Building a Digital First Future: Digital Primary Care Congress - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

building a digital first
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Building a Digital First Future: Digital Primary Care Congress - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Building a Digital First Future: Digital Primary Care Congress Chamber of Commerce, Manchester 5 th of February 2020 8:00am 15:15pm #Convenzi s Dimitri Varsamis Senior Policy Lead, General Practice Strategy and Contracts at NHS England


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Building a Digital First Future: Digital Primary Care Congress

Chamber of Commerce, Manchester 5th of February 2020

8:00am – 15:15pm

#Convenzi s

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Dimitri Varsamis

Senior Policy Lead, General Practice Strategy and Contracts at NHS England and Improvement

“Comparing drivers and delivery of digital- first general practice across California, Australia and New Zealand; lessons for the NHS.”

#Convenzi s

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Comparing drivers and delivery of digital and digital-first general practice across Scandi-nordic, California, Australia and New Zealand; lessons for the NHS? Dimitri Varsamis PhD

Made possible with funding from the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust February 2020

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

I will talk about

  • Why am I here
  • What works well and why in:
  • Norway,
  • Sweden,
  • Denmark,
  • Australia,
  • New Zealand,
  • USA.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

  • Senior policy lead for digital primary care in the national

GP contract team

  • digital-related commitments in the contract
  • policy for GP payments and contracting in light of

emerging digital-first GP models.

  • Churchill Fellow

https://www.wcmt.org.uk/

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Churchill fellowship-related meetings

  • Perx
  • Australian Digital Health Agency
  • Potential X
  • MQ, AIHI,
  • NSW Ministry of Health
  • Healius
  • Practice Hub, Avant
  • Uni Western Sydney
  • RACGP
  • Telstra Health
  • Precedence
  • ANDHealth
  • EMPHN and Alliance
  • Uni of Melbourne
  • DHHS, Telehealth VIC
  • SEM PHN
  • Uni of Melbourne
  • NZ Ministry of Health
  • Compass Health
  • Home Care Medical
  • Pro Care
  • Waitemata District Health

Board

  • ACESO
  • Ministry of Health
  • Vensa Health
  • UCSF
  • GE Ventures
  • DrChrono
  • SJV
  • Kaiser P
  • UCLA
  • Kaiser P
  • Google
  • CHCF
  • VA / RAND
  • Anthem
  • USC Center for Health System Innovation
  • Wildflower health
  • USC Center for Body Computing
  • UCLA Health
  • RAND
  • Headspace
  • Cedars Sinai
  • Biocom
  • DIT
  • Lantum
  • Cedars Sinai
  • MD Insider
  • Heal
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Common people

All healthcare systems are dealing with the same issues:

  • Multiple Chronic Diseases,
  • Ageing,
  • Increase in Demand,
  • Lifestyle,
  • Access,
  • Efficiency...

All healthcare systems are dealing with the same digital health issues:

  • Interoperability,
  • Balance between health data

protection and exploitation,

  • Fragmentation,
  • Clinician suspicion,
  • Investment ...
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Health expenditure

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Semantics and concepts

  • Focus on systems and reform options, in terms of functions, not labels
  • Are German citizens more insured that British, just because they call

their system insurance?

  • Are the Dutch people dying in the streets due to rationing because their

system has the word social?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

What I heard and what I saw

Key issues at national governments level:

  • Old organisation + New Technology = Costly Old Organisation

Digitising the present or towards a digital future?

  • Hospitals as fortresses or lighthouses?
  • Health systems that do not use seamless consumer-friendly

digital health, will be replaced by those who do I observed in every country :

  • National top-down and emerging innovation at local level
  • Struggle with digital across providers outside hospital: primary

care, general practice, community pharmacy or other community services

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Norway

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Norway – secondary

  • 98% use the Internet. Second in the world after Iceland;
  • In hospital care:
  • Video conversations with patients at home are now approved

for use in specialist health services under certain conditions.

  • Such consultations paid for, same rate as regular

consultations.

  • Benefits: mostly for patients, employers; savings in transport
  • costs. Not to healthcare system.
  • A nationwide audit in Norway showed that, despite geographical

remoteness, a history of early adoption of telehealth, a strong policy push, and adoption in principle by 75% of all hospitals, fewer than 1% of outpatient consultations in participating specialties were actually undertaken via telehealth in 2013. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688245/

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Norway – primary

  • Technology is not used as much between patients and primary

health services.

  • Due to:
  • No policy encouragement for GPs to use video.
  • GPs would need to pay for IT, fit into business model.
  • The tariff system regulating payments for general

practitioners has explicitly forbidden charging consultation payments for video consultations.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Sweden

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Sweden and digital general practice

Accessing primary care

  • Until now, no legislation for the concept of registration with a primary

care provider, although used in practice a lot by the county councils. Rules akin to temporary resident / out-of-area urgent primary care

  • Residents of one county can visit temporarily a GP when in another

county, with provider getting a fee.

