bylabel a boundary based semi automatic
play

ByLabel: A Boundary Based Semi-Automatic Image Annotation Tool - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ByLabel: A Boundary Based Semi-Automatic Image Annotation Tool Xuebin Qin, Shida He, Zichen Zhang, Masood Dehghan and Martin Jagersand Department of Computing Science University of Alberta, Canada Introduction Our Solution Results


  1. ByLabel: A Boundary Based Semi-Automatic Image Annotation Tool Xuebin Qin, Shida He, Zichen Zhang, Masood Dehghan and Martin Jagersand Department of Computing Science University of Alberta, Canada

  2. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions We are aiming at developing a boundary based semi-automatic Centriod Bounding box Quadrilateral annotation tool to acquire pixel accurate ground truth. Polygon Boundary map Region mask Fig. 1 Several types of ground truth

  3. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions To acquire accurate boundary maps and region masks with light human workload, three problems have to be solved:  P.1 Many control points are  P.2 Accurately  P.3 It is hard to describe objects required to describe smoothed locating these control with holes and objects divided by and complex curves. points are difficult. occlusions. (Sampling problem) (Locating problem) (Description problem) (b) Object divided (a) Object with hole by occlusions Fig. 2 Illustration of the three problems in annotation

  4. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions Our annotation tool has the following workflow: Fig. 3 Workflow of our method

  5. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions Feature Detection Detect Edge Segments and Split them into Edge Fragments ( Solves locating pro. ) (b) Edge Fragments (a) Input image Boundaries Manually select fragments Labeling to form closed boundaries Objects (Solves sampling pro.) Annotation Group boundaries belong to the same object and input the class name (Solves description pro.) (d) Output region mask (c) Labeled boundaries Fig. 4 Annotate an object step by step

  6. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Fig. 5 15 Testing images in three groups

  7. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions Table. 1. Average Clicks Table. 2. Average Time Costs (s) Table. 3. Average Error (pixel)

  8. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions (b) Earphone (a) Pedestrian (c) Bicycle (d) Input image (e) Classes annotation (f) Instances annotation Fig. 6 Typical annotation results

  9. Introduction Our Solution Results Conclusions ByLabel greatly improves the annotation efficiency and accuracy . It also reduces the annotation uncertainty and error .

  10. Questions ??? Poster: 3C-9 ByLabel http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~vis/bylabel/ xuebin@ualberta.ca, mj7@ualberta.ca

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend