo Gregg Rokosh Qianghong Li Atul Chugh John Loughran Sohail Ikram Marcus Stoddard Steve Wagner Garth Beache Mark Slaughter Boston group Piero Anversa Annarosa Leri Jan Kajstura