  • Recently, digital sub-contractor to a primary care centre in one county

council area have been pro-actively advertising and offering appointments to residents of other counties. All change?

  • National inquiry into rules for registration and access to care

in light of digito-physical care models https://www.regeringen.se/4ad5e9/contentassets/6e3786584628447986 30946d5bf12fc3/digifysiskt-vardval-_-tillganglig-primarvard-baserad-pa- behov-och-kontinuitet.pdf

  • English summary on page 35
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Sweden and digital general practice

On the concept of registration:

  • The Inquiry proposed that all primary care users must be registered with a

practice and patients can choose between them. On out-of-area rules:

  • Patients will no longer be able to access urgent primary care offered by

contractors or sub-contractors in other county council area.

  • These digital health service providers may need to apply for establishment in

all county council areas.

  • These providers would need to offer in-person care, either themselves or by

sub-contractors.

  • But, these same companies may also be used as digital care sub-

contractors by established / ‘traditional’ primary care providers to enhance their in-person appointments with video ones.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Denmark

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Denmark

Many similarities to the UK:

  • Universal coverage
  • Free and equal / equitable access
  • GP as “gatekeeper”

! Denmark has capitation for hospitals; any underspent is reinvested by the provider High ICT-maturity

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Email consultations

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Digital General Practice via an App

  • Developed by the Danish BMA equivalent and the Ministry of Health and

Elderly

  • App available since Jan 2019
  • 3 weeks: 25k downloads, in 6 months: 100k unique users
  • Not all practice IT systems support the app

Gives patients:

  • Renew prescriptions, access to coded record, imms, children's

vaccinations, notifications from practice, record of referrals and of doctor's appointments

  • e-consultations: asychronous messaging
  • From 2020, first wave of clinics to be able to book face to face appts via

the My Doctor app.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Digital General Practice via an App

For staff, the online consultations / digital platform allows:

  • Fast patient overview
  • “Intelligent” inbox
  • Communication with local nursing teams.

Who pays?

  • asynchronous consultations, national agreement to pay per episode.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Australia

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Lessons from Australia:

  • Success in rolling out telehealth for remote + rural, but explicit payment

via fee-for-service.

  • No default expansion of any success into wider outpatient care.

In general practice:

  • General practice tends to be small units: anyone can open a practice,

and the GPs pay “rent”. Small margins.

  • Two-tier general practice: for long term care and very easy “walk-in”

access for episodic care. Fee for service.

  • No lack of access or convenience of face to face GP.
  • No concept of registration, or expectation that a patient record will be

available.

  • Patients therefore have not been attracted to digital PC, despite efforts

by a couple of large General Practice companies.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

New Zealand

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Lessons from New Zealand:

  • Even more similar to England in terms of model inc administration,

commissioning functions, organisation of primary care.

  • No major digital patient-facing functions by all PC / for all patients.

(apart from a major programme for telephone based advice)

  • Bottom-up prioritisation of telehealth in 2 geographies where GP-

at-scale models have existed for a while.

  • PC leaders have made clear: practices need ministry-led funding

and policy, to set up and deliver.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

USA

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

US healthcare

  • For-profit, non-universal PHI system vs the (non-) profit universal systems

(SHI or single-payer)

  • Total $ disproportionally spent on healthcare for a proportion of population

based on multiple sources of private financing (insurance coverage / OOP) and not on need alone.

  • more and better care for those that can afford it,
  • the rest get sufficient coverage based on their budget,
  • and some get “none” (stabilised and treated in ER, unfunded mandate)
  • 15.5 % Americans lacked coverage for a core set of services than residents
  • f all other OECD countries (-1) had
  • 25% of American adults say they or a family member has put off treatment

for a serious medical condition because of cost

  • More than 13% of American adults report knowing of at least one friend or

family member in the past five years who died after not receiving needed medical treatment because they were unable to pay for it.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Health insurance in the United States

  • 907 health insurance companies
  • 60% of Americans are covered through an employer-

sponsored program, while about 9% purchase health insurance directly. Initially all-private, increasingly complex public/private mix

  • Plurality of payers / insurers / health plans, providers /

delivery parties.

  • Supplementary and complementary payers and deliverers.
  • Major difference in State funding on medicare / medicaid.
  • An estimated $2.1 billion is spent annually across the

healthcare system chasing and maintaining provider data.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Primordial soup, but a v networked one

  • About half of population receive their healthcare through an HMO or

some other managed care organisation. But also more integrated “health systems” than we have:

  • Integrated delivery systems and integrated delivery networks
  • Some have an HMO component, while others are a network of

physicians only, or of physicians and hospitals.

  • The goal is to serve as a self-contained healthcare ecosystem,

coordinate delivery of care (and manage population health).

