by emission source + + Catherine BOUTIN , Claire EME Pour mieux - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

by emission source
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

by emission source + + Catherine BOUTIN , Claire EME Pour mieux - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Domestic wastewater characterization by emission source + + Catherine BOUTIN , Claire EME Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea + + .. + www.irstea.fr Context Methods Results Conclusion


slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.irstea.fr

Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea

Domestic wastewater characterization by emission source

Catherine BOUTIN , Claire EME

+ + + + ….. +

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Domestic wastewater characterization by emission source

Why this subject? because of the demand of the society

  • to better reuse nutrients, metals, treated wastewater,…
  • to limit the use of drinking water,
  • to help those who make the choice of dry toilets,
  • to optimize treatment units, also at the scale of a house,

In France, 20% of the population are concerned by the “on-site treatment”. In this context, we try to answer to 2 questions:

1- What is the characterization of each source of effluent from the human activity? 2- What is the potential of each effluent to be treated by a biological process?

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Which classification of the sources?

Domestic Wastewater Blackwater

Yellow water

Urine Flush water

Brown water

Faecal matter Toilet paper / Flush water

Other s

Cleaning activities / Spillage

Greywater

Food and cleaning

Laundry Kitchen sink / Dish washer

Personal care

Bath and shower Wash basins

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Which classification of the sources?

Domestic Wastewater Blackwater

Yellow water

Urine Flush water

Brown water

Faecal matter Toilet paper / Flush water

Other s

Cleaning activities / Spillage

Greywater

Food and cleaning

Laundry Kitchen sink / Dish washer

Personal care

Bath and shower Wash basins

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Which classification of the sources?

Domestic Wastewater Blackwater

Yellow water

Urine Flush water

Brown water

Faecal matter Toilet paper / Flush water

Other s

Cleaning activities / Spillage

Greywater

Food and cleaning

Laundry Kitchen sink / Dish washer

Personal care

Bath and shower Wash basins

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Which classification of the sources?

Domestic Wastewater Blackwater

Yellow water

Urine Flush water

Brown water

Faecal matter Toilet paper / Flush water

Other s

Cleaning activities / Spillage

Greywater

Food and cleaning

Laundry Kitchen sink / Dish washer

Personal care

Bath and shower Wash basins

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Which classification of the sources?

Domestic Wastewater Blackwater

Yellow water

Urine Flush water

Brown water

Faecal matter Toilet paper / Flush water

Other s

Cleaning activities / Spillage

Greywater

Food and cleaning

Laundry Kitchen sink / Dish washer

Personal care

Bath and shower Wash basins

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Bibliographic review

Data from

  • Scientific support (treatment of domestic wastewater)
  • Medical characterization on human excreta
  • From the occidental part of Europe (life similar than in France)

~ 100 papers

Datasets are not often detailed. This review is mainly based on averages

Specific attention during the critical reading:

  • Occupation rate of the house.
  • Analysis methods: SS, BOD5, …………………
  • What effluent? new, stored? If stored , how?

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Which classification of the sources?

Domestic Wastewater Blackwater

Yellow water

Urine Flush water

Brown water

Faecal matter Toilet paper / Flush water

Other s

Cleaning activities / Spillage

Greywater

Food and cleaning

Laundry Kitchen sink / Dish washer

Personal care

Bath and shower Wash basins

For each source: mean, minima and maxima.

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Which classification of the sources?

Domestic Wastewater Blackwater

Yellow water

Urine Flush water

Brown water

Faecal matter Toilet paper / Flush water

Other s

Cleaning activities / Spillage

Greywater

Food and cleaning

Laundry Kitchen sink / Dish washer

Personal care

Bath and shower Wash basins

For each source: mean, minima and maxima.

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016

Data in the preprint

slide-11
SLIDE 11

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Volume en L.pers-1.jour-1

Eaux ménagères

The volumes are very different and sometimes very

  • important. They are depending from the habits.

Volumes : L.(person)-1 (day)-1

mean > 80L

Context Methods Results Conclusion

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Volume en L.pers-1.jour-1

Cuisine Lave linge Salle de bain

Personal care Laundry Food

All greywater

max > 120L

23 data 23 data 23 data 23 data

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-12
SLIDE 12

The number of data are very low. The 3 types of greywater are still concentrated.

Concentrations: mg.L-1

Context Methods Results Conclusion

Food

1 data

DM = 879 mg/L BOD5 = 756 mg/L

Laundry

1 data

DM = 658 mg/L BOD5 = 567 mg/L

Personal Care

4 - 14 data

DM = 477 mg/L BOD5 = 131 mg/L

BOD5 = 300-450 mg/L in case of a non diluted wastewater in a sewerage:

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016

Mass: g.(person)-1.(day)-1

Context Methods Results Conclusion

3 5 8 0,3 0,0 4 7 17 0,4 1,1 12 15 35 0,4 0,1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MES DBO5 DCO NGL PT Cuisine Lave-linge Salle de bain

Valeurs exprimées en g.pers-1.j-1

Food

Laundry Personal care

C (SS, BOD5, COD) is the half of effluent from food, mass from laundry is higher than mass from personal care N: food= laundry= personal care P: from laundry only, depending on the composition of the wash powder

2-4 data for each source !!! SS BOD5 COD TN TP

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Nutrient balance for biological treatment

based on BOD5:N:P = 100:5:1

0,001 0,01 0,1 1 10 0,001 0,01 0,1 1 10

TN / BOD5 TP / BOD5

Urine Faecal matter Greywater Domestic wastewater

NITROGEN DEFICIENCY NEGATIVE RESPONSE TO BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT POSITIVE RESPONSE TO BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PHOSPHORE DEFICIENCY Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016

Greywater Domestic wastewater Faecal matter Urine

5:100 1:100

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1- Qualification and quantification by emission source are not well known (<10 data by each source)

It is necessary to complete the basis by new data. Greywater seem to be very different: food, laundry or personal care

2- Greywater represent a important part of the wastewater

Volume : ~ 70% (and more, if no use of flush water) C (COD, BOD5, SS): ~ 25- 40% P : ~50%

3- Greywater could show some deficiency in nutrients.

Which are the impact of those lacks on the bacterial growth, necessary for their biological treatment? In the aim to answer to the society demand (dry toilets, reuse

  • f nutrients,…), technical adaptations have to be defined. They have also

to be in adequation with the scale of a “house”.

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Context Methods Results Conclusion

  • C. BOUTIN, C. EME, Athens, 14-17 sept 2016

Thank EMA as financial support for this review.

Thank you for listening.