  • Provider systems are starting new health plans, acquiring existing

health insurers, evolving from an existing ACO into a licensed health insurance company, JV with established health insurers.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Integration across providers and payers

  • Horizontal integration: scale
  • Vertical integration
  • Integration between providers: hospitals and PC
  • Integration between some providers and payers
  • Sometimes integration across payer – hospital care – primary care

BUT

  • “population” = those that are in the plan, not the true population.

Evidence of positive impact of this:

  • EHR within and across orgs
  • eConsults between GPs and specialists

Main requirement for better use of digital: health system integration Unified health system like KP or even: UCSF, UCLA, VA, USC, CS

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Adding to the mix: telehealth / tele-primary care providers: synergy?

  • I observed a lot of patient-facing digital inc concierge medicine

and direct-to-consumer primary care

  • Some start from DtC and move upstream, some the opposite.

DtC has struggled to take off. Why do we bother with PC?

  • With HI: insurer would rather treat you cheaply and not at

surgical intervention or LTC treatment.

  • With PHI: as above, but also applies to employer.

Why digital PC:

  • As above, AND cheaper for insurer to pay provider for delivery,

cheaper to access for patient as lower co-pay, and employer doesn’t lose you for half a day.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Continued

How to drive utilisation?

  • Anthem has decreased the copay for these visits to $5,

compared to a $25 to $35 copay if a member visits face to face their primary care doctor.

  • An Anthem HealthCore study of claims analysis for utilization of

acute non-urgent care, found telehealth saved 6% in costs by diverting members who would otherwise have gone to the emergency room.

  • Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina: "This isn't a 'build it

and they will come' kinda of thing" "You really need to develop strategies to drive utilization.“

  • They set a policy around telemedicine in order to boost care

in rural areas.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Continued

VA Video Connect platform

  • To start: VA had more than 1.3 million video telehealth encounters with

more than 490,000 Veterans in 2018.

  • In 2019: pilot video consultations in Walmart rooms, in rural areas

Synergy example: partnership between Anthem, American Well, and Samsung

  • American Well's telehealth service available to Anthem members with

Galaxy phones, via the Samsung Health app

  • Aiming to become a ‘one-stop-shop’ platform for consumers to track their

health, share data, and communicate with healthcare professionals. Doctor on Demand in 2019 made a deal with Humana to sell what it calls the first "virtual only" plan design, which involves assigning primary care doctors upon sign-up based on a set of questions from the worker.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

I have not seen a health system that has answers to all these (and does it matter?):

  • Who are the right patients to see via video?
  • To get to book these appointments? How many result in

additional face to face visits?

  • How to risk stratify via the triage stage? Prioritise?
  • Supply-induced demand: does it hold truth for primary care more

than e.g. surgery?

  • Digital skills divide
  • Impact on clinicians (burnout and decision fatigue major issue in

US

  • What is really needed: capacity, capability and willingness to

prioritise, consider, act

  • Who pays for the tech, its implementation, and activity?
slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Take home messages

What has worked:

  • integration between providers, especially: hospital and primary care,
  • capital and incentivisation by fee for service
  • its allocation based on drivers such as:
  • increased access via digital,
  • convenience and 2ndary non-healthcare benefits that will drive uptake

(video consultations without leaving work / home) and

  • on earlier action and prevention (PHI and SHI key drivers).

What hasn’t worked:

  • Where necessary, NOT incentivising uptake by providers, or paying for tech

and implementation.

  • Alternative routes to access to primary care; harder to replace something

that works.

  • Build it and they will come.
slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Thank you Dimitri Varsamis PhD

Senior Policy Lead, General Practice Strategy and Contracts Primary Care Strategy and NHS Contracts Group, NHS England https://www.england.nhs.uk/gp/gpfv/investment/gp-contract/ Made possible with funding from the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust, and represents the views of the author only, not of NHS England or the Trust. Hear more from me on: HIMSS SoCal podcast https://himsssocalpodcast.wordpress.com/2019/11/14/episode-27- developing-digital-first-models-of-primary-care-ft-dimitri-varsamis/

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Dr Minal Bakhai

National Clinical Lead Digital First Primary Care at NHS England and Improvement

“Building a Digital-first Primary Care.”

#Convenzi s

slide-38
SLIDE 38

NHS England and NHS Improvement

Digital First Primary Care

Presented by Dr. Minal Bakhai Deputy Director and National Clinical Lead for Digital First Primary Care, NHS England and Improvement General Practitioner, Brent CCG

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39 |

“A 2016 Lancet paper said GPs’ workload had risen by 16% in the seven years up to 2014, with more frequent and longer GP consultations”

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40 |

  • Appointment booking without triage
  • Lack of patient signposting to appropriate

services

  • Disconnected PC, community and UEC

patient pathways

  • Frequent fliers – appointment skew

Current “as-is” patient pathway

Digital First Accelerator change to current process
slide-41
SLIDE 41

41 |

Getting the front door right: What most patients currently do

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42 |

The primary care landscape

There are significant opportunities to use primary care capacity more effectively. Investing in and harnessing digital technology is a necessary and important part of the solution in

  • rder to tackle:
  • Increase in demand and

workload

  • Patient expectations and

satisfaction

  • An increase in patients with

complex health conditions

  • Staff retention
slide-43
SLIDE 43

43 |

The big picture of demand vs. capacity is

  • ptimistic
slide-44
SLIDE 44

44 |

askmyGP data (n=44 practices, total list size 447,000) The assumption that every patient in contact with a GP wants or needs a face-to-face appointment is false and is a major cause of GP

  • verload... Twitter, Steve the Skeptic

Do patients want a face- to-face appointment?

Median time to respond = 38 minutes

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45 |

Our aspirations

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46 |

RESPONSE

The digital first patient journey

SIGNPOSTING

Get the right help (triage) Book appointments

  • nline

View records online

Tele[hone & Video consults

Right person/team in the GP practice

  • r PCN

Self Care Self referral Social Prescriber A&E UTC Hub Finding the most appropriate care pathway Pharmacy Order meds

  • nline

Online messages Get advice, check my symptoms

Go online

NHS App NHS.uk 111.nhs.uk Practice website Local Apps

E n t r y p

  • i

n t s

Secondary care referral Outpatients Patients are able to easily access and flow through primary care pathways using digital tools.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47 |

Continuity: did patients get the staff they requested?

slide-48
SLIDE 48

A B C D E F A B C D E F

Average waiting times are going down and monthly DNAs are reduced.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49 |

Case study – Witley Surgery

30% 60% 87%

Number of appointments moved to an online consultation on the first day. Number of patients who prefer to contact the practice

  • nline rather than by phone.

Patients reporting that the new online system is better.

The number of face-to-face consultations has reduced by 43%, home visits by 73%, with an overall saving of 10% of clinicians’ time.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50 |

Continuity: did patients get the staff member they requested?

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51 |

Time Spent with Patients In Clinic

Increase in face-to-face time with patients due to ability to plan appointment length appropriately.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52 |

askmyGP, weekly activity as a proportion of patient list

Case study – Tudor Lodge

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53 |

Case study – Tudor Lodge

53% 76%

76%

Number of patients who prefer to contact the practice

  • nline rather than by phone.

Patients are seen on the same day. Patients reporting that the new online system is better.

Overall productivity has doubled. Time to respond is less than 30 minutes. Increase in face-to-face time with patients that need it. When asked: “Would you go back? Not a chance” Practice Manager

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54 |

Resident is able to access a platform which allows them to consult online with eHub clinicians

eHub could be set up as: 1. Separate entity 2. Part of access hub 3. Linked to UCC/UTC if applicable

Online consultations are managed centrally by a group of clinicians working

  • n behalf of a group of GP

Practices

eHub provides digital and possible F2F services. Where eHub appointment is not in patients’ best interest, capacity at registered GP is sought.

Virtual Hubs

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55 |

Case study – Hurley Group eHub

700 hours 88%

Hours saved in administrative time for practices Increase in GP recruitment interest Online consultations closed remotely

Average online consultation takes three minutes Integration of wider clinical workforce Improved staff satisfaction and retention

10X

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56 |

The digital first vision

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57 |

Digital first primary care – the vision

What can patients expect? The NHS Long Term Plan commits that every patient will have the right to be offered digital-first primary care by 2023/24. The use of digital channels will be at the choice of the individual patient, with those who can’t or don’t wish to use digital tools still able to access services

  • ver the phone or in person.

Patients should be able to easily access advice, support and treatment from primary care using digital and online tools. These tools should be integrated to provide a streamlined experience for patients, and direct them to the right digital or in- person service for their needs.

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58 |

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59 |

Benefits

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60 |

What we want to achieve

Digital First Primary Care

Transformed care processes

By looking beyond existing organisational structures, care becomes more person-centred, better coordinated and

  • proactive. This starts to address underlying challenges,

but gaps in key digital enablers limit the scope, speed & effectiveness of change

Current state

Low levels of digitisation limit the potential impact of efforts to improve existing processes and service models. Does not address fundamental issues affecting long-term sustainability of individual providers or local health economies as a whole. Low levels of digital maturity, particularly regarding infrastructure & cyber security, create operational risk

Service transformation enabled by technology

Digital technology is a core component of quality improvement across STPs and Integrated Care Systems. This enables the scale & pace of change required to manage population health and address :

  • The Health & Wellbeing Gap
  • The Funding & Efficiency Gap
  • The Care & Quality Gap

Digitally enabled services

Technology drives improvements in the quality, safety and efficiency of healthcare delivery within existing service models. Providers are better placed to deal with the pressure of rising demand but cannot fully address the root causes of it

Technological maturity Clinical transformation Service transformation Consumer transformation

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61 |

Unlocking success in digital transformation

Digital first primary care

Essential Infrastructure The core infrastructure and IT systems needed so practices and PCNs can deliver digital first primary care and can work collaboratively and share information. Functional Capabilities The core functional capabilities practices and PCNs will need to have to deliver digital first primary care (such as online appointment booking, triage mechanisms and secure messaging) Integration Across PCNs and health systems (e.g. at ICS/STP level) to deliver streamlined services for patients (so patients can be directed to the right service quickly and easily) Effective Utilisation Primary care staff and patients are appropriately trained and supported to use digital tools – leading to high levels

  • f utilisation.

A learning culture Primary care has access to data, analytics and evaluation to support learning and a focus on impacts. Supplier Engagement There is effective engagement with suppliers to encourage compliance with standards, innovation and development.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62 |

The vision for digital first primary care

Commissioners are designing integrated digital primary care pathways Health systems are deploying both nationally commissioned and locally procured products to build these pathways Digital products meet nationally developed standards to enable effective integration and to ensure safety Digital products can be easily procured and deployed by commissioners Primary care contracting, regulation and payments support development of these integrated digital pathways

Patients are able to easily access and flow through primary care pathways using digital tools safely and effectively Staff receive time, resource, training and implementation and service improvement support to

  • ptimise the use of digital tools and meet the growing and changing demands on Primary Care
slide-63
SLIDE 63

63 |

Digital first accelerators

Twelve accelerator site have been selected to develop digital first primary care. Other regions are working to establish their own accelerator sites.

1 2-6 7 8 9 10 11

Devon East Kent London

12

Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin Hereford and Worcester West Birmingham and Black Country Cambridge and Peterborough Norfolk and Waveney

2-6 7 1 8 10 9 11 12

slide-64
SLIDE 64

64 |

Digital Maturity

IT IS NOT JUST IT IS

  • More technology
  • Better/ faster technology
  • Functionality “Do you have X?”
  • Capability “Can you do X?”
  • Digitising paper pathway

…….Digitising alone doesn’t mean anything

  • Logical journey towards a data

driven learning healthcare system supported by tech

  • Congruence: fundamentally

changing workflows, aligning digital strategy with outcomes, aligning incentives

  • Outcomes based delivery of ever

improving high-quality care

  • Changing your processes, culture

and behaviours

  • More technology
  • Better/ faster technology
  • Functionality “Do you have X?”
  • Capability “Can you do X?”
  • Digitising paper pathway

…….digitising alone doesn’t mean anything

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65 |

A journey

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66 |

Digital first programme

Case study library Implementation support Evaluation standards and data analytics Training Community of Practice Deep dive evaluation Funding DPS framework Blueprinting

slide-67
SLIDE 67
slide-68
SLIDE 68

Dr Ed Turnham

Clinic Lead for GP Online Consultations at Norfolk and Waveney STP and CCIO at Arden & GEM CSU

“Digital-First General Practice using Online Consultations in Norfolk and Waveney.”

#Convenzi s

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Digital-First Primary Care: using FootFall for Norfolk & Waveney CCGs

Dr Ed Turnham

Clinical Lead for GP Online Consultations at Norfolk and Waveney STP CCIO for Norfolk and Waveney at Arden & GEM CSU

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Bolt-on Online Consultations to practice website

September 2018 – possible approach 1

0.2% of consultations (Edwards et al., 2018) Disagreement about what it should be used for (Banks et al., 2018) Seen as a short-cut to getting an appointment Extra work for GPs

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Online request Admin triage GP triage Admin resolve Send to other team Phone request

September 2018 – possible approach Digital Triage

Phone Online message Face-to- face

slide-72
SLIDE 72

AskMyGP – encounter resolution mode

Requested by patient How practice resolved

Reproduced with consent of

slide-73
SLIDE 73

AskMyGP – Digital Triage

Reproduced with consent of

slide-74
SLIDE 74

AskMyGP – Digital Triage – key numbers

Reproduced with consent of

Demand is stable over time at 8% of patients per week Average response time around 90 minutes 78% of patients say the new system is better

slide-75
SLIDE 75

https://www.aclemedicalcentre.co.uk/

FootFall

slide-76
SLIDE 76

FootFall

https://www.aclemedicalcentre.co.uk/

slide-77
SLIDE 77

FootFall

slide-78
SLIDE 78

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Requests as a proportion of practice population Week

Requests by source

Self Proxy Staff

Our early findings

slide-79
SLIDE 79
  • Get patients online
  • Equity
  • Rapid response. Keep the patients on board + updated
  • Training, training, training
  • Process change
  • Avoid duplication of clinical work

Digital Triage - key ingredients for success

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Digital Triage – not telephone triage

Requested by patient How practice resolved

Reproduced with consent of

slide-81
SLIDE 81

5.8 4.9 5.0 3.7 4.5 8.0 6.8 7.0 5.1 6.2 8.4 7.2 7.4 5.4 6.5 5 10 15 20 25 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday

Encounters per clinical session, by mode of resolution

Messages Phone F2F

Demand predictor

slide-82
SLIDE 82

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Hours

Time taken per clinical session, by mode of resolution

Messages Phone F2F

Workload predictor

slide-83
SLIDE 83

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.5 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Hours

Time taken per clinical session, by mode of resolution

Messages Phone Same day F2F Prebookable F2F

Workload smoothing

slide-84
SLIDE 84
  • Here’s what I’m going to say
  • T
  • 1)

c

  • 2)

p wo

  • T

s a

Continuity of care with Digital Triage

Assign the first request of the day to Dr A, the second to Dr B, and so on. Workload will be fair between doctors, but there is no continuity of care for patients. Assign each request to the doctor who knows the patient best, or the doctor whom the patient requests. This is good for continuity, but the popular doctors will get more work than

  • ther doctors. When a

doctor is away for a day or more, they may come back to a huge backlog of work.

The solution:

  • Identify the 10-20% of patients who

are most complex, and therefore are most in need of continuity (i.e. use simple population segmentation).

  • Focus on getting them seen by the

doctor who knows them best.

  • The remaining patients can be dealt

with by any doctor.

  • This allows the practice to spread

workload evenly while maintaining continuity when it is important.

PATIENT AND DOCTOR BENEFITS SCALE

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Next steps

Verifying patient’s identity Integrating into clinical system Online booking Video Tools to support practices: demand- supply calculators, population segmentation etc.

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Online request Admin triage GP triage Admin resolve Send to other team Phone request

Where video fits in

Phone Online message Face-to- face Video

slide-87
SLIDE 87
  • https://bjgp.org/content/68/666/e1?ijkey=1b09bc08c14947fe84f792

9e78942948beaecedd&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha

  • https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/11/e016901?int_source=trend

md&int_medium=cpc&int_campaign=usage-042019

References

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Thank you for listening! Any questions?

Dr Ed Turnham

Clinical Lead for GP Online Consultations at Norfolk and Waveney STP CCIO for Norfolk and Waveney at Arden & GEM CSU

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Kieran Waterson

Head of Sales (UK) at iPlato

‘myGP – delivering digital-first primary care in 2020’

#Convenzi s

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Delivering Digital First Primary Care Kieran Waterston

slide-91
SLIDE 91

What’s the problem?

1. Demand growth for healthcare services is unsustainable 2. Healthcare is behind other sectors in adopting digital In an attempt to change this patients are being given the right to have digital first service

slide-92
SLIDE 92

What does digital look like elsewhere?

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Touch points in Primary Care

Appointment Booking & Cancellation Appointment Reminders Consultation Prescription Ordering Medical Record Access Queries Signposts Screening Advice

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Patient Engagement Patient Intake & Care Navigation

Appointment Triage & Remote Consultation

Patient Insight (PHR) Book, Cancel & Request

Clinician Reception

25m patients

The myGP Platform

slide-95
SLIDE 95

The myGP platform provides a streamlined interface solution between practices and patients

slide-96
SLIDE 96

The myGP App

slide-97
SLIDE 97

24/7 appointment booking & cancellation

Patients can manage their access to healthcare wherever they are via myGP. Links directly with INPS, TPP & EMIS

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Appointment reminders

Patients receive appointment reminders as in-app messages. You can configure reminder settings in myGP platform. SMS costs removed automatically (typically 30%)

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Improve uptake and awareness of health campaigns

Patients who are entitled to a free flu jab or NHS screening test can be invited to book via myGP. Hidden appointments just for eligible patients

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Cervical Screening Programme in London Organisation NHS England (NHSE) and Public Health England (PHE) Goal Invite thousands of women to their due/overdue smear test appointments. Start August 2018 End August 2021 Description Female women across London surgeries will receive a letter from Capita and 2.5 weeks after a text reminder to encourage them to book the smear test appointment. If no appointment is booked, a second letter will be sent from Capita.

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Consent No consent

Engagement Hub

Practice 2 Practice 3 Practice 1

London Cervical Screening Hub

slide-102
SLIDE 102 Book Smear Test Appointment

From Station Road Medical Centre. Your cervical smear test is due. Please call 020 3345 7891

  • r click on this link

to download our app to book on your phone.

Patient Experience

slide-103
SLIDE 103

97% of practices in London signed up to the project 384,112 women were invited for screening from consenting practices Mobile phone numbers were extracted for 88% of these women For women who received a text reminder, uptake at 18 weeks was higher by: 4.8% in all age groups 4.8% in women aged 25 to 49 5.9% in women aged 50 to 64 The average time between invitation and screening: 54 days for women who received an invitation letter and a text reminder and 71 days for women who received an invitation letter only

Results

slide-104
SLIDE 104

myGP Patient Surveys (FFT)

Feedback is automatically shared with you so you can make informed improvements to your services.

slide-105
SLIDE 105

Medication Reminders

Patients can set up daily, weekly or monthly reminders for all of their medications. Push notifications are sent when it is time to take the medication. Adherence tracking helps patients to take control over their condition.

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Repeat Prescriptions & Medical Record Access

  • EMIS- Already Released
  • TPP- Already Released
  • INPS- Under Development
  • 4504 practices in England have myGP

users (Jan 2020)

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Directions to the nearest pharmacy

Patient's may be able to get their queries resolved at a pharmacy via a minor ailment scheme

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Add Dependants

Patients can book and cancel appointments for their children, family and dependants. 273,000 dependants have been added (Jan 2020)

Mary Smith Jane Smith Alex Smith

slide-109
SLIDE 109

Patient self-care tracking

Patients can record and monitor their blood pressure and weight on myGP. This module is for patient use only and helps with long-term condition management. Almost 100,000 patients are doing this (Jan 2020)

slide-110
SLIDE 110

Remote Monitoring

slide-111
SLIDE 111

Remote Monitoring

Self-monitoring is clinically proven to improve patient health outcomes. Request patients to capture biophysical data such as blood pressure or weight. Upon request, a temporary monitoring module will appear in the app.

slide-112
SLIDE 112

Clinicians view in Platform

slide-113
SLIDE 113

preGP

slide-114
SLIDE 114

Patient Appointment Booking Data capture Intelligent Care Navigation Remote consultation

preGP remoteGP

Care Navigation- preGP

slide-115
SLIDE 115

Intelligent care navigation

When booking an appointment, patients are signposted to alternative pathways depending on appointment reason, e.g. pharmacy. Automated, clinically safe sign-posting. Proven to successfully reduce appointment demand by 20%.

slide-116
SLIDE 116

preGP signposting

slide-117
SLIDE 117

preGP signposting

slide-118
SLIDE 118
  • Patient list of 6179
  • 29% active myGP app users
  • Over 1000 appointments listed on myGP across various slot types
  • 1849 appointment reminders sent via myGP or SMS
  • 27 cancellations (£810)
  • 10% reduction in calls to the surgery
  • One day of administration time saved
  • preGP + remote consultation diversion rate of 25% away from

F2F appointment (£3,330 cost savings)

  • Total cost savings: £4,140

Case Study

slide-119
SLIDE 119

Remote Consultation

slide-120
SLIDE 120

Appointment Triage- All online appointments visible on one screen

slide-121
SLIDE 121

Communicate with patient via Chat

slide-122
SLIDE 122

Remote Consultation

Decrease unnecessary face to face appointments by resolving requests remotely. Check appointment details and make informed decisions about triaging. Organise a video or telephone consultation on myGP. Send in-app messages to request additional information.

slide-123
SLIDE 123

The ability to start a Video call with just one click

Simply click here to initiate Video

slide-124
SLIDE 124

During the call you can control: Sound Microphone Camera End Call

Video Call Controls

slide-125
SLIDE 125

Video Calls – Patient Experience

slide-126
SLIDE 126

Is the myGP active at the practice? Yes Registration with just mobile number and DOB Book & Cancel Appointments Signposting Video Consult Remote Monitoring If they add their Online credentials Prescription Ordering Medical Record Access No Patient has to have their online credentials Book & Cancel Appointments Prescription Ordering Medical Record Access

Easy Access

slide-127
SLIDE 127

Question Time

Please email any questions to myGPSupport@iplato.net.

QUESTION TIM IME

kie ieran.waterston@ip iplato.com

slide-128
SLIDE 128

Dr Pritesh Mistry

Clinic Innovation and Research at the Royal College of General Practitioners

“Primary care innovation: from frontline ingenuity to AI”

#Convenzi s

slide-129
SLIDE 129

Primary Care Innovation: from frontline ingenuity to AI

Dr Pritesh Mistry – Head of Innovation Royal College of GPs

slide-130
SLIDE 130

Declaration of interest

I do not have a conflict of interest (financial, commercial, personal, professional, advisory, research-linked or other) relating to this event.

slide-131
SLIDE 131

Who am I?

slide-132
SLIDE 132

Who am I?

slide-133
SLIDE 133

RCGP Innovation

Not just tech! Supporting ethical innovation

  • Co-development,
  • Demonstrable evidenced improvements preferably outcomes based
  • Respects privacy
  • Honesty and transparency
  • Inclusive
  • Matches values of the users and professionals
  • Sustainability

Leaps and iterations not destabilising

slide-134
SLIDE 134

RCGP Innovation

  • System level
  • Person centred care
  • Team based care delivery
  • Network based care model
  • Digital systems
  • Continuity of care
  • Genomic services
  • Digital Therapeutics
slide-135
SLIDE 135

Grassroots innovation: what's happening on the frontline?

  • Open source
  • Process, systems and COTS
  • GPs, Practice Managers, Nurses and Patients!
  • Peer group based spread and adoption
slide-136
SLIDE 136

Entrepreneurial innovation: Mentoring innovative GPs

  • GP entrepreneurs
  • Commercial products/services addressing

unmet needs

  • Mentoring
  • Non-clinical skills
slide-137
SLIDE 137

Entrepreneurial innovation: Mentoring innovative GPs

  • Dr Campbell Murdoch (Gro Health) a digital health platform

addressing type 2 diabetes burden

  • Dr Monal Wadhera (LiveSmart), digital health tool supporting

prevention

  • Dr Farhan Amin (Founder Concept Health), VR+ML making

existing resources go further

  • Dr Rakeeb Chowdhury: (Founder BookYourGP), automating

processes saving time and money

  • Dr Nicholas Harvey (Founder Digitalis CPD), improving how we

learn

slide-138
SLIDE 138

Entrepreneurial innovation: Mentoring innovative GPs

  • Dr Abdullah Albeyatti (Medicalchain) interoperability of health record

systems

  • Dr Chris Castle (GPEP), empowering self care and rehabilitation for MSK

conditions

  • Dr Stephen Katabe (Tekihealth), rural telemedicine addressing GP

workload and recruitment

  • Dr Tom Adler: (Peak Medtek), rural tech preventing night-time falls in frail

elderly

  • Dr Catherine Millington-Sanders (Difficult Conversations), improving how

we train professionals for digital consultations

slide-139
SLIDE 139

Entrepreneurial innovation: Pilot sites

  • Medway Innovation Hub – 48 practices and 300k patients, co-founded

with CCG to accelerate innovation in Medway

  • One Care Ltd – 80 practices and 1 million patients, support practices in

key areas: service redesign, workforce, workload, digital and analytics

  • South Westminster Primary Care Network – mid-London network of 10

practices with broad demographics and challenges

  • Sunderland GP Alliance – 42 practices, 250k patients, not-for-profit
  • rganisation, collaborative working for benefit of GPs and patients
  • AT Medics – 42 practices, 270k patients, London’s largest primary care

provider

slide-140
SLIDE 140

Entrepreneurial innovation: Year 1 impact

£3M VC £400k grants

1 NHS contract

Peer support confidence learning credibility networks

Clinical safety Evidence generation

3 new innovations

Professional Development

slide-141
SLIDE 141

Digital nurses

  • South Staffs
  • Upskilling GPNs to be digital nurse champions (8 wk)
  • Substantially increase utilisation of technology
  • Pragmatic and realistic approach using familiar tools (Facebook, WhatsApp, etc)
  • Empower the individual enabling greater self-care
  • Increase GPN confidence -> support colleagues -> increase colleague confidence ->

change in culture

  • Small but steady & manageable changes
slide-142
SLIDE 142

RCGP Innovation

  • Emerging areas
  • Establish a foundation of understanding
  • White papers and round table discussions
  • Artificial Intelligence (published)
  • Internet of things (in process)
slide-143
SLIDE 143

Trust & bias

  • Multi-layered
  • Algorithms
  • Data
  • Corporations
slide-144
SLIDE 144

Creating tensions: Replacing or co-existing

slide-145
SLIDE 145

Artificial Intelligence

slide-146
SLIDE 146

AI – Machine Learning & vision

Adaptive algorithms Black box systems Trust, bias, explainability, regulation How much data is enough? Quality and biases? Remote ECG system, (symptom checkers), radiology & ophthalmology Translate the secondary care advances to support primary care – dermatology, retinopathy New data sources: E-stethoscope, ultrasound

slide-147
SLIDE 147

AI – Natural Language Processing & Speech

Voice to text, text to voice and querying free text Alexa used to access health information Consultation support Chatbots to provide trusted information Privacy, accuracy, terminology, error correction Free text section of EHR, consultation, asynchronous support

slide-148
SLIDE 148

Planning, scheduling, optimisation & Robotics

Rotas, admin automation, workflow optimization Robotic and remote surgery Nascent field of AI Multi-disciplinary teams, complex patients, insufficient workforce numbers, automation Improving and deskilling surgical interventions Minor surgery

slide-149
SLIDE 149

What are the concerns?

  • Clinical autonomy and clinical judgment
  • Unclear bias, risk and liabilities
  • Widening health inequalities
  • Overdiagnosis and overmedicalization
  • Conflict between black box systems and
  • Shared decision making
  • Evidence
  • Risk
slide-150
SLIDE 150

Unmet need

  • Workforce
  • Insufficient numbers – making resources go further without adding burden
  • Workload
  • High workload – improving safety, wellbeing (patient and clinician), automation
  • Complex patients
  • Multiple long term conditions - Older more complex patients
slide-151
SLIDE 151

Discussions and collaborations…

  • pritesh.mistry@rcgp.org.uk
  • Twitter: @mustbemistry